Skip to main content

Animal Experimentation and its Shortcomings

  • Chapter
  • 85 Accesses

Part of the book series: Developements in Hematology and Immunology ((DIHI,volume 20))

Abstract

Despite the fact that animal experiments are performed on a large scale and their value for biomedical research is beyond doubt, the use of animals for this purpose is increasingly being criticized not only by the general public but also by the scientific community. The importance and value of animal experimentation have been discussed in the previous chapters. The limitations of this type of research will now be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CIOMS: Proposed International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. XVIIth CIOMS Round Table Conference, Geneva, Switzerland. 8–9 December 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Osterhaus, A.D.M.E. and Steenis, G. van: Virologic control of monkeys used for the production of poliomyelitis vaccine. Develop. Biol. Standard. (1981), 47, 157–161.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stainer, D.W. et al.: Reduction in animal usage for potency testing of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. 19th IABS Congress on Use and Standardization of Combined Vaccines. Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1985. Develop. Biol. Standard. (1986), 65, 241–244.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Strasser, H.: The choice of animals for drug testing seen from genetic aspects. In: The laboratory animal in drug testing. 5th ICIA Symposium, Hannover, 1972. Gustav Fischer Verlag. Stuttgart, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Porter, G. and Festing, M.: Effects of daily handling and other factors on weight gain of mice from birth to six weeks of age. Lab. Anim. (1969), 3, 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pittman, M. and Cox, C.B.: Pertussis vaccine testing forfreedom from toxicity. Applied Microbiol. (1965), 13, 447–456.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knight, P.A. and Lucken, R.N.: The effects of laboratory animal diets on the potency tests of bacterial vaccines. Develop. Biol. Standard. 1980), 45, 143–149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cameron, J.: The influence of environment on the mouse weight-gain test for estimating the toxicity of Bordetella pertussis vaccines. Progr. Immunobiol. Standard. (1969), 3, 319–323.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steenis, G. van et al.: Use of captive-bred monkeys for vaccine production. Develop. Biol. Standard. (1980), 45, 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abdussalam, M.: Animals for biomedical research: perspective of developing countries. XVIIth CIOMS Round Table Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, 8–9 December 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prigge, R.: Diphtherie-Schutzimpfung mit hochaktiven Impfstoffen. (Diphtheria vaccination using highly potent vaccines.) Ergebnisse der Hygiene, (1939), 22, 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramshorst, J.D. van: The influence of external factors on immune response in animals. Proc. Symposium on Bacterial Vaccines (1971), 313–315.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osterhaus, A.D.M.E. and Steenis, G. van: Virologic control of monkeys used for the production of poliomyelitis vaccine. Develop. Biol. Standard. (1981), 47, 157–161.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beale, A.J.: Cell substrate for killed polio-vaccine production. Develop. Biol. Standard. (1981), 47, 19–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hennessen, W.: Replacement of animals in manufacture and control of vaccines. Develop. Biol. Standard. (1980), 45, 163–173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walsh, J.A. and Warren, K.S.: Selective primary health care. New. Engl. J. Med. (1979), 301, 967–974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Keja, K. and Henderson, R.H.: Expanded Programme on Immunization: the continuing role of the European region. WHO Chronicle, (1985), 39, 3, 92–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Perkins, F.T.: The need for quality control in the developing countries. Develop. Biol. Standard. (1978), 41, 291–294.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendriksen, C.F.M. (1988). Animal Experimentation and its Shortcomings. In: Laboratory Animals in Vaccine Production and Control. Developements in Hematology and Immunology, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1321-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1321-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7088-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1321-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics