Advertisement

The use of exercise testing in Comprehensive Coronary Care (C.C.C.)

  • J. J. Kellermann
  • E. Ben-Ari
  • M. Hayet
  • E. Z. Fisman
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 92)

Abstract

For some mysterious reasons, which remain unclear, the rehabilitation of cardiac patients has been considered for decades as equal to physiotherapy and as a kind of psychological intervention. Clinical cardiology has shown an unfounded dogmatic aversion against rehabilitation and it has often been stated that there is a lack of scientific proof to show that cardiac rehabilitation influences longevity and prevents reinfarction. Despite the fact that a number of randomized trials have been undertaken in the past decade, only the so-called historically controlled, but not randomized studies, have demonstrated that there is a decreased mortality in the intervention groups. Randomized studies also had a beneficial effect, at least in the short term (up to 4 years), but it has proven almost impossible to continue these studies for the last few years due to various problems concerning compliance, drop-outs, drop-ins and contaminations [1]. It was also impossible to avoid a number of other biases which would influence the studies outcome and the approach fact that cardiac rehabilitation is identical to comprehensive multifactorial therapeutic approach has been neglected.

Keywords

Angina Pectoris Cardiac Rehabilitation Coronary Bypass Surgery Physical Work Capacity Chronotropic Incompetence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kellermann JJ (1982) Cardiac rehabilitation as a secondary preventive measure—end-points. In: Kellermann JJ (ed.): Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation. Advances in Cardiology 31:134–137, S. Karger, BaselGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kellermann JJ (1985) Cardiac rehabilitation: An integral part of comprehensive coronary care. In: Hofman H (ed.) Primary and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease, pp 132–138, Springer Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kellermann J J, Hayet M, Fisman E (1986) Exercise testing: Intercenter variabilities, prognostic value, work and training prescription. In: Wenger NK, Almeida-Feo D, & Rosenthal J (eds) Rehabilitation of the Cardiac Patient. Advances in Cardiology 33:64–73, S. Karger, BaselGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellestad MH (1986) Stress testing. 3rd edition, F.A. Davis Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wenger, NK (1985) (ed.) Exercise and the heart, 2nd edition. Cardiovascular Clinics, F.A. Davis, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Whipp BJ (1987) Principles of exercise testing and interpretation, Lea and Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kellermann J J (1975) Rehabilitation of patients with coronary heart disease. Prog in Cardiovascular Diseases XVII:4: 303–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Myocardial infarction—How to prevent, how to rehabilitate. 2nd edition, Scientific Council on Cardiac Rehabilitation of Cardiac Patients. International Society and Federation of Cardiology, 1983Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brody S (1945) Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kellermann JJ, Feldman S, Levy M, Kariv I (1967) Rehabilitation of coronary patients. Journal of Chronic Diseases 20: 815–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kellermann JJ, Ben-Ari E, Chayet M, Lapidot C, Drory Y, Fisman E (1977) Cardiocir-culatory response to different types of training in patients with angina pectoris. Cardiology 62:218–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ben-Ari E, Kellermann JJ (1983) Comparison of cardiocirculatory responses to intensive arm and leg training in patients with angina pectoris. Heart and Lung 12:4:337–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kellermann JJ, Ben-Ari E, Shemesh J (1988) Contraindications to physical training in patients with left ventricular impairment. European Heart Journal, Suppl (in press)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kellermann JJ, Ben-Ari E, Fisman E, Hayet M, Drory Y, Haimovitz D (1986) Physical training in patients with ventricular impairment. In: Kellermann JJ and Spodick D (eds) Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Advances in Cardiology 34:131–147. S. Karger, BaselGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ben-Ari E, Kellermann JJ, Rothbaum DA, Fisman E, Pines A (1987) Effects of prolonged intensive versus moderate leg training on the untrained arm exercise response in angina pectoris. American Journal of Cardiology 59:231–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hayet M, Kellermann JJ (1981) The angina pectoris threshold heart rate as a prognostic sign. Cardiology 68, Suppl 2:78–83Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayet M, Kellermann JJ (November 1984) Angina pectoris threshold heart rate in patients with and without rehabilitation. Proceedings II World Congress on Cardiac Rehabilitation, p. 77Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisman EZ, Pines A, Rosenblum Y, Ben-Ari E, Kessler G, Drory Y, Kellermann JJ (1986) Pressure/volume ratio and pressure/volume ratio exercise quotient: an echocar-diographic comparative study of left ventricular function indicators. Cardiology 73:354–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kellermann JJ, Ben-Ari E, Lederman N (1980) Frequency of ventricular ectopic activity recorded during exercise stress test and continuous Holter monitoring. In: Raineri A, Kellermann JJ, Rulli V (eds) Selected Topics in Exercise Cardiology and Rehabilitation. Plenum Publishing Corporation, pp 195–207Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. Kellermann
    • 1
  • E. Ben-Ari
    • 2
  • M. Hayet
    • 3
  • E. Z. Fisman
    • 3
  1. 1.Hermann Mayer Cardiac Rehabilitation InstituteTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Joseph and Krystyna Kasierer Center for Preventive CardiologyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations