Advertisement

Implementation of Plans

  • Richard W. Judy
Conference paper

Abstract

The Complex Program of Scientific and Technical Progress of the CMEA Nations to the Year 2000 (hereafter called CPS&T) was adopted at the 41st CMEA Session in 1985. This ambitious program aimed to raise the integration of science, technology, and innovation (ST&I) among member nations to a level above that accomplished during previous decades.1

Keywords

Technical Progress Computer Industry Member Nation Multilateral Agreement CMEA Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    For a concise history of those efforts, see L. E. Nolting, Integration of Science and Technology in the CMEA, Foreign Economics Report No. 21 ( U.S. Department of Commerce, December, 1983 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    An excellent review of the CPS&T may be found in Henrik Bischof, Das “Eureka” Project Osteuropas, Research Institute of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Bonn, December, 1986. See also Chukanov, op. cit.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peter F. Drucker, “The Changed World Economy”, Foreign Affairs, 64(4), Spring 1986, pp. 768–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. A. Chukanov (ed.), Nauchno-tekhnicheskoye sotrudnichestvo stran SEV, spravochnik, Moscow, 1986, p. 33.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Andrzej Zielinski, Main Directions of Science and Technology Progress in the Domain of Telecommunications during the 1986–1990 period, Przeglad telekomuinikacyjny, Oct—Nov, 1987, pp. 291–294, translated in JPRS-EST-88–003, June 9, 1988, pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    See Vyber Informaci,(Prague), No. 4, 1987, pp. 452–454. translated in JPRS-ELS-88–005, February 22, 1988, pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Robert Clough, Eastern Europe’s Successful and Unsuccessful Policy Choices in the Development of the Computer Industry: A Lesson for Those Under Dually-Imposed Hegemony,Hudson Institute Discussion Paper HI-3996-DP, May 7, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Magyar Hirlap (Budapest), December 29, 1987, p. 5, translated in JPRS-ELS-88–010, April 5, 1988, pp. 43–44.Google Scholar
  9. 20.
    See, e.g., John Unger and Stan Miastkovski, “Outclassing the AT”, Byte, July 1988, pp. 134–134.Google Scholar
  10. 21.
    Walter Dieter, Robotron’s Deputy Director, said in a published interview: “I estimate that we are 2.5–3 years behind the world level in electronics. There are those who say twice this much”. Magyar Hirlap,December 29, 1987, op cit.Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    For an up-to-date report on the status of DDR computer technology, see Klaus Krakat’s report of the 1988 Leipzig Fair in “Auch der Ostblock will flexibele Fertigung”, Computerwoche, May 13, 1988, pp. 36–41. See also Fred Klinger, “The Crises of Progress in the GDR, Innovation Problems and Microelectronics”, Das Parlament (Supplement), January 17, 1987, pp. 3–19, translated in JPRS, pp. 53–75.Google Scholar
  12. 26.
    See Kenneth Tacky, “Eastern Europe: Trends in Imports of Western Computer Equipment and Technology”, East European Economic Assessment, U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, July 1981, pp. 296–327; and N. C. Davis and S. E. Goodman, “The Soviet Bloc’s Unified System of Computers”, Computing Surveys, 10:2, June 1978.Google Scholar
  13. 30.
    Szamitastechnika Magyarorszag ‘88,Computerworld Informatika Kft., Budapest, 1987, 215 pp.Google Scholar
  14. 32.
    Computerworld/Szamitastechnika,June 20, 1988, p. 3. At the rate of exchange prevailing on Budapest streets during the summer of 1988, 72 billion forint amounts to slightly more than US$1.0 billion.Google Scholar
  15. 34.
    Computerworld/Szamitastechnika,March 23, 1988, op-cit.Google Scholar
  16. 36.
    See the interview with Jozef Marjai on Budapest MTI [in English], 1959 GMT, 6 July 88, translated in FBIS-EEU-88–130, p. 16.Google Scholar
  17. 37.
    Margit Racz as quoted in Computerworld/Szamitastechnika,February 24, 1988, p. 9, translated in JPRS-EST-88–003, June 9, 1988, pp. 65–67.Google Scholar
  18. 39.
    Zielinski (1987), op. cit.Google Scholar
  19. 41.
    Cited in Robert W. Campbell, “The Soviet Telecommunications System”, Hudson Discussion Paper H1–4039-DP, June 1, 1988, Chapter 4, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar
  20. 42.
    L. Ya. Misulovin, “Itogi razrabotki, vnedreniya i puti sovershenstvovaniya sistemy ‘Istok’ ”, Elektrosvyaz’,1987:11, p. 2, as quoted by Campbell, op. cit., p. 10.Google Scholar
  21. 44.
    Rybakov, O., “Yeschche raz o novom podkhode k razvitiyu ekonomicheskogo sotrud- nichestva SSSR s sotsialisticheskimi stranami”, Planovoye khozyaystvo, 1988: 4, pp. 65–75.Google Scholar
  22. 45.
    Moscow International Service in Slovak, 1700 GMT, July 4, 1988, translated in FBIS-SOV88, pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
  23. 46.
    Rude Provo,July 6, 1988, p. 2, translated in FBIS-EEU-88–136, p. 4.Google Scholar
  24. 47.
    See the report by Rodolf Rohlicek, Chairman of the CMEA Executive Committee as reported by Prague Domestic Service in Slovak, 1100 GMT, July 5, 1988, translated in FBIS-EEU-99–129, p. 23.Google Scholar
  25. 48.
    Izvestia,July 8, 1988, p. 4, and TASS International Service in Rusian at 1440 GMT, July 6, 1988, translated in FBIS-SOV-88–131, July 8, 1988, p. 8.Google Scholar
  26. 50.
    Problemy sotsialisticheskoy integratsii“, Ekonomicheskoye sotrudnichestvo stran-chlenov SEV, No. 5, 1987, p. 107.Google Scholar
  27. 51.
    Rude Provo, July 6, 1988, p. 2, translated in FBIS-EEU-88–136, p. 4.Google Scholar
  28. 52.
    Nepszabadsag, Jan. 31, 1987, p. 5.Google Scholar
  29. 54.
    Budapest Domestic Service in Hungarian 1630 GMT, July 7, 1988, FBIS-EEU-88–132, p. 3.Google Scholar
  30. 56.
    Bucharest AGERPRES in English, 0749 GMT, July 7, 1988, translated in FBIS-EEU-88132, p. 3, see also AGERPRES in English 1904 GMT, July 1988, translated in FBIS-EEU88–138, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
  31. 57.
    Budapest MTI in English 0718 GMT, July 7, 1988, translated in FBIS-EEU-88–138, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard W. Judy
    • 1
  1. 1.Hudson InstituteIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations