Abstract
The magnitude of Ingarder’s philosophy and Wirkung becomes clearly evident to anyone who tackles the enterprise of compiling a bibliography of the Polish phenomenologist. This bibliography is the first to cover all Ingarden scholarship on a comprehensive international scale. It follows the standardized format consistent with the received norms of bibliographical display. Due respect must nevertheless be paid to the pioneering achievement of Andrzej Półtawski who published the very first Ingarden bibliography in 1964 and an updated version in 1985 together with R. Jagannathan, P. J. McCormick, and J. Sidorek. For completeness and comparison for accuracy, both versions have necessarily been consulted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Roman Ingarden International Bibliography (1915–1989)
Primary Sources Books and Major Works
Intuition und Intellekt bei Henri Bergson. Darstellung und Versuch einer Kritik. Inaugural Dissertation. Halle: Buchdruckerei des Waisenhauses, 1921.
“Intuition und Intellekt bei Henri Bergson.” JPpF 5 (1922): 285–461.
Über die Stellung der Erkenntnistheorie im System der Philosophie. Halle: Niemeyer, 1925.
“Essentiale Fragen. Ein Beitrag zum Wesensproblem.” JPpF 7 (1925): 125–304.
Das literarische Kunstwerk. Eine Untersuchung aus dem Grenzgebiet der Ontologiey Logik und Literaturwissenschaft. Halle: Niemeyer, 1931.
O poznawaniu dzieia literackiego [The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art]. Lwów: Ossolineum, 1937.
O budowie obrazu. Szkic z teorii sztuki [On the Structure of Painting. A Sketch in the Theory of Art], Vol. 67, no. 1. Kraków: Rozprawy Wydzialu Filologicznego PAU, 1946.
Spór o istnienie świata [The Controversy Over the Existence of the World], Vol. 1. Kraków: PAU, 1947.
Szkice z fllozofii literatury [Sketches in the Philosophy of Literature], Vol. 1: “Polonista.” Łodź: Spöłdzielnia wydawnicza, 1947.
Spór o istnienie świata [The Controversy over the Existence of the World], Vol. 2. Kraków: PAU, 1948.
Studia z estetyki [Studies in Aesthetics], Vol. 1. Warszawa: PWN, 1957.
Studia z estetyki [Studies in Aesthetics], Vol. 2. Warszawa: Prace Filozoficzne PWN, 1958.
O dziele literackim; badania z pogranicza ontologii, teorii jeȩzyka i filozofli literatury [The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic and Theory of Literature], translated from German into Polish by Maria Turowicz. Warszawa: PWN, 1960.
Das literarische Kunstwerk, Anhang: Von den Funktionen der Sprache im Theaterschauspiel. 2. verbesserte und erweiterte Auflage. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1960.
Spór o istnienie świata [The Controversy Over theExistence of the World], Vol. 1, 2nd ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1960.
Spór o istnienie świata [The Controversy Over theExistence of the World], Vol. 2, 2nd ed. Warszawa: Prace Filozoficzne PWN, 1961.
Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst: Musikwerk, Bild, Architektur, Film. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1962.
Issledovania po Estetikie [Studies in Aesthetics], translated from Polish into Russian by A. Jermilova and B. Fiedorova. Foreword by W. Razumny. Moskwa: Izdatielstwo Inostrannoj Litieratury, 1962.
Z badań nad filozofiaȩ współczesng [Studies in Contemporary Philosophy]. Warszawa: PWN, 1963.
Time and Modes of Being, translated by Helen Michejda. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publ., 1964.
Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vol. 1: Existenzialontologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1964.
Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vol. 2: Formalontologie, Part 1: Form und Wesen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1965.
Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vol. 2: Formalontologie, Part 2: Welt und Bewußtsein. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1965.
Das literarische Kunstwerk, Anhang: Von den Funktionen der Sprache im Theaterschauspiel. 3. durchgesehene Auflage. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1965.
R Ingarden, O strukturze obrazu [The Structure of Painting],translated from Polish to Slovak by Eduard Andras, revised by Marian Varess. Bratislava: Slovenske Vydavatelstvo Krasnej Literatury, 1965.
Przezycie, dzieło, wartość [Experience, Work of Art and Value]. Kraków: WL, 1966.
Studia z estetyki [Studies in Aesthetics], Vols. 1 and 2, 2nd ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1966. [With an Ingarden bibliography by Andrzej Półtawski.]
O poznávání literárního díla [The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art], translated from Polish into Czech by Hana Jechova, Overview and Introduction by Jan Patočka. Prague: Československý Spisovatel, 1967. [Translation of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego.]
Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks. Tübingen: Niemeyer; and Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968.
Fenomenologia dell’opera letteraria, translated by Guliana Brozich-Lipszer and Sergio Checconi. Milano: Silva, 1968. [Translation of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
Erlebnis, Kunstwerk und Wert. Vorträge zur Ästhetik 1937–1967. Tübingen: Niemeyer; and Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1969.
Über die Verantwortung; ihre ontischen Fundamente. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1970.
Innføring I Edmund Husserl Fenomenologi [Introduction to Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology]. Oslo: Johan Grundt Tanum, 1970.
Studia z estetyki, Tom III [Studies in Aesthetics, Vol.3]. Warszawa: PWN, 1970.
U podstaw teorii poznania [Foundations of the Theory of Cognition]. Warszawa: PWN, 1971.
O Saznavanju Književnog Umetničkog Dela [The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art], translated by Branimir Živojinovič, Književna misao series, Vol. 3. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga, 1971. [Translation of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks.]
Ksiaȩżeczka o człowieku [A Little Book on Man]. Krakow: WL, 1972.
Das literarische Kunstwerk, Anhang: Von den Funktionen der Sprache im Theaterschauspiel. 4. unveränderte Auflage. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1972.
Z teorii jeȩzyka i filozoficznych podstaw logiki [The Theory of Language and the Philosophical Foundations of Logic], Danuta Gierulanka, ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1972.
Ksiaȩżeczka o człowieku [A Little Book on Man], 2nd ed. Krakow: WL, 1973.
The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic and Theory of Literature. With an Appendix on the Functions of Language in the Theatre, translated and with an introduction by George G. Grabowicz. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973. [With a short Ingarden bibliography.]
The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, translated by Ruth Ann Crowley and Kenneth R. Olson. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
A obra de arte literária [The Literary Work of Art], translated by Albin E. Beau, Maria da Conceição Puga and Joāo F. Barrento, preface by Maria Manuela Saraiva. Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 1973. [Translation of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
Utwór muzyczny i sprawa jego tożsamości [The Musical Work and the Problem of Its Identity]. Kraków: Polskie Wydawnictwo Muzyczne, 1973.
Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vol. 3: Über die kausale Struktur der realen Welt. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1974.
Wsteȩp do fenomenologii Husserla [Introduction to Husserl’s Phenomenology], translated by Andrzej Półtawski. Warszawa: PWN, 1974. [Translation of Ingarden’s 1966 Oslo Lectures.]
Doživljaj, Umetničko Delo i Vrednost [Experience, Work of Art and Value], translated by Drinka Gojković, Sazveždja series, Vol. 49. Beograd: Nolit, 1975. [Translation of Erlebnis, Kunstwerk und Wert.]
On the Motives Which Led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism, translated from Polish by Arnór Hannibalsson. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1975.
O poznawaniu dziela literackiego [The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art], translated from German by Danuta Gierulanka. Warszawa: PWN, 1976.
Gegenstand und Aufgaben der Literaturwissenschaft: Aufsätze und Diskussionsbeiträge (1937–1964), edited, selected and introduced by Rolf Fieguth. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1976.
Az irodalni mualkotas [The Literary Work of Art], translated by Bonyhai Gabor. Budapest: Gondolat, 1977. [Translation of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
Det litterare Konstverket [The Literary Work of Art], translated by Margit Kinander. Lund: Bo Cavefors Bokforlag, 1977. [Translation of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
Sobre la Responsabilidad, translated by Juan Miguel Palacios. Madrid: Dorcas-Verbo Divino, 1980. [Translation of Über die Verantwortung.]
Eseji iz Estetike. O zgradbi slike. O arhitekturni umetnini. Glazbena umetnina in Problem njene istovetnosti [Essays in Aesthetics. On the Structure of Painting. On Architectural Art. Musical Art and the Problem of Its Identity], translated by Frane Jerman, Filozofska knjižnica, Vol. 22. Ljubljana: Slovenska matica, 1980. [Translation from Studia z estetyki.]
Spór o istnienie świata, Tom III. O strukturze przyczynowej realnego świata [The Controversy Over the Existence of the World, Vol. III. On the Causal Structure of the Real World], translated from German into Polish by Danuta Gierulanka. Warszawa: PWN, 1981.
Wykłady i dyskusje z estetyki [Lectures and Discussions on Aesthetics], Anita Szczepańska, ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1981. [Lectures 1 through 17 delivered between March and June 1960.]
Sulla responsabilità, translated by Antonio Setola. Bologna: CSEO Biblioteca, 1982. [Translation of Über die Verantwortung.]
Bungakuteki-geijutsu-sakuhin [The Literary Work of Art], translated by Makio Takiuchi and Yuusuke Hosoi. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo Co., 1982. [Translation of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
Husserl shokan-shu 1915–1938 [Husserl’s Letters to Ingarden 1915–1938], translated by Kozo Kuwano and Marito Sato. Tokyo: Serika Shobo Co., 1982. [Translation of Briefe an Roman Ingarden mit Erläuterungen und Erinnerungen an Husserl herausgegeben von Roman Ingarden.]
Man and Value, translated from Polish and German by Arthur Szylewicz. München: Philosophia Verlag; and Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1983.
L’œuvre d’art littéraire, translated by Philibert Secretan with the collaboration of N. Lüchinger and B. Schwegler. Lausanne: L’Age d’Homme, 1983.
Ningen-Ron: Jikan, Sekinin, Kati [Essays on Man: Time, Responsibility, Value], translated from Polish and German by Yushiro Takei and Tsunehiro Akamatsu. Tokyo: Housei University Publishing House, 1983.
Spór o istnienie świata [The Controversy Over the Existence of the World], 3 vols., 3rd critical ed., Danuta Gierulanka, ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1985.
The Work of Music and the Problem of Its Identity, translated by Adam Czerniawski; Jean Harrell, ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; and London: Macmillan, 1986.
The Ontology of the Work of Art: The Musical Work, the Picture, the Architectural Work, the Film, translated by Raymond Meyer with John T. Goldthwait. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1989.
Articles and Treatises
“Daȩżenia fenomenologów” [The Goals of Phenomenologists]. PFil 22, no. 3 (1919): 118–156
“Daȩżenia fenomenologów” [The Goals of Phenomenologists]. PFil 22, no. 4 (1919): 315–351.
“O jasnym i niejasnym stylu filozoficznym” [On Clear and Unclear Philosophical Style]. RFil 5, no. 3 (1919–20): 45–48.
“Über die Gefahr einer Petitio Principii in der Erkenntnistheorie.” JPpF 4 (1921): 545–568.
“Max Scheler.” PWar 2, no. 4(13) (1922): 5–13.
“Spór o istoteȩ filozofii” [Controversy Over the Essence of Philosophy]. PWar 2, no. 4(14) (1922): 161–172.
“W sprawie istoty doświadczenia wewneȩtrznego” [On the Essence of Internal Experience]. PFil 25, no. 4 (1922): 512–534.
“Uwagi do ‘Krótkiej rozprawy itd’” [Remarks On ‘A Short Debate etc.’]. PFil 26, nos. 1–2 (1923): 100–104.
“Stanowisko teorii poznania w systemie nauk filozoficznych” [The Place of a Theory of Cognition in the System of Philosophical Disciplines]. Sprawozdanie Gimnazjum w Toruniu za r.szk. 1924–25 [Report of the Toruń Gymnasium for the Years 1924–25]. Toruń: 1925. 5–14.
“Max Scheler.” Słowo Polskie 33, no. 154 (1926): 6–7.
“Max Scheler, wspomnienie pośmiertne” [Max Scheler: in memoriam]. PFil 31, no. 4 (1928): 343–351.
“Bemerkungen zum Problem Idealismus-Realismus.” JPpF 11 (1929): 159–190. [Supplementary volume: Husserl Festschrift.]
“Psycho-fizjologiczna teorja [sic] poznania i jej krytyka” [Psycho-Physiological Theory of Cognition and Its Criticism]. Ksieȩga Pamiaȩtkowa Gimnazjum im. K. Szajnochy [The Visitors’ Book of Szajnocha’s Gymnasium]. Lwów: 1930. 1–44.
“Niektóre założenia idealizmu Berkleya” [Some Premises of Berkeley’s Idealism]. Ksieȩga Pamiaȩtkowa Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoflcznego [The Visitors’ Book of the Polish Philosophical Society]. Lwów: 1931. 215–258.
“Zagadnienie tożsamości dzieła muzycznego” [On the Identity of the Musical Work of Art]. PFil 36, no. 4 (1933): 320–362.
“Formy obcowania z dzielem literackiem” [Forms of Contact with the Literary Work of Art]. WLit 10, no. 7 (1933): 3.
“Logistyczna próba uksztaltowania filozofii” [The Logistic Attempt at Reshaping Philosophy]. PFil 37, no. 4 (1934): 335–346.
“Edmund Husserl: twórca fenomenologji” [Edmund Husserl: the Founder of Phenomenology]. WLit 11, no. 41 (1934): 4.
“Jeszcze ‘Atulli mirohłady’” [More about ‘Atulli Mirohłady’ (folkloristic nonsense rhymes)]. WLit 11, no. 43 (1934): 4.
“Niektóre sprawy sporne we współczesnej psychologii” [Some Controversial Issues of Contemporary Psychology]. Marchołt 1, no. 1 (1934–35): 34–50.
“Vom formalen Aufbau des individuellen Gegenstandes” SPhiP 1 (1935): 29–106.
“L’essai logistique d’une refonte de la philosophie” RPh 120, nos. 7–8 (1935): 137–159.
“VIII Kongres Filozoficzny w Pradze” [The 8th Philosophical Congress in Prague]. Pion 3, no. 5 (1935): 6–7.
“Człowiek i jego rzeczywistość” [Man and His Reality]. TPol 6 (1935): 8.
“Monachomachii humanistycznej ciaȩg dalszy” [The Continuation of Humanistic Monachomachy]. Pion 3, no. 5 (1935): 2–3.
“Formy poznawania dzieła literackiego” [Ways of Cognizing the Literary Work of Art]. Zjazd Naukowy imienia Ignacego Krasickiego we Lwowie…l935 roku [Ignacy Krasicki’s Scholarly Convention in Lwów, June 8–10, 1935], Ludwik Biernacki, ed. Lwów: 1936.
“Der logistische Versuch einer Neugestaltung der Philosophie. Eine kritische Bemerkung.” Actes du Vlll-ème Congrès International de Philosophie à Prague, 1934. Prague: Comité d’Organisation du Congrès, 1936. 203–208.
“Główne tendencje neopozytywizmu” [Main Tendencies of Neo-Positivism]. Marchołt 2, no. 2 (1936): 264–278.
“Formy poznawania dzieła literackiego” [Ways of Cognizing the Literary Work of Art]. PL 33, no. 3 (1936): 163–192.
“Poznanie” [Cognition]. ŚiŻ (Encyclopedia) 4 (1936): 345–354.
R Ingarden “Racjonalizm” [Rationalism]. ŚiŻ (Encyclopedia) 4 (1936): 507–515.
“Teoria poznania” [Theory of Cognition]. ŚiŻ (Encyclopedia) 4 (1936): 1073–1087.
“Kazimierz Twardowski.” Nowe Czasy 2, no. 9 (1936): 4.
“Czy zadaniem filozofii jest synteza nauk szczegółowych?” [Is It the Task of Philosophy to Synthesize the Findings of the Exact Sciences?]. KFil 13, no. 3 (1936): 195–214.
“Wandlungen in der philosophischen Atmosphäre in Polen.” SRun 9, no. 4 (1937): 224–233. [With a bibliography of Ingarden’s works.]
“Der Mensch und die Zeit.” Traveaux du IX-ème Congrès International de Philosophie (Congrès Descartes), Vol. 8. Paris: 1937. 129–136.
“Das ästhetische Erlebnis.” II-ème Congrès International d’Esthétique et des Sciences de l’Art, Vol. 1. Paris: 1937. 54–60.
“O tak zwanej prawdzie w literaturze” [On So-Called Truth in Literature]. PWsp 61, no. 182 (1937): 80–94 and
no. 183 (1937): 72–91.
“O psychologii i psychologiźmie w nauce o literaturze” [Psychology and Psychologism in Literary Scholarship]. Pion 5, no. 34 (1937): 1–2.
“Czas i czlowiek; fragment” [Man and Time; a Fragment]. Czas 89, no. 352 (1937): 15.
“Sprawa formy i treści w dziele literackim” [Form and Content in the Literary Work of Art]. ZLit 1, no. 5 (1937): 153–167.
“Czlowiek i czas” [Man and Time]. PFil 41 (1938): 54–67.
“Das Form-Inhalt Problem im literarischen Kunstwerk.” Helikon 1, nos. 1–2 (1938): 51–67.
R Ingarden, “Dzialalność naukowa Kazimierza Twardowskiego” [The Scientific Activity of Kazimierz Twardowski]. Kazimierz Twardowski, nauczyciel, uczony, obywatel [Kazimierz Twardowski; Teacher, Scholar, Citizen]. Lwów: Nauczyciel-Uczohy-Obywatel, 1938. 13–30.
“Mscislaw Wartenberg.” DzPol 4, no. 111 (1938): 6.
“Główne linie rozwoju poglaȩdów filozoficznych Edmunda Husserla” [Major Directions in the Development of Edmund Husserl’s Philosophical Views]. PFil 42, no. 2 (1939–45): 25–76.
“W sprawie tzw.‘fenomenologizmu’” [The So-called ‘Phenomenologism’]. TygP, no.33(1945):6.
“O dziele architektury” [The Architectural Work of Art]. NiS 2, no. 1 (1946): 3–26 and
no. 2 (1946): 217–242.
“Esencjalne zagadnienie formy i jej podstawowe pojeȩcia” [The Essential Problem of Form and its Basic Concepts]. KFil 16, nos. 2–4 (1946): 101–164.
“Czlowiek i czas” [Man and Time]. Tw 2, no. 2 (1946): 121–137.
“O różnych rozumieniach ‘prawdziwosci’ w dziele sztuki” [Different Understandings of ‘Truthfulness’ in the Work of Art]. ZaLit 10, no. 1 (1946): 12–19 and
no. 2 (1946): 36–43.
“Quelques remarques sur la relation de causalité.” SPhiP 3 (1947): 151–166.
“The Scientific Activity of Kazimierz Twardowski.” SPhiP 3 (1947): 17–30.
“Le temps, l’espace et le sentiment de réalité.” Revue Internationale de Filmologie 1, no. 2 (1947): 127–141.
“Ks. Konstanty Michalski, uczony, filozof, czlowiek” [Father Konstanty Michalski; Savant, Philosopher, Human Being]. TygP 3, no. 34 (1947): 1–2.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O poznawaniu cudzych stanów psychicznych” [Studying the Psychological States of Others]. KPsych 13 (1947): 1–28. [With a summary in English.]
ROMAN INGARDEN “Problém formy a obsahu w literarnim dile” [The Problem of Form and Content in the Literary Work of Art]. Blok Brno 2, no. 1 (1947): 4–7.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Quelques remarques sur le problème de la rélativité de valeurs.” Actes du III-ème Congrès des Sociétés de Philosophie de langue française, Bruxelles-Louvain. Paris: Vrin, 1947. [8 pp. submitted separately after the Congress.]
ROMAN INGARDEN “Międzynarodowy kongres filozoficzny w Rzymie” [The International Congress of Philosophy in Rome]. PFil 43, nos. 1–4 (1947): 157–158.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Z dziejów teorii dziela literackiego. (Uwagi na marginesie Poetyki Arys-totelesa)” [On the History of the Theory of the Literary Work of Art. (A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics)]. KFil 17, nos. 1–2 (1948): 133–172.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Uwagi o względnosci wartości” [Remarks on the Relativity of Values]. PFil 44, nos. 1–3 (1948): 83–94.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Nekolik uvah o filmovem umeni” [Some Remarks Concerning the Art of Film]. Blok Brno 3, no. 2 (1948): 91–96.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Wspomnienie o prof. Zawirskim” [Remembering Professor Zawirski]. DzLit 2, no. 18 (1948): 7.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Quelques remarques sur la relation de causalité.” Attidel Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia, Roma 1946, Vol. 3. Milano: 1948. 573–577.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Zagadnienie przypadku” [The Problem of Hazard]. SprPAU49, no. 4 (1948): 195–200.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Krytyczne uwagi o poglądach fonologicznych. Zędziejów teorii języka w XX wieku” [Critical Observations on Phonological Concepts. The History of Language Theory in the 20th Century]. SprPAU 49, no. 3 (1948): 124–129.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Les modes d’existence et le problème ‘idéalisme-réalisme’.” Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Philosophy, Amsterdam 1948. Amsterdam: 1949. 347–350.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Ze studiów nad zagadnieniem formy i treści dzieła sztuki” [Studies in the Form and Content of a Work of Art]. PFil 45, nos. 1–2 (1949): 65–86.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O sądzie warunkowym” [On the Conditional Judgement]. KFil 18, nos. 3–4 (1949): 263–308.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Des differentes conceptions de la vérité dans l’œuvre d’art.” RE 2, no. 2 (1949): 162–180.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Kritische Bemerkungen zu Husserls Cartesianischen Meditationen.” Edmund Husserl: Gesammelte Schriften, Vol.1: Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1950; 2nd ed., 1963. 203–218.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Descartes a fizyka nowożytna” [Descartes and Modern Physics]. KFil 19, nos. 1–2 (1950): 71–149.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Wspomnienie o Stanislawie Ignacym Witkiewiczu” [Remembering Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz]. TygP 7, no. 20 (1950): 3–4.
ROMAN INGARDEN “De la structure du tableau.” Bulletin International de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences et des Lettres 1945, nos. 1–10. Kraków: 1953. 36–39.
ROMAN INGARDEN “De la poétique.” Bulletin International de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences et Lettres 1945, nos. 1–10. Kraków: 1953. 39–42.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Lekceważenie pamięci” [The Misunderstood Memory]. Muzeum, no. 1 (1953): 8–18.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O tłumaczeniach” [On Translations]. O sztucet łwnaczenia [The Art of Translation], M. Rusinek, ed. Wroclaw: Ossolineum, 1955. 127–190.
ROMAN INGARDEN “La valeur esthétique et le problème de son fondement objectif.” Atti del III Congresso Internazionale di Estetica, Venezia 1956. Torino: Istituto di Estetica dell’Università di Torino, Edizioni delia Rivista di Estetica, 1957. 167–173.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Über die gegenwärtigen Aufgaben der Phänomenologie.” Archivio di Filosofia, il Compito delia Fenomenologia, nos. 1–2 (1957): 229–241.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Die Asymmetrie der ursächlichen Beziehung.” PJGG 66 (1957) (Festschrift für Hedwig Conrad-Martius): 100–110.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Wspomnienie o Stanislawie Ignacym Witkiewiczu” [In Memory of Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz]. Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz, człowiek i twórca [Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz; Man and Artist], T. Kotarbinski, ed. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1957. 169–170.
ROMAN INGARDEN “I compiti attuali della fenomenologia” Archivio di Filosofla, il Compito della Fenomenologia, nos. 1–2 (1957): 243–249.
ROMAN INGARDEN “The Hypothetical Proposition.” PPR 18, no. 4 (1958): 435–450.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Bemerkungen zum Problem des ästhetischen Werturteils.” RdE 3, no. 3 (1958): 414–423.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Le problème de la constitution et le sens de la réflexion constitutive chez Edmond Husserl.” Cahiers de Royaumont: Philosophie: Husserl, Vol. 3. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1959. 242–264 and (contributions to discussion) 66–67, 88–89, 188, 233–234, 265–270,329–330, 373.
66–67
88–89
188
233–234
265–270
329–330
373
ROMAN INGARDEN “Von den Funktionen der Sprache im Theaterschauspiel.” ZRL 1 (1959): 65–91.
ROMAN INGARDEN “L’intuition Bergsonienne et le problème phénoménologique de la constitution.” Actes du X-ème Congrès des Sociétés de Philosophie de langue française. Congrès Bergson, Vol. 1. Paris: Colin, 1959. 163–166
Vol 2: Discussions. Paris: Colin, 1959. 26–27.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Edmund Husserl zum 100. Geburtstag.” ZpF 13, no. 3(1959): 459–463.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Über den transzendentalen Idealismus bei E. Husserl.” Phaenomenologica, Vol. 2: Husserl und das Denken der Neuzeit. Akten des II. internationalen phänomenologischen Kolloquiums, Krefeld 1956. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959. 190–204.
ROMAN INGARDEN “De l’idéalisme transcendental chez E. Husserl.” Phaenomenologica, Vol. 2: Husserl et la pensée moderne. Actes du II-ème Colloque International de Phénoménologie, Krefeld 1956. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959. 205–215.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Besinnung auf Grundfragen.” Slavische Geisteswelt, West- und Südslaven, Vol. 3: Mensch und Welt, S. Hafner, O. Turecek and G. Wytrzens, eds. Baden-Baden: Holle, 1959. 145–154.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O tak zwanym malarstwie abstrakcyjnym” [On So-Called Abstract Painting]. Estetyka 1 (1960): 147–168.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O zagadnieniu percepcji dzieła muzycznego. Fragment” [On the Question of the Perception of the Musical Work of Art. A Fragment]. Charisteria: Rozprawy filozoflczne złożone w darze Władysiawowi Tatarkiewiczowi w siedemdziesią;tą rocznicę urodzin [Charisteria: Essays in Philosophy Dedicated to Władyslaw Tatarkiewicz on his 70fh Birthday]. Warszawa: PWN, 1960. 109–124.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Notes sur l’objet de l’histoire de la philosophie.” Diogène 7, no. 29 (1960): 130–141.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Reflections on the Subject Matter of the History of Philosophy.” Diogenes 7, no. 29 (1960): 111–121.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Podstawowe twierdzenia o budowie dziela literackiego” and “Dodatek: Przedmiot i zadania wiedzy o literaturze” [Basic Statements on the Structure of the Literary Work with an Appendix on The Object and Tasks of Literary Theory]. Teoria badań literackich w Polsce [Theory of Literary Scholarship in Poland], Vol. 2, H. Markiewicz, ed. Kraków: 1960. 178–206.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Racourcis de perspective du temps dans la concrétisation de l’œuvre littéraire,” translated by Elisabeth Willman. RMM 65, no. 1 (1960): 19–51.
ROMAN INGARDEN “The General Question of the Essence of Form and Content,” translated by Max Rieser. JP 57, no. 7 (1960): 222–233. [From Vol. 2 of Studia z estetyki.]
ROMAN INGARDEN “L’homme et la nature.” Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia, Venezia 1958, Vol. 2. Firenze: Sansoni, 1960. 209–213.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Zasady epistemologicznego rozważania doświadczenia estetycznego” [The Principles of the Epistemological Consideration of Aesthetic Experience]. Estetyka 2(1961):3–11.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object,” translated by Janina Makota with the co-operation of Shia Moser. PPR 21, no. 3 (1961): 289–313.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Nature humaine.” Nature humaine. Actes du XI-ème Congrès des Sociétés de Philosophie de langue française, Montpellier 1961. Paris: 1961. 220–223.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O dyskusji owocnej słow kilka” [A Few Words on Fruitful Discussion]. PKul 10,no.48(1961): 1.
ROMAN INGARDEN “La pittura astratta,” translated by G. Vattimo. RdE 6, no. 2 (1961): 165–190.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Bemerkungen zum Problem des ästhetischen Werturteils.” Il guidicio estetico. Atti del Simposio di Estetica. Venezia 1958. Padua: Edizioni della Rivista di Estetica, 1961.41–50.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Osservazioni sul problema del guidizio di valore estetica.” Il guidicio estetico. Atti del Simposio di Estetica. Venezia 1958. Padua: Edizioni della Rivista di Estetica, 1961.41–50.
ROMAN INGARDEN “A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics. Part I,” translated by Helen Michejda. JAAC 20, no. 2 (1961): 163–173.
ROMAN INGARDEN “A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics. Part II,” translated by Helen Michejda. JAAC 20, no. 3 (1962): 273–285.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Prinzipien einer erkenntniskritischen Betrachtung der ästhetischen Erfahrung.” Actes du IV-ème Congrès International d’Esthétique, Athens 1960. Athens: Myrtides, 1962. 622–631.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Poetik und Sprachwissenschaft.” Poetics [Proceedings of the International Conference on Poetics, Warsaw 1960]. Warszawa: PWN; and The Hague: Mouton, 1961. 3–9.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Bemerkungen zum Problem der Begründung.” Studia Logica 13 (1962): 153–176.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Le mot comme élément d’une langue.” Thinking and Meaning. Entretien d’Oxford 1962, Logique et Analyse, Nouvelle Série 5, no. 20 (1962): 212–216.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Edith Stein on Her Activity as an Assistant of Edmund Husserl. Extracts from the Letters of Edith Stein with a Commentary and Introductory Remarks.” PPR 23, no. 2 (1962): 155–175.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Leopold Blaustein, teoretyk radia i filmu” [Leopold Blaustein; Radio and Film Theoretician]. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze 4, no. 4 (1963): 86–93.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Dialogue avec Ansermet. Il oblige le lecteur à penser par lui même.” Supplement littéraire du Journal de Genève, no. 293 (1963): v.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Artistic and Aesthetic Values.” BJA 4, no. 3 (1964): 198–213.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Das schöpferische Verhalten des Autors und das Mitschöpfertum des Virtuosen und der Zuhörer.” Aspecten van Creativiteit, Verhandelingen voorgedragen in een zitting ter herdenking van het 50-jarig bestaan van het Bureau voor Muziek-Auteursrecht BUMA. Amsterdam: 1964. 29–33.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Husserls Betrachtungen zur Konstitution des physikalischen Dinges.” AdP 27, nos. 3–4 (1964): 356–407.
ROMAN INGARDEN “W sprawie budowy dzieła literackiego. Profesorowi Markiewiczowi w odpowiedzi” [On the Structure of the Literary Work of Art. An Answer to Professor Markiewicz]. PL 55, no. 1 (1964): 183–202.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Zakończenie dyskusji z prof. Markiewiczem” [Concluding my Discussion with Professor Markiewicz]. PL 55, no. 2 (1964): 435–438.
ROMAN INGARDEN “List do Redakcji” [Letter to the Editor]. StEs 1(1964): 245–247. [Response to Jadwiga Sławińska: “Uwagi o teorii dziela architektonicznego Romana Ingardena.”]
ROMAN INGARDEN “Fenomenologia” [Phenomenology]. Wielka Encyklopedia, Vol. 3. Warszawa: PWN, 1964. 616.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Edmund Husserl.” Wielka Encyklopedia, Vol. 4. Warszawa: PWN, 1964. 776.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Husserls Betrachtungen zur Konstitution des physikalischen Dinges.” Archives de l’Institut International des Sciences Théoretiques, Vol. 13: La phénoménologie et les sciences de la nature. Colloque de l’Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences, 2–4 Septembre 1963, Fribourg (Suisse). Bruxelles: Office international de librairie, 1965. 36–87.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Zagadnienie systemu jakości estetycznie doniosłych” [On the System of Aesthetically Valent Qualities]. StEs 2 (1965): 3–26.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Werte, Normen und Strukturen nach René Wellek.” DVLG 40, no. 1 (1966): 43–55.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Einige ungelöste Probleme der Werttheorie.” Orbis Scriptus, Festschrift für Dimitrij Tschizewskij. München: Fink, 1966. 365–373.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Uwagi o niektórych twierdzeniach ontologicznych w książce Kazimierza Twardowskiego pt. ‘Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen’” [Comments on Some Ontological Assertions in Kazimierz Twar-dowski’s “Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen”]. RFil 25, nos. 1–2 (1966): 21–35.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Uwagi do Uwag Zofii Lissy” [Remarks on Zofia Lissa’s Comments]. StEs 3 (1966): 115–128.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O bezpośrednim poznaniu apriorycznym” [On Direct A Priori Cognition]. Głowne zagadnienia filozofii, Vol. 2, W. Krajewski, ed. Warszawa: 1966. 228–239.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Zygmunt Łempicki jako teoretyk literatury” [Zygmunt Łempicki’s Theory of Literature]. Zygmunt Łempicki: Wybór pism, Tom II: Studia z teorii literatury [Zygmunt Łempicki: Works, Vol. 2: Studies in Literary Theory]. Warszawa: 1966. 9–17.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Betrachtungen zum Problem der Objektivität.” ZpF 21, no. 1 (1967): 31–46
no. 2 (1967): 242–260.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Poglądy J. Volkelta na wczucie” [J. Volkelt’s Views on Empathy (Einfühlung)]. StEs 4 (1967): 135–149.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Z teorii dziela literackiego” [On the Theory of the Literary Work of Art]. Problemy teorii literatury [Problems of Literary Theory], H. Markiewicz, ed. Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków: 1967. 7–59.
ROMAN INGARDEN “La ‘vita’ dell’opera letteraria.” Verri, no. 23 (1967): 3–28.
ROMAN INGARDEN “L’homme et la nature.” La Pologne, no. 6 (1967): 17.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Der Mensch und die Natur.” Polen, no. 6 (1967): 17.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Man and Nature.” Poland, no. 6 (1967): 17.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O saznavanju književnog delà” [The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art]. Izraz 11, nos. 2–12 (1967): (serial publication). [Translation of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks.]
and 12, no. 1 (1967)
ROMAN INGARDEN “A kép és az irodalni mualkotás” [The Picture and the Literary Work of Art], translated by Barley László. Helikon 14 (1968): 3–4 and 396–403.
and 396–403.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Problemet on verdienes ‘relativitet’” [Problems of the Relativity of Values], translated by Per Fredrik Christiansen. Minerva 12 (1968): 181–195.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Meine Erinnerungen an Edmund Husserl.” Edmund Husserl: Briefe an Roman Ingarden. Mit Erläuterungen und Erinnerungen an Husserl, R. Ingarden, ed. Phaenomenologica, Vol. 25. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1968. 106–135.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Erläuterungen zu den Briefen [Husserls].” Edmund Husserl: Briefe an Roman Ingarden. Mit Erläuterungen und Erinnerungen an Husserl, R. Ingarden, ed. Phaenomenologica, Vol. 25. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1968. 136–184.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Die ontischen Fundamente der Verantwortung.” Akten des XIV. Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie, Wien 1968, Vol. 1. Vienna: Herder, 1968. 235–242.
ROMAN INGARDEN “De la connaissance de l’œuvre littéraire.” AdP 31, no. 2 (1968): 202–263.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Das Problem des Systems der ästhetisch relevanten Qualitäten.” Actes du V-ème Congrès International d’Esthétique, Amsterdam 1964. The Hague: 1968. 448–456.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Sprawa stosowania metod statystycznych do badania dziela sztuki” [On Applying Statistical Methods to the Analysis of Works of Art]. KiS 12, no. 4 (1968): 35–50.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Ästhetik und Kunstphilosophie.” Akten des XIV. Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie, Wien 1968, Vol. 4. Vienna: Herder, 1969. 214–219.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Le concept de philosophie chez Franz Brentano.” AdP 32, no. 3 (1969): 458–475 (Part 1).
and no. 4 (1969): 609–638 (Part 2)
ROMAN INGARDEN “Z rozważań nad wartościami moralnymi” [Meditations on Moral Values]. Rozprawy filozoficzne. Księ;ga Pamiątkowa z okazji 80 roczicy urodzin prof. T. Czeżowskiego [Essays in Philosophy. The Visitors’ Book on the 80th Birthday of Professor T. Cżezowski]. Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu. Prace Wydzialu Filologiczno-Filozoficznego [Toruń Scientific Society. Publications of the Philological-Philosophical Department] 21, no. 2 (1969): 105–117.
ROMAN INGARDEN “The Physicalistic Theory of Language and the World of Literature,” translated from German by Maria Pelikan. YCC 2 (1969): 80–98.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Co jest nowego w ostatniej pracy Husserla?” [What is New in Husserl’s Last Work?]. SFil, nos. 4–5 (1970): 3–14.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Künstlerische Funktionen der Sprache. Ein Ausblick.” Sprachkunst 1, no. 1–2 (1970): 20–31.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Bemerkungen zu den Bemerkungen von Professor Zofia Lissa,” translated by Antoni Starzeński. SFil (in translation), no. 4 (1970): 351–363.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Bericht über meine Studien zur Ästhetik.” Contemporary Philosophy. A Survey, Vol. 4, R. Klibansky, ed. Firenze: La nuova Italia Editrice, 1971. 106–110.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Ausgangsprobleme zur Bertrachtung der kausalen Struktur der Welt.” Philomates, Studies and Essays in Memory of Philip Merlan, R.B. Palmer and R. Hamerton-Kelly, eds. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1971. 398–411.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Die vier Begriffe der Transzendenz und das Problem des Idealismus bei Husserl.” Analecta Husserliana 1 (1971): 36–74.
ROMAN INGARDEN “O badaniach filozoficznych Edith Stein (12.10.1891–9.8.1942)” [On Edith Stein’s Philosophical Investigations (10/12/1891–8/9/1942)]. Znak 23, no. 4 (1971): 389–409.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Les fonctions du langage au théâtre.” Poétique 8 (1971): 531–538.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Književno delo kao višeslojna tvorevina” [The Literary Work as a Many-Sided Creation]. Polja 17, no. 15 (1971): 24. [Excerpt from Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
ROMAN INGARDEN “Pogled na neka kritičko-epistemološka pitanja saznanja književnog delà” [A View on Some Critical-Epistemological Questions of Knowledge of Literary Work]. KnjiK 2, nos. 1–3 (1971): 58–64
and no. 4 (1971): 75–94.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Max Bense und das Problem der Anwendung statistischer Methoden in der Literaturforschung.” Sprachkunst: Beiträge zur Literaturwissenschaft 3, nos. 3–4 (1972): 177–213.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Filozofia Edmunda Husserla, Zarys encyklopedyczny” [The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl. An Encyclopedic Outline]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special edition) (1972): 5–17.
ROMAN INGARDEN “What is New in Husserl’s ‘Crisis’?” Analecta Husserliana 2 (1972): 23–47.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Über den transzendentalen Idealismus bei E. Husserl”, translated into Japanese by Susumu Kaneta. Husserl to gendai shiso [Husserl and Modern Thought]. Tokyo: Serika Shobo Co., 1972. 149–166.
ROMAN INGARDEN “Istraživanja u ontologiji umetnosti.” Umetnost 8, nos. 29–30 (1972): 63–74. [From Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst.]
ROMAN INGARDEN “Osnovne tvrdnje o suštinskoj strukturi književnog umetnic’kog dela” [A Basic Assertion On the Essential Structure of the Literary Work of Art]. Venae 1, no. 3 (1972): 15. [Excerpt from O saznavanju književnog umetnickog dela.]
ROMAN INGARDEN “On So-called Truth in Literature.” Aesthetics in Twentieth-Century Poland. Selected Essays, J.G. Harrel and A. Wierzbiańska, eds. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1973. 164–204.
ROMAN INGARDEN “About the Motives that led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism.” Phenomenology and Natural Science, D. Riepe, ed. New York: 1973.
“Główne kierunki polskiej filozofii” [Main Directions of Polish Philosophy]. SFil, no. 1 (1973): 3–15. [Originally written in German in 1936.]
“Identitet muzičkog dela” [On the Identity of the Musical Work of Art]. Trećdi program Radio Beograda, no. 19 (1973): 471–595.
“Istraživanja iz ontologije umetnosti: film” [Investigations in the Ontology of Art: Film]. Filmske sveske, no. 1 (1973): 7–25. [Foreword from Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst.]
“O različitom shvatanju istinitosti u delima umetnosti” [Different Conceptions of Truth in Works of Art]. Stremljenja 16, no. 6 (1973): 685–700.
“O filosofskoj estetici” [On Philosophical Aesthetics]. KnjiK 4, no. 1 (1973): 24–31.
“‘A priori’ Knowledge in Kant vs. ‘a priori’ Knowledge in Husserl.” DaH (inaugural issue) (1973): 5–18.
“Main Directions of Polish Philosophy.” DaH 1, no. 2 (1974): 91–103. [Originally written in German in 1936.]
“Psychologism and Psychology in Literary Scholarship.” NLH 5, no. 2 (1974): 215–223. [With a note from the translator, John Fizer, 213–215.]
“Napomene na marginama Aristotelove poetike” [A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics]. Polja 20, nos. 186–187 (1974): 8–12
“Napomene na marginama Aristotelove poetike” [A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics]. Polja 20, no. 188 (1974): 2–6.
“O rečenici” [On the Sentence]. Knji 29, no. 1 (1974): 71–83.
“O problemu percepcije muzičkog delà” [On the Problem of the Perception of the Musical Work]. Vidici [Beograd], nos. 169–170 (1975): 16–18.
“On the Ontology of Relations.” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 75–80. [Prepared for publication by Guido Küng.]
“Remarks Concerning the Relativity of Values.” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 102–108. [Prepared for publication by Guido Küng and E. M. Świderski.]
“Phenomenological Aesthetics: An Attempt at Defining Its Range.” JAAC 33, no. 3 (1975): 257–269.
“Estetska vrednost i problem njenog fundiranja u umetničkom delu” [Aesthetic Value and the Problem of Its Foundation in the Work of Art]. Književna reč 4, no. 4 (1975): 36.
“Kritičke primedbe prof, dr Romana Ingardena” [Critical Remarks of Prof. Dr. Roman Ingarden]. Kartezijanske Meditacije, Vol. 1, by Edmund Husserl. Zagreb: 1975. 173–184.
“Lesingov Laokoon” [Lessing’s Laokoon]. Knji 30, no. 1 (1975): 62–70.
“Poetika i nauka o jeziku” [Poetics and the Science of Language]. Književna reč 6, no. 4 (1975): 38.
“Stvaralačko ponašanje autora i stvaralačka radnja izmedju virtuoza i slušaoca” [The Creative Behavior of the Author and the Creative Action between the Virtuoso and Listener]. Književna reč 4, no. 4 (1975): 36.
“Slika” [Painting]. Fenomenologija, Milan Damnjanović, ed. Beograd: Nolit, 1975. 188–232. [Excerpt from Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst.]
“Probleme der Husserlschen Reduktion.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 1–71.
“O funkcijama jezika u pozorišnoj scenskoj igri” [Von den Funktionen der Sprache im Theaterschauspiel]. Estetika Modernog Teatra, Radoslav Lazić and Dusan Rnjak, eds. Beograd: Vuk Karadžič, 1976. 99–122. [From Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
“Čovek i vreme” [Man and Time]. Ideje 8, no. 3 (1977): 1–19.
“On Moral Action.” Analecta Husserliana 1 (1978): 151–162.
“Čovek i priroda” [Man and Nature]. Književna reč 7 (Jul. 25) (1978): 105.
“Lesingov Laokoon” [Lessing’s Laokoon]. Odnosi Medju Umetnostima, Branislava Milijić, ed. Beograd: Nolit, 1978. 116–130. [From Studia z Estetyki, Vol. 1.]
“Opaske na marginama Aristotelove ‘Poetike’” [A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics]. Književna smotra 10, nos. 31–32 (1978): 33–48.
“Čovek i njegova stvarnost” [Man and His Reality]. Savremenik 24, no. 4 (1978): 320–325.
“Über die philosophischen Forschungen Edith Sleins ” FZPT 26, nos. 2–3 (1979): 456–480.
“Künstlerische und ästhetische Werte” (from Erlebnis, Kunstwerk und Wert), translated into Japanese by Takashi Nishizawa. The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 13, no. 4 (1979): 278–303.
“O różnych rozumieniach prawdziwości w dziele sztuki” [On Various Understandings of “Truthfulness” in the Work of Art], translated into Japanese by Yushiro Takei. The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 14, no. 1 (1980): 122–142.
“Fragmenty dyskusji” [Fragments of Discussions (with Roman Ingarden)]. StEs 17(1980): 3–31.
“Psychologism and Psychology.” Psychologism and Psychoaesthetics: A Historical and Critical View of Their Relations, by John Fizer. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press, 1981. 202–216.
“Nekoliko napomena o filmskoj umetnosti” [Several Remarks on the Art of Film]. Lica 10, nos. 5–7, (1981): 43–49.
“Nekoliko riječi o plodotvornoj diskusiji” [Some Words on Fruitful Discussion]. Kulturni radnik 34, no. 3 (1981): 53–60.
“O funkciji govora u pozorišnoj predstavi” [Von den Funktionen der Sprache im Theaterschauspiel]. Moderna Teorija Drame, Mirjana Miočinović, ed. Beograd: Nolit, 1981. 244–263. [From Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
“O raznim shvatanjima ‘istinitosti’ u umtničkom delu” [On Different Conceptions of “Truth” in a Work of Art]. Ideje, no. 8 (1981): 31–43.
“Wartości artystyczne: wartości estetyczne” [Artistic Values: Aesthetic Values]. StEs 19 (1982): 194–214.
“Teorijska poetika i normativna poetika” [Theoretical and Normative Poetics]. Književne novine 34 (1982): 651.
“On Philosophical Aesthetics.” DaH 10, no. 1 (1983): 5–12.
“Subjekat spoznavanja i čovek koji spoznaje” [The Object of Cognition and Cognizing Man]. Dijalog, nos. 1 and 2 (1983): 29–44.
“Definicija poetike i njen odnos prema filozofiji književnosti i nauci o književnosti” [The Definition of Poetics and Its Relation to Literary Theory and Criticism]. Književna reč 12 (1984): 7–8.
“Reminiscences of Stanislaw Ignacy Witkiewicz.” DaH 12, no. 2 (1985): 55–59.
“On the Cognition of the Literary Work of Art.” The Hermeneutics Reader. Texts of the German Tradition from the Enlightenment to the Present, Kurt Mueller-Vollmer, ed. New York: Continuum, 1985. 187–213. [Excerpts from The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art.]
“Phenomenological Aesthetics: An Attempt at Defining Its Range.” Critical Theory Since 1965, Hazard Adams and Leroy Searle, eds. Tallahassee, FL: University Presses of Florida, 1986. 185–197.
“Über die philosophischen Forschungen Edith Sieins.” Edith Stein — Eine große Glaubenzeugin, translated by Waltrand Herbstrith. Annweiler: Plöger, 1986. 203–229.
“Theory of Knowledge as Phenomenology of the ‘Essence’ of Cognitive Experiences and Their Correlates,” translated by A. Szylewicz. Aletheia: An International Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 4: Epistemology and Logic. Bern: Lang, 1988. 1–106.
Reviews, Lectures and Miscellanea
Logische Untersuchungen, by Edmund Husserl, 2nd revised ed. Halle: 1913. Rev. in PFil 18, nos. 3–4 (1915): 305–311.
Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, Vol. 3. Halle: 1916. Rev. in RFil 5, no. 9 (1919–20): 181–184.
Gesammelte Schriften, by Adolf Reinach. Halle: 1921. Rev. in RFil 6, nos. 8–10(1921–22): 116–117.
Wielość rzeczywistości [The Multiplicity of Reality], by Leon Chwistek. Kraków: 1921. Rev. in PFil 25, no. 3 (1922): 451–468.
Wielość rzeczywistości [The Multiplicity of Reality], by Leon Chwistek. Kraków: 1921. Rev. in RFil 7, nos. 7–8 (1922–23): 99–101.
Wartości twórcze religijnej myśli polskiej [Creative Values of Polish Religious Thought], by Jadwiga Marcinowska. Warszawa: 1922. Rev. in PWar 3, no. 2 (20) (1923): 254–275.
Ksieȩga Pamiaȩtkowa ku uczczeniu…Kazimierza Twardowskiego [The Visitors’ Book … in Memory of Kazimierz Twardowski]. PFil (special vol.) 23 (1920). Rev. in PWar 4, no. 1 (30)(1924): 370–383.
“O pytaniach esencjalnych” [On Essential Questions]. SprTNL 4, no. 3 (1924): 119–135. [Summary of a lecture delivered by K. Twardowski, May 13, 1924.]
“O pytaniu i jego trafności” [On the Question and Its Pertinence]. RFil 9, nos. 3–5 (1925): 73–74. [Summary of lecture delivered on May 9, 1925 to the PTF.]
“O klasyfikacji” [On Classification]. RFil 9, nos. 9–10 (1925): 164. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Dec. 15, 1925 to the PTF.]
“Polskie czasopisma filozoficzne” [Polish Philosophical Periodicals]. PWar 5, no. 2 (43–44) (1925): 108–110.
“Polskie czasopisma filozoficzne” [Polish Philosophical Periodicals]. PWar 5, no. 2 (43–44) (1925): 237–245
Intuicjonizm Bergsona [Bergson’s Intuitionism], by Zygmunt Mysłakowski. Warszawa: 1924. Rev. in RFil 10, nos. 7–10 (1926–27): 103–106.
“Czy i jak można wykazać obiektywnos’d spostrzezenia zewnçtrznego?” [Can the Objectivity of External Perception Be Proven? If so, How?]. PFil 30, no. 4 (1927): 303–305. [Summary of a lecture delivered to the First Polish Congress of Philosophy, Lwów 1923.]
“Badania marburskie nad obrazami ejdetycznymi” [Marburg-School Analyses of Eidetic Images]. RFil 11, nos. 1–10 (1928–29): 164. [Summary of a lecture delivered on April 21, 1928 to the PTF.]
“Idealizm transcendentalny E. Husserla” [Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism]. RFil 11, nos. 1–10 (1928–29): 167–168. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Dec. 6, 1928 to the PTF.]
“Zagadnienia tkwiaȩce w problematyce idealizmu i realizmu” [Questions on the Problem of Idealism and Realism]. RFil 11, nos. 1–10 (1928–29): 168–169. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Dec. 13,1928 to the PTF.]
Husserlowska nauka o akcie, treści i przedmiocie przedstawienia [Husserl on the Act, Content and Object of Representation], by Leopold Blaustein. Lwów: 1928. Rev. in PFil 32, no. 4 (1929): 315–316.
Husserlowska nauka o akcie, treści i przedmiocie przedstawienia [Husserl on the Act, Content and Object of Representation], by Leopold Blaustein. Lwów: 1928. Rev. in SRun 1 (1929): 837–839.
“O nazwach i wyrazach funkcyjnych” [On Functional Names and Words]. RFil 12, nos. 1–10 (1930–31): 204–205. [Summary of lecture delivered on Oct. 19, 1929 to the PTF.]
“Verbum finitum a zdanie” [The Finite Verb and the Sentence]. RFil 12, nos. 1–10 (1930–31): 205–206. [Summary of lecture delivered on Oct. 26, 1929 to the PTF.]
“Formale und transzendentale Logik,” by Edmund Husserl. JPpF 10 (1929): 1–298. Rev. in Kantstudien 38, nos. 1–2 (1933): 206–209.
Psychologia [Psychology], by Władysław Witwicki, 2nd ed. Lwów: 1930–1933. Rev. in Przyjaciel Szkoły 13y nos. 1–2 (1934): 61–62.
Zwischen Hegel und Nietzsche. Der Ästhetiker Friedrich Theodor Vischer, by Ewald Volhard. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann, 1932. Rev. in Kantstudien 40 (1935): 325.
“Czy zadaniem filozofii jest synteza wyników nauk szczegółowych?” [Is It the Task of Philosophy to Synthesize the Findings of the Natural Sciences?]. PFil 39, no. 4 (1936): 352–355. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Sep. 16 1936 to the Third Polish Congress of Philosophy, Kraków.]
“Analiza zdania warunkowego” [Analysis of the Conditional Sentence]. SprPTPN 10 (1936): 17–27. [Lecture delivered on Dec. 13, 1935 to the PTPN.]
“O niektórych twierdzeniach R. Odebrechta (sprostowanie)” [On Some Statements by R. Odebrecht (Rectification)]. Marchołt 3, no. 3 (1937): 365–367.
“Sprostowanie niektórych twierdzeń H. Życzyńskiego w artykule ‘Nowinkarstwo w polonistyce’” [Rectification of Some Statements of H. Życzyński in his Article “Innovations in Polish Studies”]. Prosto z Mostu 3, no. 29 (1937): 4.
“List do Redakcji” [Letter to the Editor]. NKs 4, no. 4 (1937): 218–219.
Geist und Sache, by Wilhelm Grebe. Frankfurt/Main: 1934. Rev. in NaP 22 (1937): 333–336.
“Problematyka tożsamości przedmiotu indywidualnego” [The Problem of the Identity of the Individual Object]. RFil 14, nos. 1–3 (1938): 134–136. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Feb. 12,1937 to the PTF.]
Osobowość twórcza Żeromskiego [Żeromski’s Artistic Persona], by Stefan Baley. Warszawa: 1936. Rev. in NKs 5, no. 1 (1938): 15–16.
Wsteȩp do badań nad dzieiem literackim [Introduction to the Analysis of the Literary Work], by Manfred Kridl. Wilno: 1936. Rev. in PL 35 nos. 1–4 (1938): 265–271.
“Forma i norma” [Form and Norm]. Prace ofiarowane Kazimierzowi Wóycickiemu [Works Dedicated to Kazimierz Wóycicki], by Zygmunt Łempicki. Wilno: 1937. 17–32. Rev. in PL 35, nos. 1–4 (1938): 271–279.
Phänomenologie und Metaphysik. Das Problem des Relativismus und seiner Überwindung, by Arnold Metzger. Halle: 1934. Rev. in RFil 14, nos. 1–3 (1938): 53–54.
“Przemówienie na pogrzebie Kazimierza Twardowskiego” [Obituary for Kazimierz Twardowski]. RFil 14, nos. 1–3 (1938): 11–12.
“Spór o istnienie świata mieȩdzy idealizmem a realizmem” [The Controversy over the Existence of the World Between Idealism and Realism]. SprPAU 46, no. 7 (1945): 154–155. [Summary of lecture delivered on July 20, 1945 to the Dept. of History and Philosophy, PAU.]
“O budowie obrazu” [On the Structure of Painting]. SprPAU 46, no. 8 (1945): 183–184. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Oct. 11,1945 to the Committee on the History of Art, PAU.]
“O poetyce” [On Poetics]. SprPAU 46, no. 8 (1945): 183. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Oct. 29,1945 to the Dept. of Philology, PAU.]
“Z dziejów teorii dziela literackiego. Czeȩść 1” [From the History of the Theory of the Literary Work of Art. Part 1]. SprPAU 48, no. 3 (1947): 63. [Summary of a lecture delivered on March 19,1947 to the Dept. of Philology, PAU.]
“Sprostowanie” [Rectification]. Tw 4, no. 5 (1948): 123–127.
“Krytyczne uwagi o poglaȩdach fonologów. Czeȩść 1. Z dziejów teorii jeȩzyka XX wieku” [Critical Remarks on the Views of Phonologists. Part 1: The History of the Language Theories in the 20th Century]. SprPAU 49, no. 3 (1948): 124–129 [Summary of a lecture delivered on March 23, 1948 to the Dept. of Philology, Committee on Linguistics, PAU.]
“Krytyczne uwagi o pogladach fonologów. Czeȩść 2” [Critical Remarks on the Views of Phonologists. Part 2]. SprPAU 49, no. 5 (1948): 219–224. [Summary of a lecture delivered on May 18, 1948 to the Dept. of Philology, PAU.]
“Zagadnienie przypadku” [The Problem of Chance]. SprPAU 49, no. 4 (1948): 195–200. [Summary of a lecture delivered on April 26, 1948 to the Dept. of History and Philosophy, PAU.]
“Metodologiczny wstçp do teorii poznania” [Methodological Introduction to the Theory of Cognition]. SprWTN 3 (1948): 242–244. [Summary of a lecture delivered on May 16, 1948 at the Dept. of History and Philosophy in Wrocław.]
“O słowie jako składniku określonego jeȩzyka” [On the Word as an Element of a Given Language]. SprPAU 50, no. 4 (1949): 182–186. [Summary of a lecture delivered on April 28, 1949 at the Committee on Linguistics, PAU.]
“O słowie jako składniku określonego jeȩzyka” [On the Word as an Element of a Given Language]. JPol 29 (1949): 231–232. [Partial reprint of number 324 above.]
“O saȩdzie warunkowym” [On the Conditional Judgement]. SprPAU 50, no. 9 (1949): 503–504. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Nov. 18, 1949 to the Committee on Philosophy, PAU.]
“Introduction” to: La gnoséologie de Dante, by Konstanty Michalski. Kraków: WL, 1950.
“O możliwości i o warunkach jej zachodzenia w świecie realnym” [On Possibility and the Conditions of Its Occurrence in the Real World]. SprPAU 52, no. 2 (1951): 123–127. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Feb. 27, 1951 to the Committee on Philosophy, PAU.]
“Z dziejów teorii dziela literackiego. Czeȩść 2: Lessing, Laokoön” [On the History of the Theory of the Literary Work of Art. Part 2: Lessing’s Laocoön]. SprPAU 53, no. 2 (1952): 92–98. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Feb. 20, 1952 to the Committee on Western European Philologies, PAU.]
“O przedmiocie historii filozofii” [On the Subject-Matter of the History of Philosophy]. SprPAU 53, no. 5 (1952): 273–279. [Summary of a lecture delivered on May 23, 1952 to the Committee of Philosophy, PAU.]
(Głos w dyskusji nad referatem) Zofia Lissa. “O percepcji dziela muzycznego” [(Discussion of the essay by) Zofia Lissa. “On the Perception of the Musical Work of Art”]. Materiały do studiów i dyskusji z zakresu teorii i historii sztuki [Materials for Study and Discussion of Theory and History of Art] 6, nos. 1–2 (1955): 286–289.
“Niektóre twierdzenia o zwiaȩzku przyczynowym” [Some Statements on Causality]. SprTNT 4, nos. 1–4 (1955): 77–82. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Sep. 21, 1955 to the Dept. of Philosophy and Philology in Toruń.]
“Elementy dzieła muzycznego” [The Elements of the Musical Work of Art]. SprTNT 9, nos. 1–4 (1955): 82–84. [Summary of a lecture delivered on Sep. 21,1955 to the Dept. of Philosophy and Philology in Toruń.]
“Przedmowa” [Introduction]. Problematyka estetyki. Przedmiot i metoda [Problems in Aesthetics. Subject and Method], by Jerzy Galecki. Kraków: 1962. 5–9.
“Przedmowa” [Introduction]. O klasyfikacji sztuk pieȩknych [On Classification of the Fine Arts], by Janina Makota. Kraków: 1964. 5–8.
“Uczciwość i dobroć: Dyskusja” [Honesty and Goodness: Discussion]. Znak 17, no. 4 (1965): 419. [Discussion of Wladyslaw Tatarkiewicz’s lecture: “Uczciwość i dobroć.”]
“Dyskusja” [Discussion]. Znak 17, no. 4 (1965): 466–467. [Discussion of a lecture by Władyslaw Stróżewski.]
“Jean Hering (1890–1966).” PPR 27, no. 2 (1966): 308–309.
“Człowiek i przyroda” [Man and Nature]. Polska 6, no. 154 (1967): 17.
“Przedmowa” [Introduction]. Idee czystej fenomenologii i fenomenologicznej filozofii [The Ideas of Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy], by Edmund Husserl, translated from German into Polish by Danuta Gierulanka. Warszawa: PWN, 1967. 2nd ed.: 1975. xiii–xxiv.
“Remarques” [Remarks on Asbjørn Aarnes’ “Roman Ingarden i Norge”]. RMM 72, no. 3 (1967): 341–343.
“Bemerkungen…” [Remarks on Asbjørn Aarnes’ “Roman Ingarden i Norge”]. OL 22, nos. 1–4 (1967): 60–61.
“Bemerkninger…” [Remarks on Asbjørn Aarnes’ “Roman Ingarden i Norge”]. Samtiden 76, no. 2 (1967): 107–108. [Text in German.]
“Uwagi Romana Ingardena” [Remarks on Asbjørn Aarnes’ “Roman Ingarden i Norge”]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 501–502.
Edmund Husserl: Briefe an Roman Ingarden. Mit Erläuterungen und Erinnerungen an Husserl, Roman Ingarden, ed. Phaenomenologica, Vol. 25. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1968.
Enciclopedia filosofica, 2nd ed., interamenta vielaborata. Firenze: Sansoni, 1967.
Roman Ingarden. Rev. in RFil 28, nos. 1–2 (1970): 27–32.
“Gastvorlesung von Roman Ingarden.” Bulletin International d’Esthétique 5, no. 14 (1970): 5–7. [Summary of a lecture delivered in Amsterdam on March 14, 1969.]
“Uwagi Romana Ingardena” [Remarks of Roman Ingarden] on: “Roman Ingarden w Norwegii” [Roman Ingarden in Norway], by Asbjørn Aarnes. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special edition) (1972): 501–502.
“Formale und transzendentale Logik,” by Edmund Husserl. JPpF 10 (1929): 1–298. Rev. reprinted in Husserl, Hermann Noack, ed. Darmstadt: 1973. 168–173.
(Contribution to the discussion of) “Wahrheit und Lebenswelt,” by A. Pazanin. Phaenomenologica, Vol. 61: Vérité et vérification/Wahrheit und Verifikation. Akten des IV. Internationalen Kolloquiums für Phänomenologie, 8–11 September 1969. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1974. 92.
(Contribution to the discussion of) “Probleme des Verstehens,” by Stephan Strasser. Phaenomenologica, Vol. 61: Vérité et vérification/Wahrheit und Verifikation. Akten des IV. Internationalen Kolloquiums für Phänomenologie, 8–11 September 1969. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1974. 182.
“O fenomenološkoj estetici. Pokušaj odredbe oblasti istraživanja” [On Phenomenological Aesthetics. An Attempt to Define the Field of Research]. Gledišta 16, no. 3 (1975): 289–310. [Lecture held at the Institute of Aesthetics in Amsterdam on March 17, 1969.]
“O teoriach kontemplacji” [On Theories of Contemplation]. StEs 14 (1977): 99–110. [Part of Lecture IX of May 3, 1960.]
“O sytuacji estetycznej” [On the Aesthetic Situation]. StEs 14 (1977): 110–116. [Part of Lecture XI of May 10, 1960.]
“Przedmowa” [Introduction]. Krytyka teorii przyczynowości Davida Hume’a [Critique of David Hume’s Theory of Causality], by Jan Szewczyk. Kraków: WL, 1980. 5–8.
“Lectures on Aesthetics,” translated by Boguslaw Lewandowski. Literary Studies in Poland 11 (1983): 15–37. [Translation of Lectures 13 and 14 from Wykłady i dyskusje z estetyki.]
Uzasadienie metafizyki moralności” [Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals], by Immanuel Kant, 3rd ed., translated by M. Wartenberg, Roman Ingarden, ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1984.
Translations
“O zjawisku tragiczności” [On the Phenomenon of the Tragic] (“Zum Phänomen des Tragischen” by Max Scheler). PWar 2, no. 4 (13) (1922): 32–52.
“O rehabilitacji cnoty” [On the Rehabilitation of Virtue] (“Zur Rehabilitierung der Tugend” by Max Scheler), translated in collaboration with Stefan Kołaczkowski. Marchołt 3, no. 1 (1936): 5–28.
“O zjawisku tragiczności” [On the Phenomenon of the Tragic] (“Zum Phänomen des Tragischen” by Max Scheler), 2nd corrected ed. Biblioteczka Filozoficzna, Vol. 10. Lwów: 1938.
Krytyka czystego rozumu [Critique of Pure Reason](Kritik der reinen Vernunft by Immanuel Kant). Warszawa: PWN, 1957.
“O zjawisku tragiczności” [On the Phenomenon of the Tragic] (“Zum Phänomen des Tragischen” by Max Scheler). O tragedii i tragiczności [On Tragedy and the Tragic], by Aristotle, David Hume and Max Scheler. Kraków: WL, 1976.
Krytyka władzy sqdzenia [Critique of Judgment], by Immanuel Kant. Warszawa: PWN, 1986.
Letters
“Letters Pro and Con” [Letter to Professor Fizer on “Schematism”]. JAAC 28, no. 4 (1970): 541–542.
“Roman Ingarden’s Two Letters to Janusz Kuczyński, the Editor of SFil.” SFil, nos. 4–5 (1970): 193–194. [Preceded by a note from the Editors, cf. “OD REDAKCJI,” item no. 828.]
“Der Brief an Husserl über die VI. Untersuchung und den Idealism[us].” Analecta Husserliana 2 (1972): 357–374.
“The Letter to Husserl about the VIth ‘[Logical] Investigation’ and ‘Idealism’.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 419–438.
Secondary Sources
AARNES, ASBJØRN. “Roman Ingarden en Norvège.” RMM 72, no. 3 (1967): 332–340.
AARNES, ASBJØRN. “Roman Ingarden en Norvège.” OL 22, nos. 1–4 (1967): 49–60.
AARNES, ASBJØRN. “Roman Ingarden i Norge” [Roman Ingarden in Norway]. Samtiden 76, no. 2 (1967): 96–107.
AARNES, ASBJØRN. “Roman Ingarden w Norwegii” [Roman Ingarden in Norway]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 493–501.
ACHAM, K. L. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, by Roman Ingarden. PhiL 19, no. 3 (1966): 147–155.
ALES BELLO, ANGELA. “Valore e Significato della Filosofia di Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka.” Sapienza 26, no. 1 (1973): 113–115.
ALES BELLO, ANGELA. “Fenomenologia e Creativita.” Sapienza 28, no. 2 (1975): 229–233.
ALES BELLO, ANGELA. “A proposito della polemica Ingarden-Husserl.” Rivista d’Europa 1 (1978).
AMERIKS, KARL. “Husserl’s Realism.” PhR 86, no. 4 (1977): 498–519.
ARANITOVIĆ, DOBRILO and CEKIĆ, Miodrag. “Bibliography of Phenomenology in Yugoslavia.” Analecta Husserliana 27 (1989) [Roman Ingarden]: 769–777.
ARANITOVIĆ, DOBRILO and CEKIĆ, MIODRAG. “Supplementary Bibliography of Phenomenology in Yugoslavia (1982–1988).” Analecta Husserliana 27 (1989) [Roman Ingarden]: 817–818.
BACZEWSKI, A. “Poznanie dzieła literackiego a elementy teorii R. Ingardena” [The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art and the Elements of R. Ingarden’s Theory]. Studia i Materialy WSP Zielona Góra, no. 7 (1981): 81–87.
BARCK, KARLHEINZ. “Zur Kritik des Rezeptionsproblems in bürgerlichen Literaturauffassungen.” Gesellschaft-Literatur-Lesen. Literaturrezeption in theoretischer Sicht, Manfred Naumann, ed. Berlin und Weimar: Aufbau-Verlag, 1975. 125–130.
BAR-ON, A. Z. “On the Autonomy of the Literary Work of Art: On A.-T. Tymieniecka’s Criticism of Ingarden’s Aesthetics” (in Hebrew). Iyyun 32, nos. 1–2 (1983): 87–91.
BARRAL, MARIE, R. “The Phenomenology of the Specifically Human Person.” The Human Person and Philosophy in the Contemporary World, J. M. Życiński, ed. Krakow: The Pontifical Faculty of Theology, 1980. 95–116.
BARTOSZYŃSKI, KAZIMIERZ. “Teoria miejsc niedookreślenia na tie Ingardenowskiego systemu filozoficznego” [The Theory of Undefinable Places in the Context of Ingarden’s Philosophical System]. Wypowiedź literacka a wypowiedź fllozoficzna [Literary Expression vs. Philosophical Expression], Michał Glowiriski and Janusz Sławiński, eds. Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1982. 183–197.
BARTOSZYŃSKI, KAZIMIERZ. “The Ontology of Objects in Ingarden’s Aesthetics.” Analecta Husserliana 27 (1989): 369–393.
BERG, TEMMA F. “Wrestling with the Deconstructive Angel.” Reader 12 (1984): 1–10.
BIEMEL, WALTER. “Reflexionen zu Ingardens Deutung des Bildes.” The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden: Reports on Philosophy (Polish), no. 10 (1986): 5–18.
BLAUSTEIN, L. O ujmowaniu przedmiotów estetycznych [On Apprehension of Aesthetic Objects]. Lwów: 1938.
BLEICH, DAVID. “Teleology and Taxonomy in Critical Explanation.” BuR 26, no. 1(1981): 102–127.
BOCHEŃSKI, JOSEPH M. Contemporary European Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956.
BOCHEŃSKI, JOSEPH M. Europäische Philosophie der Gegenwart. Bern: Francke, 1947; 2nd ed., München: 1951.
BOJTÁR, ENDRE T. “Slavonian Structuralism in the Literary Scholarship” (in Hungarian). Magyar Filozófiai Szemle (1975): 369–394.
BOJTÁR, ENDRE T. “Der ontologische Structuralismus in der Literaturwissenschaft (Roman Ingarden).” Neohelicon. Acta Comparationis Litterarum Universarum 6, no. 2 (1978): 47–82.
BOJTÁR, ENDRE T. Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe (LLSEE): Slavic Structuralism. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press, 1985. 80–121. [Translation of Hungarian co-published A szláv strukturalizmus az irodalom-tudo mányban. Budapest: Académia Kiadó, 1985.]
BOROWY, WACŁAW. “Szkola krytyków” [The School of Critics]. PWsp 16, no. 2 (1937): 35–41.
Borzym, Stanisław. “Ingardenowska krytyka bergsonizmu jako teorii poznania” [Ingarden’s Critique of Bergsonism as Theory of Cognition]. SFil, no. 11 (1981): 23–41.
BORZYM, STANISLAW. Bergson a przemiany światopoglqdowe w Polsce [Bergson and the Change of Philosophical Thinking in Poland]. Wroclaw-Warszawa: Ossolineum, 1984.
BRECHT, F. J. Summary review of “Bemerkungen zum Problem Idealismus-Realismus,” by Roman Ingarden [JPpF 11 (1929)]. Kantstudien 36, nos. 1–2 (1931): 168–170.
BREDELLA, LOTHAR. “Die Tätigkeit des Lesers beim sinnhaften Aufbau der fiktiven Welt literarischer Texte: Zur Kritik von Ingardens Begriff der ‘Unbestimmtheitsstelle’.” Anglistentag 1981: Vorträge, Jörg Hasler, ed. Frankfurt/Main: Lang, 1983. 170–189.
BRESLIN, C. F. Review of The Literary Work of Art, by Roman Ingarden. RevM 28, no. 3 (1975): 555–556.
BRINKER, MENACHEM. “Roman Ingarden and the ‘Appropriate Aesthetic Attitude’ to the Literary Work of Art.” PoT 5, no. 1 (1984): 129–148. [Includes a 1-page bibliography.]
BRINKER, MENACHEM. “Phenomenology and Literature: Roman Ingarden and the ‘Appropriate Aesthetic Attitude’ to the Literary Work of Art” (in Hebrew). Iyyun 33, nos. 1–2 (1984): 137–155.
BRUNIUS, TEDDY. “The Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden.” PPR 30, no. 4 (1970): 590–595. [Discussion of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks and Erlebnis, Kunstwerk und Wert.]
ČAPEK, MILIČ. Bergson and Modern Physics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7, Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1971. 168–172.
CAVAILLES, JEAN. “L’école de Vienne au Congrès de Prague.” RMM 42 (1935): 145–146.
ČeRVENKA, MIROSŁAW. Der Bedeutungsaufbau des literarischen Werks. Theorie und Geschichte der Literatur und der schönen Künste series, Vol. 36. München: Fink, 1978.
CHARLSON, PRICE. Review of Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst, by Roman Ingarden. PPR 32, no. 2 (1971): 269–271.
CHUDY, WOJCIECH. “Zagadnienie naocznosci aktów poznawczych” [How to Present the Acts of Cognition]. RoFil 29, no. 1 (1981): 165–232.
CHWISTEK, LEON. “Krótka rozprawa z panem Romanem Ingardenem, doktorem Uniwersytetu Fryburskiego” [A Brief Confrontation with Mr. Roman Ingarden, doctor of Freiburg University]. PFil 25, no. 4 (1922): 540–544.
CHWISTEK, LEON. “Tragedja werbalnej metafizyki” [The Tragedy of Verbal Metaphysics]. KFil 10, no. 1 (1932): 46–76. [Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
CICHOŃ, WŁADYSLAW. “W sprawie relatywności wartości” [On the Relativity of Values]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 429–443.
CLARK, WALTER H. Review of The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, by Roman Ingarden. JAAC 33, no. 2 (1974): 220–222.
COBB-STEVENS, VEDA. “Contextual Phenomenology and the Problem of Creativity.” Analecta Husserliana 1 (1978): 163–174.
COHEN, SIBYL. “Ingarden’s Benign Circle.” DaH 4, no. 4 (1977): 137–149.
COHEN, SIBYL. “Ingarden’s Aesthetics and Dance.” Illuminating Dance: Philosophical Explorations, Maxine Sheets-Johnstone, ed. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press. London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1984. 146–166.
COLLINS, J. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, by Roman Ingarden. MSch 45 (1967–68): 151–155.
COLOMB, GREGORY. “Roman Ingarden and the Language of Art and Science.” JAAC 35, no. 1 (1976): 7–13.
CROWLEY, RUTH. “Roman Ingarden and Literary Truth Value.” Erkennen und Deuten. Essays zur Literatur und Literatur Theorie, Martha Woodmansee and Walter F. W. Lohnes, eds. Berlin: E. Schmidt, 1983.42–53.
CSASTO, EDWARD. “Funkcje mowy scenicznej” [Functions of Stage Diction]. Estetyka 3 (1962): 177–202.
CYSARZ, HERBERT. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. DeLit 25, no. 34 (1931): (columns) 1595–1599.
CYWIŃSKI, STANISLAW. “Niezwykla ksiazka Ingardena: O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego” [Ingarden’s Extraordinary Book: The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art]. Słowo (Wilno) 16, no. 184 (1937): 3.
ČYZEWSKYJ, D. “Der VIII. Internationale Philosophische Kongress in Prag am 2.–7. September 1934.” SRun 6, no. 6 (1934): 422–425.
CZERNIAK, STANISŁAW. “Philosophical Perspectivism and the Rigours of Dialectics.” DaH 3, no. 1 (1976): 135–143.
CZEŻOWSKI, TADEUSZ. “Roman Ingarden (1893–1970).” RFil 29, no. 1 (1971): 1–6.
DAȩBROWSKI, STANISŁAW. “Ontologiczne ugruntowanie aksjologii literatury w ujeȩciu Romana Ingardena” [The Ontological Foundation of the Axiology of Literature by Roman Ingarden]. RFil 38, nos. 3–4 (1980): 248–250.
DAȩBROWSKI, STANISŁaw. “Od stylistyki do metafizyki (mieȩdzy referatami a Ingardenem)” [From Stylistic to Metaphysic]. Wypowiedź literacka a wypowiedź filozoficzna [Literary Expression vs. Philosophical Expression], Michał Głowiński and Janusz Sławiński, eds. Wroclaw: Ossolineum, 1982. 65–78.
DAȩBROWSKI, STANISŁAW. “Roman Ingarden et la perspective temporelle dans la concrétisation de l’œuvre littéraire” (in Polish). PL 77, no. 2 (1986): 161–178.
DȩBROWSKI, STANISŁAW. “Roman Ingarden (1893–1970).” RPh 160, no. 4 (1970): 503–506.
DȩMBSKA, IZYDORA “Poglaȩdy filozoficzne Romana Ingardena” [Philosophical Views of Roman Ingarden]. KiS 15, no. 1 (1971): 3–7.
DȩMBSKA, IZYDORA. “O pewnych punktach stycznych w filozofii jçzyka Ingardena i Fregego” [On Certain Tangential Points in Ingarden’s and Frege’s Philosophy of Language]. RFil 34, no. 3 (1976): 203–206.
DAMNJANOVIĆ, MILAN. “In memoriam. Roman Ingarden (1893–1970).” Filozofija 12, nos. 2–3 (1970): 211–213.
DAMNJANOVIĆ, MILAN. “Ingardenov nagoveštaj jedne teorije filma” [Ingarden’s Announcement of a Theory of Film]. Filmske sveske 5, no. 1 (1973): 1–6.
DAMNJANOVIĆ, MILAN. “Ideja fenomenološke estetike Romana Ingardena” [The Idea of the Phenomenological Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden]. Fenomenologija, Milan Damnjanović, ed. Beograd: Nolit, 1975. 186–187.
DAWES-HICKS, G. Review of Intuition und Intellekt bei Henri Bergson, by RomanIngarden. Hibbert Journal 21 (1922–23): 182–183.
DE VRIES, J. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, by Roman Ingarden. Theologie und Philosophie 44, no. 1 (1969): 138–139.
DEȩBOWSKI, JÓZEF. “Ingardenowska koncepcja eliminacji ‘petitio principii’ z teorii poznania” [Ingarden’s Concept of Eliminating the ‘Petitio Principii’ from the Theory of Cognition]. SFil, no. 12 (1980): 31–44.
DEȩBOWSKI, JÓZEF. “U źródeł fikcji przetrwania” [On the Sources of the Fiction of Enduring]. Akcent, no. 3 (1982): 128–135.
DEȩBOWSKI, JÓZEF. “Koncepcja człowieka” [The Concept of Man]. Człowiek i światopoglaȩd 9 (1982): 77–100.
DELGADO, ANA MARIA. “A Note on Misreading; or Filling the Author’s Gaps II.” Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, Anna Balakian et al., eds. New York: Garland, 1985. 19–23.
DES LOGES, MARIAN. “Nowe podstawy nauki o literaturze” [New Foundations of Literary Scholarship]. Lwów Literacki 1, no. 3 (1937): 3.
DISCUSSION. Analecta Husserliana 2 (1972): 64–77 and 218–241.
DISCUSSION. Analecta Husserliana 3 (1974): 147–158.
DJEMIDOK, BOHDAN. “Teorija vrednosti umetničkog dela Romana Ingardena u svetlosti marksističke estetike” [The Theory of Value of the Work of Art of Roman Ingarden in the Light of Marxist Aesthetics]. KnjiK 7, no. 3 (1976): 27–36.
DJORDJIĆ, STOJAN. “Roman Ingarden: Doživljaj, umetničko delo i vrednost” [Roman Ingarden: Erlebnis, Kunstwerk und Wert]. Knjlst 8, no. 32 (1976): 687–692.
DOBROWOLSKI, T. “Uwagi o rozprawie na temat budowy obrazu” [Comments on (Ingarden’s) Article, ‘On the Structure of Painting’]. Tw 2, no. 12 (1946): 79–100. [Review of “O budowie obrazu.”]
DOLGOW, K. M. “Fenomenologia literatury Romana Ingardena” [Roman Ingarden’s Phenomenology of Literature]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972):
DOŁGOV, K. M. “Roman Ingarden’s Phenomenology of Literature.” DaH 2, no. 2 (1975): 95–108.
DOLINAR, Darko. “Roman Ingarden: Eseji iz estetike” [Roman Ingarden: Essays on Aesthetics]. Primerjalna književnost, no. 2 (1981): 42–44.
DREWNOWSKI, T. and JANION, M. “Zagadnienie fikcji literackiej ze stanowiska socjologicznej teorii literatury” [The Question of Literary Fiction from the Point of View of the Sociological Theory of Literature]. Tw 4, no. 2 (1948): 70–92.
DUFRENNE, Mikel. Phenomenologie de l’expérience esthétique. Paris: 1953.
DUFRENNE, Mikel. “Filozofia człowieka i filozofia natury” [The Philosophy of Man and the Philosophy of Nature]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 483–92.
DUFRENNE, Mikel. The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Romana Ingardena teoria wartości dziela sztuki w świetle estetyki marksistowskiej” [Roman Ingarden’s Theory of Value of the Work of Art in the Light of Marxist Aesthetics]. SFil, no. 3 (1975): 49–68.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Roman Ingarden’s Theory of Value of the Work of Art in the Light of Marxist Aesthetics.” DaH 2, no. 2 (1975): 123–132.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Pluralizm estetyczny” [Aesthetic Pluralism]. StEs 12, (1975): 247–263.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Roman Ingarden’s Views on the Aesthetic Attitude.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 9–32.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Kontrowersje wokół wartości estetycznych: Próba typologizacji stanowisk” [The Controversy Surrounding Aesthetic Values: An Attempt at a Typology of Positions]. Studia z dziejów estetyki polskiej 1918–1939 [Studies in the History of Polish Aesthetics 1918–1939]. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 7–47.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “La teoria di Roman Ingarden sul valore dell’opera l’arte alla luce dell’estetica marxista.” Bolletino di Storia della Filosofia dell’Universita degli Studi di Lecce 4 (1976): 59–70.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Spór o natureȩ, przeżya emocjonalnych doznawanych podczas obcowania z dzielem sztuki” [Controversy Over the Nature of Emotional Experiences from Contact with the Work of Art]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 1, sectio 1 (1976): 263–284.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Aestheticism and Formalism in the Theory of the Value of the Work of Art — Ingarden versus Marxism.” VIIIth International Congress of Aesthetics. Darmstadt: 1976. 5–11.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Ingarden i marksizm wobec estetyzmu i formalizmu w teorii wartości dziela sztuki” [Ingarden and Marxism Facing Aestheticism and Formalism in the Theory of the Value of the Work of Art]. StEs 14 (1977): 56–59.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. Teoria przezyc i wartości estetycznych w polskiej estetyce dwudziestolecia miedzywojennego [The Theory of Aesthetic Experiences and Values in Polish Aesthetics between the Wars]. Warszawa: PWN, 1980.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Aesthetic Experience and Evaluation.” Essays on Aesthetics: Perspectives on the Work of Monroe C. Beardsley, John Fisher, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983. 53–68.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Estetski doživljaj i vrednovanje” [Aesthetic Experience and Evaluation]. KnjiK 15, nos. 5 and 6 (1984): 45–57.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan and McCORMICK, Peter J., eds. On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. “Ingarden’s Theory of Values and the Evaluation of the Work of Art.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 71–100.
EDIE, James M. (ed.) An Invitation to Phenomenology: Studies in the Philosophy of Experience. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1965.
ELBRACHT-HÜLSEWEH, Lucie. Jacob Bidermanns “Belisarius”. Ein Beitrag zur phänomenologischen Behandlung eines literarischen Kunstwerkes. Berlin: Junker und Dünnhaupt, 1935.
ESHELMAN, Martin. “Aesthetic Experience, the Aesthetic Object and Criticism.” Monist 50 (1966): 281–298.
EWING, A. C. Review of “Essentiale Fragen,” by Roman Ingarden. Mind 35, no. 138 (1926): 250.
EYKMAN, Christoph. Phänomenologie der Interpretation. Bern and München: Francke, 1977.
EYKMAN, Christoph. “Eidetic Conception and the Analysis of Meaning in Literature.” Analecta Husserliana 12 (1982): 443–53.
FALK, Eugene H. “Ingarden’s Concept of the Aesthetic Object.” CLS 18, no. 3 (1981): 230–237.
FALK, Eugene H. The Poetics of Roman Ingarden. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1981.
FALK, Eugene H. “Ingarden’s Conception of Aesthetic Values in Literature.” YCC, Vol. 10: Literary Criticism and Philosophy (1983): 78–85.
FARBER, Marvin. “Tezy o istnieniu świata jako problem filozoficzny” [Theses on the Existence of the World as a Philosophical Problem]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 229–235.
FARBER, Marvin. “On Subjectivism and the World Problem. In Memory of Roman Ingarden.” PPR 34, no. 1 (1973): 134–141.
FARBER, Marvin. “On Subjectivism and the World Problem. In Memory of Roman Ingarden.” Revolutionary World, no. 7 (1974): 1–7.
FATAUD, Jean-Marie. “Roman Ingarden, Critique de Bergson.” For Roman Ingarden. Nine Essays in Phenomenology, A.-T. Tymieniecka, ed. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959. 7–28.
FELS, H. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. PJGG 45, no. 2 (1932): 250–251.
FIEDLER, Theodore. “Taking Ingarden Seriously: Critical Reflections on The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. Part I.” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 131–140.
FIEGUTH, Rolf. “Rezeption kontra falsches und richtiges Lesen, oder: Mißverständnisse mit Ingarden.” StZ 38 (1971): 142–159.
FIEGUTH, Rolf, (ed.) Werksinterne und werksexterne literarische Kommunikation. Konstanz: Scriptor, 1975.
FIEGUTH, Rolf. “Notiz des Herausgebers.” Gegenstand und Aufgaben der Literaturwissenschaft. Aufsätze und Diskussionsbeiträge (1937–1964), edited, selected and introduced by Rolf Fieguth. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1976. vii–viii.
FIEGUTH, Rolf. “Einleitung.” Gegenstand und Aufgaben der Literaturwissenschaft. Aufsätze und Diskussionsbeiträge (1937–1964), edited, selected and introduced by Rolf Fieguth. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1976. x–xliii.
FIEGUTH, Rolf. “Literarischer Wandel — Struktur des Einzelwerkes.” Merleau-Ponty und das Problem der Struktur in den Sozialwissenschaften, Richard Grathoff and Walter Sprondel, eds. Stuttgart: Enke, 1976. 81–94.
FIEGUTH, Rolf. “Pierwiastek historyczny w literaturoznawczych koncepcjach Romana Ingardena” [The Historical Element in Roman Ingarden’s Conceptions of Literary Science]. Teksty, no. 1 (1978): 37–62.
FIEGUTH, Rolf. “Zur poetischen Bedeutung des Bedeutungslosen. Norwids Gedicht ‘Zwei Knöpfen (hinten)’.” RusL 13, no. 3 (1983): 291–312.
FILEK, Jacek. “Od ‘wartości czegoś” do ‘wartości samej”’ [From “Value of Something” to “Value in Itself”]. SFil, no. 6 (1984): 187–204.
FIZER, John. “Schematism: Aesthetic Device or Psychological Necessity?.” JAAC 27, no. 3 (1969): 417–423.
FIZER, John. “Letters Pro and Con” [A Response to Professor Ingarden; cf. Ingarden “Letters” section above, item no. 365] JAAC 28, no. 4 (1970): 542.
FIZER, John. “The Concept of Strata and Phases in Roman Ingarden’s Theory of Literary Structure.” YCC 6 (1973): 10–39.
FIZER, John. “Conceptual Affinities and Differences Between A. A. Potebnaja’s Theory of ‘Internal Form’ and Roman Ingarden’s ‘Stratum of Aspects’.” American Contributions to the VIIIth International Congress of Slavists, Vol. 1. Warszawa: 1973. 101–115.
FIZER, John. “Fazy Ingardena, ‘durée réelle’ Bergsona, strumień Williama Jamesa. Metaforyczne warianty rozumienia czasu czy wykluczajaȩce sieȩ pojeȩcia czasu?” [Ingarden’s Phases, Bergson’s ‘Durée Réelle’, and William James’ Stream: Metaphoric Variants or Mutually Exclusive Concepts on the Theme of Time?]. SFil, nos. 10–11 (1975): 27–43.
FIZER, John. “Ingarden’s Phases, Bergson’s Durée Réelle, and William James’ Stream: Metaphoric Variants or Mutually Exclusive Concepts on the Theme of Time.” DaH 2, no. 3 (1975): 33–48.
FIZER, John. “Ingarden’s Phases, Bergson’s Durée Réelle, and William James’ Stream: Metaphoric Variants or Mutually Exclusive Concepts on the Theme of Time.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 121–139.
FIZER, John. “‘εποχη’, Artistic Analysis, Aesthetic Concretization: Reflections upon Roman Ingarden’s Reflections.” Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe (LLSEE), Vol. 1: Language, Literature and Meaning, John Odmark, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press, 1979. 351–371.
FIZER, John. “Indeterminancies as Structural Components in Semiotically Meaningful Wholes.” Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, II: Twentieth Century Literatures Originating in Different Cultures & Comparative Literature and Theory of Literature, Bela Kopeczi and Gyorgy M. Vajda, eds. Stuttgart: Bieber, 1980. 767–773.
FIZER, John. Psychologism and Psychoaesthetics: A Critical View of Their Relations. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press, 1981, 202–215.
FIZER, John and Kuczyński, Janusz; an interview. “Philosophy and Slavic Literatures.” DaH 9, no. 2 (1982): 79–90.
FIZER, John. “Ingarden’s and Mukarovsky’s Binominal Definition of the Literary Work of Art. A Comparative View of Their Respective Ontologies.” RusL 13, no. 3 (1983): 269–290.
FIZER, John. “Deconstruction of the Subject in Light of Ingarden’s Epis-temology.” The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden: Jagiellonian University Reports on Philosophy (Polish) 10 (1986): 19–26.
FIZER, John. “Ingarden’s and Mukarovsky’s Binominal Definition of the Literary Work of Art: A Comparative View of Their Ontologies.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 159–186.
FOHT, Ivan. “Učenje o heteronomiji muzičkog djela — Roman Ingarden” [Doctrine on the Heteronomy of the Musical Work — Roman Ingarden]. Savremena Estetika Muzike. Beograd: Nolit, 1980. 141–155.
FORREST, William C. “The Poem as a Summons to Performance.” BJA 9 (Jul 1969): 298–305.
FRANCKOWIAK, Franciszek. “Budowa dziela sztuki u Nicolaia Hartmanna i Romana Ingardena” [The Structure of the Work of Art in Nicolai Hartmann and Roman Ingarden]. SFil, no. 5 (1976): 85–96.
FRANK, W. A. Review of The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art and The Literary Work of Art, by Roman Ingarden. RevM 28, no. 3 (1975): 554–557.
FRYDE, Ludwik. “Lekcja marzenia” [A Dream Lesson] TIl, no. 17 (1937): 330. [Review of O poznawaniu dziela literackiego.]
GABRIEL, Gottfried. Fiktion und Wahrheit: Eine semantische Theorie der Literatur. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1975.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. “Die phänomenologische Bewegung.” PRun 11, nos. 1–2(1963): 1–45.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. “Die phänomenologische Bewegung.” Kleine Schriften III: Idee und Sprache. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1972. 150–189.
GALAROWICZ, Jan. “U podstaw sporu Ingardena z Husserlem. Czeȩść I: Spór o metodeȩ” [The Grounds of the Controversy between Husserl and Ingarden. Part 1: Controversy over Method]. SFil, nos. 3–4 (1982): 79–86.
GALAROWICZ, Jan. “U podstaw sporu Ingardena z Husserlem. Czeȩść II: Spór o świadomość” [The Grounds of the Controversy between Husserl and Ingarden. Part 2: Controversy over Consciousness]. SFil, nos. 5–6 (1982): 83–95.
GALEWICZ, Wlodzimierz. “Saȩdy ontologiczne a istnienie” [Ontological Judgments and Existence]. SFil, no. 2 (1981), 45–57.
GALEWICZ, Włodzimierz. “Prawdziwość a inne wartości poznawcze. Uwagi w zwiaȩzku z Ingardenowskaȩ. definicjaȩ prawdy” [Truth and Other Cognitive Values. Remarks on Ingarden’s Definition of Truth]. SFil, nos. 1–2 (1983): 135–144.
GIERGIELEWICZ, M. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. PL 29, (1932): 260–272.
GIERULANKA, Danuta and PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “O istnieniu i strukturze dzieła literackiego” [On the Existence and Structure of the Literary Work of Art]. SFil, no. 5 (1958): 142–157.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. Review of Studia z estetyki, Vols. 1 and 2, by Roman Ingarden. RPh 151 (1961): 367–370.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Siedemdziesiçciolecie Profesora Romana Ingardena” [The 70th Birthday of Professor Roman Ingarden]. SFil, nos. 3–4 (1963): 323.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Roman Ingarden.” NaP 10, no. 1 (1963): 93–97.
GIERULANKA, Danuta and Półtawski, Andrzej. “Kierunki badań filozoficznych Romana Ingardena” [Directions of Roman Ingarden’s Philosophical Investigations]. Szkice filozoficzne Romanowi Ingardenowi w darze [Philosophical Sketches presented to Roman Ingarden]. Warszawa-Kraków: 1964.473–482.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Teoria poznania bez kompromisów” [The Theory of Cognition without Compromises]. ZiM 18, no. 1 (1968): 47–64.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Roman Ingarden — 5. II 1893—14. VI 1970.” Kroniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. (1968/69–1969/70). 223–226.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Roman Ingarden (1893–1970).” NaP 21 (1971): 114–116.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Filozofia Romana Ingardena” [Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 71–90.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Zarys struktury wewnçtrznej filozoficznego dzieła Romana Ingardena” [Outline of the Internal Structure of Roman Ingarden’s Philosophical Work]. RFil 30, no. 1 (1972), 4–10.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Od wydawcy” [From the Editor]. Z teorii jeȩzyka i filozoficznych podstaw logiki [The Theory of Language and the Philosophical Foundations of Logic], Danuta Gierulanka, ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1972. 5–11.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Slowo wsteȩpne” [Foreword]. Ksiaȩżeczkaȩ o człowieku [A Little Book on Man]. Kraków: WL, 1972; 2nd ed., 1973. 7–9.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Przedmowa tiumacza” [Translator’s Foreword]. O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego [The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art]. Warszawa: PWN, 1976. 5–10.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “The Philosophic Work of Roman Ingarden — (A Systematic Outline).” DaH 4, no. 4 (1977): 117–128 (plus 2 flow-charts).
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “The Philosophic Work of Roman Ingarden.” Felsete Arkivi Sayi 21 den Ayri Basim. Istanbul: 1978. 3–21.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Jak dopełniało sieȩ dzieło Romana Ingardena” [How Ingarden’s Work Has Taken Shape]. SFil, no. 12 (1980): 3–11.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Przedmowa tłumacza” [Translator’s Foreword]. Spór o istnienie świata. Tom III. O strukturze przyczynowej realnego świata [Controversy Over the Existence of the World. Vol. 3. On the Causal Structure of the Real World]. Warszawa: PWN, 1981. 5–12.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Foreword.” Man and Value. München: Philosophia Verlag, 1983. 9–15.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Ingarden’s Philosophical Work: A Systematic Outline.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 1–20.
GIERULANKA, Danuta. “Select Bibliography of the Philosophical Works of Roman Ingarden.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 297–301.
GŁOWINSKI, Michał. “On Concretization.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 33–6.
GŁOWINSKI, Michał. Style odbioru [Styles of Reception]. Kraków: 1977.
GŁOWINSKI, Michał. “O konkretyzacji” [On Concretization]. Style odbioru [Styles of Reception]. Kraków: 1977. 93–115.
GŁOWINSKI, Michał. “On Concretization.” Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe (LLSEE), Vol. 1: Language, Literature and Meaning, John Odmark, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press, 1979. 325–349.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “O estetyce Ingardena” [On Ingarden’s Aesthetics]. ŻLit, no. 1 (1957). [Review of Studia z estetyki, Vols. 1 and 2.]
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Roman Ingarden (1893–1970).” StEs 8 (1971): 3–8.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Romana Ingardena filozofia moralnosci” [Roman Ingarden’s Moral Philosophy]. Estetyka 9 (1971): 113–144.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Ingardenowska filozofia sztuki” [Ingarden’s Philosophy of Art]. Nowe Ksiaȩzki, no. 18 (1971): 1223–1226. [Review of Studia z estetyki, Vol. 3.]
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Ingardenowski świat wartości” [Ingarden’s World of Values]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 397–420.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Pologne.” RE 25, nos. 1–2 (1972): 199–205.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. Zarys estetyki. Problematyka, metody, teorie [Aesthetics. Problematics, Methods and Theories]. Kraków: WL, 1973. 326–331.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Romana Ingardena filozofia wartości este tycznych” [Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy of Aesthetic Values]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, no. 310: Zeszyty Filozoficzne, no. 3 (1973): 33–49.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “O Ingardenowskiej epistemologii” [On Ingarden’s Epistemology]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, no. 358: Zeszyty Filozoficzne, no. 4 (1974): 63–79.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Ingarden’s World of Values.” DaH 2, no. 2 (1975): 133–146.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Ingardenowska koncepcja osoby” [Ingarden’s Concept of Person]. SFil, no. 7 (1975): 125–141.
GoŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Aesthetic Values in Ingarden’s System of Philosophy.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr
GOŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Roman Ingarden’s Moral Philosophy.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 73–103.
GOŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Ingarden’s Concept of Aesthetic Values in the Light of His Theory of Partly Isolated Systems.” Phenomenology Information Bulletin 8 (1984): 25–42.
GOŁASZEWSKA, Maria. Zarys estetyki. Problematyka. Metody. Teorie [Aesthetics. Problematics, Methods and Theories]. Warszawa: PWN, 1984. 326–331.
GOŁASZEWSKA, Maria. “Platonic Ideas in Ingarden’s Phenomenological Aesthetics.” Diotima (Greece) 12 (1984): 113–119.
GÓRNIAK-KOCIKOWSKA, Krystyna. “Controversy about Actual Existence: Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka’s Contribution to the Study of Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy.” Analecta Husserliana 27 (1989): 165–192.
GRABOWICZ, George G. “Translator’s Introduction.” The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic and Theory of Literature. With an Appendix on the Functions of Language in the Theatre. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973. lv–lxx.
GRABOWICZ, George G. “Value and Valuation in the Phenomenological Theory of Roman Ingarden.” SAG, Vol. 94: Davis Symposium on Literary Evaluation, Karl Menges and Daniel Rancouré Laferriere, eds. Stuttgart: Akademischer Verlag Hans-Dieter Heinz, 1981. 22–34.
GRABOWSKI, Tadeusz. “Próba syntezy nowej nauki o literaturze” [An Attempt to Synthesize New Studies of Literature]. PPow 198, no. 592 (1933): 50–67 (Part 1).
no. 593 (1933): 198–221 (Part 2).
GRABOWSKI, Tadeusz. Krytyka literacka w Polsce w epoce realizmu i modernizmu 1863–1933 [Polish Literary Criticism in the Period of Realism and Modernism, 1863–1933]. Poznań: 1934.
GRAFF, Piotr and KRZEMIEŃ-OJAK, Sław, eds. Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics. Warszawa: PWN, 1975.
GRAFF, Piotr. “The Ontological Basis of Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetics. A Tentative Reconstruction.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzenień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 69–96.
GRAFF, Piotr. “O poznawaniu cudzych stanów psychicznych” [On the Cognition of the Mental States of Others]. Studia z dziejów estetyki polskiej, 1918–1939, Sław Krzemień-Ojak and W. Kalinowski, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 105–121.
GRAFF, Piotr. “Pojeȩcie przedmiotu estetycznego w najnowszej polskiej refleksji nad sztukaȩ” [The Concept of Aesthetic Object in Recent Polish Thought on Art]. StEs 19 (1982): 251–274.
GREGOIRE, François. “Notes sur la philosophie de Roman Ingarden.” RPh 150 (1960): 505–512.
GRELLING, K. “Bericht über den VIII. Internationalen Kongress für Philosophie in Prag.” Erkenntnis (The Journal of Unified Science) 4, no. 2 (1934): 437–438.
GRLIĆ, Danko. “Roman Ingarden.” Leksikon Filozofa. Zagreb: Naprijed, 1968. 255.
GRLIĆ, Danko. “Estetski Osnovi Aristotelovskog i Savremenog Teatra: Ingardenovo interpretiranje katarze” [Aesthetic Foundations of Aristotle’s Theater and Contemporary Theater: Ingarden’s Interpretation of Catharsis]. Filosofija: Jugoslovenski Časopis za Filosoflju 15, no. 4 (1971): 43–44.
GRLIĆ, Danko. “Roman Ingarden.” Filozoflja (lexicon). Beograd: Interpres, 1973.
GRODZIŃSKI, Eugeniusz. “Roman Ingarden o współczesnej logice formalnej” [Roman Ingarden’s Remarks on Present-Day Formal Logic]. SFil, no. 1 (1985): 107–121.
GRÜNEWALD, Bernward. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vol. 3, by Roman Ingarden. AGP 59 (1977): 339–345.
GRUSZEWSKA, Ludmiła. “Polish Studies in Literary Space.” Essays in Poetics: The Journal of the British Neo-Formalist School 9, no. 2 (1984): 24–32.
GUMPEL, Liselotte. “‘The Essence of Reality’ as a Construct of Language.” Foundations of Language 11, no. 2 (1974): 167–185.
GUMPEL, Liselotte. Metaphor Reexamined. A Non-Aristotelian Perspective. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1984.
GÜNTHER, Hartmut. Struktur als Prozess. Studien zur Ästhetik und Literaturtheorie. München: Fink, 1973.
GUTH, A. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. Etudes Germaniques 18, no. 4 (1963): 506–507.
GUY, A. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt and Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst, by Roman Ingarden. EP 22, no. 4 (1967): 473–475.
GUY, A. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt and Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst, by Roman Ingarden. Bulletin de l’Université de Toulouse 22 (1967): 285–287.
HAFNER, Stanislaus et al. (eds.) Slavische Geisteswelt, West- und Südslaven, Vol. 3: Mensch und Welt. Baden-Baden: Holle, 1959. 145–154.
HALDER, A. Review of Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst, by Roman Ingarden. PJGG 70 (1962): 414–416.
HAMBURGER, Käthe. Die Logik der Dichtung. Stuttgart: Klett, 1957.
HAMM, Victor. “The Ontology of the Literary Work of Art: Roman Ingarden’s Das literarische Kunstwerk.” The Critical Matrix. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1961. 171–209.
HAMRICK, William S. “Ingarden on ‘Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object’.” JBSP 5, no. 1 (1974): 71–80.
HAMRICK, William S. “Ingarden and Artistic Creativity.” DaH 2, no. 4 (1975): 39–49.
HAMRICK, William S. “Ingarden i twórczość artystyczna” [Ingarden and Artistic Creativity]. StEs 13 (1976): 17–31.
HANIN, D. M. “La conception esthétique de Roman Ingarden et son analyse dans l’esthétique contemporaine” (in Russian). VoFi, no. 7 (1984): 111–119.
HANNEBORG, Knut. “New Concepts in Ontology: Roman Ingarden’s Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt.” Inquiry 9 (1966): 401–409.
HART, Samuel L. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, by Roman Ingarden. PPR 27, no. 1 (1966): 144–145.
HECKER, K. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. Blätter für deutsche Philosophie 7, nos. 1–2 (1933): 157–158.
HELLER, Michał. “Przyczynek do sporu o istnienie świata” [A Contribution to the Controversy Over the Existence of the World]. Znak, no. 1 (1978): 145–147.
HELMAN, Alicja. “The Influence of Ingarden’s Aesthetics on the Theory of Film.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 97–108.
HEMPOLIŃSKI, Michał. “On Ingarden’s Conception of ‘Pure’ Epistemology as a Starting Point to His Criticism of So-Called Psychophysiological Epistemology.” DaH 2, no. 3 (1975): 49–54.
HEMPOLIŃSKI, Michał. “Epistemologie und Metaphysik bei Husserl und Ingarden.” DZP 24, no. 12 (1976): 1546–1555.
HEMPOLIŃSKI, Michał. “Ingarden’s Concept of ‘Pure’ Theory of Cognition” (in Russian). VoFi, no. 8 (1976): 135–138.
HEMPOLIŃSKI, Michał. “O fenomenologicznej i tzw. psychofizjologicznej koncepcji teorii poznania” [On Phenomenological and So-Called Psychophysiological Conceptions of the Theory of Cognition]. SFil, no. 6 (1976): 3–33.
HERNADI, Paul. (ed.) What Is Literature? Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978. 115–126.
HOLL, O. “Zum letzten deutschsprachigen Werk Roman Ingardens.” Literatur und Kunst 71, no. 2 (1979): 45–50.
HOLLINGSWORTH, Alan. “Beyond Survival.” Profession 77. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1977. 7–11.
HOLMES, R. H. “Is Transcendental Phenomenology Committed to Idealism?” Monist 59, no. 1 (1975): 98–114.
HOLUB, Robert C. “Teorija recepcije” [Reception Theory]. Treći program Radio-Sarajeva, no. 59 (1988): 399–436.
HOMNAN, Ursula. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vol. 3, by Roman Ingarden. PhiL 29 (1976): 96–100.
HUDZIK, Jan P. “The Reception in Polish Literature of Roman Ingarden’s Theory of Painting.” Analecta Husserliana 27 (1989): 417–436.
HUSSERL, Edmund. “Drei unveröffentlichte Briefe von Husserl an Ingarden.” ZpF 13, no. 2 (1959): 349–351.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Edmund Husserl: Briefe an Roman Ingarden. Mit Erläuterungen und Erinnerungen an Husserl, Roman Ingarden, ed. Phaenomenologica, Vol. 25. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1968.
IRZYKOWSKI, K. “Monachomachia humanistyczna” [Humanistic Monachomachia]. Pion 3 (1935): 26–27.
ISEMINGER, Gary. “Roman Ingarden and the Aesthetic Object.” PPR 33, no. 3 (1973): 417–420.
ISER, Wolfgang. Der Akt des Lesens. Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. München: Fink, 1976.
JADACKI, Jacek J. “Odpowiedzialność i istnienie świata” [Responsibility and the Existence of the World]. SFil, no. 5 (1973): 245–257.
JADACKI, Jacek J. “O poglaȩdach Romana Ingardena na jeȩzyk. (oraz) Wykaz prac Romana Ingardena dotyczaȩcych zagadnien jeȩzyka” [Roman Ingarden’s Views on Language. (And) Index of Roman Ingarden’s Works on Language]. Studia Semiotica 5 (1974): 17–54.
JADACKI, Jacek J. “O poglaȩdach Romana Ingardena na dzieło muzyczne” [On Roman Ingarden’s Views of the Musical Work of Art]. Zeszyty Naukowe Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Muzycznej w Gdańsku, no. 14 (1975): 5–30.
JADACKI, Jacek J. “Wiedza i istnienie. O poglaȩdach Romana Ingardena — w dziesiaȩtaȩ roczniceȩ śmierci” [Cognition and Existence. On the Views of Roman Ingarden — on the Occasion of the Tenth Anniversary of his Death]. SFil, no. 6 (1980): 73–98.
JADACKI, Jacek J. “Spór mieȩdzy Romanem Ingardenem a Edmundem Husserlem” [The Controversy between Roman Ingarden and Edmund Husserl]. AHFMS 27 (1981): 191–225.
JADACKI, Jacek J. “On Roman Ingarden’s Semiotic Views: A Contribution to the History of Polish Semiotics.” Analecta Husserliana 27 (1989): 523–540.
JAGANNATHAN, R. et al. “Roman Ingarden Bibliography.” Roman Ingarden: Selected Papers in Aesthetics, Peter J. McCormick, ed. München: Philosophia; and Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1985. 181–261.
JECHOVA, Hana. “La Representation par l’absence: Statut narratif des personnages chez Dostoevskij.” RLC 219–220 (3–4) (1981): 465–479.
KAELIN, Eugene Francis. Art and Existence: A Phenomenological Aesthetics. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1970.
KAELIN, Eugene Francis. “Language as a Medium for Art.” JAAC 40, no. 2 (1981): 121–130.
KAELIN, Eugene Francis. “Exposition: Man-the-Creator and the ‘Prototype of Action.’ A Contemporary Formulatiom of The Great Chain of Being.” Analecta Husserliana 11 (1981): 11–37.
KAELIN, Eugene Francis. “What Makes Philosophical Literature Philosophical?” Analecta Husserliana 19 (1985): 451–467.
KAELIN, Eugene Francis. “Etre-dans-un-monde-littéraire.” Analecta Husserliana 23 (1988): 407–433.
KAKABADZE, Zurab M. “Przyczynek do krytyki fenomenologii Husserla” [Towards the Criticism of Husserl’s Phenomenology]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 113–126.
KALINOWSKI, Georges. Review of Z badań nad filozofiaȩ współczesnaȩ, by Roman Ingarden. RPL 65, no. 87 (1967): 389–390.
KALINOWSKI, Georges. “Ontologie et ésthétique chez Roman Ingarden.” AdP 31, no. 2 (1968): 281–287. [Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk and Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst.]
KALINOWSKI, Georges. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vols. 1 and 2, and Time and Modes of Being, by Roman Ingarden. AdP 31, no. 2 (1968): 329–334.
KALINOWSKI, Georges. Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, by Roman Ingarden. EP 3 (1969): 406–407.
KALINOWSKI, Georges. Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, by Roman Ingarden. AdP 33, no. 1 (1970): 162–164.
KALINOWSKI, Georges. “Les thèses principales de l’esthétique Ingardenienne.” AdP 33, no. 4 (1970): 945–950. [Review of Erlebnis, Kunstwerk und Wert.]
KALINOWSKI, Georges. “Métaphysique: science ou mythe? A propos des récents livres d’Ingarden et de Kołakowski.” AdP 38, no. 2 (1975): 239–252.
KALINOWSKI, Georges. “La pensée philosophique de Karol Wojtyla et la Faculté de Philosophie de l’Université Catholique de Lublin.” Aletheia: An International Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 4: Epistemology and Logic. Bern: Lang, 1988. 198–216.
KANATA, S. “Ingarden in Japan.” Phenomenology Information Bulletin 6 (Oct. 1982): 1–5.
KASPRZYK, Leszek. (Introductory remarks to the conference on) “Marksistowska krytyka fenomenologii a filozofia Romana Ingardena” [Marxist Criticism of Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden]. SFil, no. 9 (1975): 13–14.
KAST, Emil. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. Kantstudien 39, no. 2 (1934): 224–225.
KAYSER, Wolfgang. Das sprachliche Kunstwerk. Bern: Francke, 1948 and 1976.
KELLY, Eugene. “Philosophy, Aesthetic Experience, and the Liberal Arts.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 17, no. 3 (1983): 5–17.
KERSTEN, Fred. “On Understanding Idea and Essence in Husserl and Ingarden.” Analecta Husserliana 2 (1972): 55–63.
KHATCHADOURIAN, Haig. Review of The Literary Work of Art, by Roman Ingarden. JAAC 33, no. 2 (1974): 217–220.
KIVY, Peter. Review of The Work of Music and the Problem of Its Identity, by Roman Ingarden. JAAC 45, no. 4 (1987): 413–415.
KLIMSKI, T. “Sesja ku czci Ingardena” [A Session in Honour of Ingarden (in ATK, Warsaw 1972)]. SPC 8, no. 2 (1972): 277–282.
KMITA, Jerzy. “Od wu [sic] metodach doboru terminów teoretycznoliterackich” [On Two Methods of Choosing Theoretical Terms for a Theory of Literature]. StEs 2 (1965): 143–160.
KMITA, Jerzy. Problematyka terminów teoretycznych w odniesieniu do pojec literaturoznawczych [The Theoretical Terminology in Literary Research]. PTPN Prace Komisji Filozoficznej, Vol. 11, no. 21. Poznań: PTPN, 1967.
KMITA, Jerzy. “Work of Art: Its Concretization, Artistic Value, Aesthetic Value.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 109–128.
KOGUT, R. “Koncepcja czasu w filozofii Romana Ingardena” [The Concept of Time in Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ślaȩskiego. Prace Nauk Społecznych, no. 4 (1978): 25–38.
KOJEVNIKOFF, A. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. RePh 2 (1932–33): 480–486.
KOŁACZKOWSKI, Stefan. “Bilans ‘estetyzmu’” [The Balance of ‘Aestheticism’]. Marchołt 3, no. 2 (1937): 149–185.
KOLNAI, A. Review of Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst, by Roman Ingarden. BJA 4, no. 2 (1964): 164–166.
KÖNIG, R. “Das Kunstwerk als Quelle kunsttheoretischer Einsichten.” ZAaK 30, no. 1 (1936): 1–27.
KONRAD, G. Review of Erlebnis, Kunstwerk und Wert, by Roman Ingarden. Literarische Monatsschrift, no. 10 (1970).
KONSTANTINOVIĆ, Zoran. “Ingardenova teorija o slojevima” [Ingarden’s Theory on Layers]. Fenomenološki Pristup Književnom Delu [Phenomenological Approach to the Literary Work]. Beograd: Prosveta, 1969. 154–166.
KONSTANTINOVIĆ, Zoran. “Devet metodoloških beleški. Teoretičari nemačke nauke o književnosti” [Nine Methodological Notes. Theoreticians of German Literary Scholarship]. Treći program Radio Beograda, no. 6 (1970): 403–470.
KONSTANTINOVIĆ, Zoran. “Fenomenologija i kritika” [Phenomenology and Criticism]. Savremenik 17, no. 10 (1971): 275–279. [Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks.)
KONSTANTINOVIĆ, Zoran. “Predgovor knjizi Romana Ingardena: O Saznavanju Književnog Umetničkog Dela” [Foreword to Ingarden’s Book: Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks]. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga, 1971. vii–xiii.
KONSTANTINOVĆ, Zoran. Phänomenologie und Literaturwissenschaft. Skizzen zu einer wissenschaftstheoretischen Begründung. München: 1973. [List Taschenbuch der Wissenschaft. Literaturwissenschaft Band 1448.]
KONSTANTINOVIĆ, Zoran. “Od Ingardena dalje…” [Ingarden and Beyond]. Delo 20, no. 11 (1974): 1355–1376.
KONSTANTINOVIĆ, Zoran. “Über Ingarden hinaus… Forschungsgeschichtliche Hinweise zur Entwicklung des phänomenologischen Ansatzes in der Literaturwissenschaft.” LiLi 5, no. 17 (1975): 25–34.
KONSTANTINOVIĆ, Zoran. “Huserlovim tragovima” [Following Husserl]. Fenomenologija i višeznačnost književnog dela. Ingardenova teorija opalizacije [Phenomenology and the Meaning of the Literary Work. Ingarden’s Theory of Concretization], by Dragan Stojanović. Politika (newspaper) 74 (Dec. 1) (1977): 23044.
KONTE, Božidar. “Dve interpretacije Aristotelove poetike (Ingarden, Grassi)” [Two Interpretations of Aristotle’s Poetics (Ingarden, Grassi)]. Problemi 18, nos. 194–195 (1980): 41–54.
KOPRINAROV, Lazar. “Belezki za fenomenologiceskata estetika na Roman Ingarden.” LMi (Bulgaria) 21, no. 1 (1977): 65–87.
KORMIR, Peter M. “Književne istine i metafizički kvaliteti” [Literary Truth and Metaphysical Qualities]. KnjiK 16, no. 6 (1985): 107–119.
KOS, Janko. “Roman Ingarden i kriza evrospske aksiologije” [Roman Ingarden and the Crisis of European Axiology]. Knji 35, no. 3 (1980): 521–528.
KOTOWA, Barbara. “Ziemska moc programu Ingardena. Ziemska moc nauki” [The Earthly Power of Ingarden’s Program. The Earthly Power of Science]. Nurt, no. 12 (1976): 1–4.
KOTOWA, Barbara. “Założenia Ingardenowskiego programu badań literackich” [The Foundations of Ingarden’s Program of Literary Research]. SMet, no. 16 (1977): 21–58.
KOTOWA, Barbara. Założenia filozoficzne programu badan literackich Romana Ingardena [The Philosophical Foundations of Ingarden’s Program for the Study of Literature]. Poznań: PWN, 1980.
KOTOWA, Barbara. “Ingardenowski minimalizm aksjologiczny” [Ingarden’s Axiological Minimalism]. SMet, no. 21 (1981): 49–65.
KOWALSKI, Jerzy. “Romana Ingardena koncepcja materii i formy. Próba analizy krytycznej” [Roman Ingarden’s Concept of Matter and Form. A Critical Analysis]. RFil 14, no. 3 (1966): 99–126.
KOWALSKI, Jerzy. “Ingardenowska koncepcja filozofii” [Ingarden’s Concept of Philosophy]. SPC 2, no. 1 (1966): 107–134.
KOWALSKI, Jerzy. “Problem absolutu w filozofii Romana Ingardena” [The Problem of the Absolute in Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy]. Czeȩstochowskie Studia Teologiczne 3 (1975): 163–183.
KOWALSKI, Jerzy. Review of Wsteȩp do fenomenologii Husserla, by Roman Ingarden. RPL 74, no. 22 (1976): 311–317.
KOWATZKI, Irmgard. “Die Funktion des konstituierenden Bewußtseins in einem ‘Studium für die Seelenmaler’.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 149–164.
KRAMPF, W. “Der VIII. Internationale Kongress für Philosophie in Prag.” PJGG 47, no. 4 (1934): 525–530.
KRATTLI, A. “Diagramme der Literatur.” SchM 49, no. 1 (1969): 116–118. [Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks.]
KRAUS, Oskar. “Epilog zum Philosophenkongress.” Zur Philosophie der Gegenwart. Prague: Lerche, 1934.
KREJČI, Karel. “Der Kampf um die Methoden in polnischer Literaturwissenschaft.” SRun 8, no. 3 (1936): 162–168.
KREJČI, Karel. “Nove slovenske prace o metodice literarni vedy” [New Slovakian Publications on the Methodology of Literary Scholarship]. Sbornik Matice Slovenskej 15, no. 4 (1937).
KREJČI, Karel. “Z nove literatury o metodice literarni vedy” [From the New Literature on the Methodology of Literary Scholarship]. Slavia 15, no. 2 (1937–38): 241–255.
KRENZLIN, Norbert. “Für die Erforschung der formalen Seite der Schönen Literatur.” DZP 12, no. 9 (1964): 1116–1127.
KRENZLIN, Norbert. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. WB 13, no. 3 (1967): 519–521.
KRENZLIN, Norbert. “Untersuchungen zur phänomenologischen Ästhetik.” WB 14, no. 6 (1968): 1236–1284.
KRENZLIN, Norbert. “Bürgerliche Ideologieentwicklung und ästhetische Theorie. Untersucht an der phänomenologischen Konzeption der Ästhetik.” DZP 17, no. 11 (1969): 1285–1309.
KRENZLIN, Norbert. Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, by Roman Ingarden. Referatendienst zur germanistischen Literaturwissenschaft, no. 2 (1969): 7–8.
KRENZLIN, Norbert. “Różnice w poglaȩdach Romana Ingardena i Waldemara Conrada. Przyczynek do historii metody fenomenologicznej w estetyce” [Differences of Opinion between Roman Ingarden and Waldemar Conrad. A Contribution to the History of the Phenomenological Method in Aesthetics]. SFil, no. 1 (1976): 41–49.
KRENZLIN, Norbert. “A Critique of the Phenomenological Approach to the Theory of Literature.” DaH 4, no. 4 (1977): 151–156.
KRENZLIN, Norbert. Das Werk “rein für sich”: Zur Geschichte des Verhältnisses von Phänomenologie, Ästhetik und Literaturwissenschaft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1979.
KRIDL, Manfred. Wsteȩp do badań nad dziełem literackim. [Introduction to the Investigation of the Literary Work of Art]. Wilno: 1936.
KRIDL, Manfred. “Badania nad literaturaȩ” [Investigations in Literature]. RoLit (1936): 208–211.
KRIDL, Manfred. Review of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego, by Roman Ingarden. RoLit 1 (1936): 208–211.
KRIDL, Manfred. “Teoria literatury” [The Theory of Literature]. RoLit 2 (1937): 262–266. [Review of “O tak zwanej ‘prawdzie’ w literaturze,” “O psychologii i psychologiźmie w nauce o literaturze,” and “Sprawa formy i treści w dziele literackim.”]
KRIDL, Manfred. A Survey of Polish Literature and Culture. The Hague: Mouton, 1956.
KROLL, W. and Flaker, A. Literaturtheoretische Modelle und kommunikatives System. Zur aktuellen Diskussion in der polnischen Literaturwissenschaft. Kronberg-Taunus: Scriptor, 1974.
KROŃSKA, Irène. Review of Spór o istnienie świata, by Roman Ingarden. RPh 139 (1949): 219–225.
KROŃSKA, Irena. Review of Studia z estetyki, Vols. 1 and 2, by Roman Ingarden. RoLit 1 (1962): 550–552.
KROŃSKA, Irena. “Roman Ingarden: Fragment retrospekcji” [Roman Ingarden: A Retrospective Fragment]. Tw, no. 10 (1971): 86–94.
KROŃSKA, Irena. “Wspomnienie o profesorze Ingardenie w pierwszaȩ, roczniceȩ jego śmierci” [Remembering Professor Ingarden on the 1st Anniversary of his Death]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 59–70.
KROŃSKI, Tadeusz J. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. PFil 36, no. 4 (1933): 387–391.
KROŃSKI, Tadeusz J. “Świat w klamrach ontologii” [The World in Ontological Fetters]. Myśl Filozoficzna, no. 1 (1952): 318–331. [Review of Spór o istnienie świata.]
KRZEMICKA, Irena. “Dzieło literackie i formy jego poznawania” [The Literary Work of Art and Forms of Its Cognition]. Pion 5, no. 5 (1937): 4. [Review of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego.]
KRZYŻANOWSKI, Julian. “W poszukiwaniu teorii literatury” [In Search of a Theory of Literature]. NKs 4, no. 2 (1937): 65–71. [Review of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego.]
KSIAŽEK-KONICKA, Hanna. “Semiotički aspekti Ingardenove koncepcije slojevitosti” [Semiotic Aspects of Ingarden’s Understanding of Layers]. Filmske sveske 18, no. 4 (1986): 230–234.
KUCZYŃSKI, Janusz. (Przemøwienie inauguracyjne na konferencji poświeȩconej tematowi) “Marksistowska krytyka fenomenologii a filozofia Romana Ingardena” [(The Opening Speech at the Conference on) Marxist Criticism and the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden]. SFil, no. 9 (1975): 5–7.
KUCZYŃSKI, Janusz. “Homo Creator versus Homo Contemplator. Dialektyka a fenomenologiczna koncepcja człowieka” [Homo Creator versus Homo Contemplator. The Dialectical and Phenomenological Conception of Man]. SFil, nos. 10–11 (1975): 67–86.
KUCZYŃSKI, Janusz. “Homo Creator versus Homo Contemplator. The Dialectical and Phenomenological Conception of Man. Introductory Remarks.” DaH 2, no. 3 (1975): 99–121.
KUCZYŃSKI, Janusz et al. “From the Editors.” DaH 2, no. 2 (1975): 67–70. [Special section on “Marxist Critique of Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden.”]
KUCZYŃSKI, Janusz et al. “The Conference at Jadwisin (June 19–22, 1975). A Report.” DaH 2, no. 3 (1975): 7–16. [Special section on “Marxist Critique of Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden.”]
KUDEROWICZ, Zbigniew. “Osobowość filozoficzna Romana Ingardena” [The Philosophical Personality of Roman Ingarden]. SFil, nos. 4–5 (1970): 195–200.
KUDEROWICZ, Zbigniew. “The Problem of the Relation of Philosophy to Special Sciences as Discussed in Cracow in the Period 1944–1974.” DaH 2, no. 2 (1975): 147–155.
KÜNG, Guido. Review of Spór o istnienie świata, by Roman Ingarden. PhiL 14, no. 6 (1961): 258–261.
KÜNG, Guido. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. PhiL 14, no. 8 (1961): 351–353.
KÜNG, Guido. Review of Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst, by Roman Ingarden. ZpF 17, no. 1 (1963): 179–181.
KÜNG, Guido. “Nowe spojrzenie na rozwój filozoficzny Husserla” [A New Look at Husserl’s Philosophical Development]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 145–156.
KÜNG, Guido. “Ingarden on Language and Ontology.” Analecta Husserliana 2 (1972): 204–217.
KÜNG, Guido. “The World as Noema and as Referent.” JBSP 3, no. 1 (1972): 15–26.
KÜNG, Guido. “Zum Lebenswerk von Roman Ingarden: Ontologie, Erkenntnistheorie und Metaphysik.” Phaenomenologica, Vol. 65: Die Münchener Phänomenologie, H. Kuhn et al., eds. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1975. 158–173.
KÜNG, Guido and Świderski, E. “Marxism and Phenomenology: An International Congress in Poland.” SST 16, nos. 1–2 (1976): 113–120.
KÜNG, Guido. “Understanding and Its Rational Justification.” Dialectica, 33 (1979), 217–232.
KÜNG, Guido. “Roman Ingarden (1893–1970): Ontological Phenomenology.” The Phenomenological Movement, Herbert Spiegelberg, ed., 3rd revised ed. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1982. 223–233.
KÜNG, Guido. “Brentano and Ingarden on the Experience and Cognition of Values.” The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden: Jagiellonian University Reports on Philosophy (Polish) 10 (1986): 57–67. [Includes a one-page bibliography.]
KUNZ, Hans. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, by Roman Ingarden. SPhiS 25 (1965): 239–242.
KUROWICKI, J. “Kwestia poznania bezpośredniego u Ingardena” [The Question of Direct Cognition in Ingarden]. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Ślaȩskiej, no. 351: Nauki Społeczne, no. 14 (1973): 45–56.
KURYŁOWICZ, J. Review of Z teorii jeȩzyka i filozoficznych podstaw logiki, by Roman Ingarden. BPTJ, no. 31 (1972): 163–169.
KUZNICKA, Danuta. “Ingarden on the Theatre.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 283–296.
LAFERRIERE, D. “Ingarden and Husserl versus Literary Semiotics.” Semiotica 26, nos. 1–2 (1979): 181–196.
LABUS, Mladen. “Ontologija umjetnosti Romana Ingardena” [The Ontology of Art of Roman Ingarden]. Dometi (Rijeka) 14, no. 4 (1981): 5–10.
LALO, Charles. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. RPh 112, nos. 9–10 (1931): 308.
LASKEY, Dallas. “Ingarden’s Criticism of Husserl.” Analecta Husserliana 2 (1972): 48–54.
LAUER, Q. Review of Time and Modes of Being, by Roman Ingarden. International Philosophical Quarterly 4 (1964): 630–631.
ŁEMPICKI, Zygmunt. “Dzieło literackie: struktura i wyglaȩd” [The Literary Work of Art: Structure and Appearance]. WLit 9, no. 9 (1932): 2. [Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
ŁEMPICKI, Zygmunt. Review of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego, by Roman Ingarden. PL 35, nos. 1–4 (1938): 279–287.
ŁEMPICKI, Zygmunt. “Dzieło literackie: moc i działanie” [The Literary Work of Art: Its Power and Action]. WLit 9, no. 10 (1932): 3. [Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
ŁEMPICKI, Zygmunt. “Dzieło literackie: struktura i wyglaȩd” [The Literary Work of Art: Structure and Appearance]. Wybór pism, Vol. 2: Studia z teorii literatury, by Zygmunt Łempicki. Warszawa: PWN, 1966. 225–229. [Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
ŁEMPICKI, Zygmunt. “Dzieło literackie: moc i działanie” [The Literary Work of Art: Its Power and Action]. Wybór pism, Vol. 2: Studia z teorii literatury, by Zygmunt Łempicki. Warszawa: PWN, 1966. 229–234. [Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
ŁEMPICKI, Zygmunt. Review of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego, by Roman Ingarden. Wybór pism, Vol. 2: Studia z teorii literatury, by Zygmunt Łempicki. Warszawa: PWN, 1966. 323–330.
LEO, Ulrich. “Pirandello, Kunsttheorie und Maskensymbol.” DVLG 11, no. 1 (1933): 94–129.
LEON, P. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. Mind 41.no. 161 (1932): 97–106.
LeŠIĆ, Zdenko. “Fenomenološki pristup književnom delu” [Phenomenological Approach to the Literary Work]. Moderna Tumačenja Književnosti. Sarajevo: Svjetlost, 1981. 137–164.
LEVIN, D. M. “Foreword.” The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic and Theory of Literature. With an Appendix on the Functions of Language in the Theatre, by Roman Ingarden. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973. xi–liv.
LEWANDOWSKA, M. “Revue de certaines conceptions de la théorie logique des questions.” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Lodzkiego, Seria I, Nauki Humanistyczno-Społeczne 1, no. 9 (1976): 63–85.
LEWICKI, B. W. “O autonomii estetycznej dzieła literackiego” [On the Aesthetic Autonomy of the Literary Work of Art]. Słowo Polskie 36, no. 20 (1932): 4.
LI, You-Zheng. “On Ingarden’s Phenomenological Aesthetics” (in Chinese). Aesthetics (Chinese), Vol. 2. Shanghai: The People’s Publisher, 1980.
LI, You-Zheng. “Roman Ingarden” (in Chinese). The Chinese Encyclopedia (Chinese), volume on Philosopy. Shanghai: The Dictionary Publisher, 1987.
LICHAŃSKI, Jakub Z. “Uwagi do Romana Ingardena teorii dzieła literackiego” [Remarks on Roman Ingarden’s Theory of the Literary Work of Art]. SFil, no. 4 (1973): 75–78.
LIDA, Raimundo. “La obra literaria.” Megafono (Buenos Aires) 11 (Aug. 1933): 6–8.
LIPIEC, J. “Ingarden.” ŻLit, no. 29 (1975): 15.
LISSA, Zofia. “Uwagi o Ingardenowskiej teorii dzieła muzycznego” [Remarks on Ingarden’s Theory of the Musical Work]. StEs 3 (1966): 95–114.
LISSA, Zofia. “Zur Ingardenschen Theorie des musikalischen Werks.” SFil (in translation), no. 4 (1970): 331–350.
LISSA, Zofia. “Einige kritische Bemerkungen zur Ingardenschen Theorie des musikalischen Werkes.” International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 3, no. 1 (1972): 75–95.
LISSA, Zofia. “Some Remarks on Ingardenian Theory of a Musical Work.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 129–144.
LONG, E. T. Review of The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, by Roman Ingarden. RevM 28, no. 3 (1975): 554–555.
ŁOZINSKI, Jerzy. “Intencjonalność i przedmiot intencjonalny w filozofii Romana Ingardena” [Intentionality and Intentional Object in Ingarden’s Philosophy]. SFil, no. 9 (1974): 49–62.
ŁUBNICKI, Narcyz. “Sylwetka filozoficzna Romana Ingardena” [Roman Ingarden’s Philosophical Profile]. Folio Societatis Scientiarum Lublinensis, Sectio A, no. 12 (1971): 21–28.
ŁUBNICKI, Narcyz. “Sylwetka filozoficzna Romana Ingardena” [Roman Ingarden’s Philosophical Profile]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 91–111.
ŁUBNICKI, Narcyz. “Roman Ingarden’s Philosophical Profile.” DaH 1, no. 3 (1974): 157–177.
LUKIC, Sveta. “Publika kao funkcija umetnicke istine.” Knji 38, nos. 8–9 (1983): 1332–1334.
LÜTHE, Rudolf. “Czy alternatywa dla sceptycyzmu? O niektórych aspektach Ingardenowskiej teorii wartości dzieła sztuki” [Is There An Alternative to Scepticism? Some Aspects of Ingarden’s Theory of Value of the Work of Art]. StEs 14 (1977): 29–44.
LÜTHE, Rudolf. “Objectivism or Decisionism? A Critical Interpretation of Ingarden’s Value Theory from an Ingard[en]ian Point of View.” JBSP 9, no. 2 (1978): 82–91.
MACKIEWICZ, Witold. “Nad Ksiaȩżeczkaȩ o człowieku” [On A Little Book on Man]. SFil, no. 9 (1973): 126–128. [Review of Ksiaȩżeczkaȩ o człowieku.]
MAGLIOLA, Robert R. Phenomenology and Literature: An Introduction. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1977.
MAKOTA, Janina. O klasyfikacji sztuk pieȩknych [On Classification of the Fine Arts]. Kraków: WL, 1964.
MAKOTA, Janina. “Fenomenologia świadomości w filozofii Romana Ingardena” [The Phenomenology of Consciousness in Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 237–251.
MAKOTA, Janina. “Applicability of Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetic Categories to Contemporary Art.” Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress of Aesthetics, Bucharest 1972. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste, 1976. 611–614.
MAKOTA, Janina. “Stosowalność kategorii estetycznych Ingardena do sztuki współczesnej” [Applicability of Ingarden’s Aesthetic Categories to Contemporary Art]. StEs 11 (1974): 45–50.
MAKOTA, Janina. “Roman Ingarden’s Theory of Man.” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 126–130.
MAKOTA, Janina. “Roman Ingarden’s Views on the Communication with a Work of Art.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 145–158.
MAKOTA, Janina. “Aesthetic vs. Moral Values in Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy” (in Polish). Etyka 22 (1986): 183–194.
MAKOTA, Janina. “Nicolai Hartmann’s and Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy of Man.” The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden: Jagiellonian University Reports on Philosophy (Polish) 10 (1986): 69–79.
MARGOLIS, J. Review of Time and Modes of Being, by Roman Ingarden. Revue de Synthèse 87 (1966): 275–277.
MARKIEWICZ, Barbara. “Ingarden.” Nowe Ksiaȩżki, no. 19 (1981): 58–60. [Reviews of Wykłady i dyskusje z estetyki and Spór o istnienie świata, Vol 3.]
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk. “Roman Ingarden o dziele literackim” [Roman Ingarden on the Literary Work of Art]. Estetyka 2 (1961): 266–277. [Review of O dziele literackim.]
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk. “Jeszcze o budowie dzieła literackiego. W zwiaȩzku z artykułem prof. R. Ingardena” [More on the Structure of the Literary Work of Art. A Response to Prof. R. Ingarden’s Article]. PL 55, no. 2 (1964): 429–434.
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk. “Twørczość Romana Ingardena a rozwój badań literackich” [Roman Ingarden’s Work and the Development of Literary Scholarship]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 307–322.
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk. “Das Werk Roman Ingardens und die Entwicklung der Literaturwissenschaft.” Formalismus, Strukturalismus und Geschichte, A. Flaker and V. Žmegač, eds. Kronberg-Taunus: Scriptor, 1974. 221–246.
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk. “Places of Indeterminacy in a Literary Work.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 159–172.
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk. “Polnische Diskussion über Form und Inhalt.” RusL 13, no. 3 (1983): 223–268.
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk. “Ingarden and the Development of Literary Studies.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 101–130.
MARTINEZ-BONATI, Felix. Fictive Discourse and the Structures of Literature, translated by Philip W. Silver. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.
MATIUS, U. “O wkładzie fenomenologii do współczesnej teorii wartości” [On the Contribution of Phenomenology to the Contemporary Theory of Values]. Człowiek i światopoglaȩd, nos. 1–2 (1982): 127–135.
MAYENOWA, Maria Renata. Review of Studia z estetyki, Vols. 1 and 2, by Roman Ingarden. RoLit 1, no. 2 (1962): 154–157.
MAYENOWA, Maria Renata. Poetyka teoretyczna. Zagadnienia jeȩzyka [Theoretical Poetics. Problems of Language]. Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1974. 29–38.
MAYS, W. “The Later Husserl.” Inquiry 17, no. 1 (1974): 113–125.
MAYS, W. “Editorial [on Ingarden].” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 72–74.
MAZUREK, Franciszek J. “Le caractère intentionnel du droit et son rôle dans la determination des relations sociales.” RUO 44, no. 3 (1974): 362–372.
McCORMICK, Peter J. “On Ingarden’s Account of the Existence of Aesthetic Objects.” DaH 2, no. 4 (1975): 31–38.
McCORMICK, Peter J. Review of The Literary Work of Art and The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, by Roman Ingarden and Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Dialogue 15 (1976): 511–515.
McCORMICK, Peter J. “Z zagadnień struktury dzieła literackiego” [On the Problem of the Structure of the Literary Work). StEs 16 (1979): 173–191.
McCORMICK, Peter J. “Literary Truths and Metaphysical Qualities.” Journal of the Faculty of Letters, The University of Tokyo (Aesthetics) 8 (1983): 1–14.
McCORMICK, Peter J. (ed.) Roman Ingarden: Selected Papers in Aesthetics. München: Philosophia; and Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1985.
McCORMICK, Peter J. Fictions, Philosophies, and the Problems of Poetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988. 93–106.
McCORMICK, Peter J. “Literary Truths and Metaphysical Qualities.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 187–232.
MENGES, Karl. “Theories of Aesthetic Response and the Question of Literary Evaluation.” SAG, Vol. 94: Davis Symposium on Literary Evaluation, Karl Menges and Daniel Rancour-Laferriere, eds. Stuttgart: 1981. 35–45.
MERCIER, A. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Vol. 3, by Roman Ingarden. ErasmusE 27 (1975): 706–708.
MICHALSKI, Bohdan. “Miejsce filozofii Witkacego we współczesnej mu filozofii polskiej (monadyzm biologiczny a reizm i fenomenologia)” [The Place of Witkacy’s Philosophy in Contemporary Polish Philosophy (Biological Monadism vs. Reism and Phenomenology)]. SFil, no. 3 (1978): 79–94.
MICHEJDA, Helena R. “Whitehead i Ingarden” [Whitehead and Ingarden]. Szkice filozoficzne Romanowi Ingardenowi w darze [Sketches in Philosophy for Roman Ingarden]. Warszawa-Kraków: 1964. 5–18.
MILBRANDT, M. Review of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego, by Roman Ingarden. PFil 41 (1938): 314–325.
MISIEWICZ, Janusz. “O tak zwanych quasi-saȩdach Romana Ingardena” [On So-Called Quasi-Judgements of Roman Ingarden]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio F 28, no. 16 (1973): 321–328.
MISIEWICZ, Janusz. “The Work of Art and Aesthetic Categories According to Ingarden.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 55–70.
MISKIEWICZ, W. “A propos de l’origine des ‘Leçons sur la conscience intime du temps.” RMM 89, no. 4 (1984): 536–542.
MITIAS, Michael H. “Ingarden on the Aesthetic Object.” DaH 12, nos. 3–4 (1985): 199–220.
MITOSEK, Zofia. “Fenomenologia literatury (Ingarden, 1893–1971)” [The Phenomenology of Literature (Ingarden, 1893–1971)]. Teorie badań literackich [Theories of Literary Research]. Warszawa: PWN, 1983. 129–156.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff. “Roman Ingarden’s The Literary Work of Art: Exposition and Analyses.” PPR 45, no. 3 (1985): 351–382.
MOKREJS, Anton. “Filosofie umeni Romana Ingardena” [Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy of Art]. Filozofia 28, no. 5 (1973): 559–573.
MORAWSKI, Stefan. “Ingardenowska koncepcja sztuki filmowej” [Ingarden’s Concept of Film Art]. KFilm 8, no. 4 (1958): 17–32.
MORAWSKI, Stefan. “Estetyczne królestwo Ingardena” [Ingarden’s Aesthetic Kingdom]. NoK 27 (1958). [Review of Studia z estetyki, Vols. 1 and 2.]
MORAWSKI, Stefan. “Skola kladeni otazek” [The School of Asking Questions]. Estetyka 6, no. 4 (1969): 284–307.
MORAWSKI, Stefan. “Szkoła stawiania pytań I” [The School of Asking Questions I]. StEs 7 (1970): 261–282.
MORAWSKI, Stefan. “Szkoła stawiania pytań II” [The School of Asking Questions II]. StEs 8 (1971): 243–256.
MORAWSKI, Stefan. “Eine Schule des Fragens. Zu Roman Ingardens Buch Erlebnis — Kunstwerk — Wert.” ZAaK 19, no. 2 (1974): 143–158.
MORAWSKI, Stefan. “Ingarden on the Subject-Matter and Method of Aesthetics.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN 1975. 173–190.
MÖRCHEN, Hermann. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanisten-Verbandes 8, no. 1 (1961).
MÖRCHEN, Hermann. Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, by Roman Ingarden. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanisten-Verbandes 16, no. 4 (1969): 173–189.
MOTROSHIŁOVA, N. V. “The Problem of the Cognitive Subject as Viewed by Husserl and Ingarden.” DaH 2 no. 3 (1975): 17–31.
MOTROSHIŁOVA, N. W. “Problem podmiotu poznania u E. Husserla i R. Ingardena” [The Problem of the Cognitive Subject in E. Husserl and R. Ingarden]. SFil, no. 1 (1976): 3–17.
MUELLER-VOLLMER, Kurt. Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, by Roman Ingarden. Germanistik 10, no. 2 (1969): 282–283.
MUELLER-VOLLMER, Kurt. “Rezeption und Neuansatz: Phänomenologische Literaturwissenschaft in den Vereinigten Staaten.” LiLi 5, no. 17(1975): 10–24.
MUELLER-VOLLMER, Kurt, (ed.) The Hermeneutics Reader. Texts of the German Tradition from the Enlightenment to the Present. New York: Continuum, 1985. 187–213.
MÜLLER, Günter. “Über die Seinsweise der Dichtung.” DVLG 17, no. 2 (1939): 137–152.
MURRAY, Michael. Modern Critical Theory. A Phenomenological Introduction. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1975. 119–126.
NICOLAE, V. A. “L’esthétique phénoménologique de Roman Ingarden.” RdF 17, no. 10 (1970): 1223–1230.
NISHIZAWA, Takashi. “On Roman Ingarden’s The Literary Work of Art: Part 1” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 13, nos. 1–2 (1979): 203–220.
NISHIZAWA, Takashi. “On Roman Ingarden’s The Literary Work of Art: Part 2” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 13, no. 4 (1979): 267–277.
NISHIZAWA, Takashi. “On Roman Ingarden’s The Literary Work of Art: Part 3” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 18, nos. 3–4 (1984): 143–163.
NISHIZAWA, Takashi. “The Literary Work of Art and Its Concretization in Roman Ingarden” (in Japanese). Doku—Ou-Bungaku-Ronbunshu [Collected Articles on German-Austrian Literature]. Nagoya: Nagoya University Press, 1986. 349–374.
NITTA, Hiroe. “Sprache der Dichtung.” Bigaku 21, no. 4 (1971): 1–11.
NITTA, Hiroe. “Sprache der Dichtung.” Bigaku 22, no. 1 (1971): 41–52.
NOACK, Hermann. “Über Arbeiten auf dem Felde der Ästhetik und Kunstwissenschaften.” DVLG 10, no. 1 (1932): 164–165. [Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
NOTA, John H. “Misunderstanding and Insight About Edith Stein’s Philosophy.” HumanS 10 (1987): 205–212.
NYGAARD, Jon. “Druga wizyta Romana Ingardena w Norwegii” [Roman Ingarden’s Second Visit to Norway], Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 503–506.
NYGAARD, Jon. “An Analysis of Ingarden’s Distinction Between the Literary Work of Art and Its Related Branches of Art.” DaH 2, no. 2 (1975): 109–121.
OBERTI, Elisa. “Estetica e ulteriorita metafisica nel pensiero di Roman Ingarden.” RdE 9 (1964): 401–426.
“OD REDAKCJI” [From the Editors]. SFil, nos. 4–5 (1970): 192–193. [A note on Ingarden’s death followed by his last two letters to the Editor, cf. Ingarden “Letters” section, item no. 366.]
“OD REDAKCJI” [From the Editors]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 3–4.
ODMARK, John. “Ingarden and the Concretization of the Literary Text.” Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, Vol. 2, Zoran Konstantinović et al., eds. Innsbruck: AMOE, 1980. 223–226.
ODUJEW, Stiepan F. “Fenomenologia i nietzscheanizm” [Nietzsche and Phenomenology]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 445–456.
OKOPIEŃ, K. “Ingarden, czyli świadomość niedofenomenologizowana” [Ingarden, or the Underphenomenologized Consciousness]. Teksty, no. 1 (1979): 85–102.
ÖSterreich, Christian. “Zur Identität des literarischen Werkes.” Erkennen und Deuten. Essays zur Literatur und Literaturtheorie, Martha Woodmansee and Walter F. W. Lohnes, eds. Berlin: E. Schmidt, 1983. 54–67.
PACKMAN, David. Vladimir Nabokov. The Structure of Literary Desire. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1982.
PACUŁA, St. “Profesor Roman Ingarden — odkrywca nowego wymiaru rzeczywistości” [Professor Roman Ingarden — The Discoverer of a New Dimension of Reality]. ZiM, no. 9 (1970): 140–142.
PACZKOWSKA, Elżbieta. “Z ingardenowskich sporów o teorieȩ przedmiotu” [Ingardenian Controversies on the Theory of Objects]. SFil, no. 5 (1976): 27–33.
PACZKOWSKA, Elżbieta. Psychika i poznanie. Epistemologia Kaziemierza Twardowskiego [Psyche and Cognition. The Epistemology of Kazimierz Twardowski]. Warszawa: PWN, 1980.
PAGEL, Albert. Summary review of “Essentiale Fragen,” by Roman Ingarden [JPpF 1 (1925)]. Kantstudien 31, nos. 2–3 (1926): 371–372.
PARRET, H. “Taalfilosifische perspektieven in het werk van Roman Ingarden” [Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy of Language]. Tijdschift Voor Filosofie 33 (Dec. 1971): 684–736.
PAŚNICZEK, Jacek. “Struktura ontologiczna przedmiotów nieistniejaȩcych: Meinong a Ingarden” [The Ontological Structure of Non-Existent Objects: Meinong and Ingarden]. SFil, no. 4 (1984): 27–41.
PASTEKA, Julius. “Roman Ingarden o divadle a filme” [Roman Ingarden on Theater and Film]. SDi 11, no. 3 (1963): 441–445.
PASTEKA, Julius. Review of Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst, by Roman Ingarden. AAS 1 (1963): 174–179.
PASTERNAK, Gerhard. Theoriebildung in der Literaturwissenschaft. München: Fink, 1975. 58–66
PASTERNAK, Gerhard. Theoriebildung in der Literaturwissenschaft. München: Fink, 1975. (and 208–212).
PATOČKA, Jan. “Uwagi o Romana Ingardena filozofii obrazu” [Remarks on Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy of Painting]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972):267–275.
PATOČKA, Jan. “Zu Roman Ingardens Ontologie des malerischen Kunstwerks.” PPer 4 (1972): 117–125.
PATRIK, L. E. “The Aesthetic Experience of Ruins.” Husserl Studies 3, no. 1 (1986): 31–55.
PEDERIN, Ivan. “Dramaturgija Romana Ingardena” [The Dramaturgy of Roman Ingarden]. Pozorište 13, nos. 1–2 (1971): 77–82.
PELC, Jerzy. “O istnieniu i strukturze dzieła literackiego. Rozważania logiczne nad Studiami z estetyki Romana Ingardena” [On the Existence and Structure of the Literary Work of Art: Logical Considerations on Roman Ingarden’s Studies in Aesthetics]. SFil, no. 3 (1958): 121–164.
PELC, Jerzy. “Polnische philosophische Publikationen.” Wöchentliche Rundschau, no. 16 (1961): 24–26.
PELC, Jerzy. “Zdanie a saȩd w dziele literackim. Wartość logiczna i charakter a sertoryczny quasi-saȩdu” [Opinion and Judgement in the Literary Work of Art: Logical Truth and the Assertive Character of the Quasi-Judgement]. Estetyka 3 (1962): 131–154.
PELC, Jerzy. “Roman Ingarden.” Tw, no. 10 (1970): 124–127.
PELC, Jerzy. “The Development of Polish Semiotics in the Post-War Years.” DaH (inaugural issue) (1973): 225–235.
PETERSEN, Julius. Die Wissenschaft von der Dichtung, Vol. 1: Werk und Dichter. Berlin: Junker und Dünnhaupt, 1939.
PETROVIĆ, Miodrag. “Ingardenova poetika” [Ingarden’s Poetics]. Most (Niš) 17 (1982): 3–14.
PETSCH, Danuta. “PWN-owska edycja ‘Dzieł Filozoficznych’ R. Ingardena” [R. Ingarden’s Philosophical Works Published by the Polish Scientific Publishers]. SFil, nos. 10–11 (1975): 87–88.
PETSCH, Danuta. “Roman Ingarden’s Works Published by the Polish Scientific Publishers.” DaH 2, no. 3 (1975): 123–124.
PFAFF, P. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. Germanistik 2, no. 2 (1961): 193–194.
PISARKOWA, Krystyna. “Roman Ingarden a jeȩzykoznawstwo (1893–1970)” [Roman Ingarden and Linguistics (1893–1970)]. BPTJ, no. 29 (1971): 3–11.
PLOETZ, Hans Achim. Die Theorie der Dichtung. Berlin: Triltsch und Huther, 1936.
POCIEJ, B. “Ingarden Symposium.” Polskie Perspektywy, no. 1 (1972): 51–53.
POLLICK, G. David. “The Sculptural Work of Art: Uniquely ‘Within’ the World.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 255–282.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “O dziele literackim” [The Literary Work of Art]. RuchL 2, no. 1 (1961): 44–49. [Review of The Literary Work of Art.]
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “O istnieniu intencjonalnym” [On Intentional Existence] Szkice filozoficzne Romanowi Ingardenowi w darze [Sketches in Philosophy for Roman Ingarden]. Warszawa-Kraków: PWN, 1964. 71–84.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Prace filozoficzne Romana Ingardena. Bibliografia” [Philosophical Works of Roman Ingarden. A Bibliography]. Szkice filozoficzne Romanowi Ingardenowi w darze [Sketches in Philosophy for Roman Ingarden]. Warszawa-Kraków: PWN, 1964.483–511.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Bibliografia prac filozoficznych Romana Ingardena” [Bibliography of Roman Ingarden’s Philosophical Works]. Studia z estetyki [Studies in Aesthetics], Vols. 1 and 2, 2nd ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1966.495–527.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Roman Ingarden — The Structure of Reality and the Structure of Art.” Poland, no. 6 (1967): 18–19.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Roman Ingarden — struktura rzeczywiśtos’ci i struktura sztuki” [Roman Ingarden — The Structure of Reality and the Structure of Art]. Polska, no. 6 (1967): 18–19.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Roman Ingarden — die Struktur der Realität und die Struktur der Kunst.” Polen, no. 6 (1967): 18–19.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Roman Ingarden — la structure de la réalité et la structure de l’art.” La Pologne, no. 6 (1967): 18–19.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Dane wrażeniowe a doświadczenie pierwotne” [Sense Data and Primary Experience]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 157–173.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Bibliografia prac filozoficznych Romana Ingardena: 1915–1971” [Bibliography of Roman Ingarden’s Philosophical Works: 1915–1971]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 19–54.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Czysta świadomość a ontologia Ingardena” [Pure Consciousness and Ingarden’s Ontology]. RFil 30, no. 1 (1972): 10–14.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Constitutive Phenomenology and Intentional Objects.” Analecta Husserliana 2 (1972): 90–95.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. Świat, spostrzeżenie, świadomość [World, Perception, Consciousness]. Warszawa: PWN, 1972.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Consciousness and Action in Ingarden’s Thought.” Analecta Husserliana 3 (1974): 124–137.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Od tłumacza” [Translator’s Note]. Wsteȩp do fenomenologii Husserla [Introduction to Husserl’s Phenomenology]. Warszawa: PWN, 1974. 5.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Ingarden’s Way to Realism and His Idea of Man.” DaH 2, no. 3 (1975): 65–76.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Świadomośa a działanie w filozofii Ingardena” [Consciousness and Action in Ingarden’s Thought]. SPC 11, no. 2 (1975): 131–152.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Ingardena droga do realizmu a jego koncepcja człowieka” [Ingarden’s Way to Realism and His Idea of Man]. SFil, no. 1 (1976): 27–39.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “The Idea and the Place of Human Creativity in the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden.” DaH 5, no. 2 (1978): 129–140.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Slowo wsteȩpne” [Foreword]. Medytacje kartezjańskie, by Edmund Husserl. Warszawa: PWN, 1982. xi–xxvii.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “The Epistemological Situation of Moral Values” (in Polish). SPC 22, (1986): 175–195.
PÓŁTAWSKI, Andrzej. “Roman Ingarden. Ein Metaphysiker der Freiheit.” The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden: Reports on Philosophy (Polish), no. 10 (1986): 43–56.
PRUCHA, Milan. “Technika a filosofie” [Technology and Philosophy]. Filosoficky Časopis 16, no. 3 (1968): 357–364.
PYTKA, L. Review of Ksiaȩżeczkaȩ o człowieku, by Roman Ingarden. Argumenty, no. 31 (1972): 4–10.
PYTLAK, Andrzej. “Kilka uwag na temat Ingardenowskiej koncepcji dzieła muzycznego” [Some Remarks On Ingarden’s Conception of the Musical Work of Art]. StEs 3 (1966): 81–94.
PYTLAK, Andrzej. “Propozycje aksjologiczne Ingardena” [Ingarden’s Axiological Propositions]. SFil, no. 1 (1968): 210–215. [Review of Przeżycie — dzieło — wartość.]
PYTLAK, Andrzej. “On Ingarden’s Conception of the Musical Composition.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 233–254.
RACZYNSKA, I. Review of “Essentiale Fragen.” PFil 29, nos. 1–2 (1926): 113–118.
RAY, William. “Ingarden and Iser: Reading as Concretization.” Literary Meaning: From Phenomenology to Deconstruction, by William Ray. Oxford, London and New York: Blackwell, 1984. 27–40.
RAY, William. “Ingarden, Iser, and the Geneva School: Three Versions of Phenomenological Criticism.” Literary Meaning: From Phenomenology to Deconstruction, by William Ray. Oxford, London and New York: Blackwell, 1984. 41–59.
REESE, William. “Phenomenology and Metaphysics.” RevM 19 (Sep 1965): 103–114.
RICO, Joaquin. “La teoria de la recepcion literaria.” Arbor: Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura 116, no. 455 (1983): 15–33.
RIESER, Max. “Die Philosophie in Polen” [“Przeglaȩd niemiecki w Polsce”]. Deutsche Rundschau [in Polen] 5, nos. 79–85 (1959): 409–418.
RIESER, Max. “The Philosophy in Poland.” JP 57, no. 7 (1960): 201–209.
RIESER, Max. “Contemporary Aesthetics in Poland.” JAAC 20, no. 3 (1962): 421–428.
RIESER, Max. Review of Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst, by Roman Ingarden. JAAC 24, no. 3 (1966): 454.
RIESER, Max. “Roman Ingarden and His Time.” JAAC 29, no. 4 (1971): 443–452.
RIESER, Max. “Romana Ingardena filozofia sztuki” [Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy of Art]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 259–265.
RIESER, Max. “The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden in a Critical Light.” DaH 2, no. 2 (1975): 89–94.
RISCH, Claudia. “Zeit und Musik. Kritische Betrachtungen zum Kunstverständnis im Schaffen H.-G. Gadamers und R. Ingardens.” Ästhetische Erfahrung und das Wesen der Kunst. SPhiS 43 (1984): 156–172.
RISCH, Claudia. “Die Rolle der Zeit in der Ästhetik H. G. Gadamers und R. Ingardens.” ZAaK 30, no. 1 (1985): 119–137.
RISCH, Claudia. Die Identität des Kunstwerks: Studien zur Wechselwirkung von Identitätskriterien und ontologischem Status des Kunstwerks. Bern-Stuttgart: Haupt, 1986.
RISKA, Augustin. “The ‘A Priori’ in Ingarden’s Theory of Meaning.” Analecta Husseriana 3 (1974): 138–146.
RISKA, Augustin. “Language and Logic in the Work of Roman Ingarden.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 187–217.
ROSNER, Katarzyna. O funkcji poznawczej dzieła literackiego [On the Cognitive Function of the Literary Work of Art]. Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1970.
ROSNER, Katarzyna. “Świat przedstawiony a funkcja poznawcza dzieła literackiego” [Represented World and the Cognitive Function of the Literary Work of Art]. StEs 7 (1970): 69–93.
ROSNER, Katarzyna. “Ingardenowska koncepcja budowy dzieła literackiego jako źródło inspiracji do analizy komunikacji artystycznej” [Ingarden’s Philosophy of Literature and Analysis of Artistic Communication]. Studia Semiotyczne 5 (1974): 55–74.
ROSNER, Katarzyna. “Ingarden’s Philosophy of Literature and the Analysis of Artistic Communication.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 191–222.
RÓŻANOWSKI, R. “Świadomość estetyczna a zdrowy rozsaȩdek” [Aesthetic Consciousness and Common Sense]. MLit, no. 11 (1982): 55–67.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “Zur Wertontologie des literarischen Kunstwerkes.” Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Philosophy, Vol. 4. Vienna: Herder, 1969. 230–234.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetics of Literature.” CollG 8, nos. 1–2 (1974): 1–14.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “Roman Ingarden’s Literary Theory.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 105–119.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “From Things to Individuals.” Phenomenology Information Bulletin 1 (1977): 3–14.
RUDNICK, Hans H. Review of Roman Ingarden: Gegenstand und Aufgaben der Literaturwissenschaft, edited, translated, and introduced by Rolf Fieguth, and Literatur als System und Prozess by Janusz Sławinski. Phenomenology Information Bulletin 3 (1979): 71–75.
RUDNICK, Hans H. Review of Roman Ingarden: Gegenstand und Aufgaben der Literaturwissenschaft, edited, translated, and introduced by Rolf Fieguth. CollG 14, no. 1 (1979): 119–121.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “The Literary Work of Art as a System.” Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vol. 8, Franz Pichler, ed. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1980. 93–96.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “Roman Ingarden als Literatursystematiker.” Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Germanists, Vol. 8, no. 3. Berne: Lang, 1980. 189–194.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “The Historicity of the Literary Work of Art: An Ingardenian Perspective.” CLS 18, no. 3 (1981): 251–259.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “The Concretization of Meaning: Roman Ingarden.” Semiotica 41 (1982): 247–255.
RUDNICK, Hans H. “Strelka als Literaturwissenschaftler.” Sinn und Symbol: Festschrift für Joseph P. Strelka, Karl Konrad Polheim, ed. Bern, Frankfurt, New York, Paris: Lang, 1987. 639–645.
RUTHROF, Horst. “A Phenomeno-Sociological Approach to Fiction.” PPR 33, no. 3 (1973): 399–407.
RYBICKI, Janusz. “Romana Ingardena i Władysława Tatarkiewicza teorie przeżyć estetycznych (analiza porównawcza)” [The Theories of Aesthetic Experience of Roman Ingarden and Władysław Tatarkiewicz (A Comparative Analysis)]. StEs 10 (1973): 193–213.
RYBICKI, Janusz. “Teorie przeżyć estetycznych — struktura i funkcje głównych koncepcji” [Theories of Aesthetic Experience — The Structure and Functions of Central Concepts]. Studia z dziejów estetyki polskiej, 1918–1939, Sław Krzemień-Ojak and W. Kalinowski, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 92–100.
RYLE, Gilbert. Review of “Essentiale Fragen,” by Roman Ingarden. Mind 36, no. 143 (1927): 366–370.
RYLE, Gilbert. “Roman Ingarden: ‘Essentiale Fragen’.” JBSP 4, no. 1 (1973): 72–75.
RZEPIŃSKA, Maria. “Remarks on the Existence of a Painting.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 223–236.
SANCIPRIANO, Mario. “R. Ingarden et le ‘vrai’ Bergsonisme.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 141–148.
SARNA, J. W. “Ontologia sztuki w ujeȩciu Romana Ingardena” [The Ontology of Art of Roman Ingarden]. Studia Kieleckie, no. 3 (1977): 5–23.
SARNA, J. W. “De l’évaluation philosophique de la phenomenologie réaliste de Roman Ingarden.” (in Russian) Filos (Nauki, USSR), no. 4 (1980): 121–129.
SARNA, J. W. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena na tle filozofii Edmunda Husserla [Roman Ingarden’s Phenomenology against the Background of Edmund Husserl’s Philosophy]. Kielce: 1981.
SARNOWSKI, Stefan. “Fenomenologia i egzystencjalizm” [Phenomenology and Existentialism]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 457–482.
SAUTER, J. “Der VIII. Internationale Philosophen-Kongress 1934.” Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 8, no. 6 (1934): 437–438.
SCARAMUZZA, Gabriele. “Il tempo della letteratura: Roman Ingarden.” Materiali Filosoflci: Il tempo dell’arte, Fulvio Papi et al., eds. Milano: Franco Angeli, 1984. 40–59.
SCHAPER, Günter. Review of Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst by Roman Ingarden. ZAaK 14, no. 2 (1969): 237–245
SCHAPER, Eva. Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, by Roman Ingarden. JBSP 1, no. 3 (1970): 82–84.
SCHMALENBACH, Hermann. “Neues zum Problem der Phänomenologie.” Deutsche Literaturzeitung 33, no. 44 (1922): 971–973. [Review of Intuition und Intellekt bei Henri Bergson and “Über die Gefahr einer ‘Petitio Principii’ in der Erkenntnistheorie.”]
SCHMID, Herta. “Das dramatische Werk und seinstheatralische Konkretisation im Lichte der Literaturtheorie Roman Ingardens.” Das Drama und seine Inszenierung, Erika Fischer-Lichte et al., eds. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1985. 22–36.
SCHMIDT, Wolf A. von. Philosophische Grundfragen der Literarästhetik. München: Ehrenwirth, 1970.
SCHOBER, Rita. Abbild, Sinnbild, Wertung: Aufsätze zur Theorie und Praxis literarischer Kommunikation. Berlin und Weimar: Aufbau, 1982. 253–256.
SCHOPPER, Werner. Das Seiende und der Gegenstand: Zur Ontologie Roman Ingardens. München: Berchmanskolleg Verlag, 1974.
SCHWABE, Karl-Heinz. Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, by Roman Ingarden. DZP 17, no. 11 (1969): 1395–1399.
SCHWANKL, P. Review of Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, by Roman Ingarden. Univ (German edition) 12, no. 12 (1967): 1323–1324.
SEIDLER, Herbert. “Deutsche Dichtungswissenschaft in den letzten Jahren.” DU 3, no. 15 (1963): 1–16. [Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk.]
SEIFERT, Joseph. “Roman Ingarden’s Realism and the Motives that Led Husserl to Adopt Transcendental Idealism: Critical Reflections on the Importance and Limits of Roman Ingarden’s Critique of Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology.” The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden: Jagiellonian University Reports on Philosophy (Polish) 10 (1986): 27–42.
SERRETTI, M. Conoscenza di sé e trascendenza. Introduzione alia filosofia dell’uomo attraverso Husserl, Scheler, Ingarden, Wojtyla. Bologna: Centro Studi Europa Orientale, 1984.
SHUSTERMAN, Richard. “Ingarden, Inscription and Literary Ontology.” JBSP 18, no. 2 (1987): 103–119.
SHUSTERMAN, Richard. “Ingarden, Inscription, and Literary Ontology.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 131–158.
SIDOREK, J. “Nowa ksiaȩżka Romana Ingardena” [A New Book of Roman Ingarden]. KiS 21, no. 1 (1977): 293–296. [Review of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego.]
SIDOREK, J. “O Ingardenowskiej teorii przedmiotów czysto intencjonalnych. Czeȩść 1” [On Ingarden’s Theory of Purely Intentional Objects. Part 1]. SPC 13, no. 2 (1977): 163–185.
SIDOREK, J. “O Ingardenowskiej teorii przedmiotów czysto intencjonalnych. Czeȩść 2” [On Ingarden’s Theory of Purely Intentional Objects. Part 2]. SPC 16, no. 1(1980): 167–177.
SIEMIANOWSKI, A. “Roman Ingarden (5.2.1893–14.6.1970).” Wieȩź 9, no. 9(1970): 125–126.
SILVERMAN, Hugh. “Dufrenne’s Phenomenology of Poetry.” Philosophy Today 20, no. 1 (1976): 20–24.
SIMONS, Peter M. Review of On the Motives Which Led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism, by Roman Ingarden. JBSP 9, no. 2 (1978): 137.
SIMONS, Peter M. “Categories and Ways of Being.” The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden: Jagiellonian University Reports on Philosophy (Polish) 10 (1986): 89–104.
SIMONS, Peter M. “Computer Composition and Works of Music: Variation on a Theme of Ingarden.” JBSP 19, no. 2 (1988): 141–154.
SKOLIMOWSKI, Henryk. “Roman Ingarden.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 4. New York: 1967. 193–194.
SKOLIMOWSKI, Henryk. “Roman Ingarden.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 4, 2nd ed. New York: 1974. 195–197.
SKOLIMOWSKI, Henryk. Polish Analytical Philosophy. A Survey and a Comparison with British Analytical Philosophy. London: Routledge-Kegan Paul, 1967
SKOLIMOWSKI, Henryk. Polish Analytical Philosophy. A Survey and a Comparison with British Analytical Philosophy. New York: Humanities Press, 1967. 29–31.
SKUŠEK-MOČNIK, Zoja. “Roman Ingarden: Konstitucija estetskega objekta” [Roman Ingarden: The Constitution of the Aesthetic Object]. Problemi 17, nos. 192–193 (1979): 100–105.
SKWARCZYŃSKA, Stefania. Wsteȩp do nauki o literaturze [Introduction to Literary Scholarship]. Warszawa: 1954.
SKWARCZYŃSKA, Stefania. “Rodzaje literackie wśród podstawowych pojeȩć teoretyczno-literackich Romana Ingardena” [Literary Genres Among Roman Ingarden’s Basic Concepts in the Theory of Literature]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 323–358.
SKWARCZYŃSKA, Stefania. “Roman Ingarden on Literary Genres.” Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe (LLSEE), Vol. 1: Language, Literature and Meaning, John Odmark, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press, 1979. 391–467.
SKWARCZYŃSKA, Jadwiga. “Roman Ingarden’s Theory of the Work of Architecture.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 237–246.
SŁAWIŃSKA, Jadwiga. “Uwagi o teorii dzieła architektonicznego Romana Ingardena” [Roman Ingarden’s Theory of the Work of Architecture]. StEs 1 (1964): 235–244.
SŁAWIŃSKA, Jadwiga. “Inspiracja Ingardena w teatrologii współczesnej” [Ingarden’s Inspiration in Contemporary Theatre]. DialogW 21, no. 5 (1976): 91–99.
SŁAWIŃSKA, Jadwiga. Współczesna refleksja o teatrze. Ku antropologii teatru [Contemporary Reflection on Theatre. Towards the Anthropology of Theatre]. Kraków: 1978.
SŁAWIŃSKA, Jadwiga. “Ingarden’s Impact on Theatre Criticism.” Poetica Slavica: Studies in Honour of Zbigniew Folejewski. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1981. 181–189.
SŁAWINSKI, Janusz. Literatur als System und Prozess. München: Nymphenburger Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1975.
SMITH, Barry. Review of The Literary Work of Art by Roman Ingarden. JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 141–144.
SMITH, Barry. “The Ontogenesis of Mathematical Objects.” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 91–101.
SMITH, Barry. “Historicity, Value and Mathematics.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 219–239.
SMITH, Barry. “Matematyka a ontologiczna estetyka Ingardena” [Mathematics and the Ontological Aesthetics of Ingarden]. SFil, no. 1 (1976): 51–56.
SMITH, Barry. “An Essay in Formal Ontology.” Grazer philosophische Studien 6 (1978): 39–62.
SMITH, Barry. “Roman Ingarden: Ontological Foundations for Literary Theory.” Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe (LLSEE), Vol. 1: Language, Literature and Meaning, John Odmark, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press, 1979. 373–390.
SMITH, Barry. “Ingarden vs. Meinong on the Logic of Fiction.” PPR 41, nos. 1–2 (1980): 93–105.
SMITH, Barry. “Meinen und Vorstellen in der literarischen Gegenstandskonstitution.” Kunst und Kunstforschung, Beiträge zur Ästhetik, G. Wohlandt, ed. Bonn: Bouvier, 1983. 49–61.
SMITH, Barry. “Practices of Art.” Practical Knowledge. Outlines of a Theory of Traditions and Skills, J. C. Nyiri and Barry Smith, eds. London: Croom Helm, 1988. 172–209.
SODEIKA, Tomas. “The Ingarden-Husserl Controversy: The Methodological Status of Consciousness in Phenomenology and the Limits of the Human Condition.” Analecta Husserliana 27 (1989): 209–221.
SOKOLOWSKI, Robert. Review of On the Motives Which Led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism, by Roman Ingarden. Report by Arnór Hannibalson: JP 74, no. 3 (1977): 176–180.
SOWA, Ewa. “Problem literackiej metafory” [The Problem of Literary Metaphor]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 381–395.
SPIEGELBERG, Herbert. Review of Das literarische Kunstwerk, by Roman Ingarden. ZAaK 25, no. 4 (1931): 379–387.
SPIEGELBERG, Herbert. The Phenomenological Movement, 3rd revised ed. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1982.
SPYTKOWSKI, Józef. “Anatomia dzieła literackiego” [The Anatomy of the Literary Work]. Gazeta Polska 9, no. 172 (1937). [Review of O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego.]
STANNY, B. “Filozofia która wymaga charakteru” [Philosophy which Requires Character]. Kierunki, no. 29 (1970): 3.
STANZEL, Franz K. Die typischen Erzählsituationen im Roman. Wien: W. Braumüller, 1955.
STANZEL, Franz K. Narrative Situations in the Novel: Tom Jones, Moby Dick, The Ambassadors, Ulysses. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1971.
STARZYCKI, Andrzej. “Uwagi o rozważaniach aksjologicznych Romana Ingardena” [Remarks on Roman Ingarden’s Axiological Considerations]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Seria I, Nauki Humanistyczno-Społeczne, no. 2 (1975): 53–61.
STEINBACH, Heribert. “Ist Ontologie als Phänomenologie möglich? Kritische Betrachtungen zu Ingardens Existenzialontologie.” ZpF 22, no. 1 (1968): 78–100.
STEINBACH, Heribert. Review of Briefe an Roman Ingarden, by Edmund Husserl. PhiL 23, no. 2 (1970): 88–91.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Metafizyka a ontologia” [Metaphysics and Ontology]. RoLit 9, no. 1 (1961): 85–98.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Ocena metodologiczna analizy istnienia u Romana Ingardena” [Methodological Evaluation of the Analysis of Existence in Roman Ingarden]. Sprawozdania Towarzystwa Naukowego KUL 13 (1962): 37–39.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “O sposobie istnienia dziela sztuki” [On the Mode of Existence of the Work of Art]. Zeszyty Naukowe KUL 6, no. 3 (1963): 55–64.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “O filozofii Romana Ingardena” [On Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy]. RFil 22, nos. 2–4 (1964): 153–159.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Ingardenowska koncepcja teorii poznania. Próba oceny” [Ingarden’s Concept of the Theory of Cognition. An Evaluative Attempt]. RoFil 12, no. 1 (1964): 77–92.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “W sprawie mozliwości teorii poznania” [On the Possibility of the Theory of Cognition]. RoFil 13, no. 1 (1965): 73–88.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Zagadnienie punktu wyjścia teorii poznania” [The Problem of the Starting Point of the Theory of Cognition]. RoFil 13, no. 1 (1965): 89–104.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “W kierunku metasystemu teorii poznania” [Towards a Metasystem of the Theory of Cognition]. RoFil 13, no. 1 (1965): 105–118.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. O metodzie teorii poznania [Methodology of the Theory of Cognition]. Lublin: 1966.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Fenomenologia w Polsce 1945–1965” [Phenomenology in Poland 1945–1965]. SPC 1, no. 1 (1966): 29–47.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. Review of Przezycie, dzieto, wartośé, by Roman Ingarden. Zeszyty Naukowe KUL 12, no. 4 (1969): 58–59.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Rodzaje bezposredniego poznania” [Types of Immediate Cognition]. RoFil 19, no. 1 (1971): 95–127.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Uwagi o Ingardenowej koncepcji ontologii” [On Ingarden’s Concept of Ontology]. RoFil 20, no. 1 (1972): 5–14.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Utwór filmowy a Ingardenowa teoria warstw” [The Cinematic Work and Ingarden’s Theory of Strata]. RoFil 20, no. 1 (1972): 119–121.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Istnienie (czegoś) a pojȩcie i sąd” [Existence (of Something) vs. Concept and Judgement]. SPC 9, no. 1 (1973): 235–261.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. Propedeutyka estetyki [Propaedeutics of Aesthetics]. Warszawa: Akademia Teologii Katolickiej, 1975.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. “Bemerkungen zu Ingardens Konzeption der Ontologie.” St. Thomas Acquinas 700th Anniversary of Death: Modern Interpretation of his Philosophy. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1976. 127–139.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. Elementy filozofii [Elements of Philosophy]. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1976.
STȩPIEń, Antoni. Wprowadzenie do filozofii [Introduction to Philosophy]. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1982. [2nd ed. of Elementy filozofii.]
STOJANOVIć, Dragan. “Ingarden i Huserl” [Ingarden and Husserl]. Delo 20, no. 11(1974): 1377–1396.
STOJANOVIć, Dragan. “Ingardenova koncepcija književnog umetničkog dela” [Ingarden’s Conception of the Literary Work of Art]. Knji 30, no. 1 (1975): 21–41 (Part 1); and
STOJANOVIć, Dragan. “Ingardenova koncepcija književnog umetničkog dela” [Ingarden’s Conception of the Literary Work of Art]. Knji 30, no. 2 (1975): 161–178 (Part 2).
STOJANOVIć, Dragan. “‘Neznačenjski’ vodovi fenomena višeznačnosti u Ingardenovoj koncepciji” [“Meaningless” Aspects of the Phenomenon of Meaning in Ingarden’s Conception]. KnjiK 6, no. 4 (1975): 25–43.
STOJANOVIć, Dragan. Fenomenologija i višeznačnost književnog dela. Ingardenova teorija opalizacije [Phenomenology and the Meaning of the Literary Work. Ingarden’s Theory of Concretization]. Beograd: Vuk Karadzic; 1976.
STRELKA, Joseph P. Review of Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks, by Roman Ingarden. GQ 43, no. 2 (1970): 237–240.
STRELKA, Joseph P. “The Literary Work: Its Structure, Unity, and Distinction from Forms of Non-Literary Expression.” What Is Literature?, Paul Hernadi, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978. 115–126.
STRELKA, Joseph P. Literarische Textanalyse. Tübingen: Francke, 1989.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. Review of “O tak zwanym malarstwie abstrakcyjnym,” by Roman Ingarden. RFil 21, no. 2 (1962): 165–166.
STRóżEWSKI, Ladislav. “Gli studi di estetica di Roman Ingarden.” RdE 8 (1963): 131–142.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. “Ontologia, metafizyka, dialektyka” [Ontology, Metaphysics, Dialectics]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 209–228.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. “Program estetyki Romana Ingardena” [Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetic Program]. RFil 30, no. 1 (1972): 14–20.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. Review of Książeczką o człowieku, by Roman Ingarden. TygP, no. 33 (1972): 3.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. “Nad Książeczką o człowieku” [On A Little Book on Man]. SFil, no. 9 (1973): 123–126. [Review of Książeczką o człowieku.]
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. “Man and Values in Ingarden’s Thought.” Analecta Husserliana 5 (1976): 109–123.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. “Blisko Ingardena” [Close to Ingarden]. Student, no. 9 (1977): 8. [Interview by Z. Szlachta.]
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. “On the Truthfulness of the Work of Art.” RevM 35, no. 2 (1981): 251–273.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. “Wstȩp” [Introduction]. Wykłady i dyskusje z estetyki [Lectures and Discussions on Aesthetics], Anita Szczepańska, ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1981. 5–14.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. Dialektyka twórczości [Dialectics of Creativity]. Kraków: Polskie Wydawnictwo Muzyczne, 1983.
STRóżEWSKI, Władysław. “Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetic Program.” Aletheia: An International Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 4: Epistemology and Logic. Bern: Lang, 1988. 226–234.
STRUBE, Werner. “Was heiβt ‘Wahrheit’ auf Kunstwerke bezogen? Überlegungen im Anschluβ an Roman Ingarden.” LJGG 22 (1981): 325–335.
STUCKI, Pierre-André. “Le langage littéraire selon M. Roman Ingarden.” SPhiS 25(1965): 189–199.
STYCZEń, Tadeusz. “O metodzie antropologii filozoficznej: na marginesie Osoby i czynu K. Wojtyły oraz Książeczki o człowieku R. Ingardena” [On the Method of Philosophical Anthropology: A Marginal Note on The Acting Person by K. Wojtyła and A Little Book on Man by R. Ingarden]. RoFil 21, no. 2 (1973): 105–114.
STYCZEń, Tadeusz. “Reply to Kalinowski: By Way of an Addendum to the Addenda.” Aletheia: An International Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 4: Epistemology and Logic. Bern: Lang, 1988. 217–225.
SUMIC-RIHA, Jelica. “Teorija estetskega ucinka in vloga komunidacije: Ingarden-Iser-Austin.” Primerjalna Knjižzevnost 8, no. 1 (1985): 34–41.
SUROWIEC, D. “Dylematy odbioru w teorii Romana Ingardena” [Dilemmas of Reception in Roman Ingarden’s Theory]. PHum 22, no. 11 (1978): 93–102.
Surowiec, D. “Prawda dzieła literackiego w rozważaniach Romana Ingardena” [The Truth of the Literary Work of Art in Roman Ingarden’s Considerations]. PHum 23, no. 3 (1979): 71–89.
SUROWIEC, D. Wartości w świecie literatury” [Values in the World of Literature]. PHum 23, no. 9 (1979): 148–151.
SWEENEY, Robert, D. “Axiology in Scheler and Ingarden and the Question of Dialectics.” DaH 2, no. 3 (1975): 91–97.
śWIDERSKI, Edward. “Some Salient Features of Ingarden’s Ontology.” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 81–90.
śWIDERSKI, Edward. “Pewne główne rysy ontologii Ingardena” [Some Salient Features of Ingarden’s Ontology]. SPC 14, no. 1 (1978): 89–108.
śWIDERSKI, Edward. “L’œuvre d’art en tant qu’objet ésthétique.” FZPT 33 (1986): 571–591.
śWIDERSKI, Edward. “Ingarden’s Puzzling Ontology-Metaphysics Distinction.” Jagiellonian University Reports on Philosophy (Polish) 11 (1987): 67–85.
śWIȩCIMSKI, Jerzy. “Filozofia ingardenowska jako narzȩdzie: jej działania w dziedzinie niektórych nauk szczegółowych” [Ingardenian Philosophy as a Tool: Its Influence on Some Natural Sciences]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 293–305.
śWIȩCIMSKI, Jerzy. “Scientific Information Function and Ingarden’s Theory of Forms in the Constitution of the Real World.” Analecta Husserliana 3 (1974): 290–322.
śWIȩCIMSKI, Jerzy. “Museum Exhibition as a Work of Art and a Subject of ‘Specific Aesthetics’.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 165–186.
SZCZEPAńSKA. Anita. “Niejasność jako estetycznie doniosła jakość” [Ambiguity as an Aesthetically Significant Quality]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 277–292.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “W sprawie interpretacji niektórych twierdzeń ingardenowskiej estetyki” [On the Interpretation of Some Propositions of Ingarden’s Aesthetics]. StEs 9 (1972): 341–356.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Perspektywy aksjologicznych badań struktury dzieła sztuki w koncepcji R. Ingardena” [Perspectives of the Axiological Investigations of the Work of Roman Ingarden]. StEs 10 (1973): 239–254.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Perspectives of the Axiological Investigations of the Work of Roman Ingarden.” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 116–125.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Artistic Functions of Clarity in Proust.” Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics, Piotr Graff and Sław Krzemień-Ojak, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 247–268.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Polemiki wokół Ingardena” [Controversies on Ingarden]. Studia z dziejów estetyki polskiej 1918–1939 [Studies in the History of Polish Aesthetics 1918–1939], Sław Krzemień-Ojak and W. Kalinowski, eds. Warszawa: PWN, 1975. 123–139.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Ingardena wykłady z estetyki” [Ingarden’s Lectures on Aesthetics]. StEs 14 (1977): 89–98.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “O definicjach sztuki” [On Definitions of Art]. Studia o współczesnej estetyce polskiej [Studies in Contemporary Polish Aesthetics], Slaw Krzemień-Ojak, ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1977. 33–48.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Ingardenowska teoria quasi-sądów a funkcje poznawcze sztuki” [Ingarden’s Theory of Quasi-Judgements and the Cognitive Function of Art]. StEs 15 (1978): 171–183.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Związki Ingardenowskiej teorii jȩzyka z lingwis-tyką współczesną” [Relationships Between Ingarden’s Theory of Language and Contemporary Linguistics]. StEs 17 (1980): 165–185.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Od wydawcy” [Editorial]. Wykłady i dyskusje z estetyki [Lectures and Discussions on Aesthetics], Anita Szczepańska, ed. Warszawa: PWN, 1981. 15–18.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “Myśl fenomenologiczna w polskiej estetyczne [sic] współczesnej” [Phenomenological Thought in Contemporary Polish Aesthetics]. StEs 19 (1982): 275–301.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Anita. “The Structure of Artworks.” On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments, Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 27, Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter J. McCormick, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. 21–54.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Artur. “Ingardenowska koncepcja związku przyczynowego” [Ingarden’s Concept of Causality]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 253–258.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Artur. “Posłowie fizyka” [Epilogue of a Physicist]. Spór o istnienie świata. Tom III. O strukturze przyczynowej realnego świata [Controversy Over the Existence of the World. Vol. 3. On the Causal Structure of the Real World]. Warszawa: PWN, 1981. 424–428.
SZCZEPAńSKA, Jan. (Introductory remarks to the conference on) “Marksistowska krytyka fenomenologii a filozofia Romana Ingardena” [Marxist Criticism of Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden]. SFil, no. 9 (1975): 7–8.
SZEMIńSKI, P. “O budowie obrazu Romana Ingardena - kilka uwag” [Some Remarks on Roman Ingarden’s On the Structure of Painting]. Roczniki Akademii Sztuk Piȩknych [Annals of the Academy of Fine Arts]. Warszawa: 1974. 65–68.
SZEWCZYK, Jan. “Estetyka--normatywna czy opisowa? Uwagi na marginesie przedmowy do rosyjskiego wydania pism estetycznych Romana Ingardena” [Is Aesthetics Normative or Descriptive? Marginal Comments on the Foreword to the Russian Edition of Ingarden’s Essays in Aesthetics]. SFil, no. 2 (1963): 127–139.
SZEWCZYK, Jan. “Roman Ingarden.” Wielka Encyklopedia Powszechna, Vol. 5. Warszawa: PWN, 1965. 54.
SZEWCZYK, Jan. “Spór o istotȩ filozofii” [The Controversy Over the Essence of Philosophy]. SFil, no. 2 (1966): 179–201.
SZUMAN, S. Review of O poznawaniu dziela literackiego, by Roman Ingarden. PWsp 62, nos. 8–9 (1937): 283–290.
SZYMA, Tadeusz. “O Ingardenowskiej koncepcji analizy dziela literackiego” [On Ingarden’s Concept of the Analysis of the Literary Work of Art]. StEs 10 (1973): 287–301.
TAKEI, Yushiro. “On Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy (1893–1970): Part 1” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 12, no. 3 (1979): 141–160.
TAKEI, Yushiro. “On Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy (1893–1970): Part 2” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 13, nos. 1–2 (1979): 221–255.
TAKEI, Yushiro. “On Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy (1893–1970): Part 3” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 13, no. 4 (1979): 305–329.
TAKEI, Yushiro. “On Ingarden’s The Structure of the Literary Work of Art and Its Concretization” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 15, no. 1 (1981): 25–41.
TAKEI, Yushiro. “The ‘Life’ of the Literary Work of Art and Human Life: Part 1” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 16, no. 4 (1982): 149–169.
TAKEI, Yushiro. “The ‘Life’ of the Literary Work of Art and Human Life: Part 2” (in Japanese). The Journal of Gifu College of Economics 17, no. 1 (1983): 67–96.
TAKEI, Yushiro. “The Literary Work and Its Concretization in Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetics.” Analecta Husserliana 17 (1984): 285–307.
TARNOWSKI, Karol. “Konstytucja transcendentalna w oczach Romana Ingardena” [Roman Ingarden’s Critique of Transcendental Constitution]. SFil, no. 4 (1973): 65–74.
TARNOWSKI, Karol. “Roman Ingarden’s Critique of Transcendental Constitution.” DaH 3, no. 1 (1976): 111–119.
TATARKIEWICZ, Władysław. “Roman Ingarden, 1893–1970.” PPR 31, no. 3 (1971): 460–462.
TATARKIEWICZ, Władysław. “Roman Ingarden.” Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 55–57.
TATARKIEWICZ, Władysław. “Uczczenie pamiȩci Romana Ingardena” [In Memory of Roman Ingarden]. RFil 30, no. 1 (1972): 1–4.
TATARKIEWICZ, Władysław. “Roman Ingarden.” DaH 1, no. 3 (1974): 153–155.
TERTULIAN, N. “Genèse et structure.” RE 25, no. 3 (1972): 279–285.
TISCHNER, Józef. “Teoria poznania w wiȩzach ontologii” [Theory of Cognition in Ontological Fetters]. Analecta Cracoviensa 3 (1971): 33–50.
TISCHNER, Józef. “Perspektywy hermeneutyki” [Perspectives of Hermeneutics]. Znak 23, nos. 2–3 (1971): 145–172.
TISCHNER, Józef. “Ingarden-Husserl: spór o istnienie świata” [Ingarden-Husserl: The Controversy over the Existence of the World]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 127–143.
TISCHNER, Józef. “Swemu istnieniu zaufać” [Trusting One’s Own Existence]. Znak 24, no. 11 (1972): 1557–1562. [Review of Książeczką o człowieku.]
TISCHNER, Józef. “W krȩgu myśli Husserlowskiej” [In the Sphere of Husserl’s Thinking]. AHFMS 24 (1978): 215–236.
TISCHNER, Józef. “Teoria poznania w wiȩzach ontologii” [Theory of Cognition in Ontological Fetters]. Myślenie według wartości [Thinking According to Values], by Józef Tischner. Kraków: Znak, 1982. 50–70.
TISCHNER, Józef. “Perspektywy hermeneutyki” [Perspectives of Hermeneutics]. Myślenie według wartości [Thinking According to Values], by Józef Tischner. Kraków: Znak, 1982. 88–119.
TISCHNER, Józef. “Swemu istnieniu zaufać” [Trusting One’s Own Existence]. Myślenie według wartości [Thinking According to Values], by Józef Tischner. Kraków: Znak, 1982. 43–49. [Review of Książeczką o człowieku.]
TISCHNER, Józef. “W krȩgu myśli Husserlowskiej” [In the Sphere of Husserl’s Thinking]. Myślenie według wartości [Thinking According to Values], by Józef Tischner. Kraków: Znak, 1982. 17–42.
TISCHNER, Józef. Der unmögliche Dialog: Christentum und Marxismus in Polen, translated from the Polish by Theo Mechtenberg. Graz-Wien-Köln: Styria, 1982.
TODOROV, Tzvetan. “Semiologie du théâtre. Petr Bogatyrev, ‘Les signes du théâtre’; Roman Ingarden, ‘Les fonctions du langage au théâtre’.” Poétique 8 (1971): 515–538.
TRUMBLE, Rodney R. “The Essential Core and Essential Nothingness. An Essay of Critical Comparison Between the Ontological Positions of Roman Ingarden and Jean-Paul Sartre vis-à-vis the Notion of Essence.” Vérité et Ethos: Recueil Commémoratif dédié à Alphonse—Marie Parent sous la direction de Jaromir Danek. Quebec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 1982. 265–280.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Roman Ingarden ou une nouvelle position du problème Idéalisme-Réalisme.” Actes du Xl-ème Congrès International de Philosophie, Bruxelles 1953, Complément au Vol. 13. Amsterdam-Louvain: 1953.317–321.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Un dessin de la philosophie de Roman Ingarden.” RMM 60 (1955): 32–57.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. Essence et Existence. Etude à propos de la philosophie de Roman Ingarden et de Nicolai Hartmann. Aubier: Editions Montaigne, 1955.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. Essence et Existence. Etude à propos de la philosophie de Roman Ingarden et de Nicolai Hartmann, 2nd ed. Paris: Editions Montaigne, 1957.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. Review of Spór o istnienie świata, by Roman Ingarden. Mind 66, no. 262 (1957): 269–271.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. Review of Studia z estetyki, Vols. 1 and 2, by Roman Ingarden. JAAC 17, no. 3 (1959): 391–392.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa, (ed.) “Editorial: The Second Phenomenology.” For Roman Ingarden: Nine Essays in Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959. 1–5.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa, (ed.) For Roman Ingarden: Nine Essays in Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa, (ed.) “L’analyse de l’idée et la participation.” For Roman Ingarden: Nine Essays in Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959. 160–179.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. Phenomenology and Science in Contemporary European Thought. New York: Farrar Straus, 1962.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Existence Vindicated or the Hundred Real Dollars.” Personalist 46 (1965): 211–221.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Dem Wendepunkt der Phänomenologie entgegen.” PRun 14, nos. 2–3 (1967): 183–208.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Trzy wymiary fenomenologii — ontologiczny, transcendentalny, kosmiczny — rola Romana Ingardena” [The Three Dimensions of Phenomenology — Ontological, Transcendental, Cosmic — and the Role of Roman Ingarden]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 175–208.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Roman Ingarden’s Philosophical Legacy and Beyond: The Creative Freedom of the Possible Worlds.” DaH 2, no. 2 (1975): 71–87.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. (ed.) Ingardeniana. Analecta Husserliana, Vol. 4. Boston: Dordrecht, 1976.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Beyond Ingarden’s Idealism-Realism Controversy with Husserl: The New Contextual Phase of Phenomenology.” Analecta Husserliana 4 (1976): 241–418.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “The Initial Spontaneity and the Modalities of Human Life.” Analecta Husserliana 5 (1976): 15–37.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “The Prototype of Action: Ethical or Creative?” Analecta Husserliana 7 (1978): 177–211.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Man the Creator and His Triple Telos.” Analecta Husserliana 9 (1979): 3–29.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Existence and Order.” Analecta Husserliana 11 (1981): 5–10.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Poetica Nova: The Creative Crucibles of Human Existence and of Art. Part I: The Poetics of Literature.” Analecta Husserliana 12 (1982): 1–93.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “The Theme” [Introduction]. Analecta Husserliana 14 (1983): xi–xx.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “The Main Feature of Ingarden’s Aesthetics in a Philosophical Perspective” (in Hebrew). Iyyun 32, nos. 1–2 (1983): 76–86.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “The Tenets of Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetics in a Philosophical Perspective.” Analecta Husserliana 17 (1984): 271–283.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “Aesthetic Enjoyment and Poetic Sense: The Irreducible in Literature.” Analecta Husserliana 18 (1984): 3–21.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “First Principles of the Metaphysics of Life Charting the Human Condition.” Analecta Husserliana 21 (1986): 3–73.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. “The Moral Sense and the Human Person Within the Fabric of Communal Life.” Analecta Husserliana 20 (1986): 3–100.
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. Logos and Life: Creative Experience and the Critique of Reason, Book I. Analecta Husserliana, Vol. 24. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988.
TYSZCZYK, A. “L’identité, la vie, la durée de l’œuvre littéraire sur la théorie de l’œuvre d’art de R. Ingarden” (in Polish). RoHum 32, no. 1 (1984): 5–49.
ULICKA, D. “Ingarden wypowiedziany” [Ingarden Expressed]. PHum 25, nos. 10–12 (1981): 152–160. [Review of Wykłady i dyskusje z estetyki.]
VAJDA, György M. and Simon, S. “Phenomenology and Literary Criticism.” Literature and Its Interpretation, Lajos Nyiro, ed. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 1979. 165–230.
VAJDA, György M. “Phenomenology and Comparative Literature (A Kind of a Fictitious Letter to Students).” Neohelicon: Acta Comparationis Litterarum Universarum 10, no. 2 (1983): 133–146.
VALDéS, Mario J. Shadows in the Cave: A Phenomenological Approach to Literary Criticism Based on Hispanic Texts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982.
VAN BREDA, H. L. “In Memoriam Roman Ingarden.” RPL 68, no. 99 (1970): 423–426.
VAN BREDA, H. L. “Professor Roman Ingarden.” JBSP 1, no. 3 (1970): 100.
VAN BREDA, H. L. “Roman Ingarden 5.2.1893 — 14.6.1970.” RIPh 24 (1970): 161–162.
VAN PEURSEN, C. A. “Some Remarks on the Ego in the Phenomenology of Husserl.” For Roman Ingarden: Nine Essays in Phenomenology, A.-T. Tymieniecka, ed. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959. 29–41.
VODIćKA, Felix. Die Struktur der literarischen Entwicklung. München: Fink, 1976. 87–125.
VOISé, Waldemar. “Polish Considerations of Time.” The Study of Time, Vol. 3, J. T. Fraser, Nathaniel Lawrence and D. Park, eds. New York: Springer, 1978.471–480.
VON LEDEBUR, R. “Überlegungen zur Ästhetik Roman Ingardens an Beispielen neuerer deutscher Shakespeare-Rezeption.” Poetica, no. 2 (1976): 134–144.
WALLNER, Ingrid M. “In Defense of Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism: Roman Ingarden’s Critique Re-Examined.” Husserl Studies 4 (1987): 3–43.
WARNKE, Camilla. “Marxistische Kritik der Phänomenologie und die Philosophie Roman Ingardens.” DZP 23 (1975): 1513–1517.
WARNKE, Camilla. “Husserlowski podmiot transcendentalny. Próba interpretacji” [Husserl’s Transcendental Subject. Toward Interpretation]. SFil, no. 1 (1976): 19–25.
WASZCZENKO, Piotr. “Roman Ingarden — filozof rzetelnego doświadczenia” [Roman Ingarden — Philosopher of Genuine Experience]. Kierunki, no. 18(1964).
WASZCZENKO, Piotr. “Idee i możliwości. U podstaw Ingardenowskiej koncepcji ontologii” [Ideas and Possibilities. The Basis of Ingarden’s Concept of Ontology]. ŻiM 18, no. 1 (1968): 65–78.
WEȩGRZECKI, Adam. “Człowiek i sztuka. O niektórych rysach poglaȩdów estetycznych Romana Ingardena” [Man and Art. On Some Features of Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetic Views]. ŻiM 18, no. 1 (1968): 79–87.
WEȩGRZECKI, Adam. “O absolutności wartości etycznych i estetycznych” [On the Absoluteness of Ethical and Aesthetic Values]. Fenomenologia Romana Ingardena [The Phenomenology of Roman Ingarden]. SFil (special issue) (1972): 421–427.
WEȩGRZECKI, Adam. “Roman Ingarden: L’homme et son œuvre.” EP, no. 1 (1972): 55–60.
WEȩGRZECKI, Adam. “On the Absoluteness of Values.” JBSP 6, no. 2 (1975): 109–115.
WEȩGRZECKI, Adam. “Idea systemu wzgleȩdnie izolowanego w antropologii filozoficznej” [The Concept of a Relatively Isolated System in Philosophical Anthropology]. RFil 33, nos. 3–4 (1975): 339–342. [Summary only.]
WEȩGRZECKI, Adam. “Idea systemu wzgleȩdnie izolowanego w antropologii filozoficznej” [The Concept of a Relatively Isolated System in Philosophical Anthropology]. SFil, no. 1 (1976): 57–69.
WEȩGRZECKI, Adam. „Uwagi Romana Ingardena o poznawaniu drugiego człowieka” [Roman Ingarden’s Notes on the Cognition of the Other]. SFil, no. 12 (1980): 13–19.
WELLEK, René and Warren, Austin. Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1949.
WELLEK, René. Four Critics: Croce, Valéry, Lukács and Ingarden. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1981. 55–85.
WELLEK, René. “An Answer to Roman Ingarden.” Komparatistik: Theoretische Überlegungen und südosteuropäische Wechselseitigkeit. Festschrift für Zoran Konstantinovic. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1981. 21–26.
WENISCH, Fritz. “Insight and Objective Necessity: A Demonstration of the Existence of Propositions which are Simultaneously Informative and Necessarily True.” Aletheia: An International journal of Philosophy, Vol. 4: Epistemology and Logic. Bern: Lang, 1988. 107–197.
WERKMEISTER, H. Review of Time and Modes of Being, by Roman Ingarden. Personalist 45, no. 4 (1964): 560–561.
WIATOR. “Trzy portrety” [Three Portraits]. Pismo Literacko-Artystyczne, no. 3 (1984): 161–165.
WILLIAMS, Marcellette G. “How Can You Tell the Poem from the Reader?” LangQ 19, nos. 3–4 (1981): 39–40.
WOLEńSKI, Jan. “R. Ingardena krytyka logiki formalnej” [Roman Ingarden’s Examination of Formal Logic]. RFil 38, nos. 1–2 (1980): 61–64.
WOLEńSKI, Jan. “Remarks on Primitivity and Secondarity as Moments of Existence.” The Philosophy of Roman Ingarden: Jagiellonian University Reports on Philosophy (Polish) 10 (1986): 81–87.
ZABOROWSKA, M. “Le contexte ‘intérieur’ de la thèse d’Ingarden sur le caractère purement intentionnel de l’œuvre d’art” (in Polish). SMet, no. 24 (1985): 229–245.
ZAGORSEKOVA, M. “Ku kritike fenomenologickej interpretace umeleckeho diela” [On the Criticism of the Phenomenological Interpretation of a Literary Work]. Filozofia 34, no. 1 (1979): 37–51.
ŻEGLEń, Urszula. “O możliwości formalnej analizy ontologii Romana Ingardena” [On the Possibility of a Formal Analysis of Roman Ingarden’s Ontology]. SPC 16, no. 2 (1980): 192–198.
ŻEGLEń, Urszula. “Próba analizy formalnej fragmentu ontologii R. Ingardena” [An Attempt at a Formal Analysis of Pure Qualities in R. Ingarden’s Ontology]. RoFil 29, no. 1 (1981): 51–64.
ŻEGLEń, Urszula. “Analiza semantyczna relacji wysteȩpujaȩcych w ontologii Romana Ingardena” [Semantical Analysis of Relations of Roman Ingarden’s Ontology]. Studia Semiotyczne 13 (1983): 35–47.
ŻEGLEń, Urszula. “An Attempt at a Formal Analysis of Pure Qualities in Ingarden’s Ontology.” Studies in Logic and Theory of Knowledge, Ludwik. Borkowski et al., eds. Lublin: 1984. 79–89.
ZIOMEK, Jerzy. “Die Frage der Quasi-Urteile und das fiktive Bezugsfeld.” Semiotics and Dialectics: Ideology and the Text, Peter V. Zima, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press, 1981. 283–308.
ZIOMEK, Jerzy. “Fikcyjne pole odniesienia a problem quasi-saȩdów” [Fictional Field of Reference and the Problem of Quasi-Judgments]. Wypowiedź literacka a wypowiedź filozoficzna [Literary Expression vs. Philosophical Expression], Michał Glowiríski and Janusz Sławiríski, eds. Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1982. 183–198.
ZNAMIEROWSKI, Cz. “Filozofia polska na kongresie praskim” [Polish Philosophy at the Prague Congress]. Gazeta Polska 7, no. 127 (1935): 5.
ŻYCZYńSKI, Henryk. “Nowinkarstwo w polonistyce” [Innovations in Polish Studies]. Prosto z Mostu 3, no. 27 (1937): 5.
ŻYCZYńSKI, Henryk. “P.[anu] Ingardenowi w odpowiedzi” [An Answer to Mr. Ingarden]. Prosto z Mostu 3, no. 32 (1937): 4.
Dissertations
AMIGONE, Grace R. Apprehending a Literary Work of Art: A Comparative Study of Interventions Into a Poem by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers. DAI. Diss. SUNY Buffalo: 1983.
BUSCH, Charles Peter, Jr. Concerning Husserl’s Apparent Metaphysical Idealism. A Critique of Roman Ingarden’s Thesis. DAI. Diss. University of Southern California: 1977.
COHEN, Sibyl S. Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetics of Literature. DAI. Diss. Temple University: 1976.
COOLEY, Michael E. Intentionality in Literary Critical Theory and in Pedagogical Methodology. DAI. Diss. University of Louisville: 1983.
DE KIR Antoinette. Phenomenological Perspectives on Space in the Reading of Drama: An Analysis of “Thérèse Raquin,” “Vor Sonnenaufgang,” and “The Three Sisters”. DAI. Diss. University of Toronto (Canada): 1981.
HANNIBALSON, Arnór. Roman Ingarden’s Ontology. DAI. Diss. University of Edinburgh: 1973.
JAGANNATHAN, R. Roman Ingarden’s Critical Phenomenology. DAI. Diss. University of Ottawa (Canada): 1978.
JORDAN, Michael C. The Idea of the Literary Work of Art in Sophocles’ “Antigone” and Anouilh’s “Antigone”. DAI. Diss. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 1982.
LEECH, Thomas H. Approaches to Narrative in German: The Critical Theories of Ernst Hirt, Robert Petsch, Eberhard Lammert, and Franz Stanzel. DAI. Diss. The University of Texas at Austin: 1985.
LIBRACH, Ronald S. Phenomenology and Hermeneutics: The Mind’s Metaphors for Itself. DAI. Diss. University of Missouri at Columbia: 1984.
MCKENNA, William Anthony. Roman Ingarden: Ontology and Idealism. DAI. Diss. Northwestern University: 1975.
MELBOURNE, Lucy L. The Nested Structure of Unreliable First-Person Narrative: Explicit and Implicit Texts in Saul Bellow’s “Dangling Man,” Albert Camus’s “La Chute” and Franz Kafka’s “Ein Landarzt”. DAI. Diss. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 1984.
MIR, Maqsood H. The Phenomenological Response Theory: A Model for Synthesizing Reader Response and Literary Text in Teaching College English. DAI. Diss. University of Louisville: 1983.
MOORE, John J. A Phenomenological Approach to the Aesthetic Receptivity of a Dramatic Art Work. DAI. Diss. SUNY Buffalo: 1982.
POWELL, Brenda J. The Metaphysical Quality of the Tragic. A Study of Sophocles’ “Electra,” Giraudoux’ “Electre” and Sartre’s “Les Mouches”. DAI. Diss. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 1981.
SACKEN, Jeannee P. “A Certain Slant of Light”: Aesthetics of First-Person Narration, Readings of Gide’s “L’Immoraliste” and Cather’s “My Antonio”. DAI. Diss. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 1982.
SCHWEIZER, Hans. Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Literaturwissenschaft. DAI. Diss. Zürich: Genf A. Bochsler, 1944.
SHANAHAN, Joseph B. Reader Response Literature: A Source for Effective Descriptors of the Revision Stage in the Process of Writing. DAI. Diss. SUNY Buffalo: 1984.
SMITH, Jadwiga S. A Theory of the Stage Play: A Contribution to the Literary Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. DAI. Diss. Duquesne University: 1983.
SOUTHARD, David R. Author, Text and Reader in Modern Experimental Hispanic Narrative. DAI. Diss. University of Kentucky: 1983.
TAYLOR, Larry G. A Critical Study of Roman Ingarden’s Phenomenology of Literary Works of Art. DAI. Diss. The Florida State University: 1984.
TISAL, A. Der ästhetische Wert in Roman Ingardens “Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst”. DAI. Diss. Salzburg: 1972.
UDWIN, Victor M. Experience Interrupted: The Dynamics of Literary Interpretation. DAI. Diss. University of California at Berkeley: 1985.
VAN TUYL, Joanne. The Aesthetic Immediacy of Selected Lyric Poems of Keats, Fet and Verlaine. DAI. Diss. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 1986.
WILLIAMS, Marcellette G. A Phenomenological Study of Place of Indeterminacy in “Axel” and “Tiny Alice”. DAI. Diss. Michigan State University: 1981.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rudnick, H.H., Wawrzycka, J.W. (1990). Roman Ingarden: An International Bibliography (1915–1989). In: Rudnick, H.H. (eds) Ingardeniana II. Analecta Husserliana, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1964-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1964-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7378-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1964-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive