Abstract
Experienced cardiologists reviewing the RAO 30/left ventricular angiogram of a patient will usually agree on normality or abnormality of the contraction/relaxation pattern, and on the location of the abnormality if present. Thus, angiographic sequences really contain information allowing for an objective discrimination between normal and abnormal wall-motion. A great variety of quantification models have already been proposed to this purpose [1]. This, and the fact that consensus is still not obtained indicates that designing the most adequate model is not easy [2, 3]. Stating that each model has advantages, or deciding arbitrarily that realignment of the LV silhouettes is not worthy to be further investigated, may not be the right way to solve the problem. On the contrary, progress should still be achievable by improving basic concepts. The results presented in this contribution may be a step in this direction. They do not demonstrate the superiority of our model over existing ones since no cross-comparisons were performed. Our goal was rather to investigate with a new approach the old debated, but nevertheless important point: should the silhouettes of the left ventricle (LV) be realigned in order to compensate for the translation and rotation of the LV relatively to the imaging system, or should a good model include these 2 motion components, and thus quantify the overall motion (or overall displacement) of the left ventricular wall?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Sigwart U, Heintzen PH (eds): Ventricular wall motion. International Symposium Lausanne. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York, 1984.
Geldberg HJ, Brundage BH, Glantz S, Parmley WW: Quantitative left ventricular wall motion analysis. A comparison of area, chord and radial methods. Circulation 1979; 59 (5): 991–1000.
Bhargava V, Warren S, Vieweg WVR, Shabetai R: Quantitation of left ventricular wall motion in normal subjects: Comparison of various methods. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn 1980; 6: 7–16.
Heintzen PH: Erfassung der regionalen Motilität mit radiologischen Methoden. Nucl Med 1981; XX (4): 163–168.
Ratib O, Righetti A, Brandon G, Rasoamanambelo L: Usefulness of phase analysis for the evaluation of regional wall motion asynchrony from digitized contrast ventriculography. In: Sigwart U, Heintzen PH (eds) Ventricular wall motion. International Symposium Lausanne; pp 299–304 and color plates II to IV. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York, 1984.
Melchior JP, Châtelain P, Doriot P-A, Rutishauser W: Assessment of regional synchronism of regional left ventricular contraction and relaxation using realignment and ‘phase analysis’. IEEE Proc Comp Cardiol 1986, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 107–110.
Sheehan FH, Bolson EL, Dodge HT, Mitten S: Centerline method — Comparison with other methods for measuring regional left ventricular motion. In: Sigwart U, Heintzen PH (eds) Ventricular wall motion. International Symposium Lausanne; pp 139–149. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York, 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doriot, PA., Melchior, J.P., Chatelain, P., Rutishauser, W. (1988). Assessment of Synchronism of Left Ventricular Wall Motion. In: Heintzen, P.H., Bürsch, J.H. (eds) Progress in Digital Angiocardiography. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 77. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1331-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1331-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7093-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1331-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive