Advertisement

An Evaluation of Aircraft Flux Measurements of CO2, Water Vapor and Sensible Heat

  • R. L. Desjardins
  • J. I. Macpherson
  • P. H. Schuepp
  • F. Karanja

Abstract

Ground-based flux measurements of carbon dioxide and water vapor integrate physiological processes taking place on a field scale. Aircraft flux measurements have recently been undertaken to attempt to widen the scope of applicability of such measurements. However, because of the intermittency of turbulent transfer, flux measurements must be averaged over long periods of time or long distances to give reproducible results. This requirement makes it difficult to relate aircraft flux measurements to local surface processes. Flux measurements of CO2, latent and sensible heat obtained from repeated passes in four directions and at three elevations over a homogeneous wheat-growing area are compared with ground-based measurements. Averages based on four runs of 4 km in length gave results consistent with ground-based measurements. The largest percentage differences were in the sensible heat flux. Cospectral analyses showed no significant high frequency losses for the data from flight levels of 25 and 50 m, but an underestimation of approximately 10% resulted at 10 m. Flight direction with respect to wind direction was relatively unimportant at 10 and 25 m but some effects were observed at 50 m. It was also shown that at 25 m, over a relatively smooth and homogeneous surface, the means of either three or four runs 4 km in length were similar to the means of 12–16 km runs. This confirms that at this altitude, most of the flux contribution is contained at wavelengths less than 4 km and that the mean of 3 to 4 passes accounts for most of the intermittency of turbulent transfer.

Keywords

Flux Density Flux Measurement Flux Estimate Turbulent Transfer Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D. E. and Verma, S. B.: 1985, ‘Turbulence Spectra of CO2, Water Vapor, Temperature and Wind Velocity Fluctuations Over a Crop Surface’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 33, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. E. and Verma, S. B.: 1986, ‘Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor and Sensible Heat Exchanges of a Grain Sorghum Canopy’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 34, 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bingham, G. E., Gilmer, R. O., Maish, S. M. and Hansen, K.: 1983, ‘Area CO2 Flux Studies: Aircraft Measurements Over Open Ocean and Sea Ice’, Annual Report to the Department of Energy, CO 2 and Climate Office, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, 75 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Brach, E. J., Desjardins, R. L., and St. Amour, G.: 1981, ‘Open-path CO2 Analyzer’, J. Phys. E. 14, 1415–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, R. A.: 1974, Analytical Methods in Planetary Boundary Layer Modelling’, John Wiley, New York, 150 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Deardorff, J. W.: 1974, ‘Three-dimensional Numerical Study of the Height and Mean Structure of a Heated Planetary Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 81–106.Google Scholar
  7. Desjardins, R. L., Brach, E. J., Alvo, P., and Schuepp, P. H.: 1982, ‘Aircraft Monitoring of Surface Carbon Dioxide Exchange’, Science, 216, 733–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desjardins, R. L., Brach, E. J., MacPherson, J. I., Schuepp, P. H. and Austin, L.: 1985, ‘Regional Measurements of Evapotranspiration Using Aircraft Mounted Sensors’, Proceedings of Conference on Parameterization of Land Surface Characteristics in Rome, Italy pp. 381–385.Google Scholar
  9. Druilhet, A. and Durand, P.: 1984, ‘Étude de la Couche Limite Convective Sahélienne en Présence de Brumes Seches (Experiénce ECLATS)’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 28, 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaimal, J. C. and Haugen, D. A.: 1971, ‘Comments on “Minimizing the Levelling Error in shearing Stress Measurements by Filtering’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 10, 337–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaimal, J. C, Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Cote, O. R.: 1972, ‘Spectral Characteristics of Surface-Layer Turbulence’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 563–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenschow, D. H. and Agee, E. M.: 1976, Preliminary Results from the Air Mass Transformation Experiment (AMTEX), GARP Topics 57, pp. 1346–1355.Google Scholar
  13. Lenschow, D. H., Pearson, R. Jr., and Stankov, B. B.: 1982, ‘Measurements of Ozone Vertical Flux to Ocean and Forest’, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 8833–8837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lenschow, D. H.: 1986, ‘Aircraft Measurements in the Boundary Layer’, in D. H. Lenschow, (ed.), Probing the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Amer. Meteorol. Soc., pp. 39–55.Google Scholar
  15. Lenschow, D. H. and Stankov, B. B.: 1986, ‘Length Scales in the Convective Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 1198–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lumley, J. L., and Panofsky, H. A.: 1964, The Structure of Atmospheric Turbulence, Interscience, New York, 239 pp.Google Scholar
  17. MacPherson, J. I., Morgan, J. M., and Lum, K.: 1981, The NAE Twin Otter Atmospheric Research Aircraft, National Research Council of Canada Report LTR-FR-80, 21 pp.Google Scholar
  18. MacPherson, J. I., Desjardins, R. L., and Schuepp, P. H.: 1987, ‘Gaseous Exchange Measurements Using Aircraft-Mounted Sensors’, Sixth Symp. on Meteor. Observ. and Instrum., Am. Meteorol. Soc., Boston, Mass., pp. 128–131.Google Scholar
  19. Marht, L.: 1987, Boundary-Layer Eddies and Surface Inhomogeneity and Their Impact in Measurement Strategy and Data Analysis for FIFE, Report from Oregon State Univ. for NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, 94 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Ohtaki, E.: 1985, ‘On the Similarity in Atmospheric Fluctuations of Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapour and Temperature over Vegetated Fields’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 32, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schuepp, P. H., Desjardins, R. L., MacPherson, J. I., Boisvert, J., and Austin, L. B.: 1987, ‘Airborne Determination of Regional Water Use Efficiency and Evapotranspiration: Present Capabilities and Initial Field Tests’, Agr. and Forest Meteorol. J. 41, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seguin, B. and Itier, B.: 1983, ‘Using Midday Surface Temperature to Estimate Daily Evaporation from Satellite Thermal IR Data’, Int. Journ. Rem. Sens. 4, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaw, W. J. and Businger, J. A.: 1985, ‘Intermittency and the Organization of Turbulence in the Near-Neutral Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 2563–2584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Webb, E. K., Pearman, G. I. and Leuning, R.: 1980, ‘Correction of Flux Measurements for Density Effects Due to Heat and Vapor Transfer’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 106, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wyngaard, J. C: 1986, ‘Observational Strategies’, in D. H. Lenschow (ed.), Probing the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, AMS, Boston, 269 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Desjardins
    • 1
  • J. I. Macpherson
    • 2
  • P. H. Schuepp
    • 3
  • F. Karanja
    • 3
  1. 1.Agrometeorology Section, Land Resource Research Centre, Research BranchAgriculture CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Flight Research LaboratoryNational Research CouncilOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Dept. of Renewable ResourcesMacdonald College of McGill UniversitySte. Anne de BellevueCanada

Personalised recommendations