Advertisement

The Detection of Rotations by Surveying Techniques

  • P. A. Cross
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 254)

Abstract

Classical and modern space geodetic observing techniques are reviewed and their potential for detecting crustal rotations is assessed. Special emphasis is placed on the Global Positioning System and its geodynamic applications. Methods for estimating rotations from geodetic observables are given and rigorous methods for measuring the quality of estimated rotaions are explained. A brief discussion of the associated computer aided design problem is also included.

Keywords

Observation Equation Satellite Position Integer Ambiguity Optimal Design Problem Data Message 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberda, 1980, A review of analysis techniques for engineering surrvey control schemes. Proceedings of the Industrial and Engineering Survey Conference. City University, London, p6.2/l–42.Google Scholar
  2. Ashkenazi, V., Cross, P. A., Davies, M. J. K., and Proctor, D. W., 1972, The readjustment of the retriangulation of Great Britain and its relationship to the European terrestrial and satellite triangulation networks. OS Professional Paper, No 24, 51 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Ashkenazi, V. and McLintock, 1982, Very long baseline interferometry: an introduction and geodetic applications. Survey Review, vol 26, no 204, p279–288.Google Scholar
  4. Ashkenazi, V. and Yau, J. 1986, Significance of discrepancies in the processing of GPS data with different algorithms. Bulletin Geodesique, vol 60, no 3, p229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, P. J. 1986, Global Positioning System policy. Proceedings of the Fourth Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, University of Texas, p51–64.Google Scholar
  6. Beutler, G., Gurtner, W., Rothacher, M., Schildknecht, T., and Bauersima, I.,1986, Determination of GPS orbits using double difference carrier phase observations from regional networks. Bulletin Geodesique, vol 60, no 3, p205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beutler, G., Gurtner, W., and Bauersima, I., 1986, Efficient computation of the inverse of the covariance matrix of simultaneous GPS carrier phase difference observations. Manuscripta Geodaetica, vol 11, no 4, p249–255.Google Scholar
  8. Beutler, G., Gurtner, W., and Bauersima, I., 1986, Efficient computation of the inverse of the covariance matrix of simultaneous GPS carrier phase difference observations. Manuscripta Geodaetica, vol 11, no 4, p249–255.Google Scholar
  9. Bomford, G., 1980, Geodesy. 4th edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 855 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Burnside, C. D., 1982, Electromagnetic distance measurement. Granada Publishing, 204 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Caspary, W. F.,1987, Concepts of network and deformation analysis. Monograph 11, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, 183pp.Google Scholar
  12. Christodoulidis, D. C., Smith, D. E., Kolenkiewicz, R., Klosko, S. M., Torrence, S. M., and Dunn, P., 1985, Observing tectonic plate motions and deformations from satellite laser ranging. Journal of Geophysical Research, vol 90, no B11, p9249–9264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clynch, J. R. and Renfew, B. A. 1982, Evaluation of ionospheric residual range error model. Proceedings of the Third Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Doppler Positioning, University of Texas, p517–538.Google Scholar
  14. Clynch, J. R. and Coco, D. S., 1986, Error characteristics of high quality geodetic GPS measurements: clocks, orbits and propagation effects. Proceedings of the Fourth Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, University of Texas, p539–556.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, M. A. R., 1987, Control surveys in civil engineering. Blackwell’s Scientific Publications, Oxford, 381 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Cross, P. A., 1983, Advanced least squares applied to position fixing. North East London Polytechnic, Department of Land Surveying, Working Paper No 6, 205 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Cross, P. A., 1986, The design of surveying measurement processes. XVIII FIG Congress, paper 501P. 3, 23 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Cross, P. A., 1987a, Computer aided design in surveying. Chartered Land and Mineral Surveying, Vol 5, No 9, p466–476.Google Scholar
  19. Cross, P. A., 1987b, The assessment and control of the quality of industrial and engineering surveying information. Proceedings II Industrial and Engineering Surveying Conference, London, p66–83.Google Scholar
  20. Cross, P. A. and Ahmad, N, 1988, Field validation of GPS phase data. Proceedings of the GPS Workshop, Darmstadt (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Grafarend, E. W., and Sanso,F., 1985, Optimisation and design of geodetic networks. Springer Verlag, 606 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Hopfield, H. S. 1980, Improvements in the tropospheric refraction correction for range measurement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A294, p341–352.Google Scholar
  23. Mepham, M. P. A. 1983, Computer aided survey network design. MSc Thesis, University of Calgary, Division of Surveying Engineering, 98 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Mueller, 11 (1986) From 100m to 100mm in (about) 25 years. Proceedings of the Fourth Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, University of Texas, p6–20.Google Scholar
  25. Mueller, I. I., and Wilkins, G. A., 1986, On the rotation of the earth and the terrestrial reference system: joint summary report of the IAU/IAG Working Groups MERIT and COTES. Bulletin Geodesique, vol 60, no 1, p85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ordnance Survey, (1980) Report of investigations into the use of satellite Doppler positioning to provide coordinates on the European Datum 1950 in the area of the North Sea. Ordnance Survey Professional Paper, no 30, 32 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Pelzer, H., 1979, Criteria for the reliability of geodetic networks. In Optimisation of the Design and Computation of Control Networks, ed Halmos F, and Somogyi J, Akademiai Kaido, Budapest, P553–562.Google Scholar
  28. Remondi, B. W.,1985, Global Positioning System carrier phase: description and use. Bulletin Geodesique, vol 59, no 4, p361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharman, P., 1982, The UK satellite laser ranging facility. SLR Technical Note, no 1, Royal Greenwich Observatory, 6 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Sinclair, A. T., and Appleby, G. M., 1986, SATAN — programs for the determination and analysis of satellite orbits from SLR data. SLR Technical Note, no 9, Royal Greenwich Observatory, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Tapley, B. D., Schultz, B. E., and Eanes, R. J., 1985, Station coordinates, baselines and earth rotation from LAGEOS laser ranging: 1976–1984. Journal of Geophysical Research, vol 90, no Bll, p9235–9248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, P. T., Keating, T., Kahn, W. D., Langel, B. A., Smith, D. E., and Schnetzler, C. C., 1984, Observing the terrestrial gravity and magnetic fields in the 1990’s. EOS, vol 64, no 43, p609–611.Google Scholar
  33. Vanicek, P and Krakiwsky, E., 1986, Geodesy: the concepts. 2nd edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 697 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Walcott, R. I., 1984, The kinematics of plate boundary through New Zealand: a comparison of short and long-term deformations. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol 79, p613–633.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. Cross
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurveyingUniversity of Newcastle upon TyneEngland

Personalised recommendations