Surface Contour: Variability, Significance and Measurement

  • S. P. Barton
  • D. R. Black


The surface of the skin is not only the part which we all see, but the barrier between ourselves and the environment. Subtle changes in this layer are therefore important from a pathological, physiological and cosmetic point of view. The organization of the stratum corneum is discussed elsewhere in this book, but here we will consider the methods available for the measurement of its free surface and what the measurements imply. In doing so it is important to understand the factors which contribute to the profile of the skin. Three orders of variation exist which may be thought of as three wavelengths. The longest of these is associated with the major skin furrows and ’wrinkles’. Superimposed upon this are smaller frequency variations due to local arrangement of the corneocytes. At the submicroscopic level there are also variations in the surface of the corneocytes themselves. However, there are other factors which do not affect the actual contour but influence an observer’s impression of ’roughness’ or ’scaliness’. These include skin colour, skin lipid composition and distribution, etc. and will not be dealt with here save to mention their contribution to the subjective analysis of skin contour.


Stratum Corneum Skin Surface Surface Contour Maximum Peak Height Skin Analogue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Siegel, S. (1956). Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. (New York: McGraw Hill)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gartstein, V. and Elsnau, W.H. (1985). Skin replicas using cement materials. Bioengineering and the Skin, 1(3), 287 (abstract)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mignot, J., Chuard, M., Zahouani, H., Makki, S. and Agache, P. (1985). Microtopographical analysis of human skin surface. Bioengineering and the Skin, 1(2), 101Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spencer, T.S. and Seitz, J.C. (1985). Evaluation of corneocyte scaling with three different methods. Bioengineering and the Skin, 1(3), 253 (abstract)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grove, G. and Grove, M. (1985). Objective assessment of skin surface scaliness through digital image processing of sticky slides. Bioengineering and the Skin, 1(3), 253 (abstract)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gormley, D.E. (1985). Three dimensional optical micrometric analysis of casts of cutaneous surfaces. Bioengineering and the Skin, 1(2), 81Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corcuff, P., Chatenay, F. and Leveque, J-L. (1984). A fully automated system to study skin surface patterns. Int. J. Cosmetic Sci., 6, 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marshall, R.J. and Marks, R. (1983). Assessment of the skin surface by scanning densitometry of macrophotographs. Clin. Exp. Dermatol., 8, 121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barton, S.P., Marshall, R.J. and Marks, R. (1987). A novel method for assessing skin surface topography. Bioengineering and the Skin, 3, 93Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MTP Press Limited 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. P. Barton
  • D. R. Black

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations