Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Testing Across Cultures

  • Chapter
Advances in Educational and Psychological Testing: Theory and Applications

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series ((EEHS,volume 28))

Abstract

There has been a longstanding, scientific interest in the comparison of people belonging to different cultural groups. In the course of the history of Western science, practitioners of different disciplines have been involved. During the Renaissance the equality of races was an issue for theologians. In 1550 a number of them convened at the court of Charles V in Spain to solve the question of how the American Indians could be colonized “in a Christian fashion.” According to the chronicles, the debate focused on the question of whether the Indians formed an inferior race in comparison with their Spanish colonizers. The issue was never settled, even though “some of the most learned and powerful men of the age” participated (Boorstin, 1985, p. 633). During the nineteenth century, racial differences had become the domain of social philosophers, who, in turn, “passed the buck” (the use of the expression in this context coming from Mann, 1940) to psychologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika 38:123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angoff, W. H., & Ford, S. F. (1973). Item-race interaction on a test for scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement 10:95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. (1987). Detecting item bias in affective scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 47:55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A. (ed.) (1982). Handbook of methods for detecting item bias. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesheuvel, S. (1949). Psychological tests and their application to non-European peoples. In G. B. Jeffery (ed.), The yearbook of education. London: Evans, pp. 87–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijnen, E. J., Van der Net, Th. Z. J., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1986). On cross-cultural comparative studies with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 17:3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorstin, D.J. (1985). The discoverers. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.W. (1978). The likelihood ratio test for the equality of correlation matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 31:209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1961). The mutual methodological relevance of anthropology and psychology. In F. L. K. Hsu (ed.), Psychological anthropology: Approaches to culture and personality. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, pp. 333–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. A., & Hilton, T. L. (1968). An investigation of item bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement 28:61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, N.S., & Moss, P. A. (1989). Bias in test use. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, pp. 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral instruments New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, K.H. (1974). Cross-cultural uses of the Porteus Maze. Journal of Social Psychology 92:11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deregowski, J. B., & Serpell, R. (1971). Performance on a sorting task: A cross-cultural experiment. International Journal of Psychology 6:271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W.J. (1981). BMDP statistical software. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. (1984). The effect of race on human abilities and mental test scores. In C. R. Reynolds & R. T. Brown (eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York: Plenum, pp. 249–262.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1983). Recent advances in the cross-cultural study of personality. In J, N. Butcher & C. D, Spielberger (eds.), Advances in personality assessment, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, S.L. (1975). Flies in the ointment: Methodological problems in the analysis of the percentage of variance due to persons and situations. Psychological Bulletin 82:278–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (1966). On culture and conservation. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (eds.), Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley, pp. 225–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (1979). Response to Wolof “magical thinking.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 10:251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W.L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). On Lord’s paradox. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (eds.), Principals of modern psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ:

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J.L. (1967). On subjectivity in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 27:811–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford’s structure-of-intellect model. Psychological Bulletin 80:33–43. Erlbaum, pp. 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. G., Ilgen, D., McGrath, D., & Montanelli, R. (1969). Capitalization on chance in rotation of factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement 29:259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1980). Culture and inference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. T. (1978). Wolof “magical thinking”: Culture and conservation revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 9:300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, S. H. (1979). The place of factor-analysis in cross-cultural methodology and its contribution to cognitive theory. In L. Eckensberger, W. Lonner, & Y. H. Poortinga (eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, pp. 300–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, S.H., & Carroll, W. K. (1980). Testing and assessment across cultures: Issues in methodology and theory. In H. C. Triandis & J.W. Berry (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 2. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 181–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H.F., Hunka, S., & Bianchini, J.C. (1971). Relating factors between studies based upon different individuals. Multivariate Behavioral Research 5:409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, H. C. (1981). Extension of Feldt’s approach to testing homogeneity of coefficients of reliability. Psychometrika 46:41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, W. (1963). The statistical theory of stepped up reliability coefficients when a test has been divided into several equivalent parts. Psychometrika 28:221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancy, D. E. (1983). Cross-cultural studies in cognition and mathematics. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, R.S. (1977). Theory and method in cross-cultural psychology. American Psychologist 32:1069–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, R. S., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1986). Strategies for design and analysis. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 47–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. W. (1940). Mental measurement in primitive communities. Psychological Bulletin 37:366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marascuilo, L. A., & Slaughter, R. E. (1981). Statistical procedures for identifying possible sources of item bias based on χ2-statistics. Journal of Educational Measurement 18:229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. (1975). On so-called test bias. American Psychologist 30:848–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G.J. (1982). Contingency table models for assessing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics 7:105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G.J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory. International Journal of Educational Research 13:127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. R. (1984). What is a racially and culturally nondiscriminatory test? A sociological and pluralistic perspective. In C. R. Reynolds & R.T. Brown (eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 293–356.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Narroll, R., Michick, G. L., & Narroll, F. (1980). Holocultural research methods. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 2. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 479–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimark, E. D. (1975). Intellectual development during adolescence. In F. D. Horowitz (ed.), Review of child development research, Vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 541–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ombrédane, A., Robaye, F., & Plumail, H. (1956). Résultats d’une application répétée du matrix-couleur à une population de Noirs Congolais. Bulletin du Centre d’Etudes de Recherches Psychotechniques 5:129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord, I.G. (1970). Mental tests for pre-literates. London: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, A. D. (1981). Cognition: Psychological perspectives. In H. C. Triandis & W. Lonner (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 3. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 117–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H. (1971). Cross-cultural comparison of maximum performance tests. Psychologia Africana Monograph 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Foden, B.I.M. (1975). A comparative study of curiosity in black and white South African students. Psychologia Africana Monograph 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Malpass, R. S. (1986). Making inferences from cross-cultural data. In W.J. Lonner & J.W. Berry (eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1987). Explaining cross-cultural differences: Bias analysis and beyond. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 18:259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Van der Flier, H. (1988). The meaning of item bias in ability tests. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (eds.), Human abilities in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 166–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, S.D. (1917). Mental tests with delinquents and Australian aboriginal children. Psychological Review 24:32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, S. D. (1965). Porteus Maze Test: Fifty years of application. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price-Williams, D. R. (1962). Abstract and concrete modes of classification in a primitive society. British Journal of Educational Psychology 32:50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuning, H., & Wortley, W. (1973). Psychological studies of the Bushmen. Psychologia Africana, Monograph Supplement, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, D.A., Werts, C, & Grandy, D. (1982). Construct validity of the GTE Aptitude Test across populations (ETS Research Report 81-57). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudner, L.M., Getson, P. R., & Knight, D.L. (1980) Biased item detection techniques. Journal of Educational Statistics 5:213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, P. A. (1961). Aptitude tests for use in developing nations. Pittsburgh: American Institute for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M. H. (1986). Culture and behavior: Psychology in global perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 37:523–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, R. (1979). How specific are perceptual skills? British Journal of Psychology 70:365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L., Camilli, G., & Averill, M. (1981). Comparisons of procedures for detecting test-item bias with both internal and external ability criteria. Journal of Educational Statistics 6:317–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L., Camilli, G., & Williams, D.M. (1984). Accounting for statistical artifacts in item bias research. Journal of Educational Statistics 9:93–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strelau, J. A. (1972). A diagnosis of temperament by nonexperimental techniques. Polish Psychological Bulletin 3:97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Super, C. M. (1981). Behavior development in infancy. In R. H. Munroe, R. L. Munroe, & B.B. Whiting (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural human development New York: Garland STPM Press, pp. 181–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Berge, J. M.F. (1977). Optimizing factorial invariance. Groningen: VRB Drukkerijen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1984, December). Group differences on structured tests. Paper presented at the Advanced Study Institute, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1988). Systematizing the item content in test design. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (eds.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum, pp. 291–307.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F.J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1982). Cross-cultural generalizability and universality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 13:387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1985). A comment on McCauley and Colberg’s conception of cross-cultural transportability of tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 22:157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Daal., M., & Van Zonneveld, R. (1986). The trainability of formal thinking: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology 21:589–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1982). Two new test statistics for the Rasch model. Psychometrika 47:123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Flier, H. (1972). Evaluating environmental influences on test scores. In L.J. Cronbach & P. J. D. Drenth (eds.), Mental tests and cultural adaptation. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 447–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Flier, H. (1980). De vergelijkbaarheid van individuele testprestaties. Dissertation. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Flier, H., Mellenbergh, G. J., Ader H. J., & Wijn, M. (1984). An iterative item bias detection method. Journal of Educational Measurement 21:131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1979). Intelligence: Heredity and environment. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, B. (1976). The problem of the packaged variable. In K. F. Riegel & J. A. Meacham (eds.), The developing individual in a changing world. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 303–309.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Fons J. R. van de Vijver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ype H. Poortinga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Ronald K. Hambleton Jac N. Zaal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Vijver, F.J.R., Poortinga, Y.H. (1991). Testing Across Cultures. In: Hambleton, R.K., Zaal, J.N. (eds) Advances in Educational and Psychological Testing: Theory and Applications. Evaluation in Education and Human Services Series, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2195-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation