Abstract
Since visual imagery is usually considered to be not only analogical but also founded on visual experience, blind people should perform poorly on visual imagery tasks. Instead, many experiments on blind performance in tasks thought to involve visual imagery processes have often shown that the blind do not behave differently from matched sighted subjects. In the present paper visual images are considered as representations maintaining some of the properties of visual objects and constructed from information from various sources. The limitations of these representations are explored in a series of experiments. Results show that, presumably because of the deprivation of visual experience, the blind have particular difficulty in constructing multiple interactive images.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cornoldi C, Calore D & Pra Baldi A (1979). Imagery ratings and recall in congenitally blind subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 627–629.
De Beni R. & Cornoldi C (1985). The effects of imaginal mnemonics on congenitally total blind and on normal subjects. In DF Marks and DG Russell (Eds.) Imagery 1, Human Performance Associates, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Forno G (1980). Sviluppare la memoria é facile e diver- tente. Universale MEB, Torino.
Higbee KL (1977). Your memory. How it works and how to improve it. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Kerr NH (1983). The role of vision in “visual imagery” experiments: evidence from congenitally blind. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2, 265–267.
Jonides J, Kahn R & Rozin P (1975). Imagery instructions improve memory in blind subjects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 424–426.
Marmor GS (1978). Age at onset of blindness and the development of the semantics of color names. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 267–278.
Merry R & Graham NC (1978). Imagery bizarreness in children’s recall of sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 315–321.
Paivio A & Okovita HW (1971). Word imagery modalities and associative learning in blind and sighted subjects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 506–510.
Pra Baldi A, De Beni R, Cornoldi C & Cavedon A (1985). Some conditions for the occurrence of the bizarreness effect in free recall. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 427–436.
Sholl MJ & Easton RD (1986). Effect of referent object familiarity on verbal learning in the sighted and the blind. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 2, 190–200.
Zimler J & Keenan JM (1983). Imagery in the congenitally blind: how visual are visual images? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2, 269–282.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cornoldi, C., de Beni, R. (1988). Weakness of Imagery Without Visual Experience: The Case of the Total Congenital Blind using Imaginal Mnemonics. In: Denis, M., Engelkamp, J., Richardson, J.T.E. (eds) Cognitive and Neuropsychological Approaches to Mental Imagery. NATO ASI Series, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1391-2_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1391-2_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3659-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1391-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive