Advertisement

Comparative Research on Crime and Delinquency — The Role and Relevance of National Penal Codes and Criminal Justice Systems

  • Hans Jorg Albrecht
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASID, volume 50)

Abstract

In the fields of criminology and criminal law probably everybody can agree with two propositions. First, throughout the world, criminal and delinquent acts are observed, recorded and counted. Rates of crime are interpreted as rather important indicators of a paramount social problem. Second, we can agree that throughout the world — and independent from cultural and political systems — criminal laws as well as criminal justice systems exist, displaying (to varying degrees) successful attempts to define and classify behavior or events as requiring punishment or some other societal reactions, be it treatment or education. Offenders or delinquents are processed through various stages of criminal justice. On the other hand, it is equally easy to conclude that despite rather uniform roles and functions law has been assigned in industrialized countries (Luhmann, 1972), there do not exist universal definitions of crime and delinquency. Agreement has not been reached on what is or what should be considered to be a criminal act or delinquent behavior (neglecting here rather meaningless abstract definitions such as: a crime is an act violating criminal law without justification or excuse). The answer to the question of whether there are universal crimes thus points to the rather trivial idea that law and norms, crime and deviance, represent relative concepts which vary along the dimensions of culture and nations as well as over time (Chang & Blazichek, 1986).

Keywords

Criminal Justice System Delinquent Behavior Sexual Victimization Property Crime Penal Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler F: Nations Not Obsessed with Crime. Littleton, 1983Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, H-J: Criminal law and drug control: A look at Western Europe. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 10:17–40, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht, H-J: Particular difficulties in enforcing the law arising out of basic conflicts between the different agencies with regard to the best suited reaction upon highly sensitive kinds of crime. In European Committee on Crime Problems (Ed.), Interactions Within the Criminal Justice System,. Strasbourg, 1987, p. 13–20.Google Scholar
  4. Anttila, I: Problems of comparative research on the use of discretion in criminal justice. Annales Internationales de Criminologie, 17:43–81, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. Archer, D, & Gartner, R: Violence and Crime in Cross-national Perspective. New Haven, London, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Arnold, H: Kriminelle Viktimisierung und ihre Korrelate. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 98:1014–1058, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. Arnold, H, & Korinek, L: Kriminalitätsbelastung in der Bundesrepublik Duetschland und Ungarn: Ergehnisse einer international vergleichenden Opferbefragung. In Böhm, H et al., (Eds.), Kriminologie in Sozialistischen Ländern. Bochum, 1985, p. 65–136.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, RR: The effect of police personnel levels on crime clearance rates: A cross national analysis. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 6:177–193, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, CR, & Block, RL: Crime definition, crime measurement, and victim surveys. Journal of Social Issues, 40:137–160, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burcart, JM: Measuring delinquency through self-report instruments: A bibliographic essay. Institute of Policy Analysis, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Chang, DH, & Blazicek, DL: An introduction to comparative and international criminology. Durham, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. Chirol, Y et al.: Dde linquance juvenile et developpement socioeconomioue. Paris: La Haye, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Christiansen, KO: Method of using an index of crime of the kind devised by Sellin and Wolfgang. In Council of Europe (Ed.), The Index of Crime. Some Further Studies. Strasbourg, 1970, p. 7–30.Google Scholar
  14. Christie, N, Andenaes, J., & Skirbekk, S: A study of self-reported crime. Scandinavian Studies in Criminology, 1:86–116, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. Clinard, MB: Cities with little crime. Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. Clinard, MB, & Junger-Tas, J: Probleme und Resultate beim Vergleich ubernationaler Victim Surveys. In Kirchhoff, GBP & Sessar, K (Eds.), Das Verbrechensopfer. Bocum, 1979, p. 159–176.Google Scholar
  17. Collmann, H-J: Internationale Kriminalstatistik. Geschichtliche Entwicklung unde gegenwärtiger Stand. Stuttgart, 1973Google Scholar
  18. Council of Europe (Eds.): Report on decriminalization. Strasbourg, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Croft, J: Crime and comparative research. HORS 57. London, 1979.Google Scholar
  20. van Dijk, JJM, & Steinmetz, CHD: The RDC victim surveys 1974–79. The Hague, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. Dünkel, F & Meyer, K (eds.): Jugendstrafe und Jugendstrafvollzug. Stationäre Massnahmen der Jugendkriminalrechtspflege im internationalen Vergleich. Vol. 1, Freiburg, 1985. Vol 2, Frieburg, 1986.Google Scholar
  22. Duffee, DE: Explaining Criminal Justice. Community, Theory and Criminal Justice Reform. Cambridge 1980.Google Scholar
  23. Elmhorn, K: Study in self-reported delinquency among school children in Stockholm. Scandinavian Studies in Criminology, 1:117–146, 1965.Google Scholar
  24. Eser, A & Koch, H-G (Eds.): Schwangerschaftsabbruch im Internationalen Vergleich. Baden-Baden, 1988.Google Scholar
  25. European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control: Disputing deviance: Experience of youth in the eighties. Working papers in European Criminology No. 4.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbs, JP: Norm, deviance, and social control. Conceptual matters. New York: Oxford, 1981.Google Scholar
  27. Gross, H: A theory of criminal justice. Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
  28. Gurr, TR: Crime trends in modern democracies since 1945. Annales Internationales de Criminologie, 16:41–85, 1977.Google Scholar
  29. Hauge, R: Definition and scope of comparative studies in crime trends, including a review of work carried out since about 1945. In Council of Europe (Ed.), Trends in crime: Comparative studies and technical problems. Strasbourg, 1983, p. 25–49.Google Scholar
  30. Hauge, R, & Wolf, P: Criminal violence in three Scandinavian countries. Scandinavian Studies in Criminology, 5:25–33, 1974.Google Scholar
  31. Heine, G: Erkennung und Verfolgung von Umweltstraftaten im Europäischen Rechtsraum. Ifawelt & Planaungsrecht, 1987, p. 281–291.Google Scholar
  32. Henry, M: Etude de la comparabilite des criteres juridiques. Annales de Vaucresson. 1977, p. 61–97.Google Scholar
  33. Huizinga, D, & Elliott, DS: Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2:293–327, 1986.Google Scholar
  34. Joutsen, M: Computerization and the international exchange of information on crime and criminal justice. In HEUNI (Ed.), Computerization of criminal justice information systems: Realities, prospects, methods and effects. Helsinki, 1987, p. 253–266.Google Scholar
  35. Junger-Tas, J: Some issues and problems in cross-cultural research in criminology. The Hague, 1978.Google Scholar
  36. Kaiser, G: The comparative method in criminology. NCJRS, 1978.Google Scholar
  37. Kerner, H-J: Fear of crime and attitudes towards crime. Comparative criminological reflections. Annales Internationales de Criminologie, 17:83–99, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. Kirchhoff, C, & Kirchhoff, GF: Untersuchungen im Dunkelfeld sexueller Viktimisation mit Hilfe von Fragebögen. In Kerchhoff, GG, & Sessar, K. (Eds.), Das Verbrechensopfer. Bochum, 1979, p. 275–299.Google Scholar
  39. Klein, MW (Ed.): Western systems of juvenile justice. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications: 1984Google Scholar
  40. Landau, SF: Trends in violence and aggression: A cross-cultural analysis. Annales Internationales de Criminologie, 22:119–150, 1984.Google Scholar
  41. Lejins, PP: A speculative note on the meaning of juvenile delinquency. In Brüsten, M et al., (Eds.): Youth crime, social control and prevention: Theoretical perspectives and policy implications. Studies from nine different countries. Pfaffenweiler, 1964, p. 3–8.Google Scholar
  42. Luhmann, N: Rechtssoziologie. Reinbek, 1972.Google Scholar
  43. Malewska, H, & Peyre, V: Delinquance juvenile, famille, ecole et societe. Vaucresson, 1973Google Scholar
  44. Martin, RG, & Conger, RD: A comparison of delinquency trends: Japan and the United States. Criminology, 18:53–61, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McClintock, FH: The phenomenological and contextual analysis of criminal violence. In Council of Europe (Ed.), Violence in society. Strasbourg, 1973 p. 115–162.Google Scholar
  46. Meyer, J. (Ed.): Betäubungsmittelstrafrecht in Westeuropa. Freiburg, 1987.Google Scholar
  47. Moitra, S: Crimes and punishments. Freiburg, 1987.Google Scholar
  48. Newman, G: Comparative deviance. Perception and law in six cultures. New York, Oxford, Amsterdam, 1976.Google Scholar
  49. OECD: Social indicators: Recommended list of social concerns. In Zapf, W (Ed.): Soziale Indikatoren. Knozepte und Forschungsansätze. Frankfurt, New York, 1974, p. 229–230.Google Scholar
  50. Peters, AAG: Comparative survey of juvenile delinquency in Asia and the Far East. UNAFEI, Tokyo, 1968.Google Scholar
  51. Peyre, V: Technical problems in the design and execution of comparative studies. In Council of Europe (Ed.): Trends in crime: Comparative studies and technical problems. Strasbourg, 1983, p. 53–69.Google Scholar
  52. le Poole, F: Law and practice concerning the counterparts of ’persons in need of supervision’ in some European countries, with a particular emphasis on the Netherlands. In Teitelbaum, LE, & Gough, HR (Eds.): Beyond Control. Status Offenders in the Juvenile Court. Cambridge, 1977, p. 115–160.Google Scholar
  53. Redo, SM: The United Nations Crime Trends Surveys: Comparative criminology in the global context. Annales Internationales de Criminologie, 24:163–179, 1986.Google Scholar
  54. Reiss, AJ: Probiens in developing statistical indicators of crime. In Connaitre la criminalité: Le dernier etat de la question. Aix, Marseille, 1983, p. 25–61.Google Scholar
  55. Robertson, R, & Taylor, L: Deviance, Crime and Socio-Legal Control. Bristol, 1973.Google Scholar
  56. Rose, GNG: The merits of an index of crime of the kind devised by Wolfgang and Sellin. In Council of Europe (Ed.): The index of crime. Some further studies. Strasbourg, 1970, p. 33–52.Google Scholar
  57. Scott, JE, & Al-Thakeb, F: Perceptions of deviance cross-culturally. In Newman, G. (Ed.), Crime and deviance. A comparative perspective. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publication, 1980, p. 42–67.Google Scholar
  58. Sellin, T, & Wolfgang, ME: The measurement of delinquency. London, 1964.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, LJF: Criminal justice comparisons. London: Home Office, 1983.Google Scholar
  60. Stadler, H: Kirminalitat im Kanton Uri. Eine Opferbefragung. Jur. Diss, Entlebuch, 1987.Google Scholar
  61. Stephan, E: Die Stuttgarter Opferbefragung. Wiesbaden, 1976.Google Scholar
  62. Swanson, C: A comparison of organizational and environmental influences on arrest policies. In Meyer, FA, & Baker, R (Eds.), Determinants of law-enforcement policies. Lexington, Toronto, 1979, p. 15–33.Google Scholar
  63. Teske, RHC, & Arnold, H: Comparison of the criminal statistics of the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10:359–374, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. UNSDRI: Juvenile social maladjustment. Rome, 1984.Google Scholar
  65. UNSDRI: Action oriented research on youth crime. An international perspective. Rome, 1986.Google Scholar
  66. Vaz, EW, & Casparis, J: A comparative study of youth culture and delinquency: Upper middle-class Canadian and Swiss boys. In Shelley, LI (Ed.), Readings in comparative criminology. Cabandale, Edwardsville, 1981, p. 56–77.Google Scholar
  67. Vetere, E., & Newman, G: International crime statistics: An overview from a comparative perspective. Abstracts on Criminology and Penology, 17:251–267, 1977.Google Scholar
  68. Villmow, B: Schwereeinschätzung von Delikten. Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
  69. Villmow, B, & Stephan, E: Jugendkriminalität in einer Gemeinde. Freiburg, 1983.Google Scholar
  70. Waller, I: La criminalité au Canada et aux Etats Unis: Tendences et explications comparatives. Annales Internationales de Criminologie, 14:51–84, 1981.Google Scholar
  71. Waller, I, & Okihiro, N: Burglary: The victim and the public. Toronto, 1978.Google Scholar
  72. Weinberger, J-C, Jakubowicz, P. & Robert, P: Sociéte et perceptions des comportements déviants incriminiés. Paris, 1977Google Scholar
  73. Wellford, LF: Crime and the dimension of nation. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 2:1–10, 1974.Google Scholar
  74. Wilkins, LT: World crime. To measure or not to measure? In Newman, GR (Ed.): Crime and deviance. A comparative perspective. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications, 1980, p. 17–41.Google Scholar
  75. Wolf, P: Crime and development. An international comparison of crime rates. Scandinavian Criminology, 3:107–120, 1971.Google Scholar
  76. Wolfgang, ME, et al.: The national survey of crime severity. Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Jorg Albrecht
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck InstituteFreiburg im BreisgauFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations