Abstract
The introduction of the two-person glass cockpit to long-haul flight operations raises some critical concerns about flight safety. While the pilot is further removed from the operation of his airplane, his role as the primary decisionmaker is more apparent. Man alone can provide the judgment, flexibility, and originality to solve problems and act decisively. While advanced automation can help by providing sophisticated data on aircraft status, it may also increase boredom and reduce alertness. This is especially likely during long-haul flights where research has documented considerable sleep loss and degraded alertness in less automated three-crew aircraft. While anomaly detection software may offset the resultant loss in monitoring by the crew, the uniquely human qualities associated with successful decisionmaking and problem solving may be severely compromised. As cruise range is extended well beyond present limits strategies must be developed to manage crew alertness. One approach may be to capitalize on the powerful computer systems and color displays already onboard.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Caesar, H. ‘Safety statistics and their operational consequences.’ Proc. 9th Orient Airlines Assoc., Flight Safety Seminar, Manilla, Philippines, May, 1987.
Costley, J., and D. Johnson. ‘A comparison of cockpit communication, B737–B757.’ Interaction Trainers International, Ltd., Huntingdon, Cambs., U.K., 1987.
Feedback. Farnborough, U.K.: RAF Institute of Aviation Medicine, 1984, No. 5, 6.
Graeber, R.C. (Ed.) Sleep and wakefulness in international aircrews. Aviation, Space & Environmental Medicine, 1986, 57 (Supplement), B1–B64.
Graeber, R.C. ‘Aircrew fatigue and crcadian rhythmicity.’ In E. Wiener and D.C. Nagel (Eds.), Human Factors in Aviation. New York: Academic, 1988, in press.
Graeber, R.C., L.J. Connell, H.G. Schreiber, M. Sasaki, and Y. Kurosaki. ‘Aircrew sleep and fatigue in long-haul flight operations.’ Proc. of 40th Flight Safety Foundation International Air Safety Seminar. Arlington: Flight Safety Foundation, 1988, in press.
Klein, K.E., and H.M. Wegmann. Significance of circadian rhythms in aerospace operations. AGARDograph No. 247. NATO AGARD: Neuilly sur Seine, 1980.
Lauber, J.K. ‘Resource management in the cockpit.’ Air Line Pilot, 1984, 20–24, 38.
National Transportation Safety Board. Scandanavia Airlines System DC-10-30, John F. Kennedy Airport, Jamaica, New York, February 28, 1984 (Report NTSB-AAR-84-15). Washington, D.C., 1984.
National Transportation Safety Board. China Airlines Boeing 747-SP, N4425V, 300 nautical miles northwest of San Francisco, California, February 19, 1985 (Report NTSB/AAR-86-03). Washington, D.C., 1986.
Nicholson, A.N., P.A. Pascoe, M.B. Spencer, B.M. Stone, and R.L. Green. ‘Nocturnal sleep and daytime alertness of aircrew after transmeridian flights.’ Aviation, Space & Environmental Medicine, 1986, 57 (Suppl.), B43–B52.
Sasaki, M., Y. Kurosaki, T. Takahashi, A. Mori, C.L. Spinweber, and R.C. Graeber. ‘Flight crew sleep after multiple layover polar flights.’ Sleep Research, 1987, 16, 637.
Wiener, E.L. ‘Application of vigilance research: Rare, medium, or well done?’ Human Factors, 1987, 29, 725–736.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graeber, R.C. (1989). Long-Range Operations in the Glass Cockpit: Vigilance, Boredom, and Sleepless Nights. In: Coblentz, A. (eds) Vigilance and Performance in Automatized Systems/Vigilance et Performance de l’Homme dans les Systèmes Automatisés. NATO ASI Series, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0981-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0981-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6930-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0981-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive