Species-specific pollination: a help or a limitation to range extension?

  • F. Kjellberg
  • G. Valdeyron
Part of the Monographiae Biologicae book series (MOBI, volume 65)


Reproduction at low densities is a critical factor favoring invasion capacity. Species-specific pollination has often been viewed as an efficient means of pollination at low densities. It is however shown here that, in Ficus, an obligate mutualistic pollination system is limiting potential range extension.

There are many known instances of Ficus species introduced as ornamen- taltrees into places their pollinators have never reached: in these places the figs have remained sterile. Evidence is also given demonstrating that potential range extension in Ficus carica is limited by the inability of its pollinator to complete its yearly cycle under cooler conditions.



  1. Bronstein, J.L. 1987. Maintenance of species-specificity in a neotropical fig-pollinator wasp mutualism. Oikos 48: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bronstein, J.L. 1988. Limits to fruit production in a monoecious fig: consequences of an obligate mutualism. Ecology 69: 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Condit, I.J. 1947. The fig. Waltham, Mass., USA, 217 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Feinsinger, P. 1983. Coevolution and pollination. In: D.J. Futuyama and M. Slatkin (eds) Coevolution, Sinauer Associates, Massachusets, pp. 282–310.Google Scholar
  5. Galil, J. 1977. Fig Biology. Endeavour, New Series 1: 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galil J. & Eisikowitch D. 1969. Further studies on the pollination ecology of Ficus sycomorus L. (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae). Tijd. Ent. 112: 1–13.Google Scholar
  7. Galil, J., Stein M. & Horovitz A., 1976. On the origin of the Sycomore Fig (Ficus sycomorus L.) in the Middle East. Gardens’ Bull 29: 191–205.Google Scholar
  8. Ibrahim M. 1985. Contribution à une approche évolutive de la symbiose entre Ficus carica L. et Blastophaga psenes L. Thèse 3e cycle, U.S.T.L. Montpellier, France, 59 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Joseph, K.J. 1958. Recherches sur les chalcidiens, Blastophaga psenes L. et Philotrypesis caricae L. du figuier (Ficus carica L.). Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 2ème série 20: 187–260.Google Scholar
  10. Kjellberg F., Gouyon P.-HH., Ibrahim M., Raymond M. & Valdeyron G. 1987. The stability of the symbiosis between dioecious figs and their pollinators: a study of Ficus carica L. and Blastophaga psenes L. Evolution 41: 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Michaloud G. 1988. Aspects de la reproduction des figuiers monoïques en forêt équatoriale africaine. Thèse d’Université, U.S.T.L. Montpellier, France, 234 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Michaloud G. & Michaloud-Pelletier S. 1987. Ficus épiphytes (Moraceae) et arbres supports. Biotropica 19: 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saporta, G. de 1988. Origine paléontologique des arbres cultivés ou utilisés par l’homme. Baillère, Paris, 360 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Valizadeh M., Valdeyron G., Kjellberg F. & Ibrahim M. 1987. Le flux génique chez le figuier, Ficus carica. La dispersion par le pollen dans un peuplement dense. Oecologia plantarum 8: 143–154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Kjellberg
  • G. Valdeyron

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations