Advertisement

Multifractal Analysis of Fault Structures in Basement Rocks

  • I. R. Stakhovsky
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the International Conferences on Basement Tectonics book series (ICBT, volume 5)

Abstract

Theory of fractal sets is broadly used in structural geology for investigating such self-similar processes as faulting (Hirata, 1989) and cracking in rocks (Hirata et al, 1987; Sammis and Biegel, 1989) because it provides the simplest nontrivial description of scale invariance of physical systems. Computer simulation of quasi-static fracture in solids that incorporates lattice models (Louis and Guinea, 1989; Hassold and Srolovitz, 1989) also generates fractal patterns. In geophysical applications, however, multifractal measures are more relevant than fractal sets because geophysical quantities are best described as measures (or fields). This paper presents a multifractal method for describing crack and fault patterns in rocks using computer images of crack (fault) clusters and fault systems as depicted on geologic maps.

Keywords

Fractal Dimension Basement Rock MULTIFRACTAL Analysis Bond Rupture Singularity Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chhabra A.B., Meneveau C., Jensen V., and Streenivasan K.R. (1989) Direct determination of the f(a) singularity spectrum and its application to fully developed turbulence. Phys.Rev.A, 40, 5284–5294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gilman J.J. and Tong H.C. (1971) Quantum tunneling as elementary fracture process. J.Appl.Phys., 42, 3479–3486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hassold G.N. and Srolovitz D.J. (1989) Brittle fracture in materials with random defects. Phys.Rev.B, 39, 9273–9281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirata T., Satoh T., and Ito K. (1987) Fractal structures of spatial distribution of microfracturing in rocks. Geophys.J.R.astr.Soc., 90, 369–374.Google Scholar
  5. Hirata T. (1989) Fractal dimension of fault systems in Japan: fractal structure in rock fracture geometry at various scales, PAGEOPH, 131, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Louis E. and Guinea F. (1989) Fracture as a growth process. Physica D, 38, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lovejoy S. and Schertzer D. (1990) Multifractals, universality classes and satellite and radar measurements of cloud and rain fields. J.Geophys.Res.D, 95, 2021–2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mandelbrot B.B. (1989) Multifractal measures, especially for geophysicist. PAGEOPH, 131, 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sammis C.G. and Biegel R.L. (1989) Fractals, fault-gouge and friction. In: Fractals in Geophysic.-Basel, Boston, Berlin, 255–271.Google Scholar
  10. Scheidegger A.E. (1957) Rheology of the Earth: the basic problem of geodynamics. Canad.J.Phys., 35, 4–14.Google Scholar
  11. Stanley H.E. and Meakin P. (1988) Multifractal phenomena in physics and chemistry. Nature, 335, 405–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhurkov S.N. and Tomashevsky E.E. (1966) Thermal fluctuations of atoms and fracture. Proc. conf. “Phys. Basis Yield a. Fracture”, Oxford, 200.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. R. Stakhovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Physics of the EarthRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations