Physical Meaning of the Performed Experiments Concerning the EPR Paradox
Two types of inequalities have been proposed for the experimental study of the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) paradox. Those of the first type (“ weak inequalities”), like the original one due to Bell, can be deduced from local realism alone. Those of the second type (“ strong inequalities”) can be deduced only thanks to the introduction of some assumption additional to local realism. All such “ additional assumptions” are reviewed and discussed. They are essentally arbitrary assumptions and no evidence exists supporting their validity. The performed experiments with atomic photon pairs violate only strong inequalities. Therefore local realism is still compatible with the existing empirical evidence.
KeywordsAdditional Assumption Joint Probability Photon Pair Local Realism Strong Inequality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.AR. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, Harvard University preprint (1974);Google Scholar
- 1.CNuovo Cimento 33B, 740 (1976);Google Scholar
- 4.AT.W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. 100A, 225 (1984).Google Scholar
- 7.F. Selleri, ed., Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism: The Ein-stein,Podolsky , and Rosen Paradox (Plenum, London - New York, 1988).Google Scholar
- 9.G. Lepore, New Inequalities from Local Realism, Univ. of Bari, preprint, (1987).Google Scholar
- 11.See ref. 2.Google Scholar
- 13.A. Aspect, These, Universite de Paris-Sud (1983), page 121.Google Scholar
- 14.F. Selleri, Is Bell’s Inequality Violated in Nature in Problems in Quantum Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).Google Scholar
- 15.A. Zeilinger and F. Selleri, A Deterministic Local Model for Einstein Podolsky-Rosen Experiments, Univ. of Bari preprint, (1988).Google Scholar