# Schrödinger’s Theoretical Project

## Abstract

Even though this essay is primarily devoted to an assessment of the most sophisticated version of Schrödinger’s interpretation of quantum mechanics, namely at the beginning of the 1950’s, we cannot avoid analyzing in some detail the ideas he defended during the mid-twenties. It was indeed during this early period that Schrödinger first formulated his life-long methodological requirements for a theory of atomic processes. But of course, the perspective we shall adopt is quite different from that of most historians of the beginnings of quantum mechanics. Our task goes beyond identifying an initial version of Schrödinger’s requirements and inserting it within the intellectual context of the time. We also have to track successive statements of these requirements in later texts, and to comment retrospectively on their significance. The very vocabulary we use when we speak of a “theoretical project”, and of the “methodological requirements” which are constitutive of it, has a retrospective tinge. For, after all, little had to be said about the project as long as it appeared to be immediately realized by wave mechanics, and few of the methodological requirements had to be made explicit when they were considered as unproblematically fulfilled by the current theory.

## Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Wave Packet Wave Mechanic Compton Effect Theoretical Entity## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Reference

- 1a.N. Bohr, H.A. Kramers and J.C. Slater, “The quantum theory of radiation”, Phil. Mag. 47, 785–802, 1924;Google Scholar
- 1b.in: B.L Van der Waerden (ed.),
*Sources of quantum mechanics*, North Holland, 1967Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger, “Bohrs neue Strahlungshypothese und der Energiesatz”, Die Naturwissenschaften, 12, 720–724, 1924Google Scholar
- 1a.E. Schrödinger to N. Bohr, May 24, 1924, AHQP;Google Scholar
- 1b.quoted and translated by O. Darrigol, “Schrödinger’s statistical physics and some related themes”, in: M. Bitbol & O. Darrigol (eds.),
*Erwin Schrödinger, Philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics*, op. cit. 1924Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger, “Might perhaps energy be merely a statistical concept?”, loc. cit.Google Scholar
- 3.E. Schrödinger to B. Bertotti, December 27, 1957, in: B. Bertotti & U. Curi (eds.),
*Erwin Schrödinger scienziato e filosofo*, Il poligrafo, 1994, p. 156Google Scholar - 1.Quoted and translated by O. Darrigol, “Schrödinger’s statistical physics and some related themes”, loc. cit.Google Scholar
- 2.E. Schrödinger to N. Bohr, May 24, 1924, AHQP; quoted and translated by L. Wessels,
*Schrödinger’s interpretations of wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 73Google Scholar - 3.See M. Jammer,
*The conceptual development ofquantum mechanics*, op. cit. p. 184 (footnote)Google Scholar - 4.ibid. p. 187 (footnote 137)Google Scholar
- 1.M. Born, “On the quantum theory of collisions”, loc. cit.Google Scholar
- 2.ibid.Google Scholar
- 3.See for instance M. Born (ed.),
*The Born-Einstein letters*, op. cit. p. 186 f.Google Scholar - 4a.Einstein expressed his hopes about a future complete theory on several occasions. See e.g. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” loc. cit.;Google Scholar
- 4b.M. Born (ed.),
*The Born-Einstein letters*, op. cit. p. 173. Born, instead, noticed: “(Einstein) calls my way of describing the world ‘incomplete’; in his eyes this is a flaw which he hopes to see removed, while I am prepared to put up with it”, ibid. p. 189Google Scholar - 5.W. Heisenberg, AHQP, interview on February 15, 1963, quoted by M. Jammer,
*The conceptual development of quantum mechanics*, op. cit. p. 187*ment of quantum mechanics*, op. cit. p. 184 (footnote)Google Scholar - 1.W. Heisenberg,
*Physics and Philosophy*, op. cit. p. 40–41Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger,
*Science and Humanism*, op. cit.p. 41Google Scholar - 3.E. Schrödinger, “What is an elementary particle?”, Endeavour, 9, 109–116,1950Google Scholar
- 4.ibid.Google Scholar
- 5a.E. Schrödinger,
*Transformation and interpretation in quantum mechanics*, (Dublin seminar 1952,Google Scholar - 5b.E. Schrödinger,
*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit., p. 82)Google Scholar - 1.ibid. p. 81Google Scholar
- 2.E. Schrödinger,
*Transformation and interpretation in quantum mechanics*, (in: E. Schrödinger,*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p. 82)Google Scholar - 3a.See E. Schrödinger,
*William James lectures (c. 1954), 3rd lecture*(in: E. Schrödinger,*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, p. 145–149;Google Scholar - 3b.E. Schrödinger,
*Nature and the Greeks*, op. cit. chapter 7. An analysis of Schrödinger’s conception of the “thing” of everyday life is provided in chapter 5.Google Scholar - 4.The idea of an “intermediate position” is defended by Y. Ben-Menahem, “Struggling with realism: Schrödinger’s case”, in: M. Bitbol & O. Darrigol, (eds.),
*Erwin Schrödinger, Philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics*, op. cit.Google Scholar - 5.S. Blackburn,
*Essays in Quasi-realism*, Oxford University Press, 1993Google Scholar - 6.ibid. p.15Google Scholar
- 7.ibid. p. 28Google Scholar
- 1.ibid. p. 8Google Scholar
- 2.M. Bitbol, “Quasi-réalisme et pensée physique”, Critique n°564, 340–361, 1994Google Scholar
- 3.E. Schrödinger,
*Science and Humanism*, op. cit. p. 47Google Scholar - 4.E. Schrödinger,
*William James lectures (c. 1954)*, (in: E. Schrödinger,*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p. 145–149); and chapter 5 for further developments and analysis.Google Scholar - 5.S. Blackburn,
*Essays in Quasi-realism*, op. cit. p. 7Google Scholar - 1a.E. Schrödinger, “Bohrs neue Strahlungshypothese und der Energiesatz”, loc. cit.;Google Scholar
- 1b.translated by O. Darrigol, “Schrödinger’s Statistical physics and some related themes”, in: M. Bitbol & O. Darrigol (eds.),
*Erwin Schrödinger, Philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics*, op. cit.Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger, “Bemerkungen über die statistische Entropiedefinition beim idealen Gas”, Berlin Akademie der Wissenschaft Sitzungsberichte, 1925, 434–441Google Scholar
- 3.ibid.Google Scholar
- 4.A. Einstein, “Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases”, Berlin Akademie der Wissenschaft Sitzungsberichte, 1925, 3–14, §7Google Scholar
- 1.E. Schrödinger, “Bemerkungungen über die statistische Entropiedefinition beim idealen Gas”, loc. cit.; translated by L. Wessels,
*Schrödinger’s interpretations of wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 37Google Scholar - 2.see V.V. Raman and P. Forman, “Why was it Schrödinger who developed de Broglie’s ideas?”, HSPS, 1, 291–313, 1969, for a detailed study of Schrödinger’s reception of de Brogue’s work.Google Scholar
- 3.M.J. Klein, “Einstein and the wave-particle duality”, The natural philosopher, 3, 3–49, 1964Google Scholar
- 4.E. Schrödinger, “Zur Einsteinschen Gastheorie”, Phys. Zeits., 27, 95–101, 1926Google Scholar
- 1.L. Wessels,
*Schrödinger’s interpretations of wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 146–147Google Scholar - 2.According to L. Wessels (in: “Schrödinger’s route to wave mechanics”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 10, 311–340, 1977), one of the reasons Schrödinger did not use the language of matter waves but rather a formal condition on Hamilton’s equation for particles in his first paper on wave mechanics, was that he did not know whether the difficulties linked with the concept of wave packets could be met by his newly formulated theory.Google Scholar
- 1.E. Schrödinger, “Quantization and as a problem of proper values II”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. (see p. 19 f.)Google Scholar - 2.H.A. Lorentz to E. Schrödinger, May 27, 1926, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 47Google Scholar - 3.E. Schrödinger, “Quantization and as a problem of proper values II”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 20Google Scholar - 4.E. Schrödinger to H.A. Lorentz, June 6, 1926, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 59: “You see from the text of the note, which was written before I received your letter, how much I too was concerned about the ‘staying together’ of these wave packets”Google Scholar - 5.E. Schrödinger, “The continuous transition from micro- to macro-mechanics”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 41Google Scholar - 1.H.A. Lorentz to E. Schrödinger, June 19, 1926, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 70Google Scholar - 2.W. Heisenberg, “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics” in: J. A. Wheeler & W.H. Zurek,
*Quantum theory and measurement*, op. cit. p. 72Google Scholar - 3.F. Steiner, “Schrödinger’s discovery of coherent states”, Physica B 151, 323–326, 1988Google Scholar
- 4.H.A. Lorentz to E. Schrödinger, May 27, 1926, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 48Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger, “TI e exchange of energy according to wave mechanics” in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 140 f.Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger, “The fundamental idea of wave mechanics”, in:
*Science and the Human temperament*, op. cit. p. 153Google Scholar - 3.Especially in the two 1935 papers: E. Schrödinger, “The present situation in quantum mechanics” loc. cit. and “Discussions of probability relations between separated systems”, loc. cit.Google Scholar
- 4.See Schrödinger’s notes entitled “principium individuationis”, 1939, AHQP, microfilm 42, section 9Google Scholar
- 1.E. Schrödinger, “The so-called new forms of statistics”, 1938, AHQP, microfilm 42, section 7Google Scholar
- 2.E. Schrödinger,
*Statistical thermodynamics*, Cambridge University Press (1st edition 1944; second edition 1952)Google Scholar - 3.ibid. p. 3Google Scholar
- 4.ibid. p. 49Google Scholar
- 5a.A. Eddington,
*Relativity theory of protons and electrons*, Cambridge University Press, 1936;Google Scholar - 5b.After his first enthusiasm had died away, Schrödinger noticed several mistakes in Eddington’s reasonings: “it is unfortunately not very hard to find major errors in this ingenious book”, E. Schrödinger to A. Einstein, July 19, 1939, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 33Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger, “World structure”, Nature, 140, 742–744, 1937Google Scholar
- 2a.ibid.;Google Scholar
- 2b.see also E. Schrödinger, “Sur la théorie du monde d’Eddington”, Nuovo cimento, 15, 246–254, 1938Google Scholar
- 3a.ibid.;Google Scholar
- 3b.see a full exposition of this idea in: E. Schrödinger,
*Nature and the Greeks*, op. cit. p. 14Google Scholar - 4.E. Schrödinger, “The proper vibrations of the expanding universe”, Physica, 6, 899–912, 1939Google Scholar
- 5.E. Schrödinger, “The final affine laws”, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 51A, 163–171, 1947Google Scholar
- 6.A. Rüger, “Atomism from cosmology: Erwin Schrödinger work on wave mechanics and space-time structure”, HSPS, 18, 378–401, 1988Google Scholar
- 7.A. Einstein,
*The meaning of relativity*, (1921), Princeton University Press, 1974, p. 82Google Scholar - 1.A. Einstein, “A generalization of the relativistic theory of gravitation”, Ann. Math. Princeton, 46, 578; 47, 146,731, 1945Google Scholar
- 2.E. Schrödinger,
*Space-time structure*, Cambridge University Press, 1950, p. 116Google Scholar - 3.ibid.Google Scholar
- 4.E. Schrödinger to A. Einstein, July 19, 1939, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 33Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger “Quantization as a problem of proper values II”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 18Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger to H.A. Lorentz, June 6, 1926, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 55Google Scholar - 3.ibid.Google Scholar
- 1.This demonstration is given in: E. Schrödinger, “The exchange of energy according to wave mechanics” (1927), in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 140Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger to G. Joos, November 17, 1926, AHQP, microfilm 41, translated by L. Wessels,
*Schrödinger’s interpretations of wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 325.Google Scholar - 3.E. Schrödinger, “The exchange of energy according to wave mechanics” in:
*Collected papers on wave**mechanics*, op. cit. p. 137:Google Scholar - 4a.E. Schrödinger, “Die Erfassung der Quantengesetze durch kontinuierliche Funktionen”, Naturwissenschaften, 26, 486–489, 1929;Google Scholar
- 4b.translated by O. Darrigol, “Schrödinger’s Statistical physics and some related themes”, in:
*Erwin Schrödinger, Philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics*, op. cit. p. 259Google Scholar - 1a.E. Schrödinger, “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems”, loc. cit.;Google Scholar
- 1a.see a comment in: H.J. Trader and H.H. von Borzeszkowski, “Interference and interaction in Schrödinger’s wave mechanics”, Found. Phys., 18, 77–93, 1988Google Scholar
- 2.ibid.Google Scholar
- 3a.E. Schrödinger, “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems”, loc. cit.;Google Scholar
- 3b.see a comment in: M. Vujicic and F. Herbut, “Distant steering: Schrödinger’s version of non-separability”, J. Phys A (Math. Gen.) 21, 2931–2939, 1988.Google Scholar
- 4.See especially B. Van Fraassen, “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”, Synthese, 29, 291–309, 1974Google Scholar
- 5.E. Schrödinger, “The present situation in quantum mechanics”, loc. cit.Google Scholar
- 6.E. Schrödinger, “Probability relations between separated systems”, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc, 32, 446–452, 1936Google Scholar
- 1a.A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”, Phys. Rev., 47, 777–780, 1935;Google Scholar
- 1a.J.A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek (eds.),
*Quantum theory and measurement*, op. cit. p. 140: “(…)since at the time of measurement, the two systems no longer interact, no real change can take place in the second system in consequence of anything that may be done to the first system”Google Scholar - 2.M. Lockwood, “What Schrödinger should have learnt from his cat”, in: M. Bitbol & O. Darrigol (eds.)
*Erwin Schrödinger, Philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics*, op. cit.1935 p. 381Google Scholar - 3.E. Schrödinger, “Zur Einsteinschen Gastheorie”, Phys. Z., 27, 95–101, 1926Google Scholar
- 1.E. Schrödinger,
*July 1952 colloquium*, (in: E. Schrödinger,*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p; 32)Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger,
*Science and Humanism*, op. cit. p. 41Google Scholar - 3a.B. d’Espagnat, “Appearance of a local world”, Phys. lett., A 171, 17–20, 1992;Google Scholar
- 3b.
*Veiled reality*, Addison-Wesley, 1995Google Scholar - 4a.E. Schrödinger, “Quantization as a problem of proper values, IV”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 120 (Schrödinger relinquishes the pure wave interpretation and adopts the electrodynamic interpretation);Google Scholar - 4b.E. Schrödinger,
*Four lectures on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 52 (here, Schrödinger aknowledges that the electrodynamic interpretation is “surely not quite satisfactory”)Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger, “Quantization as a problem of proper values, I”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 9.Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger, Letter to W. Wien, February 22, 1926, AHQP, Microfilm 41Google Scholar
- 3.E. Schrödinger, “Quantization as a problem of proper values, I”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 10Google Scholar - 4.H.A. Lorentz to E. Schrödinger, May 27, 1926, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 49Google Scholar - 5.E. Schrödinger, “On the relation between the quantum mechanics of Heisenberg, Born and Jordan, and that of Schrödinger” in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 45. See also “Quantization as a problem of proper values, III”, in the same volume.Google Scholar - 1a.ibid. p. 47;Google Scholar
- 1b.see also p. 60: “(Ψ) is perfectly capable of entering into the unchanged Maxwell-Lorentz equations between the electromagnetic field vectors as the ‘source’ of the latter”Google Scholar
- 2.E. Schrödinger, “Quantization as a problem of proper values, IV”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 123Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger to H.A. Lorentz, June 23, 1927, AHQP, microfilm 41Google Scholar
- 2.H.A. Lorentz to E. Schrödinger, June 19, 1926, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit.1995 p. 71Google Scholar - 3.L. Wessels,
*Schrödinger’s interpretations of wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 265. This asymmetry can readily be detected by comparing §5 and §9 in:*Four lectures on wave mechanics*, op. cit.Google Scholar - 4.ibid.Google Scholar
- 5a.E. Schrödinger, “The Compton effect”, Ann. der Phys., 82, 1927;Google Scholar
- 5b.in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 124Google Scholar - 1a.L. Wessels,
*Schrödinger’s interpretations of wave mechanics*, op. cit.;Google Scholar - 1b.also: E.M. Mac Kinnon,
*Scientific explanation and atomic physics*, The University of Chicago Press, 1982, p. 260Google Scholar - 2.M. Born, “On the quantum mechanics of collisions”, in: J.A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek,
*Quantum theory and measurement*, op. cit. p. 52Google Scholar - 3.W. Pauli to W. Heisenberg, October 19, 1926, quoted by O. Darrigol,
*From c-numbers to q-numbers*, University of California Press , 1992, p. 335Google Scholar - 1.M. Born, “On the quantum mechanics of collisions”, in: J.A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek,
*Quantum theory and measurement*, op. cit. p. 54Google Scholar - 1a.ibid. p. 54.Google Scholar
- 1b.Mara Beller (“Born’s probabilistic interpretation: a case study of ‘concepts in flux’”, loc. cit.) has rightly pointed out the importance of Born’s having focused his original probabilistic interpretation on the energy and momentum variables rather than on position variables.Google Scholar
- 2.M. Born, “Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgänge”, Zeitschrift für physik, 38, 803–827, 1926Google Scholar
- 3.M. Born,
*Atomic Physics*, op. cit., p. 139Google Scholar - 4.ibid. p. 140Google Scholar
- 5a.E. Schrödinger, “On the relation between the quantum mechanics of Heisenberg, Born and Jordan, and that of Schrödinger” in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit.Google Scholar - 5b.Schrödinger’s further investigations on probabilities are to be found in: E. Schrödinger, “Sur la théorie relativiste de l’électron et l’interprétation de la mécanique quantique”, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, 2, 269–310, 1932,Google Scholar
- 5c.E. Schrödinger, “The foundations of the theory of probability”, Proc. R.I.A., 51 A, 51–66, 141–146, 1947.Google Scholar
- 5d.A very interesting comment on the 1932 paper can be found in: J.C. Zambrini, “Probability in quantum mechanics according to Schrödinger”, Physica B 151, 327–331, 1988.Google Scholar
- 1.E. Schrödinger to H.A. Lorentz, June 6, 1926, in: K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 56Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger,
*Four lectures on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 52Google Scholar - 3a.N. Bohr,
*Atomic theory and the description of nature*, Cambridge University Press, 1934;Google Scholar - 3b.see also a clear exposition in: W. Heisenberg,
*The physical principles of the quantum theory*, The University of Chicago Press, 1930, p. 65.Google Scholar - 1.in: E. Schrödinger,
*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p. 39Google Scholar - 2.ibid. p. 50Google Scholar
- 3.B. d’Espagnat,
*Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics*, W.A. Benjamin, 1976, p. 30 f.Google Scholar - 1.see e.g. S. d’Agostino, “Continuity and completeness in physical theory: Schrödinger’s return to the wave conception of quantum mechanics in the 1950’s”, in: M. Bitbol and O. Darrigol (eds.),
*Erwin Schrödinger, philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics*, op. cit. p. 339Google Scholar - 2.S. d’Agostino, “Boltzmann and Hertz on the Bild-conception of physical theory”, History of Science, 28, 380–398, 1990.Google Scholar
- 3.H. Hertz,
*The principles of mechanics*, Mac Millan, 1899Google Scholar - 4.L. Boltzmann,
*Theoretical physics and philosophical problems*, (B. Mac Guinness, ed.), Reidel, 1974, p. 225Google Scholar - 5a.E. Schrödinger, “Ist Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt?”, in:
*Über Indeterminismus in der Physik*, Barth, Leipzig, 1932;Google Scholar - 5b.Trad.:
*Science, Theory and Man*, Dover, 1957;Google Scholar - 5c.E. Schrödinger, “Are there quantum jumps?”, loc. cit.Google Scholar
- 1a.E. Schrödinger, “Die Besonderheit des Weltbilds der Naturwissenschaft”, Acta Physica Austriaca, 1, 201–245, 1948;Google Scholar
- 1b.English translation in: E. Schrödinger, “On the peculiarity of the scientific world-view”,
*What is life? and other essays*, Doubleday anchor, 1957Google Scholar - 2.L. Boltzmann,
*Theoretical physics and philosophical problems*, op. cit. p. 33Google Scholar - 3.E. Schrödinger, “On the relation between the quantum mechanics of Heisenberg, Born and Jordan, and that of Schrödinger” in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 46 (footnote)Google Scholar - 4.E. Schrödinger,
*Nature and the Greeks*, op. cit. p. 16Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger, “Quantization as a problem of proper values (II)” in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 26–27Google Scholar - 2a.E. Schrödinger,
*Nature and the Greeks*, op. cit. p. 17;Google Scholar - 2b.E. Schrödinger, “Ist Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt?”, loc. cit.Google Scholar
- 3.E. Schrödinger,
*Science and Humanism*, op. cit. p. 48Google Scholar - 4.E. Schrödinger to W. Wien, August 26, 1926, quoted and translated by W. Moore,
*Schrödinger, Life and thought*, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 226.Google Scholar - 5.E. Schrödinger, “Are there quantum jumps?”, loc. cit. p. 109Google Scholar
- 1a.E. Schrödinger,
*Mind and matter*, op. cit. p. 157;Google Scholar - 1b.see also p. 138 for another striking version of this identity: “The reason why our sentient, percipient and thinking ego is met nowhere within our scientific world-picture can easily be indicated in seven words: because it is itself that world picture”Google Scholar
- 2.ibid. p. 156Google Scholar
- 3.E. Schrödinger,
*Mind and matter*, op. cit. p. 88Google Scholar - 4.see M. Bitbol,
*La Clôture de la représentation*, in: E. Schrödinger,*La nature et les grecs*, Seuil, 1992, p. 27–33 for a more detailed discussion.Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger,
*Nature and the Greeks*, op. cit. p. 90Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger, “On the relation between the quantum mechanics of Heisenberg, Born and Jordan, and that of Schrödinger”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 58Google Scholar - 3.ibid.Google Scholar
- 1.E. Schrödinger, “Quantization as a problem of proper values I”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 26Google Scholar - 2a.E. Schrödinger, “Die Besonderheit des Weltbilds der Naturwissenschaft”, Acta Physica Austriaca, 1, 201–245, 1948;Google Scholar
- 2b.English translation in: E. Schrödinger, “On the peculiarity of the scientific world-view”,
*What is life ? and other essays*, op. cit.Google Scholar - 3a.E. Schrödinger,
*Nature and the Greeks*, op. cit. p. 92;Google Scholar - 3b.
*Mind and matter*, op. cit. (chapter 1, first sentence).Google Scholar - 3c.By saying so, Schrödinger was quite close from Boltzmann himself who claimed that “(…) not only matter, but also other people are for me mere mental symbols, just an expression of equations between complexes of sensations” (L. Boltzmann,
*Theoretical physics and philosophical problems*, op. cit. p. 15)Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger,
*Nature and the Greeks*, op. cit. p. 89Google Scholar - 2.A. Einstein to E. Schrödinger, August 8, 1935. French translation in: A. Einstein,
*Oeuvres choisies, I, Quanta*, Seuil, 1989, p. 238Google Scholar - 3.E. Schrödinger to A.S. Eddington, March 22, 1940 (in: E. Schrödinger,
*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p. 121)Google Scholar - 4.E. Schrödinger,
*Nature and the Greeks*, op. cit. p. 92Google Scholar - 5.E. Schrödinger,
*Science and Humanism*, p. 22Google Scholar - 6.E. Schrödinger to A.S. Eddington, March 22, 1940 (in: E. Schrödinger,
*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p. 121)Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger,
*Science and Humanism*, p. 25Google Scholar - 2.ibid. p. 24Google Scholar
- 3.E. Schrödinger, “Might perhaps energy be a merely statistical concept?”, loc. cit. p. 169Google Scholar
- 4.E. Schrödinger, “Conceptual models in physics and their philosophical value” and “Indeterminism in physics”, in:
*Science and the human temperament*, op. cit. p. 62, 121, 124, 128, 131Google Scholar - 5.E. Schrödinger, “Indeterminism in physics”, in:
*Science and the human temperament*, op. cit. p.62Google Scholar - 6.E. Schrödinger,
*Science and Humanism*, p. 40Google Scholar - 7.E. Schrödinger, “Indeterminism in physics”, in:
*Science and the human temperament*, op. cit. p. 60Google Scholar - 8.ibid.Google Scholar
- 1.W. Heisenberg, “The physical content of quantum kinematics and dynamics”, in: J.A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek,
*Quantum theory and measurement*, op. cit. p. 74Google Scholar - 1.W. Heisenberg to W. Pauli, July 28, 1926, quoted in: J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,
*The historical development of quantum mechanics*, 5–2, Springer-Verlag, 1987, p. 822Google Scholar - 2.W. Heisenberg,
*Physics and beyond, encounters and conversations*, George Allen and Unwin, 1971, p. 75Google Scholar - 3.N. Bohr to R. Fowler, October 26, 1926, quoted in: J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,
*The historical development of quantum mechanics*, 5–2, op. cit. p. 26Google Scholar - 4.In: N. Bohr,
*Collected works*, E. Rüdinger (gen. ed.), vol. 6, J. Kalckar (ed.), North-Holland, 1985, p. 12Google Scholar - 5.ibid. p. 13Google Scholar
- 6.E. Schrödinger, “The exchange of energy according to wave mechanics”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 143–145Google Scholar - 7.E. Schrödinger, “The Compton effect”, in:
*Collected papers on wave mechanics*, op. cit. p. 124Google Scholar - 1a.R. Kidd, J. Ardini, & A. Anton, “Compton effect as a double Doppler shift”, Am. J. Phys., 53, 641–644, 1985;Google Scholar
- 1b.J. Strnad, “The Compton effect: Schrödinger’s treatment”, Eur. J. Phys., 7, 217–221, 1986Google Scholar
- 2.G. Wentzel, “Zur Theorie des photoelektrischen Effekts”, Z. Phys., 40, 574–589, 1926Google Scholar
- 3a.N.F. Mott, “The wave mechanics of a-ray tracks”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A126, 79–84, 1929;Google Scholar
- 3b.in: J. A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek,
*Quantum theory and measurement*, op. cit. p. 129Google Scholar - 4.ibid.Google Scholar
- 1a.For a philosophical analysis of the pragmatic aspects of the interpretation of quantum mechanics, see: M. Bitbol,
*Mécanique quantique: une introduction philosophique*, Flammarion, 1996;Google Scholar - 1b.M. Bitbol,
*De l’intérieur du monde*(in preparation).Google Scholar - 2.E. Schrödinger,
*Notes for seminar 1949*, (E. Schrödinger,*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p. 115)Google Scholar - 3.E. Schrödinger,
*Statistical thermodynamics*, Cambridge University Press, 1952 (introductory “note on second edition”)Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger, “Are there quantum jumps?” loc. cit.Google Scholar
- 2.E. Schrödinger,
*July 1952 colloquium*, (in: E. Schrödinger,*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p. 27)Google Scholar - 3.L. Rosenfeld, Commentary on Born’s probabilistic interpretation, in: J.A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek,
*Quantum theory and measurement*, op. cit. p. 50Google Scholar - 4.M. Beller, “Schrödinger’s dialogue with Göttingen-Copenhagen physicists”, in: M. Bitbol and O. Darrigol,
*Erwin Schrödinger, Philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics*, op. cit. p. 286. One must notice that Bohr was much more prudent (and more consistent) in this respect than either Heisenberg or Born. According to Bohr in 1929, “(…) it might be said that the concepts of stationary states and individual transition processes within their proper field of application possess just as much or*as little*‘reality’ as the very idea of individual particles. In both cases we are concerned with a demand of causality complementary to the space-time description (…)”.Google Scholar - 1.ibid.Google Scholar
- 2.E. Schrödinger,
*Statistical thermodynamics*, op. cit., p. 90Google Scholar - 3.W. Heisenberg, “Schwankungerscheinungen und Quantenmechanik”, Z. Phys., 40, 501–506, 1927Google Scholar
- 4.E. Schrödinger, “The exchange of energy according to wave mechanics”, in:
*Collected papers*, op. cit. p. 137–146Google Scholar - 1.E. Schrödinger,
*Statistical thermodynamics*, op. cit., p. 89Google Scholar - 2a.ibid. p. 90, 93;Google Scholar
- 2b.see also Notes for seminar 1955 (E. Schrödinger,
*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit.1927 p. 109)Google Scholar - 3.E. Schrödinger,
*Transformation and interpretation in quantum mechanics*, (E. Schrödinger,*The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Dublin seminars 1949–1955 and other unpublished texts)*, op. cit. p. 82)Google Scholar