Endosonography pp 157-177 | Cite as

Transvaginal sonography in infertility

  • Nabil F. Maklad
Part of the Series in Radiology book series (SERA, volume 17)


The development of endovaginal ultrasound probes and their subsequent improvement and refinement over the past few years have extended the role of sonography in the diagnosis and management of female infertility. Transvaginal ultrasound provides a convenient and efficient method of evaluating the female reproductive system and has greatly expanded our understanding of reproductive physiology.


Embryo Transfer Polycystic Ovary Transvaginal Ultrasound Ovulation Induction Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mendelson E. B., Bohn-Velez M., Joseph N., Neiman H. L.: Gynecologic imaging: Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. Radiology, 1988, 166, 321–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woolf R. B., Alien W. M.: Concomitant malformations: The frequent simultaneous occurrence of congenital malformations of the reproductive and urinary tracts. Obstet. Gynecol., 1953, 2, 236–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wiersma A. F., Peterson L. F., Justema E. J.: Uterine anomalies associated with unilateral renal agenesis. Obstet. Gynecol., 1976, 47, 654–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zanetti E., Ferrari L. R., Rossi G.: Classification and radiographic features of uterine malformations. Br. J. Radiol., 1976, 51, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buttram V. C. Jr., Gibbons W. E.: Müllerian anomalies: A proposed classification. An analysis of 144 cases. Fertil. Steril., 1979, 32, 40–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McArdle C. R., Berezin A. F.: Ultrasound demonstration of uterus subseptus. J. Clin. Ultrasound, 1980, 8, 139–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valdes C., Malini S., Malinak L. R.: Ultrasound evaluation of female genital tract anomalies: A review of 64 cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1984, 149, 285–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Randolph J. F. Jr., Ying Y. K., Maier D. B.: Comparison of real-time ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy/hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine abnormalities and tubal patency. Fertil. Steril., 1986, 46, 828–832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fedele L., Dorta M., Vercellini P., Brioschi D., Candiani G. B.: Ultrasound in the diagnosis of subclasses of unicornuate uterus. Obstet. Gynecol., 1988, 71, 274–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaufman R. H., Binder G. L., Gray P. M. Jr., et al.: Upper genital tract changes associated with exposure in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1977, 128, 51–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mintz M. C., Grumbach K.: Imaging of congenital uterine anomalies. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR, 1988, 9, 167–174.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buttram V. C. Jr., Reiter R. C.: Uterine leiomyomata: Etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil. Steril., 1981, 36, 433–445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wallach E. E.: The uterine factor in infertility. Fertil. Steril., 1972, 23, 138–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malone L. H., Ingersoll F. M.: Myomectomy in infertility. In: Behrman S. J., Kistner R. W., (eds.). Progress in infertility, ed. 2. Boston, Little, Brown & Co., 1975.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ranney B., Frederick I.: The occasional need for myomectomy. Obstet. Gynecol., 1979, 53, 437–441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamou J.: Hystéroscopie et microcolpohystéroscopie: Atlas et traité. Palermo, Cofese, 1984.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buttram V. C. Jr., Reiter R. C.: Surgical treatment of the infertile female. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1985.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maheux R.: LH-RH agonists. How useful against uterine leiomyomas? Contemp. Ob/Gyn, 1986, 28, 66–77.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Balasch J., Vanrell J. A., Creus M., Marquez M., Gonzalez-Merlo J.: The endometrial biopsy for diagnosis of luteal phase deficiency. Fertil. Steril., 1985, 44, 699–701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Witten B. I., Martin S. A.: The endometrial biopsy as a guide to the management of the luteal phase defect. Fertil. Steril., 1985, 44, 460–465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    March C. M., Israel R., March A. D.: Hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1978, 130, 653–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fleischer A. C., Kalemeris G. C., Machin J. E., Entman S. S., James A. E. Jr.: Sonographic depiction of normal and abnormal endometrium with histopathologic correlation. J. Ultrasound Med., 1986, 5, 445–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stein I. F., Leventhal M. L.: Amenorrhea associated with bilateral polycystic ovaries. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1935, 29, 181.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raj S. G., Thompson I. E., Berger M. J., et al.: Clinical aspects of the polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet. Gynecol., 1977, 49, 552–556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cohen M. R.: Laparoscopic diagnosis and pseudo- menopause treatment of endometriosis with danazol. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 1980, 23, 901–915.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Williams T. J., Pratt J. H.: Endometriosis in 1,000 consecutive celiotomies: Incidence and management. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1977, 129, 245–250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kistner R. W.: Management of endometriosis in the infertile patient. Fertil. Steril., 1975, 26, 1151–1166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Strathy J. T., Molgaard C. A., Coulam C. B., et al.: Endometriosis and infertility: A laparoscopic study of endometriosis among fertile and infertile women. Fertil. Steril., 1982, 38, 667–672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marik J., Hulka J.: Luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome: A subtle cause of infertility. Fertil. Steril., 1978, 29, 270–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Portuondo J. A., Agustin A., Herran C., et al.: The corpus luteum in infertile patients found during laparoscopy. Fertil. Steril., 1981, 36, 37–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liukkonen S., Koskimies A. I., Tenhunen A., et al.: Diagnosis of luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) syndrome by ultrasound. Fertil. Steril., 1984, 41, 26–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Graf M. J., Dunaif A.: Association of reproductive endocrine dysfunction with pelvic endometriosis. Semin. Reprod. Endocrinol., 1985, 3, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nosher J. L., Winchman, H. K., Needell G. S.: Transvaginal pelvic abscess drainage with US guidance. Radiology, 1987, 165, 872–873.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Timor-Tritsch I. E., Rottem S.: Transvaginal ultrasonographic study of the fallopian tube. Obstet. Gynecol., 1987, 70, 424–428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hackelöer B. J., Fleming R., Robinson H. P., et al.: Correlation of ultrasonic and endocrinologic assessment of human follicular development. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1979, 135, 122–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maklad N. F.: Monitoring follicular development with ultrasound. In: Wolf D. P., Quigley M. M. (eds.). Human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. New York, Plenum Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Quigley M. M., Maklad N. F., Wolf D. P., et al.: Monitoring follicular development in 1VF-ET program: Comparison of ultrasonic imaging and serum estradiol measurement. Fertil. Steril., 1983, 39, 416–420.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ritchie W. G. M.: Ultrasound in the evaluation of normal and induced ovulation. Fertil. Steril., 1985, 43, 167–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ritchie W. G. M.: Sonographic evaluation of normal and induced ovulation. Radiology, 1986, 161, 1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yee B., Barnes R. B., Vargyas J. M., Marss R. P.: Correlation of transabdominal and transvaginal measurements of follicle size and number with laparoscopic findings for in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 47, 828–832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fleischer A. C., Daniell J. F., Rodier J., et al.: Sonographic monitoring of ovarian follicular development. J. Clin. Ultrasound, 1981, 9, 275–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Marrs R. P., Vargyas J. M., March C. M.: Correlation of ultrasonic and endocrinologic measurements in human menopausal gonadotropin therapy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1983, 145, 417–421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Seibel M. M., McArdle C., Smith D., et al.: Ovulation induction in polycystic ovarian syndrome with urinary follicle-stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotropin. Fertil. Steril., 1985, 43, 703–708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Smith B., Evans J., Simons E., Craft I.: The use of vaginal transducers in the detailed studies of periovulatory follicular and endometrial changes. Oral presentation, First World Congress on Vaginosonography in Gynecology, Washington, D.C., June 9–12, 1988.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hamori M., Stuckensen J. A., Rumpf D., Kniewald T., Kniewald A., Kurz C. S.: Premature luteinization of follicles during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod., 1987, 2, 639–643.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schwartz M., Jewelewicz R.: The use of gonadotropins for induction in ovulation. Fertil. Steril., 1981, 35, 3–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Painvain E., Barlese M. G., Mastrojanni F., et al.: Ultrasound evaluation of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Acta Eur. Fertil., 1987, 18, 39–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Blankstein J., Shalev J., Saadon T., et al.: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Prediction by number and size of preovulatory ovarian follicles. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 47, 597–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nader S., Berkowitz A. S., Maklad N., Winkel C. A.: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Combined use of ultrasound and hormonal profile to identify the patient at low risk in an IVF/ET program. Infertility, 1988, 11, 157–165.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fleischer A. C., Pittaway D. E., Beard L. A., et al.:. Sonographic depiction of endometrial changes occurring with ovulation induction. J. Ultrasound Med., 1984, 3, 341–346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Brandt T. D., Levy E. B., Grant T. H. et al.: Endometrial echo and its significance in female infertility. Radiology, 1985, 157, 225–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Glissant A., de Mouzon J., Frydman R.: Ultrasound study of the endometrium during in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil. Steril., 1985, 44, 786–790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Giorlandino C., Gleicher N., Nanni C., Vizzone A., Gentili P., Taramanni C.: The sonographic picture of endometrium in spontaneous and induced cycles. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 47, 508–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rabinowitz R., Laufer N., Lewin A., et al.: The value of ultrasonographic endometrial measurement in the prediction of pregnancy following in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril., 1986, 45, 824–828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fleischer A. C., Mendelson E. B., Böhm-Velez M., Entman S. S.: Transvaginal and transabdominal sonography of the endometrium. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR, 1988, 9, 81–101.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Smith B., Porter R., Ahuga K., Craft I.: Ultrasonic assessment of endometrial changes in stimulated cycles in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transfer, 1984, 1, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wood C., Leeton J. F., McTalbot J., et al.:. Technique for collecting mature human oocytes for in vitro fertilisation. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1981, 88, 756–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lenz S., Lauritsen J. G.: Ultrasonically guided percutaneous aspiration of human follicles under local anesthesia: A new method of collecting oocytes for in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril., 1982, 38, 673–677.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wikland M., Nilsson L., Hansson R., et al.: Collection of human oocytes by the use of sonography. Fertil. Steril., 1983, 39, 603–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Robertson R. D., Picker R. H., O’Neill C., Ferrier A. G., Saunders D. M.: An experience of laparoscopic and transvesical oocyte retrieval in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil. Steril., 1986, 45, 88–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Parsons J., Riddle A., Booker M., et al.: Oocyte retrieval for in-vitro fertilisation by ultrasonically guided needle aspiration via the urethra. Lancet, 1985, 1, 1076–1077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dellenbach P., Nisand I., Moreau L., et al.: Transvaginal sonographically controlled follicle puncture for oocyte retrieval. Fertil. Steril., 1985, 44, 656–662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Feichtinger W., Kemeter P.: Transvaginal sector scan sonography for needle-guided transvaginal follicle aspiration and other applications in gynecologic routine and research. Fertil. Steril., 1986, 45, 722–725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Deutinger J., Reinthaller A., Csaicsich P., et al.: Follicular aspiration for in vitro fertilization: Sonographically guided transvaginal versus laparoscopic approach. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 1987, 26, 127–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Baber R., Porter R., Picker R., Robertson R., Dawson E., Saunders D.: Transvaginal ultrasound directed oocyte collection for in vitro fertilization: Successes and complications. J. Ultrasound Med., 1988, 7, 377–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Leong M., Leung C., Tucker M., Wong C., Chan H.: Ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer. J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transfer, 1986, 3, 383–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Parsons J. H., Bolton V. N., Wilson L., Campbell S.: Pregnancies following in vitro fertilization and ultrasound-directed surgical embryo transfer by perurethral and transvaginal techniques. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 48, 691–693.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Asch R. H., Balmaceda J. P., Ellsworth L. R., Wong P. C.: Preliminary experiences with gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). Fertil. Steril., 1986, 45, 366–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jansen R. P. S., Anderson J. C.: Catheterisation of the fallopian tubes from the vagina. Lancet, 1987, 2, 309–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Devroey P., Braeckmans P., Smitz J., et al.: Pregnancy after translaparoscoplc zygote intrafallopian transfer in a patient with sperm antibodies (letter). Lancet, 1986, 1, 1329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yovich J. L., Blackiedge D. G., Richardson P. A., Matson P. L., Turner S. R., Draper R.: Pregnancies following pronuclear stage tubal transfer. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 48, 851–857.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Jansen R. P. S., Anderson J. C., Sutherland P. D.: Clinical pregnancy after nonoperative embryo transfer to the fallopian tubes. Oral presentation, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Baltimore, March 1988.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Porter R. N., Picker R. H., Robertson F. D., Saunders D. N.: The use of vaginal ultrasonography in an IVF program. Oral presentation, First World Congress on Vaginosonography in Gynecology, Washington, June 9–12, 1988.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kossoff G., McSweeney M.: Obstetrical duplex Doppler. Oral presentation, 32nd Meeting of the American Institute for Ultrasound in Medicine, New Orleans, October 6–9, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nabil F. Maklad

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations