Rainforest dynamics: the need for new paradigms

  • Peter J. Grubb
Part of the Monographiae Biologicae book series (MOBI, volume 74)

Abstract

A desire to understand the maintenance of the very high species-richness of tropical lowland rain forest provides the setting for this paper. It is widely accepted that both niche-differentiation and chance effects among ecologically very similar species play an important part in maintaining richness. The purpose of the paper is to provide an improved background of ideas on rainforest dynamics, against which to consider differentiation in the regeneration niche, and against which to plan management and conservation. Paradigms deemed to need review are the following: the all-importance of canopy gaps, the existence of a spectrum of tolerance in which the relative positions of species are not dependent on size of individual, the association of large seed size with shade tolerance, the idea that soil seed banks are composed of species demanding sizeable canopy gaps, and the all-importance of shade as opposed to competition for water or mineral nutrients in limiting regeneration. Recent evidence bearing on these ideas is reviewed briefly, and an alternative set of paradigms is offered.

Key Words

forest dynamics regeneration niche gaps litter tolerance seed mass dispersal seed banks root competition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. BAKER, F.S. 1949. A revised tolerance table. Journal of Forestry 47:179–181.Google Scholar
  2. BAZZAZ, F.A. & PICKETT, S.T.A. 1980. Physiological ecology of tropical succession: a comparative review. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BECKER, P., RABENOLD, P.E., IDOL, J.R. & SMITH, A.P. 1988. Water potential gradients for gaps and slopes in a Panamanian tropical moist forest’s dry season. Journal of Tropical Ecology 4:173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BROKAW, N.V.L. 1985. Treefalls, regrowth, and community structure in tropical forests. Pp. 53–69 in Pickett, S.T.A. & White, P.S. (eds). The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  5. BROWN, N.D. 1993. The implications of climate and gap microclimate for seedling growth conditions in a Bornean lowland rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9:153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BUDOWSKI, G. 1970. The distinction between old secondary and climax species in tropical central American lowland forests. Tropical Ecology 11:44–48.Google Scholar
  7. BURSLEM, D.F.R.P., in press. Differential responses to nutrients, shade and drought among tree seedlings of lowland tropical rain forest in Singapore. Proceedings of the Workshop on Tropical Tree Seedling Ecology. University of Aberdeen, September 1992.Google Scholar
  8. CANHAM, C.D. 1989. Different responses to gaps among shade-tolerant tree species. Ecology 70:548–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CLARK, D.A. & CLARK, D.B. 1992. Life history diversity of canopy and emergent trees in a tropical rain forest. Ecological Monographs 62:315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CONNELL, J.H. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. Pp. 298–312 in den Boer, P.J. & Gradwell, G.R. (eds). Dynamics of populations. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wagenginen.Google Scholar
  11. DALLING, J.W. 1992. Regeneration on landslides in the Blue Mountains, Jamaica. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. DENSLOW, J.S. 1987. Tropical rainfrest gaps and tree species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DENSLOW, J.S., NEWELL, E. & ELLISON, A.M. 1991. The effect of understorey palms and cyclanths on the growth and survival of Inga seedlings. Biotropica 23: 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DENSLOW, J.S., SCHULTZ, J.C., VITOUSEK, P.M. & STRAIN, B.R. 1990. Growth responses of tropical shrubs to treefall gap environments. Ecology 71:165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EDWARDS, P.J. 1989. Insect herbivory and plant defence theory. Pp. 275–297 in Grubb P.J. & Whittaker, J.B. (eds). Toward a more exact ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. ELLENBERG, H. 1963. Die Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Ulmer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  17. ELLISON, A.M., DENSLOW, J.S., LOISELLE, B.A. & BRENES M., D. 1993. Seed and seedling ecology of neotropical Melastomataceae. Ecology 74:1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. FISHER, B.L., HOWE, H.F. & WRIGHT, S.J. 1991. Survival and growth of Virola surinamensis yearlings: water augmentation in gap and understory. Oecologia 86:292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FORGET, P.-M. 1990. Seed-dispersal of Vouacapoua americana (Caesalpiniaceae) by cavimorph rodents in French Guiana. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FOSTER, S.A. 1986. On the adaptive value of large seeds for tropical moist forest trees: review and synthesis. Botanical Review 52:260–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. FOSTER, S.A. & JANSON, C.H. 1985. The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants. Ecology 66:773–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FOX, J.E.D. 1973. Dipterocarp seedling behaviour in Sabah. Malaysian Forester 36:205–214.Google Scholar
  23. FOWELLS, H.A. 1965. Sylvics of forest trees of the United States. Agriculture Handbook 271, US Department of Agriculture, Washington.Google Scholar
  24. GENTRY, A.H. & EMMONS, L.H. 1987. Geographical variation in fertility, phenology, and composition of the understory of neotropical forests. Biotropica 19:216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. GIVNISH, TJ. 1988. Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Pp. 63–91 in J.R. Evans, S. von Caemmerer & W.W. Adams (eds). Ecology of photosynthesis in Sun and Shade. CSIRO, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. GRUBB, P.J. 1977. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews 52:107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. GRUBB, P.J. 1986. Problems posed by sparse and patchly distributed species-rich plant communities. Pp. 207–225 in Diamond, J. & Case, T.J. (eds). Community ecology. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  28. GRUBB, P.J. 1988. The uncoupling of disturbance and recruitment, two kinds of seed bank, and persistence of plant populations at the regional and local scales. Annales Zoologici Fennici 25:23–36.Google Scholar
  29. GRUBB, P.J. 1992. A positive distrust in simplicity — lessons from plant defences and from competition among plants and among animals. Journal of Ecology 80:585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. GRUBB, P.J., in press. A paradox of root competition: a possible resolution and implications. Phytocoenologia.Google Scholar
  31. HALLWACHS, W. 1986. Agoutis (Dasyprocta punctata), the inheritors of guapinol (Hymenaea courbaril: Leguminosae). Pp. 285–304 in Estrada, A. & Fleming, T.H. (eds). Frugivores and seed dispersal. Junk, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. HAWTHORNE, W.D. 1993. Forest regeneration after logging in Bia South G.P.R., Ghana. Overseas Development Agency Forestry Series No. 4. N.R.I., Chatham.Google Scholar
  33. HOPKINS, M.S., ASH, J., GRAHAM, A.W., HEAD, J. & HEWETT, R.K. 1993. Charcoal evidence of the spatial extent of the Eucalyptus woodland expansions and rainforest contractions in North Queensland during the late Pleistocene. Journal of Biogeography 20.Google Scholar
  34. HOPKINS, M.S. & GRAHAM, A.W. 1984. The role of soil seed banks in regeneration in canopy gaps in Australian tropical lowland rain forest — preliminary field experiments. Malaysian Forester 47:146–158.Google Scholar
  35. HOPKINS, M.S. & GRAHAM, A.W. 1987. The viability of seeds of rainforest species after experimental soil burials under tropical wet lowland forest in north-east Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 12:97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. HOWE, H.F. 1986. Seed dispersal by fruit-eating birds and mammals. Pp. 123–189 in Murray, D.R. (ed.). Seed dispersal. Academic Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
  37. HUBBELL, S.P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203:1299–1309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. HUBBELL, S.P., CONDIT, R. & FOSTER, R.B. 1990. Presence and absence of density-dependence in a neotropical tree community. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B330:269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. HUBBELL, S.P. & FOSTER, R.B. 1986. Biology, chance and history in the structure of tropical rain forest tree communities. Pp. 314–329 in Diamond, J. & Case, T.J. (eds). Community ecology. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  40. HURLBERT, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. HYLAND, B. & WHEFFIN, T.R. 1993. Key to the tropical forest trees of Australia. CSIRO, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  42. JANZEN, D.H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist 104:501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. KELLY, C.K. & PURVIS, A. 1993. Seed size and establishment conditions in tropical trees. On the use of taxonomic relatedness in determining ecological patterns. Oecologia 94:356–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. KENNEDY, D.N. 1991. The role of colonizing species in the regeneration of dipterocarp rainforest. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  45. KENNEDY, D.N. & SWAINE, M.D. 1992. Germination and growth of colonizing species in artificial gaps of different sizes in dipterocarp rain forest. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B335:357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. KERSHAW, A.P. 1988. Australasia. Pp. 127–306 in Huntley, B. & Webb, T. (eds). Vegetation history. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  47. KIEW, R. 1988. Herbaceous flowering plants. Pp. 56–76 in Cranbrook, The Earl of (ed.). Key environments: Malaysia. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  48. KOHYAMA. T. & GRUBB, P.J., in press, 1994. Below- and above-ground allometries of shade-tolerant seedlings in a Japanese warm-temperate rain forest. Functional Ecology 8.Google Scholar
  49. LATHAM, R.E. 1992. Co-occuring tree species change rank in seedling performance with resources varied experimentally. Ecology 73:2129–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. LIEBERMAN, D., LIEBERMAN, M., HARTSHORN, G. & PERALTA, R. 1985. Growth rates and age-size relationships of lowland tropical wet forest trees in Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 1:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. LIEBERMAN, D., HARTSHORN, G.S., LIEBERMAN, M. & PERALTA, R. 1990. Forest dynamics at La Selva Biological Station 1969–85. Pp. 509–521 in Gentry, A.H. (eds). Four neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  52. LIEBERMAN, M., LIEBERMAN, D. & PERALTA, R. 1989. Forests are not just Swiss cheese: canopy stereogeometry of non-gaps in tropical forests. Ecology 70:550–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. MARTIN, T.E. 1985. Resource selection by tropical frugivorous birds: integrating multiple functions. Oecologia 66:563–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MEDINA, E., MOONEY, H.A. & VAZQUEZ-JANES, C. (eds) 1984. Physiological ecology of plants of the wet tropics. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  55. MERRENS, E.J. & PEART, D.R. 1992. Effects of hurricane damage on individual growth and stand structure in hardwood forest in New Hampshire, USA. Journal of Ecology 80:787–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. METCALFE, D.J. & GRUBB, P.J. Seed weights and light requirements for regeneration in south-east Asian rain forest. Submitted to New Phytologist, February 1994.Google Scholar
  57. MOLOFSKY, J. & AUGSPURGER, C.K. 1992. The effect of litter on early seedling establishment in a tropical forest. Ecology 73:68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. MULKEY, S.S., SMITH, A.P. & WRIGHT, S.J. 1991. Comparative life history and physiology of two understorey tropical herbs. Oecologia 88:263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. NG, F.S.P. 1978. Strategies of establishment in Malayan forest trees. Pp. 129–162 in Tomlinson, P.B. & Zimmermann, M.H. (eds). Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. NG, F.S.P. 1991. Manual of forest fruits, seeds and seedlings, Volume 1. Forest Research Institute, Kepong, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  61. OLDEMAN, R.A.A. 1990. Forests: elements of silvology. Springer, Heidelberg,Google Scholar
  62. OLDEMAN, R.A.A. & DUK, J. VAN 1991. Diagnosis of the temperament of tropical rain forest trees. Pp. 21–65 in Gomez-Pompa, A., Whitmore, T.C. & Hadley, M. (eds). Rain forest regeneration and management. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  63. ORIANS, G.H. 1982. The influence of tree-falls in tropical forests on tree species richness. Tropical Ecology 23:255–279.Google Scholar
  64. OSUNKOYA, O.O. 1992. Ecology of seed survival and seedling establishment in Australian tropical forest. Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  65. PAPAVASILLIOU, S. 1991. Ecophysiological studies on chalkland shrubs. M.Phil, thesis. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  66. PEACE, W.J.H. & GRUBB, P.J. 1982. Interaction of light and mineral nutrient supply in the growth of Impatiens parviflora. New Phytologist 90:127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. PEARCY, R.W. 1983. The light environment and growth of C3 and C4 tree species in the understorey of Hawaiian forest. Oecologia 58:19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. PLATT, W.J. & HERMANN, S.M. 1986. Relationships between dispersal syndrome and characteristics of populations of trees in a subtropical forest. Pp. 309–321 in Estrada, A. & Fleming, T.H. (eds). Frugivores and seed dispersal. Junk, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. POPMA, J., BONGERS, F., MARTINEZ-RAMOS, M. & VENENKLAAS, E. 1988. Pioneer species distribution in treefall gaps in neotropical rain forest; a gap definition and its consequences. Journal of Tropical Ecology 4:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. POULSON, T.L. & PLATT, W.J. 1989. Gap light regimes influence canopy tree diversity. Ecology 70:553–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. PRIMACK, R.B. 1992. Tropical community dynamics and conservation biology. Bioscience 42: 818–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. PUTZ, F.E. 1983. Treefall pits and mounds, buried seeds, and the importance of soil disturbance to pioneer trees on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 64:1069–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. PUTZ, F.E. & APPANAH, S. 1987. Buried seeds, newly dispersed seeds, and the dynamics of a lowland forest in Malaysia. Biotropica 19:326–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. RAICH, J.W. & GONG, W.K. 1990. Effects of canopy openings on tree seed germination in a Malaysian dipterocarp forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. REED, R.A. & GRUBB, P.J. Submitted. Nutrient supply available to species colonizing gaps in chalk grassland. Submitted to Journal of Vegetation Science, March 1994.Google Scholar
  76. RICHARDS, P.W. 1952. The tropical rain forest. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. ROTH, I. 1987. Stratification of a tropical forest as seen in dispersal types. Junk, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  78. SALISBURY, E.J. 1942. The reproductive capacity of plants. Bell, London.Google Scholar
  79. SANFORD, R.L. 1989. Fine root biomass under a tropical forest light gap opening in Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5:251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. SIM, J.W.S., TAN, H.T.W. & TURNER, I.M. 1992. Adinandra belukar: an anthropogenic heath forest in Singapore. Vegetatio 102:125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. SLAVIKOVA, J. 1958. Einfluss der Buche (Fagus silvatica L.) als Edifikator auf die Entwicklung der Krautschicht in Buchenphytozonosen. Preslia 30:19–42.Google Scholar
  82. STAPANIAN, M.A. 1986. Seed dispersal by birds and squirrels in the deciduous forests of the United States. Pp.225–236 in Estrada, A. & Fleming, T.H. (eds). Frugivores and fruit dispersal. Junk, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  83. STEENIS, C.G.G. J. van 1958a. Basic principles of rain forest sociology. Pp. 159–162 in Proceedings of the Kandy symposium on the study of tropical vegetation. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  84. STEENIS, C.G.G. J. van 1958b. Rejuvenation as a factor for judging the status of vegetation types: the biological nomad theory. Pp. 212–218 in same.Google Scholar
  85. STOCKER, G.C. & IRVINE, A.K. 1983. Seed dispersal by cassowaries (Casuarius casuarius) in north Queensland’s rainforest. Biotropica 15:170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. STRUIK, G.J. 1965. Growth patterns of some native annual and perennial herbs in southern Wisconsin. Ecology 46:401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. SUNDRALINGHAM, P. 1983. Response of potted seedlings of Dryobalanops aromatica and Dryobalanops oblongifolia to commercial fertilizers. Malaysian Forester 46:86–92.Google Scholar
  88. SWAINE, M.D. & WHITMORE, T.C. 1988. On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. Vegetatio 75:81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. TILMAN, D. & WEEDIN, D. 1991. Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology 72:685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. TOMLINSON, P.B. & ZIMMERMANN, M.H. (eds) 1978. Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. TURNER, I.M. 1991. The effects of shade and fertilizer addition on the seedlings of two tropical woody pioneer species. Tropical Ecology 32:24–29.Google Scholar
  92. TURNER, I.M., BROWN, N.D. & NEWTON, A.C. 1993. The effect of fertilizer application on dipterocarp seedling growth and mycorrhizal infection. Forest Ecology and Management 57:329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. VAZQUEZ-YANES, C. & OROZCO-SEGOVIA, A. 1984. Ecophysiology of seed germination in the tropical humid forest of the world. Pp. 37–50 in Medina, E., Mooney, H.A. & Vazquez-Yanes, C. (eds). Physiological ecology of plants in the wet tropics. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  94. VAZQUEZ-YANES, C. & OROZCO-SEGOVIA, A. 1993. Patterns of seed longevity and germination in the tropical rainforest. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 24:69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. VITOUSEK, P.M. & DENSLOW, J.S. 1986. Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in treefall gaps of lowland tropical rainforest. Journal of Ecology 74:1167–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. WALTER, H. & BRECKLE, S.-W. 1985. Ecological systems of the biosphere. I. Ecological principles in global perspective. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  97. WATT, A.S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology 35:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. WELLESLEY-WHITEHOUSE, H. 1983. White-tailed rat. Pp. 371–373 in Strahan, R. (ed.). Complete book of Australian mammals. Angus & Robertson, Sydney.Google Scholar
  99. WHITMORE, T.C. 1975. Tropical rainforests of the Far East. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  100. WHITMORE, T.C. 1984. Tropical rainforests of the Far East, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  101. WILCZYNSKI, C.J. & PICKETT, S.T.A. 1993. Fine root biomass within experimental canopy gaps: evidence for a below-ground gap. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:571–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Grubb
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations