Skip to main content

The Semiotics of Self-Revelation in Eugene O’Neill’s the Emperor Jones

  • Chapter
  • 252 Accesses

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 28))

Abstract

Eugene O’Neill’s concern with the fate of individuals over that of social systems and his belief in the primacy of emotions over thought have led him to explore dramatically the theme of self-revelation. Ostensibly, however, this theme has been subverted by the deconstructive program. The opposition here is between the idealist view of the subject as a “human essence”, a source of meaning that transcends and operates language and the social system, and the anti-idealist view of the subject as a “function” of language — of the identity of language and metaphysics, of language as the totality. Jacques Derrida argues that deconstruction does not attempt to reject the “metaphysics of presence” or logocentrism: “Since these concepts are indispensable for unsettling the heritage to which they belong, we should be even less prone to renounce them”.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. and Preface Gayatri C. Spivak (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), pp. 13–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gerald Graff, Literature Against Itself (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  3. With “self as archetype” I do not intend a Jungian approach to O’Neill, but rather make a distinction between the small self and the large self, or between ego consciousness and transcendental consciousness, the archetype that Whitman experiences in “Song of Myself”.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I refer to Vedic philosophy as formulated by Maharish Mahesh Yogi in works such as The Science of Being and Art of Living (London: International SRM Publications, 1963) and his preface to Modern Science and Vedic Science, 1 (1987), 1, in which he says, “Vedic Science is the science of Veda. ‘Veda’ means pure knowledge and the infinite organizing power that is inherent in the structure of pure knowledge. Pure knowledge is the state of awareness in which consciousness knows itself alone, when awareness is completely self-referral, when awareness has nothing other than itself in its structure. This state of pure knowledge, when knower, known, and process of knowing are in the self-referral state, is that all-powerful, immortal, infinite dynamism at the unmanifest basis of creation”.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The mechanics of “samhita” transforming itself into “rishi”, “devata”, and “chhandas”, and of their transforming themselves into “samhita”, as well as into each other, are the mechanics through which the unity of pure consciousness transforms itself into the diverse laws of nature. These self-interacting mechanics are expressed sequentially through the unfoldment of each unit of Vedic literature — Rig Veda, Sama Veda, Yajur Veda, Atharva Veda, Upanishads, Aranyakas, Brahmanas, Vedangas, Upangas, Itihasa, Puranas, Smritis, and Upaveda. See Kenneth Chandler, “Modern Science and Vedic Science: An Introduction” in Modem Science and Vedic Science 1 (1987): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Hagelin, “Is Consciousness the Unified Field” in Modem Science and Vedic Science, 1(1987), 77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferdinand de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics, ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, with Albert Riedlingen trans. W. Baskin (N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1966), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacques Derrida, “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences” in Writing and Difference, trans, and Introd. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), p. 280.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacques Derrida, Positions, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981), pp. 40–1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jacques Derrida, “Différance”, in Speech and Phenomena, trans. and Introd. David B. Allison (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacques Derrida, Positions, quoted by Charles Levin, “Derrida and the Cupidity of the Text” in The Structural Allegory, ed. John Fekete (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keir Elam, The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama (London: Methuen and Co. Ltd., 1980), p. 19.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. For an excellent analysis of literature in terms of the field concept, see Katherine Hayles, The Cosmic Web: Scientific Field Models and Literary Strategies in the 20th Century (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacques Derrida, “The Voice That Keeps Silence” in Speech and Phenomena, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kenneth Chandler, “Modern Science and Vedic Science: An Introduction” in Modern Science and Vedic Science 1 (1987): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. For articles on quantum unified theories accessible to the general public, see the following: F. W. Hawking, “Quantum Mechanics of Black Holes”, Scientific American, 236, No. 1 (1977), 34–40

    Google Scholar 

  17. Daniel Freedman and Peter van Nievenheuizen, “Super-gravity and the Unification of Laws of Physics”, Scientific American, 238 No. 2 (1978), 126–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard Georgi, “Unified Field of Elementary Particles and Forces”, Scientific American, 244, No. 4 (1981), 48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Among the critics who have noted this theme of self-understanding in The Emperor Jones are Doris Falk, F. T. Carpenter, H. Frenz, and T. Tiusanen.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eric Neumann discusses the circle as a symbol of wholeness, or the self-contained, in The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973), pp. 5–102.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957), pp. 115–28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harold G. Coward, The Sphota Theory of Language (Columbia, Missouri: South Asia Books, 1980), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haney, W.S. (1990). The Semiotics of Self-Revelation in Eugene O’Neill’s the Emperor Jones . In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) The Elemental Passions of the Soul Poetics of the Elements in the Human Condition: Part 3. Analecta Husserliana, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2335-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2335-5_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7550-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2335-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics