Skip to main content

The bean beetle (Acanthoscelides obtectus) and its host, the French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): a two-way colonization story

  • Chapter
Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin

Part of the book series: Monographiae Biologicae ((MOBI,volume 65))

Abstract

Phaseolus vulgaris and Acanthoscelides obtectus originated from Central America. But, outside equatorial America, where mature pods (of wild or cultivated beans) are present all the year in field, bean pods occur only during restricted periods of the year. In such regions, the bean bruchid exists as a domestic, man-dependent insect. Its ability to reproduce in stored seeds allows it to expand its range in anthropogenic habitats by developing alternatively in the field during the ripening time of pods, and during the rest of the year in stored seeds. Reproduction in the stores is allowed by the ability to oviposit in spite of suppression of the first sequencies of the original egg-laying behaviour, i.e. flight to mature pods, prospection of pods, holing of pods by mandibles. In stores, it glues eggs directly to the seeds tegument. Growing in stores, it can live temporarily each year in fields, during the ripening of pods, where climatic conditions in the remainder of the year are inconsistent with its biological constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Applebaum, S.W. 1964. Physiological aspects of host specificity on the Bruchidae. Journal of Insect Physiology 10: 783–788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H.G. & Stebbins, G.L. 1965. The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E.A. 1981. Non-protein amino acids in the Leguminosae. In: R.M. Polhill & P.H. Raven (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, England, pp. 489–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, J. A. 1981. Handbook of Legumes of world economic importance. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A.M.A. 1974. Research on the evolution and genetic improvement of grain legumes. Journal of Applied Biology 46: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, H. 1879. Souvenirs entomologiques 8: 26–27, 47–48, du Layet, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, G.S. 1959. The raison d’être of secundary plant substances. Science 129: 1466–1470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garaud, P. 1984. Mise en évidence d’un polyporphisme chromosomique de translocation dans une population naturelle à’Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coléoptère, Bruchidae) du Burundi. Genetica 63: 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. 1973. Insects in the population dynamics of plants. Proceedings of the 6th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society 6: 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. 1967. Behavior genetics, or ‘experimental’ analysis; the challenge of science versus the Cure of technology, The Psychologist 22 (2): 118–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hossaert, M. & Valero, M. 1985. Differences in population biology within the Lathyrus sylvestris group (Leguminosae; Papilionaceae). In: J. Haeck & J.W. Woldenburg (eds.), Structure and functioning of plant populations. Phenotypic and genotypic variation in plant populations 2, North Holland Publ., pp. 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huignard, J. 1970. Influences comparées de la plante-hôte et de la copulation sur l’ovogenèse puis sur la ponte chez Acanthoscelides obtectus. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 271: 2171–2174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huignard, J. & Biémont, J.C. 1981. Reproductive polymorphism of populations of Acanthoscelides obtectus from different Colombian ecosystems. In: V. Labeyrie (ed.), The ecology of bruchids attacking legumes (pulses), Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H. 1977. The interaction of seed predators and seed chemistry. In: Comportement des insectes et milieu trophique, C.N.R.S. Publ., pp. 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarry, M. 1981. Evolution of spatial pattern of attacks by Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) of Phaseolus vulgaris L. pods in South West France. In: V. Labeyrie (ed.), The ecology of bruchids attacking legumes (pulses), Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarry, M. & Bonnet, A. 1982. La bruche du haricot, Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Coleoptera, Bruchidae), est-elle un danger pour le cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.)? Agronomie 2 (10): 963–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jermy, T. 1984. Evolution of insect-host plant relationships. The american naturalist 124 (5): 609–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.D. 1981a. Seed bettle host specificity and the systematics of the leguminosae. In: R.M. Polhill & PH. Raven (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, England, pp. 995–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.D. 1981b. Relations of Acanthoscelides with their plant hosts. In: V. Labeyrie (ed.), The ecology of bruchids attacking legumes (pulses), Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. & Maison P. 1954. De l’influence du microclimat sur la ponte de la Bruche du haricot (Acanthoscelides obtectus Say) dans la nature. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie d’Agriculture 40: 733–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1957. Sur les conditions de pullulation en France de la Bruche du haricot (.Acanthoscelides obtectus Say) en culture. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie d’Agriculture 43: 590–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1960. Influence de l’hôte sur la fécondité à’Acanthoscelides obtectus Say. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 250: 615–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1962. Les Acanthoscelides. In: Balachowsky ed. Entomologie appliquée à l’agriculture, Vol. 1(1), Masson Publ., pp. 469–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1964a. Importance de l’intégration des signaux fournis par l’hôte lors de la ponte des insectes. Année psychologique 66 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1964b. Action sélective de la fréquence de l’hôte utilisable (Acrolepia assectella Zell) sur Diadromus pulchellus WSM: la variabilité de la fécondité de fonction de l’intensité de la stimulation. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 259: 3644–3647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1971. Trophic relations and sex meetings in insects. Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 6 (1–4): 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1977a. Influence de la variabilité du comportement dans la dynamique des populations d’insectes. In: J. Medioni & E. Boesiger (eds.), Mécanismes éthologiques de l’évolution, Masson Publ., pp. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1977b. Environnement sensoriel et coévolution des insectes. In: Colloques Internationaux du C.N.R.S.: Comportement des Insectes et Milieu Trophique, Tours 13–17/09/1976, C.N.R.S. Publ., pp. 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1978. Reproduction of insects and coévolution of insects and plants. Entomologia Experimentalis & Applicata 24: 496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1981. Vaincre la carence protéique par le développement des légumineuses alimentaires et la protection de leurs récoltes contre les bruches. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 3 (1): 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. 1987. Towards a synthetic approach to insect-plant relationships. In: V. Labeyrie, G. Farbes, D. Lachaise (eds.), Plant 86, Junk Publ., Dordrecht, pp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A.D. 1924. The effect of weevily seed beans upon the bean crop and upon the dissemination of weevils Bruchus obtectus Say and B. quadrimaculatus Feb. Journal of Economic entomology 17: 538–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi, B. 1981. Feeding, longevity and reproduction of adults of Acanthoscelides obtectus Say in laboratory conditions. In: V. Labeyrie ed. The ecology ofbruchids attacking legumes (pulses), Junk Publ., Dordrecht, pp. 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukianovitch, F.K. & Ter Minassian, M.E., 1957. Jouki Zernoyki (Bruchidat) Faune de l’U.R.S.S. 24(1) N.S. 67: 1–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maréchal, 1969. Données cytologiques sur les espèces de la sous-tribu des Papilionaceae, Phaseloae- Phaseolenae Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National Belge 39 (2): 125–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monchadsky, A.S. 1958. A propos de la classification des facteurs du milieu. Zool. Zh. 37: 680–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perttunen, V. & Häyrinen, T. 1970. Individual variation in the take-off activity of Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Col. Bruchidae) Ann.Ent.Fenn. 36 (2): 107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickersgill, B. 1977. Taxonomy and the origin and evolution of cultivated plant in the new world. Nature 268: 591–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert, M. 1985. A model of host plant change of Zabrotes subfasciatus Boh. (Coleoptera Bruchidae) in a traditional bean cropping system in Costa Rica. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 3: 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouzat, J. 1975. Analyse expérimentale du rôle de l’ovitube dans le comportement de ponte de la bruche du haricot, Acanthoscelides obtectus Say. Behaviour 54: 258–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouzat, J. 1977. Effet des stimulations provenant de la plante-hôte, le haricot Phaseolus vulgaris L., sur le comportement de la ponte de la Bruche du haricot Acanthoscelides obtectus Say. In: Colloques Internationaux du C.N.R.S. 265: Comportement des insectes et milieu trophique. pp. 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouzat, J. 1981. The role of sense organs in the relations between bruchids and their host plants. In: V. Labeyrie (ed.), The ecology ofbruchids attacking legumes (pulses), Junk Publ., Dordrecht, pp. 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, P. 1964. An outline of recent progress in stored-product entomology. Journal of Economical Entomology 57 (1): 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.R. & Van Emden, H.F. 1979. Insect pests of grain legumes. Annual Review of Entomology 24: 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, B.J. 1981. Univoltine and multivoltine cycles. Their significance. In: V. Labeyrie (ed.), The ecology of bruchids attacking legumes (pulses), Junk Publ., Dordrecht, pp. 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varaigne-Labeyrie, C. & Labeyrie, V. 1981. First data on bruchidae which attack the pods of legumes in Upper Volta of which eight species are man consumed. In: V. Labeyrie (ed.), The ecology of bruchids attacking legumes (pulses), Junk Publ., Dordrecht, pp. 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, C. 1975. The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon. Oecologia 18: 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwölfer, H. & Harris, P. 1971. Host specificity determination of insects for biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology 16: 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

F. di Castri A. J. Hansen M. Debussche

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Labeyrie, V. (1990). The bean beetle (Acanthoscelides obtectus) and its host, the French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): a two-way colonization story. In: di Castri, F., Hansen, A.J., Debussche, M. (eds) Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Monographiae Biologicae, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1876-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1876-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7337-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1876-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics