Abstract
The testing industry in the United States has undergone major changes in the last 15 years. Classical test theory models and methods which have been in wide use for 60 years or more are being replaced by new test theories and methods, most notably item response theory (Hambleton & Swaminathan, 1985; and Weiss & Yoes, in Chapter 3). For example, many of the important standardized achievement and aptitude tests (e.g., Scholastic Aptitude Test, California Achievement Tests, the Stanford Achievement Tests, and the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery) are developed using item response model principles and procedures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Psychological Association. (1986). Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC: Author.
Assessment Systems Corporation. (1988). User’s manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3. St. Paul, MN: Author.
Berk, R.A. (Ed.). (1984) A guide to criterion-referenced test construction. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Brzezinski, E., & Hiscox, M. (Eds.). (1984). Microcomputers in educational measurement (Special Issue). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 3:3–50.
Bunderson, C, V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, pp. 367–407.
De Ayala, R.J. (1989). A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement 49:789–805.
Ferguson, R. L. (1969). The development of a computer-assisted branched test for a program of individually prescribed instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Gagné, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Green, B.F. (1983). The promise of tailored tests. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (eds.), Principles of modern psychological measurement: A Festschrift for Frederic M. Lord. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 69–80.
Green, B.F. (1988). Critical problems in computer-based psychological measurement. Applied Measurement in Education 1:223–231.
Green, B.F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R.L., & Reckase, M. D. Hambleton, R. K. (ed.). (1983). Applications of item response theory. Vancouver, BC: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.
Hambleton, R. K. (1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, pp. 147–200.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Henly, S.J., Klebe, K.J., McBride, J.R., & Cudeck, R. (1990). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement 13:363–371.
Hsu, T. C, & Yu, L. (1989). Using computers to analyze item response data. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 8:21–21.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A. R. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education 2(4):359–375.
Lord, F. M. (1971). The self-scoring flexilevel test. Journal of Educational Measurement 8:147–151.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Millman, J., & Arter, J. A. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement 21:315–330.
Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J. (1984). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery and computerized adaptive testing subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement 8:155–163.
Olsen, J.B., Cox, A., Price, C., & Strozeski, M. (1989, April). Development, implementation, and validation of a predictive and prescriptive test for statewide assessment. Paper presented at the meeting of AERA, San Francisco.
Owen, R.J. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70:351–356.
Popham, W.J. (1978). Criterion-referenced measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Reckase, M. D. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 8:11–15.
Spineti, J. P., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). A computer simulation study of tailored testing strategies for objectives-based instructional programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57:139–158.
Stone, C. A. (1989). Testing software review: MicroCAT Version 3.0. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 8:33–38.
Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A successful application of latent trait theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 74:181–196.
Urry, V. W. (1983, August). Tailored testing theory and practice: A basic model, normal ogive submodels, and tailored testing algorithms (NPRDC TR 83-82). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Wainer, H. (1988). The first four millennia of mental testing: From ancient China to the computer age. In Proceedings of 29th Annual Military Testing Association Conference, pp. 357–362.
Wainer, H. (ed.). (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement 24:185–201.
Ward, W.C., Kline, R.G., & Flaugher, J. (1986). College Board Computerized Placement Tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86–29). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Weiss, D.J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement 6:473–492.
Weiss, D.J. (ed.). (1983). New horizons in testing. New York: Academic Press.
Weiss, D.J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 53:774–789.
Weiss, D.J., & Kingsbury, G.G. (1984). Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems. Journal of Educational Measurement 21:361–375.
WICAT Systems (1986). Educational measurement system. Orem, UT: Author. (1982, May). Evaluation plan for the Computerized Adaptive Vocational Aptitude Battery. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
WICAT Systems (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 21(4):347–360.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hambleton, R.K., Zaal, J.N., Pieters, J.P.M. (1991). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory, Applications, and Standards. In: Hambleton, R.K., Zaal, J.N. (eds) Advances in Educational and Psychological Testing: Theory and Applications. Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7484-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2195-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive