Modern Methods of Fertility Regulation: When and for Whom are they Appropriate?

  • Mark Nichter
Part of the Culture, Illness, and Healing book series (CIHE, volume 15)

Abstract

According to the 1982 Sri Lanka Contraceptive Prevalence Survey (CPS), 99 percent of ever-married women interviewed had knowledge of at least one contraceptive method, and 97 percent knew of a supply source or service point for this method. Fifty-five percent of currently married women interviewed during the survey had engaged in some form of contraception related behavior. This figure represents a significant increase over the findings of the 1975 World Fertility Survey (WFS) in Sri Lanka which found that 32 percent of married women interviewed had engaged in some contraceptive practice. The most popular method of contraception reported by the CPS was female sterilization, the method having been adopted by 17 percent of all women surveyed. Prevalence rates for other means of birth control were: rhythm, 13 percent; withdrawal, 5 percent; other traditional methods, 7 percent; male sterilization, 4 percent; condom, 3 percent; pill, 3 percent; and IUD, 3 percent. Between the 1975 WFS and the 1982 CPS surveys, reported prevalence of female sterilization and traditional contraceptive practices nearly doubled, while pill and condom use increased slightly and IUD use declined significantly.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. 1985 Family planning programs: The clients’ perspective. World Bank Staff Working Papers Number 676. Population and Development Series Number 1. The World Bank, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Basnayake, S., Higgins, J. E., Miller, P., Rogers, S., and Kelley, S. E. 1984 Early symptoms and discontinuation among users of oral contraceptives in Sri Lanka. Studies in Family Planning Volume 15, Number 6. Nov./Dec, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertrand, J. T., Araya, J. d., Cisneros, R. J., and L. Morris 1982 Evaluation of family planning, communication in El Salvador. International Journal of Health Education 24(3): 183–194.Google Scholar
  4. Bogue, D. J. 1975 Twenty-five Communciation Obstacles to the Success of Family Planning Programs. Media Monograph 2. Communication Laboratory, Community and Family Study Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. and Stone, L. 1984 The use and misuse of surveys in international development: An experiment from Nepal. Human Organization Vol. 43, No. 1: 27–37.Google Scholar
  6. Cassen, R. H. 1978 India: Population, Economy, Society. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
  7. Chullawathie, M. K. 1984 Lay Ideas on Fecundity During Women’s Monthly Cycle and Post-Partum until Twelve Months. M. Sc. Field Project, Post Graduate Institute of Medicine, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  8. DeClerque, J., Tsu, A. O., Abul-Ata, M. F., and Barcelona, D. 1986 Rumor, misinformation and oral contraceptive use in Egypt. Soc. Sci. Med., Vol. 23 (1), pp. 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Census and Statistics 1978 World Fertility Survey, Sri Lanka, 1975: First Report (Colombo: Ministry of Plan Implementation).Google Scholar
  10. Festinger, L., Cartwright, D., Barber, K., Fleischel, J., Gottsdarker, J., Keyer, A., and Leavitt, G. 1948 A study of rumor: its origin and spread. Human Relations 1, 464–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gendell, M. 1985 Stalls in the fertility decline in Costa Rica, Korea, and Sri Lanka. World Bank Staff Working Papers: Number 693. Population and Development Series Number 18, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Good, M. J. D. 1980 Of blood and babies: The relationship of popular Islamic physiology to fertility. Soc. Sci. Med., Vol. 14B, pp. 147–156.Google Scholar
  13. Goonasekera, A. 1976 Commercial Distribution of contraceptives in Sri Lanka: The Preethi Experience. (mimeo)Google Scholar
  14. Government of Sri Lanka, Department of Census and Statistics, Ministry of Plan Implementation and Westinghouse Health Systems 1983 Sri Lanka Contraceptive Prevalence Survey Report: 1982. (Colombo: Dept. of Census and Statistics, Ministry of Plan Implementation)Google Scholar
  15. Harrison, P. 1976 Marketing Preethi in a small package. Human Behavior, March.Google Scholar
  16. Holzner, B. and Marx, J. 1979 Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  17. Huston, P. 1979 Third World Women Speak Out. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, S. M., Snow, L., and Mayhew, H. 1978 Limited patient knowledge as a reproductive risk factor. The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 6, no. 4.Google Scholar
  19. Kay, M. 1985 Mexican American fertility regulation. Communicating Nursing Research Vol. 10, pp. 279–295.Google Scholar
  20. Khattab, M. 1978 Practice and non-practice of family planning in Egypt. In A. Molnos (ed.) Social Science in Family Planning, pp. 22–29. International Planned Parenthood Federation, London.Google Scholar
  21. Krieger, L. 1984 Body notions, gender roles, and fertility regulating methods used in Imbaba, Cairo. Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Larson, M. K. 1983 Botswana: family planning myths and beliefs. Cited in Population Reports No. 28, 1984.Google Scholar
  23. Liskin, L. 1984 After contraception: dispelling rumors about later childbearing. Population Reports No. 28. Population Information Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  24. Marshall, J. F. 1972 Culture and contraception: Response determinants to a family planning program in a North Indian village. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  25. Marshall, J. F. 1973 Fertility regulating methods: cultural acceptability for potential adopters. In G. W. Duncan, E. J. Hilton, P. Kreager and A, A. Lumsdaine (eds) Fertility Control Methods: Strategies for Introduction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Marshall, J. F. and Polgar, S. (eds.) 1976 Culture, Natality, and Family Planning, Monograph 21, Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Carolina Population Center, pp. 204–218.Google Scholar
  27. Matthews, C. and Benjamin, V. 1979 Health education evaluation and belief and practices in rural Tamil Nad: Family planning and antenatal care. Social Action 29: 377–392.Google Scholar
  28. Mercado, C. M. 1973 Application of social science methodologies to information and education. In IPPF-SEAOR. Presented at the Eighth Meeting of the Regional Information & Education Committee. Singapore, May 9–11.Google Scholar
  29. Mernissi, F. 1975 Obstacles to family planning practice in urban Morocco. Studies in Family Planning 6(12): 418–425, Dec.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morsy, S.A. 1980 Body concepts and health care: Illustrations from an Egyptian village. Human Organization Vol 39, No. 1, Spring, 92–97.Google Scholar
  31. Rogers, E. M. 1973 Communication Strategies for Family Planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Seaton, Brian 1985 Non compliance among oral contraceptive acceptors in rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning 16: 1, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shedlin, M. 1977 Body image and contraceptive acceptability in a Mexican community. Paper presented at the Symposium on Body Concepts and Implications for Health Care, Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Houston, Nov. 29–Dec. 3.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, S. E. and Radel, D. The KAP in Kenya: A critical look at KAP Survey Methodology. In Marshall & Polgar (eds), Culture, Natality and Family Planning. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Carolina Population Center.Google Scholar
  35. Sukkary-Stolba, S. and Mossavar-Rahmani, Y. 1982 The cultural context of fertility in five middle eastern countries. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  36. Tucker, G. M. 1986 Barriers to modern contraceptive use in rural Peru. Studies in Family Planning Vol. 17, No. 6/Pt. 1., Nov./Dec, 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Nichter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations