Advertisement

Intraluminal real-time ultrasonic imaging: Clinical perspectives

  • J. Roelandt
  • P. W. Serruys

Abstract

Arteriography with radiological contrast media is currently the principal method for assessment of the presence and severity of both peripheral and coronary vascular disease. The method, however, underestimates the extent and severity of arterial atherosclerotic disease and the large intra- and interobserver variability limits the quantitative assessment of therapeutic interventions [1, 2]. Noninvasive ultrasound imaging provides cross-sectional images of accessible limited portions of the peripheral arterial system [3, 4]. Resolution, however, is limited and the three-layered structure of muscular arteries is rarely appreciated. Precordial cross-sectional echocardiography allows the visualization of proximal parts of the coronary arteries but the success rate is low and the image quality insufficient for clinical decision making in coronary artery disease [5].

Keywords

Arterial Wall Mitral Valve Disease Ultrasonic Imaging Laser Angioplasty Intravascular Imaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fisher LD, Judkins MP, Lesperance J, et al. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Diag 1982; 8: 565–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegel RJ, Swan K, Edwalds G, et al. Limitations of postmortem assessment of human coronary artery size and luminal narrowing: differential effects of tissue fixation and processing on vessels with different degrees of atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 342–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pignoli P, Tremoli HE, Poli A, et al. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurements with ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1986; 74: 1399–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blankenhorn DH, Chin HP, Conover DJ, et al. Ultrasound observation on pulsation in human carotid artery lesions. Ultrasound in Med & Biol 1988; 14, 7: 583–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taams MA, Gussenhoven EJ, Cornel JH, et al. Detection of left coronary artery stenosis by transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 1162–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McPherson DD, Hiratzka LF, Lamberth WC, et al. Delineation of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis by high-frequency epicardial. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 304–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forrester JS, Litvack F, Grundfest W, et al. A Perspective of coronary disease seen through the arteries of living man. Circulation 1987; 75: 505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forrester JS, Litvack F, Grundfest W, et al. Cardiac angioscopy in acute ischemic syndromes. Am J Card Imaging 1988; 2: 178–84.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wild JJ, Reid JM. Progress in techniques of soft tissue examination by 15 MC pulsed ultrasound. In: Kelly E (ed) Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Washington, American Institute of Biological Sciences, 1950; p. 30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cieszynski T. Intracardiac method for the investigation of structure of the heart with the aid of ultrasonics. Arch Immun Ter Dosw 1960; 8: 551–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kimoto S, Omoto R, Tsunemoto M, et al. Ultrasonic tomography of the liver and detection of heart atrial septal defect with the aid of ultrasonic intravenous probes. Ultrasonics 1964; 2: 82–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mallery JA, Gregory K, Morcos NC, et al. Evaluation of an ultrasound balloon dilatation imaging catheter. Circulation 1987; 76: IV-371 (Abstr).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yock PG, Linker DT, Thapliyal HV, et al. Real-time, two-dimensional catheter ultrasound: a new technique forhigh-resolution intravascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 130 A (abstr).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bom N, Lancee CT, Slager CJ, et al. Ein Weg zur intraluminaren Echoarteriographie. Ultraschall 1987; 8: 233–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pandian NG, Kreis A, Brockway B, et al. Ultrasound angioscopy: real-time, two-dimensional, intraluminal ultrasound imaging of blood vessels. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 493–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roelandt JR, Bom N, Serruys PW, et al. Intravascular high-resolution real-time cross-sectional echocardiography. Echocardiography 1989; 6: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hodgson J, Eberle MJ, Savakus MD, et al. Validation of a new real time percutaneous intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter. Circulation 1988; 78:11–21 (abstr).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mallery JA, Griffith J, Gessert J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter assessment of normal and atherosclerotic arterial wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; II: 22A (abstr). 18.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gussenhoven WJ, Bom N, van Egmond FC, et al. A high frequency ultrasound catheter for intravascular imaging. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 802 (abstr).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pandian N, Kreis A, O’Donnell T, et al. Intraluminal two-dimensional ultrasound angioscopic quantitation of arterial stenosis: comparison with external high frequency ultrasound imaging and anatomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 5A (abstr).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pandian N, Kreis A, Brockway B, et al. Detection of intravascular thrombus by high frequency intraluminal ultrasound angioscopy: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 5A (abstr).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mallery JA, Mahon D, Griffith J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound visualization of atheroma plaque removal by atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 222A (abstr).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roelandt JR, Serruys PW, Bom N, et al. Intravascular real-time high resolution two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 4A (abstr).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bartorelli AL, Potkin BN, Almagor Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic coronary arteries: an in vitro validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 4A (abstr).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gussenhoven WJ, Essed CE, Lancee CT, et al. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol (in press).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pandian N, Kreis A, Brockway B, et al. Intraluminal ultrasound angioscopic detection of arterial dissection and in-timal flaps: in vitro and vivo studies. Circulation 1988; 78: 11–21 (abstr).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mallery JA, Tobis JM, Gessert J, et al. Evaluation of an intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter in porcine peripheral and coronary arteries in vivo. Circulation 1988; 78: 11–21 (abstr).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yock PG, Johnson EL, Linker DT. Intravascular ultrasound: development and clinical potential. Am J Card Imaging 1988; 2: 185–93.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mallery JA, Tobis JM, Gessert J, et al. Identification of tissue components in human atheroma by an intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter. Circulation 1988; 78, 4:II–22 (abstr).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Graham SP, Brands D, Savakus A, et al. Utility of an intravascular ultrasound imaging device for arterial wall definition and atherectomy guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 222A (abstr).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yock P, Linker D, Seather D, et al. Intravascular two-dimensional catheter ultrasound: initial clinical studies. Circulation 1988; 78:11–21 (abstr).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meyer CR, Chiang EH, Fechner KP, et al. Feasibility of high-resolution intravascular ultrasonic imaging catheter. Radiology 1988; 168: 113–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pandian N, Kreis A, Desnoyers M, et al. In vivo ultrasound angioscopy in humans and animals: intraluminal imaging of blood vessels using a new catheter-based high resolution ultrasound probe. Circulation 1988; 78:11–22 (abstr).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hodgson J, Graham SP, Savakus A. Percutaneous intravascular ultrasound imaging in humans: initial peripheral and coronary studies. Proceedings 4th Intl Congress on Cardiac Doppler, Anaheim, 1989.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Linker DT, Yock PG, Thapliyal HV, et al. In vitro analysis of back scattered amplitude from normal and diseased arteries using a new intraluminal ultrasonic catheter. J Am Coil Cardiol 1988; 11: 4A (abstr).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Martinelli MA, Aretz TH, Butterly J. Ultrasonic imaging of coronary arterial thickness and ultrasonic signature typing of internal abnormalities. In: Microsensors and Catheter-based Imaging Technology. Alan I. West (ed), Proc. SPIE 1988; 904: 110–5.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    McPherson DD, Ross AF, Moyers JR, et al. Can atherosclerotic coronaries vasodilate? An intraoperative high-frequency epicardial echocardiographic study. Circulation 1986; 74: 11–468 (abstr).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, et al. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic arteries. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1371–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Armstrong ML, Heistad DD, Marcus ML, et al. Structural and hemodynamic responses of peripheral arteries of macaque monkeys to atherogenic diet. Atherosclerosis 1985; 5: 336–46.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Blankenhorn DH, Krausch DM. Reversal of atherosclerosis and sclerosis: the two components of atherosclerosis. Circulation 1989; 79: 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Levenson JA, Simon AC, Maarik BE, et al. Regional compliance of brachial artery and saline infusion in patients with arteriosclerosis obliteraus. Atherosclerosis 1985; 5: 80–7.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bourassa MG, Alderman EL, Bertrand M, et al. Report of the joint ISFC/WHO Task force on coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1988; 78: 780–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Marcus M, Wright C, Doty D, et al. Measurements of coronary velocity and reactive hyperemia in the coronary circulation of humans. Circ Res 1981; 49: 877–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Harrison DG, White CW, Hiratzka LF, et al. Can the significance of coronary stenosis be predicted by quantitative coronary angiography? Circulation 1981; 64: 160 (abstr).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    White CW, Wright CW, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 819–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cole JS, Hartley CJ. The pulsed Doppler coronary artery catheter: preliminary report of a new technique for measuring rapid changes in coronary artery flow velocity in man. Circulation 1977; 56: 18–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Serruys PW, Zijlstra F, Reiber JHC, et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve during angioplasty using a Doppler tip balloon catheter. Comparison with digital subtraction cineangiography. J Interven Cardiol 1988; 1: 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Serruys PW, Julliere Y, Zijlstra F, et al. Coronary blood flow velocity during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as a guide for assessment of the functional result. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 253–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hiratzka LF, McPherson DD, Lamberth WC, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft anastomoses with high-frequency epicardial echocardiography: experimental validation and initial patient studies. Circulation 1986; 73: 1199–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Doubilet P, Abrams HL. The cost of underutilization percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for peripheral vascular disease. N Engl J Med 1983; 310: 25–102.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Abela GS, Seeger JM, Barbieri, et al. Laser angioplasty with angioscopic guidance in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8:184–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reilly LM, Lusby RJ, Hughes L, et al. Carotid plaque histology using real-time ultrasonography. Clinical and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg 1983; 146: 188–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Aalkjaer C, Heagerty AM, Petersen KK, et al. Evidence for increased media thickness, increased neuronal amine uptake and depressed excitation-contraction coupling in isolated resistance vessels from essential hypertensives. Circ Res 1987; 61: 181–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Owens GK. Influence of blood pressure on development of aortic medial smooth muscle hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 1987; 9: 179–87.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Heldman D, Mallery J, Spear G, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter accurately measures area of stenotic aortic valves in vitro. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 13, 2: 49A (abstr).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wagenvoort CA. Morphologic changes in the intrapulmonary veins. Human Pathology 1970; 1: 205–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Valdes-Cruz L, Sahn DJ, Yock P, et al. Experimental animal investigations of the potential for new approaches to diagnostic cardiac imaging in infants and small premature infants from intracardiac and transesophageal approaches using a 20 MHz real time ultrasound imaging catheter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13, 2: 137A (abstr).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bom N, Slager CJ, Van Egmond FC, et al. Intra-arterial ultrasonic imaging for recanalization by spark erosion. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14: 257–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Freeman I, Isner JM, Gal D, et al. Ultrasonic angioplasty using a new flexible wire system. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13, 2: 4A (abstr).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kitney RI, Moura L, Straughan K, et al. Three dimensional solid modelling of arterial structures using ultrasound. Proc IEEE IXth Conf on Engng Med & Biol 1987; 400–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Roelandt
    • 1
  • P. W. Serruys
    • 1
  1. 1.Thoraxcentre, Division of cardiologyUniversity Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt and Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations