Dialysers

  • Nicholas A. Hoenich
  • Celia Woffindin
  • Michael K. Ward

Abstract

From a historical view point, the treatment of renal failure by artificial support has been synonymous with haemodialysis. The past decade has, however, seen the evolution and clinical application of a number of new modalities of treatment which retain their reliance on a device containing an artificial membrane. The techniques are summarised in Table 1.

Keywords

Artif Organ Blood Pump Transmembrane Pressure Extracorporeal Circuit Ultrafiltration Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Drukker W, Haagsma-Schouten WAG, Alberts Chr. Spoek MG: Report on regular dialysis treatment in Europe V, 1969. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 6: 99, 1969Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abel JJ, Rowntree LG, Turner BB: On the removal of diffusible substances from the circulating blood of living animals by dialysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 5: 275, 1913–1914Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kolff WJ, Berk HTJ, ter Welle M, van der Ley AJW, van Dijk EC, van Noordwijk J: De kunstmatige nier, een dialysator met groot oppervlak (The artificial kidney, a dialyser with a large surface area). Geneesk Gids 21: 409, 1943 (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babb AL, Farrell PC, Uvelli DA, Scribner BH: Hemodialyzer evaluation by examination of solute molecular spectra. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 18: 98, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bluemle LW, Dickson JG, Mitchell J, Podolnick MS: Permeability and hydrodynamic studies on the MacNeil Collins dialyzer using conventional and modified membrane supports. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 6: 38, 1960Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edson H, Keen M, Gotch F: Comparative solute transport and therapeutic effectiveness of multiple point support and standard Kiil hemodialyzers. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 18; 113, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    von Hartitzsch B, Hoenich NA: Meltec Multipoint haemodialyser. Br Med J 1: 237, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sakula A: Formalin asthma in hospital laboratory staff. Lancet 2: 816, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Porter J AH: Acute respiratory distress following formalin inhalation. Lancet 2: 603, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hendrick DJ, Lane DJ: Formalin asthma in hospital staff. Br Med J 1: 607, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis KJ, Dewar PJ, Ward MK, Kerr DNS: Formation of anti-N-like antibodies in dialysis patients: effect of different methods of dialyzer rinsing to remove formaldehyde. Clin Nephrol 15: 39, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gotch FA, Keen ML: Formaldehyde kinetics in reused dialyzers. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 29: 396, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hakim RM, Friedrich RA, Lowrie EG, Mantilla JM, Lee C: Formaldehyde kinetics and bacteriology in dialyzers. Kidney Int 28: 936, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woffindin C, Hoenich NA: Some aspects of residual formaldehyde testing when reusing hemodialyzers. Int J Artif Organs 8: 313, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stragier A, Wenderickx D: Increased sensitivity of residual formaldehyde testing in reused dialysers. Int J Artif Organs 9: 277, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Howell ED, Perkins HA: Anti-N-like antibodies in the sera of patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Vox Sang 23: 291, 1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crosson JT, Moulds J, Comty CM, Polesky HF: A clinical study of anti-NDP in the sera of patients in a large repetitive hemodialysis program. Kidney Int 10: 463, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fassbinder W, Seidl S, Koch KM: The role of formaldehyde in the formation of haemodialysis-associated Anti-N-like antibodies. Vox Sang 35: 41, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Orringer EP, Mattern WD: Formaldehyde-induced hemolysis during chronic hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 294: 1416, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maurice F, Rivory JP, Larsson PH, Johansson SGO, Bousquet J: Anaphylactic shock caused by formaldehyde in a patient undergoing long-term hemodialysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 77: 594, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McDonald HP, Merrill JP: A disposable parallel flow unit for the MacNeill-Collins artificial kidney - Description and evaluation. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 6: 7, 1960Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Malchesky PS, Mrava GL, Nose Y: A totally disposable presterilized dialyzer. Arch Intern Med 127: 278, 1971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alwall N: A new disposable artificial kidney: experimental and clinical experience. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 5: 18, 1968Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoenich NA, White T, Luno J, Liano F, Kerr DNS: Disposable dialysers-current trends and experiences. In Technical Aspects of Renal Dialysis, edited by Frost TH, Tunbridge Wells, Pitman Medical, 1977, p 38Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoeltzenbein J: Efficient and inexpensive, no-prime, no blood-loss haemodialysis system. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 5: 316, 1969Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sigdell JE: A Mathematical Theory for the Capillary Artificial Kidney. Stuttgart, Hippokrates Verlag, 1974Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stewart RD, Cerny JC, Mahon HI: The capillary ‘Kidney’. Preliminary report. Univ Michigan Med Center J 30: 116, 1964Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Agishi T, Ota K, Nose Y: Is hollow fibre occlusion due to maldistribution of blood? Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 12: 519, 1975Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nakagawa S, Koshikawa S, Ishida Y, Uematsu M, Ishibashi K: Development of flat type hollow fibre dialyser (NF-01): achievement of better performance than cylinder type with same membrane area, in: Technical Aspects of Renal Dialysis edited by Frost TH, Tunbridge Wells, Pitman Medical, 1977, p 29Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee KH, Taylor JA: Multi-chambered dialyzers and their efficiencies. Artif Organs 3: 137, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sigdell JE: New hollow-fiber dialyzers. Artif Organs 9: 205, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Broyer M, Brunner FP, Brynger H, Fassbinder W, Guillou PJ, Oules R: Demography of dialysis and transplantation in children in Europe, 1984. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1: 9, 1986Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Trachtman H, Hackney P, Tejani A: Pediatric hemodialysis: A decade’s (1974–1984) perspective. Kidney Int 30: S15, 1986Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baluarte HJ, Morgenstern BZ, Kaiser BA, Polinsky MS, Perlman SA, Gruskin AB: Clinical aspects of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in children. Dial Transplant 14: 18, 1985Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leichter HE, Salusky IB, Alliapoulos JC, Hall T, Jordan SC, Ettenger RB, Fine RN: CAPD and CCPD in children: an experience of three and a half years. Dial Transplant 13: 382, 1984Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fischbach M, Tarral E, Koehl C, Coumaros G, Geisert J: High permeable membranes in children: HD or HDF for an optimal blood purification? Nieren und Hochdruckkrankh 14: 162, 1985Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muller-Wiefel DE, Rauh W, Wingen AM, Mehls O, Scharer K: Hemofiltration in children. Contr Nephrol 32: 128, 1982Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gardiner AOP, Sawyer AN, Donckerwolcke RA, Haycock GB, Murphy A, Ogg CS, Winder EA, Chantier C: Assessment of dialysis requirement for children on regular hemodialysis. Dial Transplant 11: 754, 1982Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Henderson LW: The beginning of hemofiltration. Contr Nephrol 32: 1, 1982Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Henderson LW, Besarab A, Michaels A, Bluemle LW Jr: Blood purification by ultrafiltration and fluid replacement (diafiltration). Trans Am Soc Artif Int Organs 13: 216, 1967Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Golper TA: Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in acute renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 6: 373, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kaplan AA, Longnecker RE, Folkert VW: Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Ann Intern Med 100: 358, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dodd NJ, O’Donovan RM, Bennett-Jones DN, Rylance PB, Bewick M, Parsons V, Weston MJ: Arteriovenous haemofiltration: a recent advance in the management of renal failure. Br Med J 287: 1008, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ofsthun NJ, Colton CK, Lysaght MJ: Determinants of fluid and solute removal rates during hemofiltration. in: Hemofiltration, edited by Henderson LW, Quellhorst EA, Baldamus CA, Lysaght MJ, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1986, p 18Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jeffree MA, Peacock J, Sobey IJ, Bellhouse BJ, Increased maximum haemofiltration rates in a vortex mixing haemofilter. Proc Eur Soc Artif Organs 8: 150, 1981Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vangelista A, Frasca GM, Bonomini V: Parameters for indication of plasmapheresis and the interpretation of results. Clin Nephrol 26: S64, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Freeman JG, Matthewson K, Record CO: Plasmapheresis in acute liver failure. Int J Artif Organs 9: 433, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Smith JW, Malchesky PS, Nose Y: Membrane plasmapheresis and the developing technology of plasma therapy. Cleve Clin Q 51: 135, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gurland HJ, Samtleben W, Blumenstein M, Randerson DH, Schmidt B: Clinical applications of macromolecular separations. Trans Am Soc Artif Int Organs 27: 356, 1981Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Malchesky PS, Wojcicki J, Horiuchi T, Lee JM, Nose Y: Membrane separation processes for macromolecule removal, in: Plasmapheresis, edited by Nose Y, Malchesky PS, Smith JW, Cleveland, ISAO Press, 1983, p 51Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Malchesky PS: Membrane plasma separation: critical issues, in: Therapeutic Apheresis: A Critical Look, edited by Nose Y, Malchesky PS, Smith JW, Cleveland, ISAO Press, 1984 p 93Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sueoka A, Malchesky PS, Nose Y: Effects of blood composition in membrane plasma separation, in: Plasmapheresis, edited by Nose Y, Malchesky PS, Smith JW, Cleveland, ISAO Press, 1983, p 93Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sigdell JE: New hollow-fiber dialyzers. Artif Organs 9: 69, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sigdell JE: New hollow-fiber dialyzers on the market. Artif Organs 8: 365, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lunt MJ, Powell RJ, Cattell WR: Evaluation of an ultrasonic doppler flowmeter for measurement of extracorporeal blood flow during renal dialysis, in: Technical Aspects of Renal Dialysis, edited by Frost TH, Tunbridge Wells, Pitman Medical, 1977, p 210Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gotch FA: Hemodialysis: technical and kinetic considerations. in The Kidney, edited by Brenner BM, Rector FC Jr, Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Sydney, WB Saunders Co, 1976, p 1672Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bosch JP: Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. in Hemofiltration, edited by Henderson LW, Quellhorst EA, Baldamus CA, Lysaght MJ, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1986, p 234Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sigdell JE: Comparison of hollow fiber dialyzers. Artif Organs, 5: 401, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pirofsky, B: The determination of blood viscosity in man by a method based on Poiseuille’s Law. J Clin Invest 32: 292, 1953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lowrie EG, Hampers CL, Merrill JP: Physical principles in hemodialysis, in Haemodialysis: Principles and Practice, edited by Bailey GL, New York, Academic Press, 1972, p 195Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nolph KD, Fox M, Mäher JF: Factors affecting the ultrafiltration rate from standard dialysis coils. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 16: 487, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gunnarsson B, Asaba H, Bergström J, Kiibus A, Soderborg B: Application of gamma camera technique for hemodynamic study of parallel flow dialyzers. Artif Organs 4: 201, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Longnecker RE, Goffinet JA, Hendler ED: Blood loss during maintenance hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 20: 135, 1974Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ireland R, Lutkin J, Evans R, Sharpstone P: Trafford A:Blood losses from patients on chronic hemodialysis. Dial Transplant 11: 782, 1982Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stewart WK, Fleming LW: The rupture problem with haemodialysers. Br J Hosp Med (Equip Suppl) May 1974, p 47Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Butruille YA, Leonard EF, Litwak RS: Platelet-platelet interactions and non-adhesive encounters on biomaterials. Trans Am Soc Intern Organs 21: 609, 1975Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Schultz JS, Lindenauer SM, Penner JA, Barenberg S: Determinants of thrombus formation on surfaces. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 26: 279, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Petschek H, Adamis D, Kantrowitz AR: Stagnation flow thrombus formation. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 14: 256, 1969Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rylance PB, Gordge MP, Ireland H, Lane DA, Weston MJ: Haemodialysis with prostayclin (Epoprostenol) alone. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 21: 281, 1984Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lindsay RM, Burton JA, Edward N, Dargie HJ, Prentice CRM, Kennedy AC: Dialyzer blood loss. Clin Nephrol 1: 29, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Miller JH, Shinaberger JH, Gardner PW: Comparison of new hemodialyzers: 1974–1975. Dial Transplant 4: 40, 1975Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Gorgels J, Tan BH: An evaluation of the performance of current dialyzers in routine use and in vitro. Dial Transplant 5: 68, 1976Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Cripps CM: Rapid method for the estimation of plasma haemoglobin levels. J Clin Pathol 21: 110, 1968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lindsay RM, Burton JA, King P, Davidson JF, Boddy K, Kennedy AC: The measurement of dialyzer blood loss. Clin Nephrol 1: 24, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Göhl H, Konstantin P: Membranes and filters for hemofiltration. in: Hemofiltration, edited by Henderson LW, Quellhorst EA, Baldamus CA, Lysaght MJ, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1986, p 42Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Frost TH, Petrie CJS, Saleh TAM: Hydrodynamics of purging blood filled extra-corporeal circuits. Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. August/September: 205, 1978Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Tello R, March R, Lowrie EG: A model of the reinfusion process at termination of hemodialysis. Dial Transplant 12: 444, 1983Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Clayton CB, Hoenich NA, Keir MJ: The measurement of dialyser washout characteristics, in: Technical Aspects of Renal Dialysis, edited by Frost TH, Tunbridge Wells, Pitman Medical 1977, p 65Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    von Hartitzsch B, Hoenich NA, Samson P, Erickson J, Ashcroft RA, Kerr DNS: A clinical evaluation of the new dialysers. Kidney Int 3: 35, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Colton CK, Henderson LW, Ford CA, Lysaght MJ: Kinetics of hemodiafiltration. I. In vitro transport characteristics of a hollow-fiber blood ultrafilter. J Lab Clin Med 85: 355, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Henderson LW, Colton CK, Ford CA: Kinetics of hemodiafiltration. II. Clinical characterization of a new blood cleansing modality. J Lab Clin Med 85: 372, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gupta BB, Jaffrin MY: In vitro study of combined convection-diffusion mass transfer in hemodialysers. Int J Artif Organs 7: 263, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kramer P, Tonnis HJ, Eichelberg B, Kattermann R, Scheler F: Distortion of dialysance by ultrafiltration, and its correction by means of a simple method. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 8: 460, 1971Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Nolph KD, Nothum RJ, Maher JF: Effects of ultrafiltration on dialysance in commercially available coils. Kidney Int 2: 293, 1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nolph KD, Hopkins C, Van Stone J: Effects of ultrafiltration on solute clearances in parallel plate dialyzers. Clin Nephrol 8: 453, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Nolph KD, Twardowski ZJ, Hopkins CA, Rubin J, Van Stone JC: Effects of ultrafiltration on solute clearances in Cuprophan and cellulose hollow fiber dialysers: in vitro and clinical studies. J Lab Clin Med 91: 998, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Colton CK, Smith KA, Merrill EW, Reece JM: Diffusion of organic solutes in stagnant plasma and red cell suspensions. Chem Eng Progress Symp Series 66: 85, 1970Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Farrell PC, Ward RA, Hone PW: Uric acid: binding levels of urate ions in normal and uraemic plasma, and in human serum albumin. Biochem Pharmacol 24: 1885, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Farrell PC, Grib NL, Fry DL, Popovich RP, Broviac JW, Babb AL: A comparison of in vitro and in vivo solute-protein binding interactions in normal and uremic subjects. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 18: 268, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Skalsky M, Schindhelm K, Farrell PC: Creatinine transfer between red cells and plasma: a comparison between normal and uremic subjects. Nephron 22: 514, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Woffindin C, Hoenich NA, Kerr DNS: The effect of hematocrit on the clearance of small molecules during hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs 6: 127, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Grossman NDF, Kopp KF, Frey J: Transport of urea by erythrocytes during haemodialysis. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 4: 250, 1967Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sigdell JE, Tersteegen B: Clearance of a dialyzer under varying operating conditions. Artif Organs 10: 219, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Christopher TG, Cambi V, Harker LA, Hurst PE, Popovich RP, Babb AL, Scribner BH: A study of hemodialysis with lowered dialysate flow rate. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 17: 92, 1971Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Shinaberger JH, Miller JH, Rosenblatt MG, Gardner PW, Carpenter GW, Martin FE: Clinical studies of ‘low flow’ dialysis with membranes highly permeable to middle weight molecules. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 18: 82, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Hoenich NA, White T, Conceicao S, Luno J, Liano F, Kerr DNS: High efficiency dialysers, miniature and cuprophan hollow fibre. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 14: 601, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Rubin JE, Fani K, Friedman EA, Berlyne GM: Use of fluorescent antisera (FAS) to identify blood components deposited on dialyzer membranes. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs, 24: 471, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Fumero R, Muttoni M, Scuri S, Tanzi MC, Cairo G: Blood-membrane interactions during hemodialysis: the influence of fluid-dynamics, membrane structure and manufacturing process. Proc Eur Soc Artif Organs, 13: 301, 1986Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Lehmann HD, Biesinger U, Bergkvist G, Goehl H, Weber H, Krauth E, Kulbe KD: Haemofilter efficiency as a result of membrane charge and wettability, in: Biomaterials in Artificial Organs, edited by Paul JP, Gaylor JDS, Courtney JM, Gilchrist T, London, Basingstoke, Macmillan Press Ltd, 1984, p 238Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Keshaviah PR, Constantini EG, Luehmann DA, Shapiro FL: Dialyzer ultrafiltration coefficients: comparison between in vitro and in vivo values. Artif Organs 6: 23, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Sato H, Kidaka T: Effect of moisture on and kinetic features of the ultrafiltration rate of dialysis membrane. Artif Organs 5: 286, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Takesawa S, Ohmi S, Konno Y, Sekiguchi M, Shitaokoshi S, Takahashi T, Hidai H, Sakai, K: Varying methods of sterilisation, and their effects on the structure and permeability of dialysis membranes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1: 254, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Potter LJ, Frost TH: The effect of strain and pre-tension on the permeability of cellulose membranes and on the performance of flat bed dialysers. in: Technical Aspects of Renal Dialysis, edited by Frost TH, Tunbridge Wells, Pitman Press, 1977, p 112Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Okazaki M, Yoshida F: Ultrafiltration of blood: effect of hematocrit on ultrafiltration rate. Ann Biomed Eng 4: 138, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Grossmann DF, Kopp KF: Thermo-osmotic effect and ultrafiltration in the artificial kidney. Experience with the ‘coil kidney’. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 3: 299, 1966Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Nolph KD, Groshong TD, Mäher JF: Estimation of weight loss during coil dialysis. Kidney Int 1: 182, 1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Blackshear PL Jr, Forstrom RJ: Fluid dynamics of blood cells and applications to hemodialysis. Proc 10th Annu Contractors Conf Artif Kidney program NIAMDD edited by Mackey BB, DHEW Publ No (NIH) 77–1442, 1977, p 58Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Blackshear PL Jr, Forstrom RJ: Fluid dynamics of blood cells and applications to hemodialysis. Proc 8th Annu Contractors’ Conf Artif Kidney Program NIAMDD, edited by Mackey BB, DHEW Publ No (NIH) 75–248, 1975, p 59Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Wilhelmsson S, Lins LE: Heparin elimination and hemostasis in hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 22: 303, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Lindsay RM: Variable heparin requirements during hemodialysis - Why? asaio J 3: 81, 1980Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Gotch FA, Keen ML: Precise control of minimal heparinization for high bleeding risk hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 23: 168, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Khazine F, Simons O: Pharmacokinetics monitoring of heparin therapy for regular hemodialysis. Artif Organs 9: 59, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Cipolle RJ, Seifert RD, Neilan BA, Zaske DE, Haus E: Heparin kinetics: Variables related to disposition and dosage. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29: 387, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Talstad I, Kjelby K: Analysis of heparinization methods during hemodialysis. Am J Clin Pathol 84: 317, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Griffiths GC, Nichols G, Asher JD, Flanagan B: Heparin osteoporosis. JAMA 193: 85, 1965Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Camici M, Evangelisti L: Prostacyclin and heparin during haemodialysis: Comparative effects. Life Support Systems 4: 205, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Lane DA, Ireland H, Flynn A, Anastassiades E, Curtis JR: Haemodialysis with low MW heparin: Dosage requirements for the elimination of extracorporeal fibrin formation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1: 179, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Renaud H, Moriniere P, Dieval J, Abdull-Massih Z, Dkhissi H, Toutlemonde F, Delobel J, Fournier A: Low molecular weight heparin in haemodialysis and haemofiltration - comparison with unfractioned heparin. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 21: 276, 1984Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    von Brecht JH, Flanigan MJ, Freeman RM, Lim VS: Regional anticoagulation: Hemodialysis with hypertonic trisodium citrate. Am J Kidney Dis 8: 196, 1986Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Flanigan MJ, von Brecht J, Freeman RM, Lim VS: Reducing the hemorrhagic complications of hemodialysis: A controlled comparison of low-dose heparin and citrate anticoagulation. Am J Kidney Dis 9: 147, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Kelleher SP, Schulman G: Severe metabolic alkalosis complicating regional citrate hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 9: 235, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Bischel MD, Scoles BG, Möhler JG: Evidence for pulmonary microembolization during hemodialysis. Chest 67: 335, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Veitch P, Hawkins F, Frost TH, Jolly D, Kerr DNS: Factors affecting haemolysis in extracorporeal dialysis circuits, in: Technical Aspects of Renal Dialysis, edited by Frost TH, Tunbridge Wells, Pitman Medical, 1977, p 218Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Leonard EF: Biocompatibility issues in single-needle dialysis, in: 1st Int Symposium on Single-Needle Dialysis, edited by Ringoir S, Vanholder R, Ivanovich P, Cleveland, ISAO Press, 1984, p 203Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Lindsay RM, Prentice CRM, Davidson JF, Burton JA. McNicol GP: Haemostatic changes during dialysis associated with thrombus formation on dialysis membranes. Br Med J 4: 454, 1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Blackshear PL Jr, Patankar SV: Fluid dynamics of blood cells and applications to hemodialysis. Proc 11th Annu Contractors’ Conf Artif Kidney Program NIAMDD, edited by Mackey BB, DHEW Publ No (NIH) 79–1442, 1978, p 97Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Toren M, Goffinet J A, Kaplow LS: Pulmonary bed sequestration of neutrophils during hemodialysis. Blood 36: 337, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Craddock PR, Hammerschmidt D, White JG, Dalmasso AP, Jacob HS: Complement (C5a)-induced granulocyte aggregation in vitro. J Clin Invest 60: 260, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Craddock PR, Fehr J, Brigham KL, Kronenberg RS, Jacob HS: Complement and leukocyte-mediated pulmonary dysfunction in hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 296: 769, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Craddock PR, Fehr J, Dalmasso AP, Brigham KL, Jacob HS: Hemodialysis leukopenia. Pulmonary vascular leukostasis resulting from complement activation by dialyzer cellophane membranes. J Clin Invest 59: 879, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Amadori A, Candi P, SasdelliM, Massai G, Favilla S, Passaleva A, Ricci M: Hemodialysis leukopenia and complement function with different dialyzers. Kidney Int 24: 775, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Jacob AI, Gavellas G, Zarco R, Perez G, Bourgoignie JJ: Leukopenia, hypoxia, and complement function with different hemodialysis membranes. Kidney Int 18: 505, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Wegmuller E, Montandon A, Nydegger U, Descoeudres C: Biocompatibility of different hemodialysis membranes: activation of complement and leukopenia. Int J Artif Organs 9: 85, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Woffindin C, Johnston SRD, Hoenich NA, Quereshi M, Kerr DNS: Membrane-induced neutropenia. In: Biomaterials in Artificial Organs, edited by Paul JP, Gaylor JDS, Courtney JM, Gilchrist T, London, Basingstoke, Macmillan Press Ltd, 1984, p 64Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Ivanovich P, Chenoweth DE, Schmidt R, Klinkmann H, Boxer LA, Jacob HS, Hammerschmidt DE: Cellulose acetate hemodialysis membranes are better tolerated than Cuprophan. Contr Nephrol 37: 78, 1984Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Fawcett S, Hoenich NA, Woffindin C, Ward MK: Influence of high permeability synthetic membranes on gas exchange and lung function during hemodialysis. Contr Nephrol 46: 83.1985Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Bosch T, Schmidt B, Samtleben W, Gurland HJ: Biocompatibility and clinical performance of a new modified cellulose membrane. Clin Nephrol 26: S22, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Scheuermann EH, Fassbinder W, Frei U, Koch KM, Baldamus CA: Eosinophilia in hemodialysis. Contr Nephrol 36: 133, 1983Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Novello AC, Port FK: Hemodialysis eosinophilia. Int J Artif Organs 5: 5, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Bodner G, Peer G, Zakuth V, Spirer ZH, Aviram A: Dialysis-induced eosinophilia. Nephron 32: 63, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Backenroth R, Spinowitz BS, Galler M, Golden RA, Rascoff JH, Charytan C: Comparison of eosinophilia in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 8: 186, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Cheung AK, Henderson LW: Effects of complement activation by hemodialysis membranes. Am J Nephrol 6: 81, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Levett DL, Woffindin C, Bird AG, Hoenich NA, Ward MK, Kerr DNS: Complement activation in haemodialysis: a comparison of new and re-used dialysers. Int J Artif Organs 9: 97, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Levett DL, Woffindin C, Bird AG, Hoenich NA, Ward MK, Kerr DNS: Haemodialysis-induced activation of complement. Blood Purif 4: 185, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Hakim RM: Clinical sequelae of complement activation in hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 26: S9, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Eiser AR: Pulmonary gas exchange during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: Interaction between respiration and metabolism. Am J Kidney Disease 6: 131, 1985Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Francos GC, Besarab A, Burke JF, Peters J, Tahamont MV, Gee MH, Flynn JT, Gzesh D: Dialysis-induced hypoxemia: Membrane dependent and membrane independent causes. Am J Kidney Disease 5: 191, 1985Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Nissenson AR, Kraut JA, Shinaberger JH: Dialysis-associated hypoxemia: Pathogenesis and prevention, asaio J 7: 1, 1984Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Sherlock J, Ledwith J, Letteri J: Hypoventilation and hypoxemia during hemodialysis. Reflex response to removal of CO2 across the dialyzer. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 23: 406, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Bischel MD, Scoles BG, Möhler JG: Evidence for pulmonary microembolization during hemodialysis. Chest 67: 335, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Patterson RW, Nissenson AR, Miller J, Smith RT, Narins RG, Sullivan SF: Hypoxemia and pulmonary gas exchange during hemodialysis. J Appl Physiol 50: 259, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Hakim RM, Lowrie EG: Hemodialysis-associated neutropenia and hypoxemia: the effect of dialyzer membrane materials. Nephron 32: 32, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Nissenson AR: Prevention of dialysis-induced hypoxemia by bicarbonate dialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 26: 339, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Bardin T, Zingraff J, Kuntz D, Drüeke T: Dialysis - related amyloidosis. Nephrol Dial Transpl 1: 151, 1986Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Floege J, Granolleras C, Bingel M, Deschodt G, Branger B, Oules R, Koch KM, Shaldon S: B2-microglobulin kinetics during haemodialysis and haemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transpl 1: 223, 1987Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Rockel A, Hertel J, Fiegel P, Abdelhamid S, Panitz N, Walb D: Permeability and secondary membrane formation of a high flux polysulfone hemofilter. Kidney Int 30: 429, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Shaldon S, Koch KM, Dinarello CA, Colton CK, Knudsen PJ, Floege J, Granolleras C: B2-microglobulin and haemodialysis. Lancet 1: 925, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Bonal J, Pastor MC, Romero R, Corominas A, Caralps A: B2-microglobulin and haemodialysis. Lancet 1: 926, 1987Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Mayer G, Thum J, Woloszczuk W, Graf H: B2-microglobulin and haemodialysis. Lancet 1: 927, 1987Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Hauglustaine D, Waer M, Michielsen P, Goebels J, Vandeputte M: Haemodialysis membranes, serum B2-microglobulin, and dialysis amyloidosis. Lancet, 1: 1211, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Bergström J, Wehle B: No change in corrected B2-microglobulin concentration after Cuprophane haemodialysis. Lancet 1: 628, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Zazgornik J, Schmidt P: Effects of zinc-containing dialysis membranes on zinc metabolism in patients on RDT. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 9: 548, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Barbour BH, Bischel M, Abrams DE: Copper accumulation in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. The role of Cuprophan. Nephron 8: 455, 1971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Nicholls AJ, Platts MM: Anaphylactoid reactions due to haemodialysis, haemofiltration, or membrane plasma separation. Br Med J 285: 1607, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Daugirdas JT, Ing TS, Röxe DM, Ivanovich PT, Krumlovsky F, Popli S, McLaughlin MM: Severe anaphylactoid reactions to Cuprammonium cellulose hemodialyzers. Arch Intern Med 145: 489, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Foret M, Kuentz F, Hachache T, Christollet M, Milongo R, Meftahi H, Dechelette E, Cordonnier DJ: Hypersensitivity reactions during haemodialysis in France. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 22: 181, 1985Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Villarroel F, Ciarkowski AA: A survey on hypersensitivity reactions in hemodialysis. Artif Organs 9: 231, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Pearson F, Bruszer G, Lee W, Sagona M, Sargent H, Woods E, Dolovich J, Caruana R: Ethylene oxide sensitivity in hemodialysis patients. Artif Organs, 11: 100, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Bommer J, Ritz E: Ethylene oxide (ETO) as a major cause of anaphylactoid reactions in dialysis (A Review). Artif Organs 11: 111, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Marshall CP, Pearson FC, Sagona MA, Lee W, Wathen RL, Ward RA, Dolovich J: Reactions during hemodialysis caused by allergy to ethylene oxide gas sterilization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 75: 563, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Lemke HD, Kuentz F, Foret M: Mechanisms of hypersensitivity reactions during hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 31: 149, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Keshaviah P, Luekmann D, Shapiro F, Comty CM: Investigation of the risks and hazards associated with hemodialysis devices. FDA Medical Device Standards Publication, Technical Report, DHEW publication, contract no 223-78-5046, US Govt Printing Office, 1980Google Scholar
  173. 173.
    Buxton PK, Going SM, Hunter JAA, Winney RJ: Allergic reaction to rubber chemicals in haemodialysis equipment. Br Med J 287: 1513, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Ljunggren L: Plasticizer migration from blood lines in hemodialysis. Artif Organs 8: 99, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Bommer J, Von Sonntag C, Buchler N, Ritz E: Diethylhexyl phthalate leakage from dialysis tubing. Proc Int Soc Artif Organs 1: 504, 1983Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Kevy S, Jacobson M: Hepatic effects of the leaching of phthalate ester plasticizer and silicon. Contr Nephrol 36: 82, 1983Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    Barron D, Harbottle S, Hoenich NA, Morley AR, Appleton D, McCabe JF: Particle spallation induced by blood pumps in hemodialysis tubing sets. Artif Organs 10: 226, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Leong ASY, Disney APS, Gove DW: Spallation and migration of silicone from blood-pump tubing in patients in hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 306: 135, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Altmann P, Dodd S, Williams A, Marsh F, Cunningham J: Silicone-induced hypercalcaemia in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2: 26, 1987Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Oba T, Tsuji K, Nakamura A, Shintani H, Mizumachi S, Kikuchi H, Kaniwa M, Kojima S, Kanohta K, Kawasaki Y, Furuya T, Matsumoto K, Tobe M: Migration of acetylated hemicellulose from capillary hemodialyzer to blood, causing scleritis and/or iritis. Artif Organs 8: 429, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Marshall L, Lloyd G: Intravenous fluid filtration. Care of the Critically Ill 3 (1): 10, 1987Google Scholar
  182. 182.
    Ogden DA: Clinical responses to new and reprocessed hemodialyzers. in Guide to Reprocessing of Hemodialyzers, edited by Deane N, Wineman RJ, Bemis JA, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1986, p 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Autian J, Lawrence WH, Dillingham EO, Beyer SA, Bigelow CL, Kleiman A: Detection of toxicity of extracted constitutents from dialyzers and components. Proc 10th Annu Contractors Conf Artif Kidney Program NIAMDD, edited by Mackey BB, DHEW publ No (NIH) 77–1442, 1977, p 71Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    Port FK, Bernick JJ: Pyrogen and endotoxin reactions during hemodialysis. Contr Nephrol 36: 100, 1983Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    Bernick JJ, Port FK, Favero MS: In vivo studies of dialysis-related endotoxemia and bacteremia. Nephron 27: 307, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Kolmos HJ, Moller S: The epidemiology of febrile reactions in haemodialysis. Acta Med Scand 203: 345, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Schaefer K, von Herrath D, Hufler M, Pauls A: The occurrence of fever during hemodialysis and hemofiltration. A comparative study. Int J Artif Organs, 9: 247, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Frei U, Koch KM: Fever and shock during haemofiltration. Contr Nephrol 36: 107, 1983Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    Van der Steen A: Research on dialyzers with improved biocompatibility. Clin Nephrol 26: S39, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Schaefer RM, Rautenberg W, Neumann S, Heidland A, Horl WH: Improvement of dialyzer compatibility by reduction of membrane surface area. Clin Nephrol 26: S35, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Mahiout A, Meinhold H, Kessel M, Schulze H, Baurmeister U: Dialyzer membranes: effect of surface area and chemical modification of cellulose on complement and platelet activation. Artif Organs 11: 149, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Botella J, Ghezzi PM, Zucchelli P, Koutsikos D, Sanz-Moreno C, Nigrelli S, Santoro A, Spongano M, Cento G: Two-chamber technique: Adequate philosophy for blood purification. Nephrol Dial Transpl 1: 101, 1986Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    Anonymous: Manufacturers’ Technical Information, Ab Gambro, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Anonymous: Manufacturers’ Technical Information, Hospal, Lyons, FranceGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Anonymous: Manufacturers’ Technical Information, Fresenius Ag, Bad Homburg, FRGGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Kostopoulos C, Rassidakis A, Johios J, Rokas S, Kontoleon P, Ziroyannis P, Moulopoulos S: Cuprophan and cellulose acetate hemodialyzers for partial respiratory support. Proc Eur Soc Artif Organs 13: 279, 1986Google Scholar
  197. 197.
    Verbanck J, Schelstraete J, De Paepe M, Hoenich N, Lameire N, Ringoir S: Pure ultrafiltration by repeated puncture of a peripheral arm-vein as treatment of refractory edema. Int J Artif Organs 3: 342, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Epstein M, Perez GO, Bedoya LA, Molina R: Continuous arterio-venous ultrafiltration in cirrhotic patients with ascites or renal failure. Int J Artif Organs 9: 253, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Landini S, Coli U, Fracasso A, Morachiello P, Righetto F, Scanferia F, Gallenda F, Bazzato G: Spontaneous ascites filtration and reinfusion (SAFR) as ambulatory chronic treatment for hepatorenal syndrome. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 31: 439, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Landini S, Coli U, Fracasso A, Morachiello P, Righetto F, Scanferia F, Genchi R, Bazzato G: Spontaneous ascites filtration and reinfusion (SAFR) in cirrhotic patients. Int J Artif Organs 8: 277, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Adler AJ, Feldman J, Friedman EA, Berlyne GM: Use of extracorporeal ascites dialysis in combined hepatic and renal failure. Nephron 30: 31, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Strand V, Mayor G, Ristow G, Greenbaum D, Mayle J, Rosenbaum R: Concomitant renal and hepatic failure treated by polyacrylonitrile membrane hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs 4: 136, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Denis J, Guerin J-M, Opolon P, Huguet C, Levy V-G, Poupon R: Hemofiltration with a high permeability membrane in the treatment of fulminant or end stage Wilson’s disease, asaio J 6: 36, 1983Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    Matsushita M, Nose Y: Artificial liver. Artif Organs 10: 378, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Wilkinson SP, Weston MJ, Parsons V, Williams R. Dialysis in the treatment of renal failure in patients with liver disease. Clin Nephrol 8: 287, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Al Mardini H, Hoenich N, Bartlett K, Record CO: Comparative value of different dialysis membranes, including a carbon coated membrane for removal of noxious substances in hepatic coma. Int J Artif Organs 2: 290, 1979Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas A. Hoenich
  • Celia Woffindin
  • Michael K. Ward

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations