Abstract
In most transformation systems today, in vitro regeneration of plants is an essential step and very often the main limiting factor for yield and success. Circumvention of in vitro regeneration would therefore be highly advantageous. The simplest way to do this would be to transfer DNA into the gametes and, after gamete fusion, to exploit seed embryogenesis for plant formation. If feasable, such an approach would be technically simpler and faster than methods based on in vitro regeneration. It should also be universal in its application. In addition, one would avoid the problem of somaclonal variation resulting from in vitro regeneration. Somaclonal variation in transgenic commercial lines of crop plants can spoil the advantage obtained by transferring a transgene. The problem of chimaera that is intrinsic to in vitro regeneration, would also be avoided. Gametes in the strict sense are not easily accessible in plants although progress has been achieved in isolating both sperm and egg cells (1). Both, male as well as female gametes, can be used for gene transfer. The main advantage of the egg cell might be the efficient formation of a whole plant either in situ or after isolation and in vitro culture. The latter remains to be shown, however. The male gamete in higher plants is not a free, mobile cell as in lower plants or in animals, but is part of a larger structure, the pollen. And only the pollen as such is able to perform fertilization in situ, while the isolated sperm cell would have to be fused in vitro with the egg cell. Attempts to use male gametes for gene transfer have therefore concentrated on the transfer through pollen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Sexual Reproduction in Higher Plants (Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E, eds) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Pandey KK (1975) Nature 256:310–313
Pandey KK (1980) Heredity 45:15–29
Hess D (1969) Z Pflanzenphysiol 60:348–358
Hess D (1980) Z. Pflanzenphysiol 98:321–337
Hess D (1987) Int Rev Cytol 107:169–190
De Wet JMJ, Bergquist RR, Harlan JR, Brink DE, Cohen CE, Newell CA, de Wet AE (1985) in Experimental manipulation of ovule tissue (Chapman GP, Mantell SH, Daniels W, eds), pp 197–209, Longman, London
Ohta Y (1986) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:715–719
Klein TM, Wolf ED, Wu R, Sanford JC (1987) Nature 327:70–73
Sanford JC, Skubik KA (1986) in Biotechnology and ecology of pollen (Mulcahy DL, Bergamini, Mulcahy G, Ottaviano E, eds), pp 71–76, Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg Tokyo
Booy G, Krens FA, Huizing HJ (1989) J Plant Physiol 135:319–324
DNA Plant Technology Corporation and Du Pont European Patent Application Nr. 88100267.9 from 11.01.1988)
Picard E (1988) Genome 30 (Suppl), abstract Nr. 25.8.2
Zhou GY, Weng J, Gong ZZ, Zhen YS, Yang WX, Shen WF, Wang ZF, Tao QZ, Huang JG, Qian SY, Lin GL, Ying MC, Xue DY, Hong AH, Xu YJ, Chen SB, Duan XL (1988) Scientia Agricultura Sinica 21:1–6
Luo ZX, Wu R (1989) Plant Molec Biol Rep 7:69–77
Negrutiu I, Heberle-Bors E, Potrykus I (1985) in Biotechnology and ecology of pollen (Mulcahy DL, Bergamini, Mulcahy G, Ottaviano E, eds), pp 65–70, Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg Tokyo
AGRACETUS European Patent Application Nr. 87310612.4 from 02.12.1987
Pena de la A, Lörz H, Schell J (1987) Nature 325:274–276
Twell D, Klein TM, Fromm ME, McCormick S (1989) Plant Physiol 91:1270–1274
Heslop-Harrison J (1979) Am J Bot 66:737–743
Vithanage HIMV, Heslop-Harrison J (1979) Ann Bot 43:113–114
Matousek J, Tupy J (1984) Biol Plant (Praha) 26:62–73
Matousek J, Tupy J (1985) J Plant Physiol 119:169–178
Herrero M, Dickinson HG (1979) J Cell Sci 36:1–18
Sanders LC, Lord EM (1989) Science 243:1606
Jackson JF (1988) in Sexual Reproduction in Higher Plants (Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E, eds), pp 81–86, Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg Tokyo
Engell K (1988) in Sexual Reproduction in Higher Plants (Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E, eds), pp 383–388, Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg Tokyo
Bennito Moreno RM, Macke F, Alwen A, Heberle-Bors E (1988a) Planta 176:145–148
Alwen A, Vicente O, Heberle-Bors E (1989) in “Molecular communication in higher plants”, pp 75, Abstracts of EMBO-EMBL Symposium 1989 on Molecular Communication in Higher Plants
Neuhaus G, Spangenberg G, Mittelsten Scheid O, Schweiger H-G (1987) Theor Appl Genet 75:30–36
Potrykus I, Datta SK, Neuhaus G, Spangenberg G (1988) in Abstracts of Second International Congress on Plant Molecular Biology, Nr. 57
Pechan PM (1989) Plant Cell Reports 8:387–390
Engvild KV (1985) Theor Appl Genet 69:457–461
Cornish MA, Werner CP (1985) Heredity 55:321–326
Sanford JC, Skubik KA, Reisch BI (1985) Theor Appl Genet 69:571–574
Sanford JC (1988) in Forest and crop biotechnology (Valentine HA, ed), pp 163–173, Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg Tokyo
Lavitrano M, Camaioni A, Fazio VM, Dolci S, Farace MG, Spadafora C (1989) Cell 57:717–723
Brinster RL, Sandgren EP, Behringer RR, Palmiter RD (1989) Cell 59:239–241
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heberle-Bors, E., Moreno, R.M.B., Alwen, A., Stöger, E., Vicente, O. (1990). Transformation of Pollen. In: Nijkamp, H.J.J., Van Der Plas, L.H.W., Van Aartrijk, J. (eds) Progress in Plant Cellular and Molecular Biology. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2103-0_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2103-0_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7445-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2103-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive