Relation between Coronary Flow Reserve and Severity of Coronary Obstruction, Both Assessed from Coronary Cineangiogram

  • Johan H. C. Reiber
  • Felix Zijlstra
  • Jan Van Ommeren
  • Patrick W. Serruys
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 77)

Abstract

Coronary angiography is the only technique that allows the high resolution visualization of the coronary anatomy in man. In our and other laboratories quantitative techniques have been developed for the objective and reproducible assessment of the dimensions of coronary arterial segments from 35 mm cineframes [1–3]. In addition to assessing the accurate anatomic description of the severity of coronary obstructions, it is of great interest to obtain information about the functional significance of such obstruction, i.e. the question is posed: to what extent does the obstruction limit the flow through that artery?

Keywords

Coronary Flow Reserve Normal Coronary Artery Severe Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Obstruction Single Vessel Coronary Artery Disease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reiber JHC: Morphologic and densitometric analysis of coronary arteries. In: Heintzen PH, Bürsch JH (eds) Progress in digital angiocardiography; pp 137–158. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Slager CJ: Quantitative coronary and left ventricular cineangiography; methodology and clinical applications. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reiber JHC, Kooijman CJ, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JCH, Boer A den, Wijns W, Serruys PW: Computer assisted analysis of the severity of obstructions from coronary cineangiograms: a methodological review. Automedica 1984; 5: 219–238.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith HC, Robb RA, Ritman EL: Roentgen videodensitometric assessment of myocardial blood flow: clinical applications. In: Heintzen PH, Bürsch JH (eds) Roentgen-video-techniques for dynamic studies of structure: function of the heart and circulation; pp 39–48. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vogel R, LeFree M, Bates E, O’Neill W, Foster R, Kirlin P, Smith D, Pitt B: Application of digital techniques to selective coronary arteriography: use of myocardial contrast appearance time to measure coronary flow reserve. Am Heart J 1984; 107: 153–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hodgson JMcB, LeGrand V, Bates ER, Mancini GBJ, Aueron FM, O’Neill WW, Simon SB, Beaumon GJ, LeFree MT, Vogel RA: Validation in dogs of a rapid digital angiographic technique to measure relative coronary blood flow during routine cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 188–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hahne HJ: Time and flow parameter extraction in digital angiography: principles and methods. Herz 1985; 10: 220–227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bürsch JH: Densitometric studies in digital subtraction angiography: assessment of pulmonary and myocardial perfusion. Herz 1985; 10: 208–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ratib O, Chappuis F, Rutishauser W: Digital angiographic technique for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion. Annales Radiologie 1985; 28: 193–197.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilson RF, White CW: Intracoronary papaverine: an ideal coronary vasodilator for studies of the coronary circulation in conscious humans. Circulation 1986; 73: 444–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zijlstra F, Serruys PW, Hugenholtz PG: Papaverine: the ideal coronary vasodilator for investigating CFR? A study of timing magnitude, reproducibility and safety of the coronary hyperemic response after intracoronary papaverine. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn 1986; 12: 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zijlstra F, Ommeren J van, Reiber JHC, Serruys PW: Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? Circulation 1987; 75: 1154–1161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, Wijns W, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JCH, Boer A den, Hugenholtz PG: Assessment of short-, medium- and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 1985; 71: 280–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reiber JHC, Slager CJ, Schuurbiers JCH, Boer A den, Gerbrands JJ, Troost GJ, Scholts B, Kooijman CJ, Serruys PW: Transfer functions of the X-ray-cine-video chain applied to digital processing of coronary cineangiograms. In: Heintzen PH, Brennecke R (eds) Digital imaging in cardiovascular radiology; pp 89–104. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, Dodge HT: Quantitative coronary arteriography. Estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation. Circulation 1977; 55: 329–337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gould KL, Kelly KO, Bolson EL: Experimental validation of quantitative coronary arteriography for determining pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenosis. Circulation 1982; 66: 930–937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Serruys PW, Wijns W, Geuskens R, Feyter P de, Brand M van den, Reiber JHC: Pressure gradient, exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy, quantitative coronary cineangiography: in what sense are these measurements related? In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW (eds) State of the art in quantitative coronary arteriography; pp 251–270. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, 1986.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Serruys PW, Wijns W, Reiber JHC, Feyter P de, Brand M van den, Piscione F, Hugenholtz PG: Values and limitations of transstenotic pressure gradients measured during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Herz 1985; 10: 337–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bookstein JJ, Higgins CB: Comparative efficacy of coronary vasodilatory methods. Invest Radiol 1977; 12: 121–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW: Physiological basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of CFR. Am J Cardiol 1984; 33: 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harrison DG, White CW, Hiratzka LF, Doty DB, Barnes DH, Eastham CL, Marcus ML: The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiological significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses. Circulation 1984; 69: 1111–1119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL: Assessment of stenosis severity. In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW (eds) State of the art in coronary arteriography; pp 209–228. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht/Boston/ Lancaster, 1986.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL, Parsel L: Assessment of a coronary stenosis by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions. JACC 1986; 7: 103–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dole WP, Montville WJ, Bishop VS: Dependency of myocardial reactive hyperemia on coronary artery pressure in the dog. Am J Physiol 1981; 240: H709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bache RJ, Schwartz JS: Effect of perfusion pressure distal to coronary stenosis on transmural myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1982; 65: 928–935.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dumay ACM: 3-D reconstruction from two orthogonal projections with linear programming techniques. Thesis. Information Theory Group, Delft University of Technology, June 1986 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Onnasch DGW, Lindenau J, Bürsch JH, Heintzen PH: Reconstruction of the spatial distribution of the myocardial perfusion from multiple-view arteriography. In: Heintzen PH, Bürsch JH (eds) Progress in digital angiocardiography; pp 327–335. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan H. C. Reiber
    • 1
  • Felix Zijlstra
    • 1
  • Jan Van Ommeren
    • 1
  • Patrick W. Serruys
    • 1
  1. 1.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations