Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading
It has long been recognized that it is difficult for an innovating firm to fully appropriate the benefits arising from its innovations, and that desired research might therefore not be performed (Nelson 1959, pp. 297–306). One sometimes possible solution to this dilemma is cooperative R&D conducted by firms who share the costs and benefits of particular R&D projects (Johnson 1973).
KeywordsInformal Trading Trading Behavior Rival Firm Direct Competitor Industrial Dynamics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Axelrod, Robert, 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Barnett, Donald F. and Louis Schorsch, 1983. Steel: Upheaval in a Basic Industry. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
- Collins, H. M., 1982. “Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks,” in B. Barnes and D. Edge (eds.), Science in Context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 44–64.Google Scholar
- Hollander, Samuel, 1965. The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of Du Pont Rayon Plants. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. S., 1973. Co-Operative Research in Industry: An Economic Study. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Knight, Kenneth E., 1963. “A Study of Technological Innovation: The Evolution of Digital Computers.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
- Mansfield, Edwin, 1985. “How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?” Journal of Industrial Economics, 34(2) (December), 217–23.Google Scholar
- Mansfield, Edwin, John Rapoport, et al., 1977. “Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2) (May), 221–40.Google Scholar
- Mauss, Marcel, 1954. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. Ian Cunnison. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Nemeth, Edward L., 1984. “Mini-Midi Mills-U.S., Canada, and Mexico.” Iron and Steel Engineer, 61(6) (June), 27.Google Scholar