Advertisement

Acoustic Methods of Evaluating Elastic Properties or, Will the Real Young’s Modulus Please Stand Up?

  • V. K. Kinra
  • V. Dayal

Abstract

Measurement of the elastic moduli using ultrasound has become fairly routine. One measures a speed of sound, c, the density, ρ, and calculates a modulus, E, from a formula of the type c 2=E/ρ. Now, E describes a static response whereas c describes a dynamic response of the material. The connection between the two, E= ρc2, is strictly valid for an ideally elastic and homogeneous material; it remains valid for heterogeneous materials, e.g. composites, so long as a key assumption is satisfied, namely, the wavelength is large compared to any characteristic length of the material. In metals, a characteristic length is the grain size and generally the wavelength is large compared to the grain size. By their very definition, composites are heterogeneous materials and have one or more characteristic lengths. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that when the wavelength becomes of the order of the characteristic length of a composite, large errors may occur and the dynamic measurement of E may differ from its true static value by as much as 200 percent; hence the subtitle: ‘Will the real Young’s modulus please stand up?’

Keywords

Phase Velocity Group Velocity Characteristic Length Particulate Composite Heterogeneous Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

List of Symbols

E

Young’s modulus, GPa

Vw

velocity of sound in water, mm/μs

a

inclusion radius, mm

c1

longitudinal wavespeed, mm/μs

c2

shear wavespeed, mm/μs

volume fraction

d

a characteristic length, mm

k

wavenumber, mm−1

n

frequency, cycles/s

t

travel time, s

w

specimen thickness, mm

Ω

normalized frequency, k 1 a

λ,μ

Lame’s constants

λ

wavelength, mm

ν

Poisson’s ratio

ρ

specific gravity

ω

frequency, radians/s

<>

aggregate property of composite

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kinra, V.K., Petraitis, M.S., and Datta, S.K., “Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in a Random Particulate Composite,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 16, 301–312 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kinra, V.K., “Acoustical and Optical Branches of Wave Propagation in an Epoxy Matrix Containing a Random Distribution of Lead Inclusions,” Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, ed. D. O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Publishing Corp., NY, Vol. 3B, 983–991 (1984).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kinra, V.K., and Ker, E.L., “Effective Elastic Moduli of a Thin-Wall Glass Microsphere/PMMA Composite,” J. Comp. Mat., 16, 117–138 (March 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kinra, V.K., and Anand, A., “Wave Propagation in a Random Particulate Composite at Long and Short Wavelength,” Int. J. Sol. Struct., 18 (5), 367–380 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kinra, V.K., and Ker, E.L., “An Experimental Investigation of Pass Bands and Stop Bands in Two Periodic Particulate Composites,” Int. J. Sol. Struct., 19, 393–410 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hashin, Z. and Shtrikman, S., “A Variational Approach to the Theory of the Elastic Behavior of Multiphase Materials,” J. Mech. and Phys. of Sol, 11, 127–140 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller, M.N., “Bounds for Effective Bulk Modulus of Heterogeneous Materials,” J. Math. Phys., 10, 2005 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. K. Kinra
  • V. Dayal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations