Abstract
We study the question as to the extent to which the size id(G) of a minimum independent dominating set of a graph G can differ from the size d(G) of a minimum dominating set of G under some restrictions on the vertex degrees in G. We obtain upper bounds for the ratio id(G)/d(G) for graphs with a given maximum degree and for regular graphs of a given degree.
The research of the first author was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research (Grant 93–01–00489); the research of the second author was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research (Grant 93–01–01486) and the International Science Foundation (Grant RPY000).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. B. Allan and R. Laskar (1978) On domination and independent domination numbers of a graph, Discrete Math. 23, 73–76.
C. Barefoot, F. Harary, and K. F. Jones (1991) What is the difference between domination and independent domination numbers of a cubic graph? Graphs Combin. 7, No. 1, 205–208.
A. V. Kostochka (1993) The independent domination number of a cubic 3-con-nected graph can be much larger than its domination number, Graphs Combin. 9, No. 3, 235–237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glebov, N.I., Kostochka, A.V. (1996). On Minimum Independent Dominating Sets in Graphs. In: Korshunov, A.D. (eds) Discrete Analysis and Operations Research. Mathematics and Its Applications, vol 355. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1606-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1606-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7217-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1606-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive