Abstract
The objective of this paper is to discuss and elucidate the meaning of the key-term aetia, used by Alcmeon and Hippocrates in their medical research and theoretical frameworks. In particular, it purports to (a) identify, present and compare the concept of aetia and specific causal patterns utilized by them in either exegetic or prognostic modes, (b) show their general philosophical assumptions and (c) point out repercussions upon philosophical problems. Textual evidence and supporting information from secondary sources are used to corroborate the present interpretation. The two physicians-thinkers, it must be stated in advance, given the historical distance, should not be expected to offer sophisticated theories of etiology, formally organized in a strict sense, and applied with preciseness. The variations of their causal schemata do not appear to have the subtleties and the over-elaborated interrelations as used in the contemporary epistemological apparatus. However, from a historical viewpoint it is of paramount importance to show that these physicians were conscious of the general causal pattern C-E, its functional effectiveness and practicability in their investigations. Both consciously and overtly used and often assumed it in either explaining or predicting the development of special medical cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Theophrastus, 26
Beare, Early Elementary Theories of Cognition, Oxford, 1909, p. 252 (hereafter Beare)
D. Z. Andriopoulos, Sense and Perception in Greek Philosophy, W. Green, (U.S.A.), pp. 12–13.
Phaedo, 96b
Hippocrates, II, LL, XIII, 24–25.
Hippocrates, Vol. II “The Sacred Disease”, VI, 1–3.
Hippocrates, IV, VIII, 1–10.
Hippocrates, Vol. II, “The Sacred Disease”, XX, 17–34.
Hippocrates, Vol. II, “The Sacred Disease”, p. 181.
Gr. Vlastos, “Isonomia”, American Journal of Philology, Vol. 79, 1956, p. 362
J. Lonpring, “Philosophy and Medicine: Some Early Reactions”, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, Vol. 67, 1963, pp. 155–57
D. Z. Andriopoulos, Sense and Perception in Greek Philosophy, V. Green, 1975, p. 15.
Chalcidius, Plat. Tim., p. 279, ed. Vrobel; pp. 340–41, ed. Meursius
D. Z. Andriopoulos, “Alcmeon Re-Examined”, Studii Clasice (Romanian Academy), Vol. 97, XII, pp. 7–14.
Ibid, II, 10–12.
G. Sarton, A History of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1952, p. 368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andriopoulos, D.Z. (1990). Alcmeon’s and Hippocrates’s Concept of Aetia . In: Nicolacopoulos, P. (eds) Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 121. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2015-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2015-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7403-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2015-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive