Esprit ’89 pp 903-914 | Cite as

INTUIT, a knowledge and structured design approach to user-centred design

  • Phil Pettitt
Conference paper


This paper describes INTUIT, a prototype of an integrated human factors tool for software designers. Human factors expertise has historically been made available to the designer as either guidelines or in terms of product evaluations. Neither of these forms of delivery are ideal. INTUIT adopts an alternative approach of providing a CASE tool that promotes good human factors practices and delivers contextually relevant design guidance. The emphasis is upon providing human factors expertise proactively and in-line with the design process.


Human Factor Interaction Style Case Tool Design Construct Data Flow Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Bullinger H-J., Fahnrich K-P., Ziegler J. (1989) ‘Human Factors In Information Technology - Results from a Large Cooperative European Research Programme.’ In: Proceeding of the ESPRIT Conference ’89. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Russell A.J., Elder S., Aldred W., Thompson S. (1987) ‘Functional Description of INTUIT.’ HUFIT deliverable A2.2/3.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    SSADM Reference Manual, Version 3. (1986) CCTA.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    ICL QUICKBUILD User Guide. (1985) ICL.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    SSADM Implementation Guide (QUICKBUILD). (1987) CCTA.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Mittermaier E., Haubner P., (1987) ‘A Method of Describing Dialogues.’ HUFIT deliverable 07/-SIE- 5/87,1987.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Smith S.L., Mosier J.N., (1986) Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software. MITRE Corporation.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    KEE™ Reference Manual, Version 3.00. (1986) IntelliCorp®.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Mazoyer B. (1986) ‘The Analysis of Tasks and Users for the Design of an I.T. Product.’ HUFIT deliverable A4.4a.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jeffroy F. (1987) ‘Maitrise de I’exploitation d’un systeme micro-informatique par des utilisateurs non-informaticiens. Analyse ergonomique et processus cognitif.’ Doctoral these, Universite de Paris.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Novara F., Allamanno N., Bertaggia N., Howey K., Fox S., Ophert W. (1986) ‘Methodology for Assessing Usability Of Products.’ HUFIT working paper A5.2.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Dunker J., Melchior E-M., Bosser T. (1987) ‘Empirical Methods for the Validation of Models of User Knowledge’ HUFIT working paper B7.1a.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Allison G., Dowd D., Galer M.D., Maguire M., Herring V. and Taylor B. (1987) ‘Development of Human Factors Tools to fit the Design Process.’ HUFIT working paper A1.3 HUFIT/13-HUS-11/87Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Taylor B. (1989) ‘HUFIT - User Requirements Toolset.’ In: Megaw E.D. (Ed) Contemporary Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Trefz B., Hoppe H.U. (1987) ‘Interface Prototyping - Comparison of Methods and Description of the Interaction Cell Environment (ICE).’ HUFIT report B3.2b.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Dannnenberg M., Ziegler J. (1987) ‘A Dialogue Management Tool for Prototyping and Development of Interactive Systems.’ HUFIT working paper B3.4a.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phil Pettitt
    • 1
  1. 1.International Computers LimitedBracknellUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations