The Observational Signature of Flux Tube Waves and an Upper Limit on the Energy Flux Transported by them

  • S. K. Solanki
  • B. Roberts
Part of the International Astronomical Union book series (IAUS, volume 138)

Abstract

The influence of undamped linear longitudinal tube waves on Stokes V profiles is considered. A rough upper limit is set on the energy flux transported by such waves through the photosphere. It is found that this upper limit is larger than the flux in the quiet sun. However, due to the small filling factor of the magnetic elements, the total luminosity of flux tube waves is unlikely to be larger than that of acoustic waves when averaged over the whole sun. Therefore, probably both kinds of waves contribute to chromospheric heating. However, the derived upper limit does not rule out that flux tube waves can significantly enhance the chromospheric brightness in active regions and the supergranular network where the magnetic filling factor is large.

Keywords

Energy Flux Flux Tube Tube Wave Stokes Versus Chromospheric Heating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Giovanelli, R.G., Livingston, W.C. and Harvey, J.W. (1978) “Motions in solar magnetic tubes. II. The oscillations”, Solar Phys. 59, 49–64.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Keil, S.L. and Mosman, A. (1989) “Observations of High Frequency Waves in the Solar Atmosphere”, in Solar and Stellar Granulation, Proc. NATO Advanced Research Workshop, R. Rutten and G. Severino (Eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht, in press.Google Scholar
  3. Roberts, B., and Webb, A.R. (1978) “Vertical Motions in an Intense Magnetic Flux Tube”., Solar Phys. 56, 5–35.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Roberts, B., and Webb, A.R. (1979) “Vertical Motions in an Intense Magnetic Flux Tube. III. On the Slender Flux Tube-Approximation”, Solar Phys. 64, 77–92.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Schrijver, C.J. (1987) “Magnetic Structure in Cool Stars. XI. Relations Between Radiative Fluxes Measuring Stellar Activity, and Evidence for Two Components in Stellar Chromospheres”, Astron. Astrophys. 172, 111–123.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Solanki, S.K. (1986) “Velocities in Solar Magnetic Fluxtubes”, Astron. Astrophys. 168, 311–329.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Solanki, S.K. (1989) “The Origin and Diagnostic Capabilities of the Stokes V Asymmetrie Observed in Solar Faculae and the Network”, Astron. Astrophys. in press.Google Scholar
  8. Stenflo, J.O., Harvey, J.W., Brault, J.W. and Solanki, S.K. (1984) “Diagnostics of solar magnetic fluxtubes using a Fourier transform spectrometer”, Astron. Astrophys.131, 333–346.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Withbroe, G.L and Noyes, R.W. (1977) “Mass and Energy Flow in the Solar Chromosphere and Corona”, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 15, 363–387.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Astronomical Union 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Solanki
    • 1
  • B. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsScotland

Personalised recommendations