Skip to main content

Absolute Population Estimates by Sampling a Unit of Habitat — Freshwater Habitats

  • Chapter
Ecological Methods

Abstract

Phyla other than the Arthropoda are well represented in this habitat, but it is not intended in this chapter to detail the methods for the study of the microfauna of inland waters; these are described in works such as Welch (1948) and Edmondson & Winberg (1971); whilst sampling aspects are reviewed by Elliott (1971) and Elliott & Décamps (1973). In contrast to terrestrial habitats, major difficulties in making absolute estimates lie in actually taking a sample of a known unit, as well as in the separation of the animals from the media. The problems of extraction are similar to those in terrestrial habitats and reference should therefore be made to Chapters 4 and 5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ACKEFORS, H., 1971. A quantitative plankton sampler. Oikos 22, 114–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALBRECHT, M.-L., 1959. Die quantitative Untersuchung der Bodenfauna fliessender Gewässer (Untersuchungsmethoden und Arbeitsergebnisse). Z. Fisch. (N.F.) 8, 481–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALLAN, I. R. H 1952. A hand-operated quantitative grab for sampling river beds. J. Anim. Ecol. 21, 159–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BATES, M., 1941. Field tudies of the anopheline mosquitoes of Albania. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 43, 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENFIELD, E. F., HENDRICKS, A. C. and CAIRNS, J., 1974. Proficiencies of two artificial substrates in collecting stream macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 45, 431–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRUT, N. W., 1955. New methods of collecting bottom fauna from shoals or rubble bottoms of lakes and streams. Ecology 36, 524–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, S. R., 1956. A piston sampler for surface sediments of lake deposits. Ecology 37, 611–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CALOW, P., 1972. A method for determining the surface area of stones to enable quantitative density estimates of littoral stone dwelling organisms to be made. Hydrobiologia 40, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHRISTIE, M, 1954. A method for the numerical study of larval populations of Anophelesgambiae and other pool-breeding mosquitoes. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., Liverpool 48, 271–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CLARKE, G. L. and BUMPUS, D F, 1940. The Plankton sampleran instrument for quantitative plankton investigations. Limnol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Publ. 5, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • CROSET, H., PAPIEROK, B, RIOUX, J. A., GABINAUD, A., COUSSERANS, J. and ARNAUD, D., 1976. Absolute estimates of larval populations of culicid mosquitoes: comparison of capture-recapture removal and dipping methods. Ecological Entomology 1, 251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CROSSMAN, J. S. and CAIRNS, J., 1974. A comparative study between two different artificial substrate samplers and regular sampling techniques. Hydrobiologia 44, 517–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CUMMINS, K. W., 1962. An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotie waters. Am. Midi Nat. 67, 477–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENDY, J. S., 1944. The fate of animals in streamdrift when carried into lakes. Ecol. Monogr. 14, 333–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DISNEY, R. H. L., 1972. Observations on sampling pre-imaginal populations of blackflies (Dipt., Simuliidae) in West Cameroon. Bull. ent. Res. 61, 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DUMAS, F, 1962. Deep water archaeology, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUNN, D. R, 1961. The bottom fauna of Llyn Tegid (Lake Bala), Merionethshire. J. anim. Ecol. 31, 2670–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECKBLAD, J. W., 1973. Population studies of three aquatic gastropods in an intermittent backwater. Hydrobiologia 41, 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDMONDSON, W. T., and WINBERG, G. G (eds:) 1971. A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in freshwaters. I.B.P. Handbook 17. 358 pp., Blackwells, Oxford and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • EKMAN, S., 1911. Die Bodenfauna des Vättern, qualitativ und quantitativ untersucht. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 7, 146–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ELGMORK, K, 1962. A bottom sampler for soft mud. Hydrobiologia 20, 167–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ELLIOTT, J. M., 1971. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Sci. Publ. Freshw. Biol. Assoc. 25, 148 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLIOTT, J. M. and DÉCAMPS, H, 1973. Guide pour l’analyse statistique des échantillons d’invertébrés benthiques. Annls. limnol. 9, 79–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLANNAGAN, J. F., 1970. Efficiencies of various grabs and corers in sampling freshwater benthos. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 27, 1691–1700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FORD, J. B., 1962. The vertical distribution of larvae Chironomidae (Dipt.) in the mud of a stream. Hydrobiologia 19, 262–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FROST, S., 1971. Evaluation of a technique for sorting and counting stream invertebrates. Can. J. Zool. 49, 878–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • FROST, S., HUNI, A. and KERSHAW, W. E., 1971. Evaluation of a kicking technique for sampling stream bottom fauna. Can. J. Zool. 49, 167–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FUJITA, H., 1956. The collection efficiency of a plankton net. Res. Popul. Ecol. 3, 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GERKING, S. D., 1957. A method of sampling the littoral macrofauna and its application. Ecology, 38, 219–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLIME, J. M. and CLEMONS, R. M., 1972. Species diversity of stream insects on Fontinalis spp. compared to diversity on artificial substrates. Ecology 53, 458–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOODWIN, M. H. and EYLES, D. E., 1942. Measurements of larval populations of Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Say Ecology 23, 376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOULDER, R., 1971. Vertical distribution of some ciliated protozoa in two freshwater sediments. Oikos 22, 199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRIFFITH, R. E., 1957. A portable apparatus for collecting horizontal plankton samples. Ecology 38, 538–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GULLIKSEN, B., and DERAS, K. M., 1975. A diveroperated suction sampler for fauna on rocky bottoms. Oikos 26, 246–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAMILTON, A. L., BURTON, W and FLANNAGAN, J. F., 1970. A multiple corer for sampling profundal benthos. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 27, 1867–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HESS, A. D., 1941. New limnological sampling equipment. Limnol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Publ. 6, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • HIGER, A. L. and KOLIPINSKI, M. C., 1967. Pull-up trap: a quantitative device for sampling shallow-water animals. Ecology 48, 1008–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOLOPAINEN, I. J. and SARVALA, J., 1975. Efficiencies of two corers in sampling soft-bottom invertebrates. Ann. Zoo. Fenn 12, 280–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUCKLEY, P., 1975. An apparatus for subdividing benthos samples. Oikos 26, 92–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HYNES, H.B.N., 1971. Benthos of flowing water. In Edmondson, W. I. & Winberg, G. G. (eds.). l.B.P. Handbook 17, 66–80. Blackwells, Oxford and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAMES, H. G. and NICHOLLS, C. F., 1961. A sampling cage for aquatic insects. Can. Ent. 93, 1053–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JENKIN, B. M. and MORTIMER, C. H., 1938. Sampling lake deposits. Nature 142, 834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAJAK, Z, 1963. Analysis of quantitative benthic methods. Ekologia Polska A 11, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAJAK, Z, 1971. Benthos of standing water. In Edmondson, W. T. & Winberg, G. G. (ed.) I.B.P. Handbook 17, 25–65. Blackwells, Oxford and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAJAK, Z., DUSOGE, K. and PREJS, A., 1968. Application of the flotation technique to assessment of absolute numbers of benthos. Ekologia Polska 16, 607–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARLSSON, M., BOHLIN, T. and STENSON, J., 1976. Core sampling and flotation: two methods to reduce costs of a chironomid population study. Oikos 27, 336–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KROGER, R. L, 1972. Underestimation of standing crop by the Surber sampler. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 475–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KROGER, R. L., 1974. Invertebrate drift in the Snake River, Wyoming. Hydrobiologia 44, 369–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LISITSYN, A. P. and UDINTSEV, G. B., 1955. New model dredges. [In Russian.] Trudy vses. gidrobiol Obsch. 6, 217–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIVINGSTON, D. A., 1955. A lightweight piston sampler for lake deposits. Ecology 36, 137–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LONGHURST, A. R., 1959. The sampling problem in benthic ecology. Proc. ft. Z. ecol. Soc. 6, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • MACAN, T. T., 1958. Methods of sampling the bottom fauna in stony streams. Mitt. int. Verein. theor. angew. Limnol. 8, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • MACKEY, A. P., 1972. An air-lift for sampling freshwater benthos. Oikos 23, 413–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCCAULEY, V. J. E., 1975. Two new quantitative samplers for aquatic phytomac-rofauna. Hydrobiologia 47, 81–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MASON, W. T., WEBER, C. I., LEWIS, P. A. and JULIAN, E. C., 1973. Factors affecting the performance of basket and multiplate macro-invertebrate samplers. Freshwater Biol, 3, 409–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILBRINK, G., 1971. A simplified tube bottom sampler. Oikos 22, 260–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILBRINK, G. and WIEDERHOLM, T., 1973. Sampling efficiency of four types of mud bottom sampler. Oikos 24, 479–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOON, H. P., 1935. Methods and apparatus suitable for an investigation of the littoral region of Oligotrophic Lakes, Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 32, 319–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORTIMER, C. H., 1942. The exchange of dissolved substances between mud and water in lakes. Ill and IV. J. Ecol. 30, 147–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MUNDIE, J. H., 1956. A bottom sampler for inclined rock surfaces in lakes. J. Anim. Ecol 25, 429–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEEDHAM, P. R. and USINGER, R. L., 1956. Variability in macrofauna of a single riffle in Prosser creek, California, as indicated by the Surber sampler. Hilgardia 24(14), 383–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEGUS, C. L., 1966. A quantitative study of growth and production of unionid mussels in the River Thames at Reading. J. Anim. Ecol. 35, 513–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEILL, R. M, 1938. The food and feeding of the brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in relation to the organic environment. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 59, 481–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEARSON, R. G., LITTERICK, M. R. and JONES, N V, 1973. An air-lift for quantitative sampling of the benthos. Freshwater Biol. 3, 309–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PETERSEN, C. G. J., 1911. Valuation of the sea. I Rep. Dan. biol. Stn 20, 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • REISH, D. J., 1959. Modification of the Hayward orange peel bucket for bottom sampling. Ecology 40, 502–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RICKER, W. E., 1938. On adequate quantitative sampling of the pelagic net plankton of a lake. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 4, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROWLEY, J. R and DAHL, A, 1956. Modifications in design and use of the Livingstone piston sampler. Ecology 37, 849–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCOTT, D., 1958. Ecological studies on the Trichoptera of the River Dean, Cheshire. Arch. Hydrobiol. 54, 340–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCOTT, D and RUSHFORTH, J M., 1959. Cover on river bottoms. Nature 183, 836–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHAPIRO, J, 1958. The core-freezer-a new sampler for lake sediments. Ecology 39, 758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, W. and MCINTYRE, A. D., 1954. A spring-loaded bottom-sampler. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 33, 257–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SURBER, E W., 1936. Rainbow trout and bottom fauna production in one mile of stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 66, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TONOLLI, V., 1971. Methods of collection. Zooplankton. In Edmondson. W.T. & Winberg, G. G. (eds.) I.B.P. Handbook 17, 1–20. Blackwells, Oxford and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ULFSTRAND, S., 1968. Benthic animal communities in Lapland streams. Oikos (suppl.) 10, 1–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • USINGER, R. L. and NEEDHAM, P. R., 1954. A plan for the biological phases of the periodic stream sampling program (Mimeographed) Final Rep. to Calif. St. Wat. Pollution Cont. Bd. 59 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USINGER, R. L. and NEEDHAM, P R, 1956. A drag-type riffle-bottom sampler. Progve Fish. Cult. 18, 42–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VALLENTYNE, J. R, 1955. A modification of the Livingstone piston sampler for lake deposits. Ecology 36, 139–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WATERS, T. F. and KNAPP, R. J., 1961. An improved stream bottom fauna sampler. Trans. Am. Fish. Soe. 90, 225–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WELCH, H. E. and JAMES, H G., 1960. The Belleville trap for quantitative samples of mosquito larvae. Mosquito News 20, 23–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • WELCH, P. S., 1948. Limnological methods. 381 pp., McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • WENE, G and WICKLIFF, E L., 1940. ‘Basket’methodofbottomsampling. Can. Ent. 72, 131–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WICKSTEAD, J., 1953. A new apparatus for the collection ofbottom plankton. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 32, 347–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIGLEY, R L, 1967. Comparative efficiencies of van Veen & Smith-Mclntyre grab samplers as revealed by motion pictures. Ecology 48, 168–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILDING, J. L., 1940. A new square-foot aquatic sampler. Limnol. Soc. Am. Spec. Publ. 4, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, T. R. and OBENG, L., 1962. A comparison of two methods of estimating changes in Simulium larval populations, with a description of a new method. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., Liverpool 56, 359–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WOLCOTT, R. H., 1901. A modification of the Birge collecting net. Joppl. Microsc. Lab. Meth. 4(8), 1407–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLFE, L. S. and PETERSON, D. G., 1958. A new method to estimate levels of infestations of black-fly larvae (Diptera: Simulidae) Can. J. Zool. 36, 863–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 T. R. E. Southwood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Southwood, T.R.E. (1978). Absolute Population Estimates by Sampling a Unit of Habitat — Freshwater Habitats. In: Ecological Methods. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1225-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1225-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-30710-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1225-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics