Alterity and Judgment: Some Moral Implications of Hegel’s Concept of Life

  • Mary C. Rawlinson
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 52)


Moral philosophers have not looked often to the concept of life as a foundation for moral judgment and moral respect. Greek ethics, focusing on education and the formation of character, treat life as a more or less promising raw material, to be properly reshaped through the application of appropriate pedagogical disciplines. As Christianity develops the conceptual opposition between a sensible and an intelligible world, life appears, not only raw, but also evil. In addition to disciplines of formation or education, disciplines of redemption and salvation proliferate.1 And, despite some attention to the role of actual sentiment or feeling in supplying both force and direction for moral judgment, notably by Montaigne and Hume, the tradition culminates in Kant’s celebrated alienation of reason and feeling: invoking “mutual love” as one of the two indispensible “great moral forces”, Kant is careful to point out that this love is “not to be taken as a feeling (aesthetic love), i.e., a pleasure in the perfection of other men; it does not mean emotional love… It must rather be taken as a maxim of benevolence” ([5], sec. 25). Thus, respect is not a “feeling” dependent upon actual comparisons among living beings, but a maxim derived analytically from the idea of freedom. The domain of actual life, where moral judgment and moral respect will be deployed, may contribute nothing to their determination.


Moral Judgment Social Practice Mutual Recognition Moral Consciousness Moral Discourse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ehrenreich, B. and English, D.: 1987, For Her Own Good, Vintage, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hegel, G.W.F.: 1979, Phenomenology of Spirit, A.V. Miller, trans., Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hegel, G.W.F.: 1991, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Allen E. Wood (ed.), H.B. Nesbitt, trans., Cambrige University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Irigaray, Luce: 1985, Speculum of the Other Woman, Gillian С Gill, trans., Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kant, Immanuel: 1964, The Doctrine of Virtue, Mary J. Gregor, trans., Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pinkard, Terry: 1994, ‘Historicism, social practice, and sustainability: some themes in Hegelian ethical theory’, Neue Hefte für Philosophie 35, 3–41.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rawlinson, M.C.: 1980, ‘Health, justice, and responsibility’, in T. Engelhardt and S. Spicker (eds.), The Uses of Medical Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sophocles: 1981, Antigone, F. Storr, trans., Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary C. Rawlinson
    • 1
  1. 1.State University of New YorkStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations