Abstract
Historically, the use of tests has its roots in the necessity for selection and placement decisions in education, the army, and public administration. This is demonstrated in DuBois’s (1970) historiography of such cases as Binet’s pioneering work on developing a test for the assignment of retarded children to special education, the testing of conscripts for placement in the army during World War I, and the examination of applicants for the civil service in ancient China. It is no coincidence that, in each of these fields, decision making is characterized both by high visibility and a massive number of examinees. In such cases it seems logical to use tests on which to base decisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berhold, M.H. (1973). The use of distribution functions to represent utility functions. Management Science 19:825–829.
Chuang, D.T., Chen, J. J., & Novick, M. R. (1981). Theory and practice for the use of cut-scores for personnel decisions. Journal of Educational Statistics 6:129–152.
Cronbach, L.J., & Gleser, G.C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions, 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
DeGroot, M. H. (1970). Optimal statistical decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Du Bois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ferguson, T. S. (1967). Mathematical statistics: A decision theoretic approach. New York: Academic Press.
Gross, A. L., & Su, W. H. (1975). Defining a “fair” or “unbiased” selection model: A question of utilities. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:345–351.
Hambleton, R. K., & Novick, M. R. (1973). Toward an integration of theory and method for criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 10:159–170.
Huynh, H. (1976). Statistical considerations of mastery scores. Psychometrika 41:65–79.
Johnson, N.L., & Kotz, S.S. (1970). Continuous univariate distributions, Vol. 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Keats, J.A., & Lord, F. M. (1962). A theoretical distribution for mental test scores. Psychometrika 27:59–72.
Lindgren, B. W. (1976). Statistical theory, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
Mellenbergh, G. J., Koppelaar, H., & van der Linden, W. J. (1977). Dichotomous decisions based on dichotomously scores items: A case study. Statistica Neerlandica 31:161–169.
Mellenbergh, G.J., & van der Linden, W.J. (1981). The linear utility model for optimal selection. Psychometrika 46:283–293.
Novick, M.R., & Lindley, D. V. (1978). The use of more realistic utility functions in educational applications. Journal of Educational Measurement 15:181–191.
Novick, M.R., & Petersen, N.S. (1976). Towards equalizing educational and employment opportunity. Journal of Educational Measurement 13:77–88.
Taylor, H.C., & Russell, J.T. (1939). The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: Discussion and tables. Journal of Applied Psychology 23:565–578.
van der Linden, W.J. (1980). Decision models for use with criterion-referenced tests. Applied Psychological Measurement 4:469–492.
van der Linden, W.J. (1981). Using aptitude measurements for the optimal assignment of subjects to treatments with and without mastery score. Psychometrika 46:257–274.
van der Linden, W.J. (1982). Passing score and length of a mastery test. Evaluation in Education 5:149–165.
van der Linden, W.J. (1984). Over absolute en nog relatievere zakslaag beslissingen [On absolute and more relative pass-fail decisions]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch 9:243–252. (In Dutch).
van der Linden, W.J. (1985a). Decision theory in educational research and testing. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
van der Linden, W.J. (1985b). Een overzicht van de moderne testtheorie [A review of modern test theory]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 40:380–389. (In Dutch)
van der Linden, W.J. (1987). The use of test scores for classification decisions with threshold utility. Journal of Educational Statistics 12:62–75.
van der Linden, W. J., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (1977). Optimal cutting scores using a linear loss function. Applied Psychological Measurement 1:593–599.
van der Linden, W. J., & Vos, H.J. (1985). Optimale regels voor toetsgebruik in individuele studiesystemen [Optimal rules for test use in individualized study systems]. In W.J. van der Linden (ed.), Moderne methoden voor toetsconstructie en-gebruik. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. (In Dutch)
van der Linden, W. J., & Zwarts, M. A. (1989). Some procedures for computerized ability testing. International Journal of Educational Research 13(2):175–187.
Vijn, P., & Molenaar, I. W. (1981). Robustness regions for dichotomous decisions. Journal of Educational Statistics 6:205–235.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vos, H.J., & van der Linden, W.J. (1987). Designing optimal rules for instructional decision making in CAI systems. In J. Moonen & T. Plomp (eds.), Developments in educational software and courseware. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Vrijhof, B. J., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van den Brink, W.P. (1983). Assessing and studying utility functions in psychometric decision theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 7:341–357.
Wald, A. (1950). Statistical decision functions. New York: Wiley.
Wilcox, R. R. (1977). Estimating the likelihood of false-positive and false-negative decisions in mastery testing: An empirical Bayes approach. Journal of Educational Statistics 2:289–307.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Linden, W.J. (1991). Applications of Decision Theory to Test-Based Decision Making. In: Hambleton, R.K., Zaal, J.N. (eds) Advances in Educational and Psychological Testing: Theory and Applications. Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7484-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2195-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive