Advertisement

Physical Meaning of the Performed Experiments Concerning the EPR Paradox

  • F. Selleri
Conference paper
Part of the Fundamental Theories of Physics book series (FTPH, volume 24)

Abstract

Two types of inequalities have been proposed for the experimental study of the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) paradox. Those of the first type (“ weak inequalities”), like the original one due to Bell, can be deduced from local realism alone. Those of the second type (“ strong inequalities”) can be deduced only thanks to the introduction of some assumption additional to local realism. All such “ additional assumptions” are reviewed and discussed. They are essentally arbitrary assumptions and no evidence exists supporting their validity. The performed experiments with atomic photon pairs violate only strong inequalities. Therefore local realism is still compatible with the existing empirical evidence.

Keywords

Additional Assumption Joint Probability Photon Pair Local Realism Strong Inequality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    S. J. Freedman and J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 938 (1972);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 1.A
    R. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, Harvard University preprint (1974);Google Scholar
  3. 1.B
    J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 1223 (1976);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 1.C
    Nuovo Cimento 33B, 740 (1976);Google Scholar
  5. 1.D
    E. S. Fry and R. C. Thompson Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 465 (1976);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 1.E
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 460 (1981);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 1.F
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 91 (1982);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 1.G
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1804 (1982);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 1.H
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 1790 (1985)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 2.
    J. F. Clauser and M.A. Home Phys. Rev. D10, 526 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 3.
    T. W. Marshall, E. Santos and F. Selleri Phys. Rev. A98 5 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 3.
    T. W. Marshall E. Santos F. Selleri Phys. Rev. A98, 5 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 4.
    T.W. Marshall Phys. Lett. 99A, 163 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 4.A
    T.W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. 100A, 225 (1984).Google Scholar
  15. 5.
    T.W. Marshall and E. Santos Phys. Lett. 107A 164 (1985)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 6.
    M. Ferrero and E. Santos Phys. Lett. 116A 356 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 7.
    F. Selleri, ed., Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism: The Ein-stein,Podolsky , and Rosen Paradox (Plenum, London - New York, 1988).Google Scholar
  18. 8.
    A. Garuccio and F. Selleri, Found. Phys. 10, 209 (1980)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 9.
    G. Lepore, New Inequalities from Local Realism, Univ. of Bari, preprint, (1987).Google Scholar
  20. 10.
    J. F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 11.
    See ref. 2.Google Scholar
  22. 12.
    A. Garuccio and V. Rapisarda Nuovo Cimento A65, 269 (1981).ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 13.
    A. Aspect, These, Universite de Paris-Sud (1983), page 121.Google Scholar
  24. 14.
    F. Selleri, Is Bell’s Inequality Violated in Nature in Problems in Quantum Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).Google Scholar
  25. 15.
    A. Zeilinger and F. Selleri, A Deterministic Local Model for Einstein Podolsky-Rosen Experiments, Univ. of Bari preprint, (1988).Google Scholar
  26. 16.
    E.P. Wigner >Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005 (1970).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Selleri
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità di Bari INFNSezione di BariItaly

Personalised recommendations