Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series ((EEHS,volume 28))

Abstract

The testing industry in the United States has undergone major changes in the last 15 years. Classical test theory models and methods which have been in wide use for 60 years or more are being replaced by new test theories and methods, most notably item response theory (Hambleton & Swaminathan, 1985; and Weiss & Yoes, in Chapter 3). For example, many of the important standardized achievement and aptitude tests (e.g., Scholastic Aptitude Test, California Achievement Tests, the Stanford Achievement Tests, and the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery) are developed using item response model principles and procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1986). Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Systems Corporation. (1988). User’s manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3. St. Paul, MN: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R.A. (Ed.). (1984) A guide to criterion-referenced test construction. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, E., & Hiscox, M. (Eds.). (1984). Microcomputers in educational measurement (Special Issue). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 3:3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, C, V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, pp. 367–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ayala, R.J. (1989). A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement 49:789–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. L. (1969). The development of a computer-assisted branched test for a program of individually prescribed instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B.F. (1983). The promise of tailored tests. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (eds.), Principles of modern psychological measurement: A Festschrift for Frederic M. Lord. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B.F. (1988). Critical problems in computer-based psychological measurement. Applied Measurement in Education 1:223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B.F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R.L., & Reckase, M. D. Hambleton, R. K. (ed.). (1983). Applications of item response theory. Vancouver, BC: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K. (1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, pp. 147–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henly, S.J., Klebe, K.J., McBride, J.R., & Cudeck, R. (1990). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement 13:363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C, & Yu, L. (1989). Using computers to analyze item response data. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 8:21–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A. R. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education 2(4):359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1971). The self-scoring flexilevel test. Journal of Educational Measurement 8:147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman, J., & Arter, J. A. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement 21:315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J. (1984). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery and computerized adaptive testing subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement 8:155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.B., Cox, A., Price, C., & Strozeski, M. (1989, April). Development, implementation, and validation of a predictive and prescriptive test for statewide assessment. Paper presented at the meeting of AERA, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R.J. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70:351–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W.J. (1978). Criterion-referenced measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckase, M. D. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 8:11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spineti, J. P., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). A computer simulation study of tailored testing strategies for objectives-based instructional programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57:139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. A. (1989). Testing software review: MicroCAT Version 3.0. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 8:33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A successful application of latent trait theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 74:181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, V. W. (1983, August). Tailored testing theory and practice: A basic model, normal ogive submodels, and tailored testing algorithms (NPRDC TR 83-82). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (1988). The first four millennia of mental testing: From ancient China to the computer age. In Proceedings of 29th Annual Military Testing Association Conference, pp. 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (ed.). (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement 24:185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, W.C., Kline, R.G., & Flaugher, J. (1986). College Board Computerized Placement Tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86–29). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D.J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement 6:473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D.J. (ed.). (1983). New horizons in testing. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D.J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 53:774–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D.J., & Kingsbury, G.G. (1984). Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems. Journal of Educational Measurement 21:361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WICAT Systems (1986). Educational measurement system. Orem, UT: Author. (1982, May). Evaluation plan for the Computerized Adaptive Vocational Aptitude Battery. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • WICAT Systems (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 21(4):347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Ronald K. Hambleton Jac N. Zaal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hambleton, R.K., Zaal, J.N., Pieters, J.P.M. (1991). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory, Applications, and Standards. In: Hambleton, R.K., Zaal, J.N. (eds) Advances in Educational and Psychological Testing: Theory and Applications. Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2195-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics