Seismic Data of the Carpathian Foredeep Basement (Romania)

  • Camelia Diaconescu
  • V. Raileanu
  • M. Diaconescu
  • F. Radulescu
  • A. Pompilian
  • M. Biter
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the International Conferences on Basement Tectonics book series (ICBT, volume 5)


The Carpathian foredeep is a molasse-bearing depression that formed in front of the folded eastern and southern Carpathians in the Late Miocene. Deep seismic reflection/ refraction profiles as well as gravity and thermal studies carried out in the foredeep area of the southern and eastern Carpathians provide information on the crustal structure of the study region. The variability in the reflectivity pattern and crustal thickness shown by the different sectors of the Carpathian foredeep are due to differences in the structure and lithology as well differences in crustal age (Klemperer, 1987; Wever et al., 1987).

In western part of the southern Carpathian foredeep reflectivity increases with depth and Moho is deliniated by strong reflections at 9–11.5 s two-way travel time (TWT) (30 – 33 km depth). The eastern side of the southern Carpathian foredeep shows a decreasing reflectivity with depth, the crustal base being interpreted at 12–13 s TWT (40–45 km depth) (Raileanu et al., 1994).

The eastern Carpathian foredeep is characterized by an almost transparent upper crust and a layered lower crust down to 13 s TWT (40–45 km depth). The greatest thickness of foredeep rocks is in the eastern Carpathian arc bend (Focsani depression), where Neogene rocks are 8 to 10 km thick.


Seismic Data Lower Crust Seismic Section Reflectivity Pattern Heat Flow Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andreescu, M., Burst, D., Demetrescu, C., Ene, M. and Polonic, G. (1989) On the thermal regime of the Moesian platform and Getic depression, Tectonophysics 164, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreescu, M. (1993) The inverse approach to a geothermal profile of the central Moesian platform, Romania, Tectonophysics 224, 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, L. D. (1991) A new map of crustal ‘terranes’ in the United States from COCORP deep seismic reflection profiling, Geophys. J. Int. 105, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burchfiel, B.C. and Royden, L. (1982) Carpathian foreland fold and thrust belt and its relation to Pannonian and other basins, AAPG Bull. 66(9), 1179–1195.Google Scholar
  5. Cornea, I., Radulescu, F., Pompilian, A. and Sova, A. (1981) Deep seismic sounding in Romania, PAGEOPH 119, 1144–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demetrescu, C. and Andreescu, M. (1994) On the thermal regime of some tectonic units in a continental collision environment in Romania, Tectonophysics 230, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diaconescu, C., Raileanu, V., Radulescu, F., Diaconescu, M., Andreescu, M., Demetrescu, C. and Enescu, D. (in press) Complex geophysical study in the western part of the Moesian platform and Carpathian foredeep, Rev. Roum. Geol. Geophys. Geogr., Ser. Geophys. Google Scholar
  8. Diaconescu, M., Radulescu, F., Diaconescu, C., Biter, M. and Pompilian, A. (in press). Crustal information from seismic and gravity data in the Moesian platform and Carpathian foredeep, Rom. Rep. in Phys. Google Scholar
  9. Enescu, D., Danchiv, D. and Bala, A. (1992) Lithosphere structure in Romania II.Thickness of Earth’s crust. Depth-dependent propagation velocity curves for the P and S waves, St. Cere. Geol., Geofiz., Geogr., Ser. Geofizica 30, 3–19.Google Scholar
  10. Klemperer, S. L. (1987) A relation between continental heat flow and the seismic reflectivity of the lower crust, J. Geophys. 61, 1–11.Google Scholar
  11. Mutihac, V. (1990) Geological structure of the Romanian territory, Tech. Publ. House, Bucharest, 442 pp (in Romanian).Google Scholar
  12. Nelson, K. D. (1991) A unified view of craton evolution motivated by recent deep seismic reflection and refraction results, Geophys. J. Int. 105, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paraschiv, D. (1979) The Moesian platform and its hydrocarbon deposits, Acad. Rom., Bucharest, 195 pp (in Romanian)Google Scholar
  14. Patrut, I., Paraschiv, D. and Dicea, O. (1973) Considerations on the forming of diapir structures in Romania, Petrol si Gaze 24(9), 533–542 (in Romanian)Google Scholar
  15. Pompilian, A., Radulescu, F., Diaconescu, M., Biter, M. and Bala, A. (1993) Refraction seismic data in the eastern side of Romania, Rom. Rep. in Phys. 45(7–8), 613–621.Google Scholar
  16. Popescu, M. and Dragoescu, I. (1986) Map of the recent crustal movements in Romania. Similarities and differences, Geodynamics 8, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Price, R. A. (1986) The southeastern Canadian Cordillera: thrust faulting, tectonic wedging, and delamination of the lithosphere, J. Struct. Geol. 8, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Radulescu, D.P., Cornea, I., Sandulescu, M., Constantinescu, P., Radulescu, F. and Pompilian, A. (1976) Structure de la croute terrestre en Roumanie. Essai d’interpretation des etude sismique profunde. An. Inst. Geol. Geof. L(50), 5–36 (in French)Google Scholar
  19. Radulescu, F., Pompilian, A. and Sova, A. (1977) Deep seismic sounding in Romania (Craiova-Petrosani area),Rev. Roum. Geol., Geophys., Geogr., Ser. Geophys. 21(2), 273–276.Google Scholar
  20. Radulescu, F. (1981) Crustal seismic studies in Romania, Rev. Roam. Geol., Geophys., Geogr., Ser. Geophys. 25, 57–74.Google Scholar
  21. Radulescu, F., Raileanu, V. and Cornea, I. (1984) Contributions of the reflection seismic method to the crustal structure deciphering, St.Cere. Geol., Geofiz., Geogr., Ser. Geofizica 22, 11–17 (in Romanian).Google Scholar
  22. Radulescu, F. (1988) Seismic models of the crustal structure in Romania, Rev. Roum. Geol., Geophys., Geogr., Ser. Geophys 32, 13–17 (in Romanian).Google Scholar
  23. Raileanu, V., Diaconescu, C. and Radulescu, F. (1994) Characteristics of Romanian lithosphère from deep seismic reflection profiling, Tectonophysics 239, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Royden, L. and Karner, G. D. (1984). Flexure of lithosphere beneath Apennine and Carpathian foredeep Basins: evidence for an insufficient topographic load, AAPG Bulletin 68(6), 704–712.Google Scholar
  25. Sadowiak, P., Wever, Th. and Meissner, R. (1991) Deep seismic reflectivity patterns in specific tectonic units of western and central Europe, Geophys. J. Int. 105, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sandulescu, M. (1984) Geotectonics of Romania, Techn.Publ. House, Bucharest, 336 pp. (in Romanian).Google Scholar
  27. Visarion, M., Stanica, D. and Stanica, M. (1984) Deep structure of the region between the Motru Valley and Arges Valley (Romania) as shown by the results of geophysical surveys, Acta Geodaet., Montanist. Hung., 19(1–2), 173–184.Google Scholar
  28. Visarion, M., Sandulescu, M., Stanica, D. and Veliciu, S. (1988a) Contributions a la connaissance de la structure profonde de la Plate-forme Moesienne en Roumanie, St. Teh. Econ., D(15), 211–222.Google Scholar
  29. Visarion, M., Sandulescu, M., Stanica, D. and Atanasiu, L., (1988b) An improved geotectonic model on the east Carpathians, Rev. Roum. Geol., Geoph., Geogr., Ser. Geophys., 32, 43–52.Google Scholar
  30. Wever, T., Trappe, H. and Meissner, R. (1987) Possible relations between crustal reflectivity, crustal age, heat flow, and viscosity of the continents. Ann. Geophys., 5B(3), 255–266.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camelia Diaconescu
    • 1
  • V. Raileanu
    • 1
  • M. Diaconescu
    • 1
  • F. Radulescu
    • 1
  • A. Pompilian
    • 1
  • M. Biter
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Earth PhysicsBucharest-MagureleRomania

Personalised recommendations