• Peter Slezak
Part of the Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 7)


While the papers in this volume were written independently of one another, there is a clear overall unity in their concerns, with a few common threads discernable throughout. These reflect issues of central interest within cognitive science and include in particular the computational view of the mind. The purpose of this introductory essay is to act as a guide to the contributions by summarising their central arguments and also offering some brief commentary where appropriate.


Cognitive Science Mental Rotation Propositional Attitude Folk Psychology Modular Decomposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.A. Fodor (1975) The Language of Thought. Crowell.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    J.A. Fodor (1981) ‘Propositional Attitudes’, RePresentations, Bradford/MIT, and J.A. Fodor and Z. Pylyshyn (1988) ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture’, Cognition XXVIII, pp. 3–71.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    ; (1980) ‘Language, Thought and Information Processing’, Nous XIV, pp. 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 6.
    J.A. Fodor (1980) ‘Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology’, The Behavioural and Brain Sciences III, pp. 63–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 7.
    J.A. Fodor (1987) Psychosemantics,Bradford/MIT.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    N. Chomsky (1980) Rules and Representations, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    J.A. Fodor (1983) The Modularity of Mind,Bradford/MIT.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    T. Burge (1986) ‘Individualism and Psychology’, The Philosophical Review XCV, No 1, pp. 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 15.
    D.E. Rumeihart and J.L. McLelland (eds.), (1986) Parallel Distributed Processing I and II, MIT.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    R.N. Shepard and J. Metzler (1971) ‘Mental Rotation and Three Dimensional Objects’, Science CLXXI, pp. 701–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 17.
    N. Block (ed.) (1981) Imagery, Bradford/MIT.Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    S. Gaukroger (ed.) (1980) Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics,Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  13. 19.
    D.M. Clarke (1982) Descartes’ Philosophy of Science,Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    R. Descartes (1969) Philosophical Writings, E. Anscombe and P.T. Geach (eds.), Nelson, pp. 242–246.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    M. Brand (1986) Intending and Acting,Bradford/MIT.Google Scholar
  16. 22.
    G.A. Miller, E. Galanter and K. Pribram (1960) Plans and the Structure of Behaviour, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 24.
    H. Gardner (1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences,Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. 26.
    J.A. Fodor (1986) ‘Banish disContent’ in J. Butterfield (ed.) Language, Mind and Logic, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 30.
    T.S. Kuhn (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Slezak
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Cognitive ScienceUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations