Status of Lead Salt Diode Laser Development at Spectra-Physics

  • H. Preier
  • Z. Feit
  • J. Fuchs
  • D. Kostyk
  • W. Jalenak
  • J. Sproul

Abstract

Newly developed double heterostructure (DH) lasers prepared by Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) are currently in the process of gradually replacing the traditionally fabricated diffused homostructure lasers. PbTe-PbEuSeTe DH MBE lasers are routinely fabricated at Laser Analytics, Inc. (LAI) with different Eu concentrations. The active layers operate in the short wavelength range of 3–6.5 um. The MBE device structures are lattice matched, and due to their superior electrical and optical confinement have significantly improved device performance. Threshold currents as low as 1 mA (20 A/cm2) at 20K were measured; and the maximum CW operation temperature achieved so far is 175K, which is the highest currently known for ordinary DH devices. A similar effort using the LPE technology was made to develop lattice matched PbSe-PbSnSeTe laser devices. So far lasers operating in the spectral range of 8–20 um have been developed utilizing the LPE technique. High power 10-element laser arrays were fabricated for the first time using Pb salt materials. When operating at 2A injection current, those lasers produced up to 70 mW of power and were stable at 60 mW to better than 0.2% over a period of several minutes.

Keywords

Active Layer Molecular Beam Epitaxy Liquid Phase Epitaxy Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction Laser Array 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Linden, K.J., “P-N Junction Observation on Pb Salt Diode Lasers using a EBIC Mode SEM”, J. Elect. Materials, 11, 575–596 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Linden, K.J. and Reeder, R.E., “Diode Laser Arrays with High Power in the 4 to 5 um Infrared Region”, Optical Engineering 23, 685–686 (1984).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Mccann, P.J., Fuchs J., Feit, Z., and Fonstad, C.G., “Phase Equilibria and Liquid Phase Epitaxy Growth of PbSnSeTe Lattice Matched to PbSe”, Journal of Applied Physics 62, 2994–3000 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Fuchs, J., Feit, Z., and Preier, H., “Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction Intensity Oscillations in IV-VI Compound Semiconductors”, Applied Physics Letters 53, 894–896 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Partin, D.L., and Thrush, C.M., “Wavelength Coverage of Lead- Europium-Selenide-Telluride Diode Lasers”, American Physical Society Meeting, Detroit, Michigan, March 26–30, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Tacke, M., “Recent Results in Lead Salt Laser Development at the IPM”, paper contained in this volume.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Anderson, W.W., “Gain-Frequency Relation for Pb1-xSnxTe Double Heterostructure Lasers”, IEEE J. Quantum Electr., QE-13, 532–542 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Preier
    • 1
  • Z. Feit
    • 1
  • J. Fuchs
    • 1
  • D. Kostyk
    • 1
  • W. Jalenak
    • 1
  • J. Sproul
    • 1
  1. 1.Laser Analytics, Inc.USA

Personalised recommendations