Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series ((EEHS,volume 28))

Abstract

Personnel selection constitutes a well-known example of the application of measurement theory and methods to practical problems. For a long time, “applied measurement” was synonymous with personnel selection. Even today there is a profitable cross-fertilization between psychometrics and personnel selection. In the past, personnel selection has benefited several times—and with encouraging results—from various psychometric concepts and procedures, such as the development of paper-and-pencil tests and everything associated, reliability and validity concepts, application of decision theory, and operations research. Another recent example is validity generalization (see chapter 6 in this book). It can be noted, too, that several subjects have drawn the attention of psychometricians after they were discovered in the application field of personnel selection. Examples such as restriction of range, stability of regression parameters, utility analysis, and the definition of criteria are just a few of these subjects. The relationship between personnel selection and measurement theory has been fruitful and will continue to be so, as we will hope to show in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, R. A., & Barrick, M. R. (1987). Estimating the standard error or projected dollar gains in utility. Journal of Applied Psychology 72:475–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alf, E.F., & Dorman, D.D. (1967). The classification of individuals into two criterion groups on the basis of a discontinuous pay-off function. Psychometrika 32:115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algera, J. A., & Greuter, M. A. M. (1989). Job analysis for personnel selection. In M. Smith & I. T. Robertson (eds.), Advances in selection and assessment. New York: Wiley, pp. 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algera, J. A., & Groenendijk, B. (1985). Synthetische validiteit: Een vergelijking van benaderingen. Nederlands Tijdschift voor de Psychologie 40:255–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algera, J. A., Jansen, P. G. W., Roe, R. A., & Vijn, P. (1984). Validity generalization: Some critical remarks on the Schmidt-Hunter procedure. Journal of Occupational Psychology 57:197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, R. D., & Campion, J.E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology 35:281–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, R.A., & Edgell, S.L. (1975). A note on the readability of the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). Journal of Applied Psychology 60:765–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, R.A., & Levine, E. L. (1985). Job applicant training and work experience evaluation: An empirical comparison of four methods. Journal of Applied Psychology 70:572–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, J.J., & Sciarrino, J. A. (1974). Realistic work sample tests. Personnel Psychology 27:519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. T., Humphreys, L. G., & Hulin, C. L. (1989). Another view of dynamic criteria: A critical reanalysis of Barrett, Caldwell, and Alexander. Personnel Psychology 42(3):583–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, C. G., & Murphy, K.R. (1985). Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology 38:335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G.V., & Alexander, R. A. (1989). Rejoinder to Austin, Humphreys, and Hulin: Critical reanalysis of Barrett, Caldwell, and Alexander. Personnel Psychology 42(3):597–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G.V., Caldwell, M.S., & Alexander, R.A. (1985). The concept of dynamic criteria: A critical reanalysis. Personnel Psychology 38:41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bemis, S. E. (1968). Occupational validity of the General Aptitude Test Battery. Personnel Psychology 21:396–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardin, H. J., & Buckley, M. R. (1981). Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review 6:205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J.W. (1983a). Economic considerations in estimating the utility of human resource productivity improvement programs. Personnel Psychology 36:551–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J.W. (1983b). Effects of employee flows on utility analysis of human resource productivity improvement programs. Personnel Psychology 36:396–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J.W. (1989). Selection utility analysis: A review and agenda for future research. In M. Smith & I.T. Robertson (eds.), Advances in selection and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J.W., & Rynes, S.L. (1985). Role of recruitment in staffing utility analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 70:354–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden, H. E. (1949). When testing pays off. Personnel Psychology 2:171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden, H. E., & Taylor, E. K. (1950). The dollar criterion—Applying the cost accounting concept to criterion construction. Personnel Psychology 3:133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. J. (1984). Validity generalization: A review and critique of the correlation model. Personnel Psychology 37:93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. J., & Frederick, J. T. (1986). A comparison of economic utility estimations for alternative SDy estimation procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology 71:334–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P. (1983). Some possible implications of “modeling” for the conceptualization of measurement. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (eds.), Performance measurement and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J.P., Dunnette, M.D., Lawler, E.E., & Weick, K. E. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A. (1983). Personnel selection for physically demanding jobs: Review and recommendations. Personnel Psychology 36:527–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S. J., & Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance appraisal and review systems. Glen view, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W.F. (1982). Costing human resources. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W.F. (1987). Applied psychology in personnel management, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F., Alexander, R. A., & Barrett, G.V. (1988). Setting cutoff scores: Legal, psychometric, and professional issues and guidelines. Personnel Psychology 41:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, E. T., Schmidt, F. L., & Carron, T.J. (1984). Job classification approaches and the implementation of validity generalization results. Personnel Psychology 37:247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1988). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin 102:414–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G.C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions, 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronshaw, S. F., & Alexander, R. A. (1985). One answer to the demand for accountability: Selection utility as an investment decision. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 35:102–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J.W., Boese, R.R., Neeb, R. W., & Pass, J.J. (1983). Systematically derived work dimensions: Factor analysis of the occupation analysis inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology 68:232–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, R. B. (1978). Reduced variance regression. Psychological Bulletin 85:1238–1255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, R. B., & Staufer, G. F. (1966). A method of choosing a cutting point on a test. Journal of Applied Psychology 50:229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Gruijter, D.N., & Hambleton, R. K. (1984). On problems encountered using decision theory to set cut-off scores. Applied Psychological Measurement 8:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research implications. Organization Behavior and Human Performance 33:360–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNisi, A.S., Cornelius, E.T. III, & Blencoe, A. G. (1987), Further investigation of common knowledge effects on job analysis ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 72:261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSimone, R.L., Alexander, R.A., & Cronshaw, S.F. (1986). Accuracy and reliability of SDy estimates in utility analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology 59:93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, R. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1973). Supervisor estimation of abilities required in jobs. Journal of Vocational Behavior 3:181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, R. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1975). Worker estimation of abilities requirements of their jobs. Journal of Vocational Behavior 7:13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, S. B., Mayekawa, S., & Novick, M. R. (1985). Simultaneous estimation of regression functions for Marine Corps technical training specialties (ONR Technical Report 85-1). Iowa City, IA: Cada Res. Group, University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, W. P., & Kemery, E. R. (1988). Failure to detect moderating effects: Is multicolinearity the problem? Psychological Bulletin 102:418–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekels, J. (1983). Design processes seen as decision chains: Their intuitive and discursive aspects. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design. Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H.J. (1986). Accepting error to make less error. Journal of Personality Assessment 50(3):387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology 66(2):127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 51:327–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler, B.B., Rosenthal, D.B., Thornton III, G.G., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 72(3):439–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E. E. (1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology 26:461–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuter, M.A.M. (1988). Personeelsselektie in perspektief. Haarlem: Uitgeverij Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. L., & Su, W. (1975). Defining a “fair” and “unbiased” selection model: A question of utilities. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. M. (1965). Personnel testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. Scoring of content domain samples: The problem of fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology 63:499–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. M., & Gibson, W. M. (1988). Personnel selection and placement. Annual Review of Psychology 39:349–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg, R.L., Arvey, R.D., & Osburn, H.G. (1983). Moderating effects of decision-making/information-processing job dimensions on test validities. Journal of Applied Psychology 68(4):602–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, I., & Raju, N.S. (1965). A minimum loss function as determiner of optimal cutting scores. Personnel Psychology 18:179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakel, M. D. (1986). Personnel selection and placement. Annual Review of Psychology 37:351–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., & Novick, M. R. (1973). Toward an integration of theory and method for criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 10:159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. W., & Dickinson, T. L. (1987). Comparison of several procedures for generating J-coefficients. Journal of Applied Psychology 72(1):49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, R. J., & Theodore, T. L. (1986). Monte Carlo baselines for interrater reliability correlations using the Position Analysis Questionnaire. Personnel Psychology 39:345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, H. R., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. F. (1985). Estimation of employment validities by less experienced judges. Personnel Psychology 38:337–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R, (1986). Clinical and statistical prediction: A retrospective and would be integrative perspective. Journal of Personality Assessment 50(3):376–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1984). Development and evaluation of the “accomplishment record” method of selecting and promoting professionals. Journal of Applied Psychology 69:135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J.C., Moore, P. G., & Thomas, H. (1973). Utility and its measurement. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 136:226–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin 96(1):72–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. (1976). On the reliability of decisions in domain-referenced testing. Journal of Educational Measurement 13:253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., & Favero, J. L. (1985). Limits in generalizations from psychological research to performance appraisal processes. Academy of Management Review 10:311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.H., Novick, M.R., & Thayer, D.I. (1971). Estimating regression in m-groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 24:129–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demarree, R. G., & Mulaik, S. A. (1986). A note on validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology 71(3):440–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, P. G. W., Roe, R. A., Vijn, P., & Algera, J. A. (1986). Validity generalization revisited. Delft: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. P., Johnson, L. A., Butler, M.C., & Main, D.S. (1983). Apples and oranges: An empirical comparison of commonly used indices of interrater agreement. Academy of Management Journal 26:207–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemery, E.R., Mossholder, K.W., & Dunlap, W.P. (1989). Meta-analysis and moderator variables: Cautionary note on transportability. Journal of Applied Psychology 74(1):168–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemery, E. R., Mossholder, K. W., & Roth, L. (1987). The power of the Schmidt and Hunter additive model of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology 72(1):30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, W. E. (1955). Industrial psychology. Annual Review of Psychology 6:217–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimoski, R., & Brickner, M. (1987). Why do assessment centers work? The puzzle of assessment center validity. Personnel Psychology 40:243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1983). The measurement of work performance. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. J., Zedeck, S., & Cleveland, J. (eds.) (1983). Performance measurement and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G.P. (1986). Job performance and appraisal. In C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., pp. 118–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situation interview. Journal of Applied Psychology 65:422–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, J. E. (1979). A Bayesian alternative to least squares and equal weighting coefficient in regression. Psychometrika 44:271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 28:563–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawshe, C. H., & Balma, M. J. (1966). Principles of personnel testing, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R.H., Aurbach, H. A., & Levin, L. S. (1971). Predictors, criteria and significant results. Personnel Psychology 24:519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V., & Smith, A. F. M. (1972). Bayesian estimates for the linear model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 33:1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, F. M., Kesselman, G.A., & Lopez, F. E. (1981). An empirical test of a trait-oriented job analysis technique. Personnel Psychology 34:479–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E. J., DeNisi, A. S., & Shaw, J. B. (1979). Use of the Position Analysis Questionnaire for establishing the job component validity of tests. Journal of Applied Psychology 64(1):51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E.J., Jeanneret, R.R., & Mecham, R. C. (1972). A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology 56:347–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P.E. (1986). Causes and effects of my disturbing little book. Journal of Personality Assessment 50(3):370–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G.J., & van der Linden, W.J. (1977). The linear utility model for optimal selection. Amsterdam: Psychologisch Laboratorium, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.B. (1973). Development of a taxonomy of human performance: Design of a systems task vocabulary. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 3:29–30 (Ms. No. 327).

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I. W., & Lewis, C. (1979). Bayesian m-group regression: A survey and an improved model. Methoden en Data Nieuwsbrief 4(1):62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J.H., Sherman, J.D., & Mansfield, E. R. (1986). Failures to detect moderating effects with ordinary least squares-moderated multiple regression: Some reasons and a remedy. Psychological Bulletin 99(2):282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossholder, K. W., & Arvey, R.D. (1984). Synthetic validity: A conceptual and comparative review. Journal of Applied Psychology 69:322–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, J. C. (1983). Modeling performance. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (eds.), Performance measurement and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, J. C., & Shine, L. C. (1965). A table for determining the increase in mean criterion score obtained by using a selection device. Journal of Applied Psychology 3:33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R., & Lindley, D. V. (1978). The use of more realistic utility functions in educational applications. Journal of Educational Measurement 15:181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osburn, H. G., Callendar, J. C., Greener, J. M., & Ashworth, S. (1983). Statistical power of tests of the situational specificity hypothesis in validity generalization studies: A cautionary note. Journal of Applied Psychology 68(1):115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, W. A. (1976). Background data. In M.D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 609–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paese, P. W., & Switzer, F. S. III. (1988). Validity generalization and hypothetical reliability distributions: A test of the Schmidt-Hunter procedure. Journal of Applied Psychology 73(2):267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannone, R. D. (1984). Predicting test performance: A content valid approach to screening applicants. Personnel Psychology 37:507–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1980). Validity generalization results for test used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology 65:373–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primoff, E.S. (1955, May). Test selection by job analysis: The J-coefficient. Washington, DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission, Assembled Test Technical Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. R., & Loher, B.T. (1988). Appropriate critical percentages for the Schmidt and Hunter meta-analysis procedure: Comparative evaluation of type I error rate and power. Journal of Applied Psychology 73(4):683–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R.R., & Chao, G.T. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures. Personnel Psychology 35:1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R. R., & Israelski, E. (1988). Development and validation of minicourses in the telecommunication industry. Journal of Applied Psychology 73(4):721–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R.R., & Smither, J. W. (1985). An examination of two alternative techniques to estimate the standard deviation of job performance in dollars. Journal of Applied Psychology 70:651–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I.T., & Downs, S. (1989). Work-sample tests of trainability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 74(3):402–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, R. A. (1983). Grondslagen der personeelsselektie. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, R. A. (1984, August). Advances in performance modeling: The case of validity generalization. Paper presented at the International Congress of Psychology, Acapulco, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, R. A. (1987). Un enfoque technologico en seleccion de personal. Revista Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 3(7):95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, R. A. (1989). Designing selection procedures. In P. Herriot (ed.), Handbook of assessment and selection in organizations. New York: Wiley, pp. 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronan, W. W. & Prien, E. P. (1971). Perspectives on the measurement of human performance. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L. G., Hoffman, P.J., & Hsieh, K. C. (1966). Utilities as base-rate multipliers in the determination of optimum cutting scores for the discrimination of groups of unequal size and variance. Journal of Applied Psychology 50:364–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R. (1987). Assessment centers and content validity: Some selected issues. Personnel Psychology 40:13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Harris, M. M. (1984). Honesty testing for personnel selection: A review and critique. Personnel Psychology 37:221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., Harris, M. M., & Orr, J. M. (1986). On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to type I error. Journal of Applied Psychology 71(2):302–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., Schmidt, N., Tenopyr, M. L., & Kehoe, J. (1985). Commentary on forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 38(4):697–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. (1986). Prediction and clinical inference: Forty years later. Journal of Personality Assessment 50(3):362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology 62:529–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1981). Old theories and new research findings. American Psychologist 36(10):1128–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Croll, P. R., & McKenzie, R. C. (1983). Estimation of employment test validities by expert judgment. Journal of Applied Psychology 68:550–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., McKenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T. W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 64:609–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J.E., Pearlman, K., & Shane, G.S. (1985). Forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 38:697–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Kaplan, L. B, (1971). Composite vs. multiple criteria: A review and resolution of the controversy. Personnel Psychology 24:419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., Gooding, R.A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analysis of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology 37:407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Noe, R.A. (1986). Personnel selection and equal employment opportunity. In C. L. Cooper, & I. Robertson (ed.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 71–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Ostroff, C. (1986). Operationalizing the “behavioral consistency” approach: Selection test development based on a content-oriented strategy. Personnel Psychology 39:91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.E., & Hakel, M. D. (1979). Convergence among data source, response bias, and reliability and validity of a structured job analysis questionnaire. Personnel Psychology 32:677–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C. (1976). Behavior, results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In M.D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 745–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C. (1986). Training programs for performance appraisal: A review. Academy and Management Review 11(1):22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., & Kendall, L. M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology 47:149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sockloff, A. L. (1976). Spurious product correlation. Educational and Psychological Measurement 36:33–44(b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Levine, E.L. (1987). Meta-analysis for integrating study outcomes: A Monte Carlo study of its susceptibility to type Land type II errors. Journal of Applied Psychology 72:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1984). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophic Band I: Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung. Studienausgabe Teil 5. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C. (1960). Multiple regression. In I. Alkin et al. (eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C.H., & Kendall, W.E. (1956). Effective personnel selection procedures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, H., Hambleton, R. K., & Algina, J. (1974). Reliability of criterion-related tests: A decision theoretic formulation. Journal of Educational Measurement 11:263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, H., Hambleton, R. K., & Algina, J. (1975). A Bayesian decision-theoretic procedure for use with criterion-related tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 12:87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H.C., & Russell, J.T. (1939). The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: Discussion and tables. Journal of Applied Psychology 23:565–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. (1988). What is the interpretation of the validity generalization estimate S2 p = S2 r-S2 e? Journal of Applied Psychology 73(4):679–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniform Guidelines on Employees Selection Procedures (1978). Federal Register (No. 166), 38290–38309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, R.J., Coovert, M.D., MacCallum, R.C., & Hedge, J. W. (1989). Construct models of task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 74(3):447–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Gaag, N.L., Mellenbergh, G.J., & van den Brink, W. P. (1986, April). Empirical utility functions for pass/fail situations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Franciso.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. (1984). Some thoughts on the use of decision theory to set cutoff scores: Comment on de Gruijter and Hambleton. Applied Psychological Measurement 8:9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Naerssen, R.F. (1962). Selektie van chauffeurs. Groningen: Woiters.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Naerssen, R.F., Sandbergen, S., & Bruynis, E. (1966). Is de utiliteitskurve van examenskores een ogief? Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychoiogie 21(6):358–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijhoff, B. J., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van den Brink, W. P. (1983). Assessing and studying utility functions in psychometric decision theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 7:341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weekly, J. A., Frank, B., O’Connor, E. J., & Peters, L. H. (1985). A comparison of three methods of estimating the standard deviation of performance in dollars. Journal of Applied Psychology 70:122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology 52:372–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1980). Personality and Prediction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedeck, S., & Cascio, W.F. (1984). Psychological issues in personnel decisions. Annual Review of Psychology 35:461–518.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Ronald K. Hambleton Jac N. Zaal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roe, R.A., Greuter, M.A.M. (1991). Developments in Personnel Selection Methodology. In: Hambleton, R.K., Zaal, J.N. (eds) Advances in Educational and Psychological Testing: Theory and Applications. Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2195-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics