Abstract
The alleged generality of the experimental results against the so-called local realist theories is challenged on two major grounds : first, the “naturalness” of the notorious no-enhancement hypothesis is questioned ; second it is disclosed that the possibility of subluminal information exchanges cannot be ruled out in atomic cascade tests if the emission lifetimes of both photons are taken into account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C.S. Uu and I. Shaknov, Phys. Rev. 77 (1950) 136;
L. R. Kasday, J.D. Ullman and C.S. Wu, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 15 (1970) 586;
[1.B] Nuovo Cimento 25B (1975) 633;
M. Lamehi-Rachti and U. Mittig, Phys. Rev. 14 (1976) 2543
J.S. Bell, Physics 1 (1965) 195
J.F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880
J. F. Clauser and M. A. Home, Phys. Rev. 10D (1974) 526
T.U. Marshall, private communication
S. Pascazio, in „Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism. The Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen Paradox„ (Plenum Publ., 1988) F. Selleri ed.
E. Santos, in „Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism„ (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988) G. Tarozzi A. van der Merwe eds.;
F. Selleri, in „Symposium on the Foundation of Modern Physics„ (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986) P. Lahti P. Mittelstaedt eds.
S.J. Freedman, J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 938;
[8.A] R.A. Holt, P.M. Pipkin, Harvard University preprint (1974);
J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1223;
E.S. Fry, R.C. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 465
A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Rogers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 460 ;
[8.E] Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 91;
A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1804;
U. Perrie, A.J. Duncan, H.J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1790
A. Garuccio, F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. 103A (1984) 99 and refs. therein;
M. Ferrero, T.U. Marshall and E. Santos, in „Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism. The Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen paradox„. (Plenum Publ., 1988) F. Selleri ed. and refs. therein.
J.F. Clauser, A. Shimony, Rep. Progr. Phys. 41 (1978) 1681
A. Garuccio, private communication
S. Pascazio, Phys. Lett. 111A (1985) 339; 118A (1986) 47
118A (1986) 47
S. Pascazio, J. Reignier, Phys. Lett. 126A (1987) 163
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pascazio, S. (1989). Time and Enhancement: Two Possible Local Explanations for the EPR Puzzle. In: Bitsakis, E.I., Nicolaides, C.A. (eds) The Concept of Probability. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1175-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1175-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7023-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1175-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive