Restriction fragment length polymorphism

  • Robert Bernatzky

Abstract

In the 1960s, a group of enzymes were discovered in bacteria that could degrade incoming bacteriophage DNA and would ‘restrict’ their establishment in the cell [2,6]. These enzymes, known as restriction enzymes [19], have proved very valuable in modern manipulations of DNA. The first enzymes described (type I) require various cofactors and lack sequence specificity for their sites of cleavage. However, a second class (type II) were discovered that require only Mg2+ asa cofactor and have the distinct advantage that they recognize and cleave very specific sequences. Type II restriction enzymes are therefore capable of reducing complex DNA, such as plant nuclear DNA, into a population of fragments with discrete sizes. At least 475 restriction endonucleases have been described to date [24].

Keywords

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Paper Towel Nick Translation Bromphenol Blue Restriction Fragment Length Poly 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aaij C, Borst P (1972) The gel electrophoresis of DNA. Biochim Biophys Acta 269: 192–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arber W (1979) Promotion and limitation of genetic exchange. Science 205: 361–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avise JC, Lansman RA (1983) Polymorphism of mitochondrial DNA in populations of higher animals. In: Nei M, Koehn RK (eds) Evolution of Genes and Proteins, pp 147–164. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assoc, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986) Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112: 887–898.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhattacharya SS, Wright AF, Clayton JF, Price WH, Phillips CI, McKeown CME, Jay M, Bird AC, Pearson J (1984) Close genetic linkage between X-linked Retinitis pigmentosa and a restriction fragment length polymorphism identified by recombinant DNA probe L1.28. Nature 309: 253–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyer HW (1971) DNA restriction and modification mechanisms in bacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol 25: 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis R (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burr B, Evola SV, Burr FA, Beckmann JS (1983) The application of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to plant breeding. In: Setlow JK, Hollaender A (eds) Genetic Engineering Principles and Methods, Vol 5, pp 45–59. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chyi Y-S, Jorgensen RA, Goldstein D, Tanksley SD, Loaiza-Figueroa F (1986) Locations and stability of Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA insertions in the Lycopersicon genome. Mol Gen Genet 204: 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Engels WR (1981) Estimating genetic divergence and genetic variability with restriction endo-nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 6329–6333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evola SV, Burr FA, Burr B (1986) The suitability of restriction fragment length polymorphisms as genetic markers in maize. Theor Appl Genet 71: 765–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grodziker T, Williams J, Sharp P, Sambrook J (1974) Physical mapping of temperature-sensitive mutations of adenovirus. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 39: 439–446.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gusella JF, Tanzi RE, Anderson MA, Hobbs W, Gibbons K, Raschtchian R, Gilliam TC, Wallace MR, Wexler NS, Conneally PM (1984) DNA markers for nervous system diseases. Science 225: 1320–1326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helentjaris T, King G, Slocum M, Siedenstrang C, Wegman S (1985) Restriction fragment polymorphisms as probes for plant diversity and their development as tools for applied plant breeding. Plant Mol Biol 5: 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helentjaris T, Slocum M, Wright S, Schaefer A, Nienhuis J (1986) Construction of genetic linkage maps in maize and tomato using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 72: 761–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hudson RR (1982) Estimating genetic variability with restriction endonucleases. Genetics 100: 711–719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314: 67–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leary JJ, Brigati J, Ward DC (1983) Rapid and sensitive method for visualizing biotin-labeled DNA probes hybridized to DNA or RNA immobilized on nitrocellulose: Bio-blots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 4045–4049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lederberg S, Meselson M (1964) Degredation of non-replicating bacteriophage DNA in non-accepting cells. J Mol Biol 8: 623–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nei M, Tajima F (1985) Evolutionary change of restriction cleavage sites and phylogenetic inference in man and apes. Mol Biol Evol 2: 189–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palmer JD, Jorgensen RA, Thompson WF (1985) Chloroplast DNA variation and evolution in Pisum: Patterns of change and phylogenetic analysis. Genetics 109: 195–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Polans NO, Weeden NF, Thompson WF (1985) Inheritance, organization and mapping of the rbcs and cab multigene families in pea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 32: 5083–5087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rigby PWJ, Dieckman M, Rhodes C, Berg P (1977) Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J Mol Biol 113: 815–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roberts RJ (1984) Restriction and modification enzymes and their recognition sequences. Nucl Acids Res 12: 167–191.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98: 503–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Southern EM (1979) Gel electrophoresis of restriction fragments. In: Wu R (ed) Methods of Enzymology 68: 152–176.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tanksley SD (1983) Molecular markers in plant breeding. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tanksley SD, Mutschier MA, Rick CM (1987) Linkage map of the tomato. In: O’Brien S (ed) Genetic Maps.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Templeton AR (1983) Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vallejos CE, Tanksley SD, Bernatzky R (1986) Localization in the tomato genome of DNA restriction fragments containing sequences homologous to the rRNA (45S), the major chlorophyll a/b binding polypeptide and the ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase genes. Genetics 112: 93–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wahl GM, Stern M, Stark GR (1979) Efficient transfer of large DNA fragments from agarose gels to diazobenzylmethalpaper and rapid hybridization by using dextran sulfate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 3683–3687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wallroth M, Gerats AGM, Rogers SG, Fraley RT, Horsch RB (1986) Chromosomal localization of foreign genes in Petunia hybrida. Mol Gen Genet 202: 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Bernatzky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil ScienceUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations