Abstract
That procedural justice requires an impartial decisionmaker is almost universally recognized. Yet, complete impartiality is not always attainable, and sometimes what it involves is unclear. In the criminal and civil law context, a person has a recognized human right to have his or her case heard by an impartial tribunal. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (UN 1966, art. 14(1)) and the American Convention on Human Rights (OAS 1969, art. 8.1) both recognize the right to trial by “a competent, independent, and impartial tribunal” for criminal and most civil cases. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms also requires that the tribunal be independent and impartial, but it omits the requirement of competence (CE 1950, art. 6(1)).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bayles, M.D. (1990). Impartiality. In: Procedural Justice. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1932-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1932-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7362-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1932-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive