The application of a viscoelastic lithosphere model to isostatic subsidence in backstripping

  • Willy Fjeldskaar
  • Stig Pallesen

Abstract

A frequently applied simplifying assumption in basin modelling is that isostatic compensation is of local character and takes place simultaneously with the increase in sediment load. Using such a 1-D model may introduce errors in the estimated tectonic subsidence during backstripping. For some areas, or during parts of the basin evolution, a 1-D model may be a good approximation. In general, however, a more realistic model of the Earth’s response to loading has to take into account the elastic stiffness and the viscous behaviour of the lithosphere. Such a model of the Earth’s response to loading may have implications for correlations of gravity anomalies and tectonic events in a basin. Calculations carried out with a 2-D viscoelastic model in the Northern Viking Graben show that isostatic equilibrium is not achieved even 20–30 million years after sedimentation. The main purpose of this chapter is to quantify the effect of the lithosphere’s elastic and viscous properties to estimate stretching factors, and consequently palaeoheat flow. The tectonic subsidence estimated from 1-D isostatic model may be underestimated by 15% when compared to a 2-D viscoelastic model constraincd by published laboratory data on lithospheric viscosity and elasticity.

Keywords

Viscoelastic Model Flexural Rigidity Hydrocarbon Exploration Tectonic Subsidence Isostatic Compensation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badley, M. E., Price, J. D., Dahl, C. R. and Agdestein, T. 1988. The structural evolution of the northern Viking Graben and its bearing upon extensional modes of basin formation. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 145, 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaumont, C. 1978, The evolution of sedimentary basins on a visco-elastic lithosphere: theory and examples. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 55, 471–497.Google Scholar
  3. Beaumont, C. 1981. Foreland basins. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 65, 291–329.Google Scholar
  4. Cathles, L. M. 1975. The Viscosity of the Earth’s mantle, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.Google Scholar
  5. De Rito, R. F., Cozzarelli, F. A. and Hodge, D. S. 1986. A forward approach to the problem of nonlinear viscoelasticity and the thickness of the mechanical lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 8295–8313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fjeldskaar, W. 1988. Isostatic modelling with a layered lithosphere. Report no. RF 215/88, Rogaland Research Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Fjeldskaar, W. 1989. Rapid eustatic changes—never globally uniform. In: Collinson, J. D. (ed.), Correlation in Hydrocarbon Exploration, Norwegian Petrol. Soc., Graham & Trotman, London.Google Scholar
  8. Fjeldskaar, W. and Cathles, L. 1987. Structure of mantle and lithosphere inferred from post-glacial uplift. Report no. PRC T-5/87, Rogaland Research Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Guidish, T. M., Kendall, C. G. St. C., Lerche, I., Toth, D. J. and Yarzab, R. F. 1985. Basin evaluation using burial history calculations: an overview. AAPG Bull., 69, 92–105.Google Scholar
  10. Kusznir, N. and Karner, G. 1985. Dependence of flexural rigidity of the continental lithosphere on rheology and temperature. Nature, 316, 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McKenzie, D. 1978. Some remarks on the development of sedimentary basins. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 40, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meissner, R. and Kusznir, N. J. 1987. Crustal viscosity and reflectivity of the lower crust. Ann. Geophys. 5B, 4, 365–374.Google Scholar
  13. Sclater, J. G. and Christie, P. A. F. 1980. Continental stretching: an explanation of the post-mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the Central North Sea basin. J. Geophys. Res., 85, 3711–3739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sleep, N. H. and Snell, N. S. 1976. Thermal contraction and flexure of mid-Continent and Atlantic marginal basins. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 45, 125–154.Google Scholar
  15. Steckler, M. S. and Watts, A. B. 1978. Subsidence of the Atlantic-type continental margin off New York. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 41, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thorne, J. A. and Watts, A. B. 1989. Quantitative analysis of North Sea subsidence. AAPG Bull, 73, 88–116.Google Scholar
  17. Walcott, R. I. 1970. Flexural rigidity, thickness, and viscosity of the lithosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 75, 3941–3954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Watts, A. B., Karner, G. D. and Steckler, M. S. 1982. Lithospheric flexure and the evolution of sedimentary basins. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A305, 249–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Watts, A. B. and Ryan, W. B. F. 1976. Flexure of the lithosphere and continental margin basins. Tectonophysics, 36, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Norwegian Petroleum Society 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willy Fjeldskaar
    • 1
  • Stig Pallesen
    • 2
  1. 1.Rogaland Research InstituteStavangerNorway
  2. 2.StatoilStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations