Advertisement

Conclusions Philosophizing at the Bedside

  • Ilana Löwy
Chapter
  • 47 Downloads
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 37)

Abstract

Polish philosophers of medicine were aware of the specificity and the unique character of their school of thought. In the introduction to the second edition of The Logic of Medicine, Biegański reviewed other studies dealing with the philosophy of medicine: Medizinische Logik by Oesterlen and Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expàrimentale by Claude Bernard. He noted that:

both works deal only with medical knowledge, i.e., with the theoretical and scientific aspect of medicine. The practical tasks of medical cognition, namely the theory of diagnosis and of therapeutic indications, were not discussed in these works. Thus both Oesterlen’s Logic of Medicine and Bernard’s Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine are incomplete studies which do not deal with the full scope of medical knowledge. The practical aspects of medical knowledge were taken into consideration only by a series of studies in the Polish language.

Keywords

Medical Knowledge Chapter VIII Practical Task Medical Critique Philosophical Reflection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    Agasi, J.: 1976, ‘Causality and Medicine’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1, 301–317.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Biegański, W.: 1908, The Logic of Medicine, E. Wende, Warsaw, pp. VI; 29; VIII.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Biernacki, E.: 1902, Principles of Medical Understanding, Wende i Ska, Warsaw, pp. VIII; IX.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bilikiewicz, T.: 1957, ‘Biegański as a Philosopher’ [‘Bieganski jako filozof], Archiwum Historii Medycyny 20, 347–355.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bilikiewicz, T.: 1929, ‘The Relationships Between Wtadystew Biegański and Prof. Max Neuberger, as Reflected by Their Correspondance’ [’stosunek Władysława Biegańskiego do prof. Maksa Neuburgera w ńwietle zachowanych listów’], Archiwum Historji i Filozofji Medycyny 9, 181–193.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Brown, W.M.: 1985, ‘On Defining “Disease”’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10,311–328.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Canguilhem, G.: 1966 (1947), Le Normal et le pathologique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Engelhard, H.T. Jr: 1986, ‘From Philosophy and Medicine to Philosophy of Medicine’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11, 3–8.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kaplan, A.L.: 1986, ‘Exemplary Reasoning? A Comment on Theory Structure in Biomedicine’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11, 93–105.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    King, L.: 1982, Medical Thinking, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Krummardt, R.: 1986, ‘The “Borderzone Zone” Controversy: A Study of Theory Structure in Biomedicine’, Theoretical Medicine 7, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kuhse, H., and Singer, P.: 1987, ‘Bioethics: What? and Why?’, Bioethics 1, iii–v.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Magnus, H.: 1904, Kritik der medizinischen Erkenntnis, Max Müller, Breslau.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Maull, N.: 1981, ‘The Practical Science of Medicine’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6,165–182.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Mersky, H.: 1986, ‘Variable Meaning for the Definition of Disease’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11, 215–232.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Munson, R.: 1981, ‘Why Medicine Cannot be a Science’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6,183–208.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Murphy, E.A.: 1976, The Logic of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Pellegrino, E.: 1976, ‘Philosophy of Medicine: Problematic and Potential’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1, 5–31.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Pellegrino, E.: 1986, ‘Philosophy of Medicine: Towards a Definition’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11, 9–16.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Schaffner, K.F.: 1986, ‘Exemplar Reasoning about Biological Models and Diseases: A Relation Between the Philosophy of Medicine and Philosophy of Science’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11, 63–80.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Stocki, E., and Jasinski, W.J.: 1971, ‘The Logic of Medicine in Polish and Foreign Reviews’, in G. Swiderski and M Stanski (eds.), Wladyslaw Bieganski: a Physician and a Philosopher [Wladyslaw Bieganski, lekarz i filozof], Poznanskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciol Nauk, Poznan, p. 237.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Szumowski, W.: 1926, ‘The Nearest Goals of the Philosophy of Medicine’, Archiwum Historji i Filozofji Medycyny 4, 70–73.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Toulmin, S.: 1976, ‘On the Nature of the Physician’s Understanding’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1, 32–50.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Whitbeck, C.: 1977, ‘Causation in Medicine: the Disease Entity Model’, Philosophy of Science 44, 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Widderschoven-Heerding, I.: 1987, ‘Medicine as a Form of Practical Understanding’, Theoretical Medicine 8, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilana Löwy
    • 1
  1. 1.Hôpital Necker-Enfants MaladesINSERMParisFrance

Personalised recommendations