Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series ((EEHS,volume 28))

Abstract

Historically, the use of tests has its roots in the necessity for selection and placement decisions in education, the army, and public administration. This is demonstrated in DuBois’s (1970) historiography of such cases as Binet’s pioneering work on developing a test for the assignment of retarded children to special education, the testing of conscripts for placement in the army during World War I, and the examination of applicants for the civil service in ancient China. It is no coincidence that, in each of these fields, decision making is characterized both by high visibility and a massive number of examinees. In such cases it seems logical to use tests on which to base decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berhold, M.H. (1973). The use of distribution functions to represent utility functions. Management Science 19:825–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, D.T., Chen, J. J., & Novick, M. R. (1981). Theory and practice for the use of cut-scores for personnel decisions. Journal of Educational Statistics 6:129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J., & Gleser, G.C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions, 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, M. H. (1970). Optimal statistical decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. S. (1967). Mathematical statistics: A decision theoretic approach. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. L., & Su, W. H. (1975). Defining a “fair” or “unbiased” selection model: A question of utilities. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., & Novick, M. R. (1973). Toward an integration of theory and method for criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 10:159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. (1976). Statistical considerations of mastery scores. Psychometrika 41:65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.L., & Kotz, S.S. (1970). Continuous univariate distributions, Vol. 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, J.A., & Lord, F. M. (1962). A theoretical distribution for mental test scores. Psychometrika 27:59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, B. W. (1976). Statistical theory, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G. J., Koppelaar, H., & van der Linden, W. J. (1977). Dichotomous decisions based on dichotomously scores items: A case study. Statistica Neerlandica 31:161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G.J., & van der Linden, W.J. (1981). The linear utility model for optimal selection. Psychometrika 46:283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M.R., & Lindley, D. V. (1978). The use of more realistic utility functions in educational applications. Journal of Educational Measurement 15:181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M.R., & Petersen, N.S. (1976). Towards equalizing educational and employment opportunity. Journal of Educational Measurement 13:77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H.C., & Russell, J.T. (1939). The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: Discussion and tables. Journal of Applied Psychology 23:565–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. (1980). Decision models for use with criterion-referenced tests. Applied Psychological Measurement 4:469–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. (1981). Using aptitude measurements for the optimal assignment of subjects to treatments with and without mastery score. Psychometrika 46:257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. (1982). Passing score and length of a mastery test. Evaluation in Education 5:149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. (1984). Over absolute en nog relatievere zakslaag beslissingen [On absolute and more relative pass-fail decisions]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch 9:243–252. (In Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. (1985a). Decision theory in educational research and testing. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. (1985b). Een overzicht van de moderne testtheorie [A review of modern test theory]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 40:380–389. (In Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. (1987). The use of test scores for classification decisions with threshold utility. Journal of Educational Statistics 12:62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (1977). Optimal cutting scores using a linear loss function. Applied Psychological Measurement 1:593–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J., & Vos, H.J. (1985). Optimale regels voor toetsgebruik in individuele studiesystemen [Optimal rules for test use in individualized study systems]. In W.J. van der Linden (ed.), Moderne methoden voor toetsconstructie en-gebruik. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. (In Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J., & Zwarts, M. A. (1989). Some procedures for computerized ability testing. International Journal of Educational Research 13(2):175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijn, P., & Molenaar, I. W. (1981). Robustness regions for dichotomous decisions. Journal of Educational Statistics 6:205–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, H.J., & van der Linden, W.J. (1987). Designing optimal rules for instructional decision making in CAI systems. In J. Moonen & T. Plomp (eds.), Developments in educational software and courseware. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijhof, B. J., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van den Brink, W.P. (1983). Assessing and studying utility functions in psychometric decision theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 7:341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, A. (1950). Statistical decision functions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R. R. (1977). Estimating the likelihood of false-positive and false-negative decisions in mastery testing: An empirical Bayes approach. Journal of Educational Statistics 2:289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Ronald K. Hambleton Jac N. Zaal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Linden, W.J. (1991). Applications of Decision Theory to Test-Based Decision Making. In: Hambleton, R.K., Zaal, J.N. (eds) Advances in Educational and Psychological Testing: Theory and Applications. Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2195-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics