Improved model for design of industrial column flotation circuits in sulphide applications

  • R. A. Alford


The dispersed plug flow model has gained acceptance for predicting mineral recovery from flotation columns, following the work of Dobby and Finch1. The model combines a steady state residence time distribution with first order flotation kinetics. It has been recognised that the first order rate parameter is related to a number of operating variables.

The present work has focused on developing a better understanding of the effect of the operating variables, to facilitate the use of the model in practical situations for column circuit simulation, scale-up, and design.

The influence of a range of operating variables was systematically studied at several sulphide concentrators throughout Australasia. The columns surveyed ranged from pilot to full scale, and were used to recover a variety of minerals, including galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and iron sulphides.

The basic column model structure has been modified to include the observed effects of the operating variables. In this refined model the behaviour of the operating variables is clearly separated from the mineral specific terms. Consequently the model is a useful foundation for circuit simulation, as changes in performance between stages are not clouded by changes in column operation. In circuit modelling to date only discrete distributions have been used to describe the full range of mineral behaviour (ie. the individual species were divided into fast and slow fractions).


Bubble Size Iron Sulphide Flotation Column Mineral Selectivity Slow Fraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dobby G. S. and Finch J. A., 1986. Flotation column scale-up and modelling, CIM Bulletin, May, 89–96.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levenspiel O., 1972. Chemical reaction engineering, second ed., Wiley, 253–314.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laplante A.R., Yianatos J.B., and Finch J.A. 1988. On the mixing characteristics of the collection zone in flotation columns, Proceedings — Column Flotation’88, AIME.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Espinosa-Gomez R., Finch J.A., Yianatos J.B., and Dobby G.S., 1988. Flotation column carrying capacity: particle size and density effects, Minerals Engineering, Vol 1, 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Szatkowski M., and Freyberger W.L., 1985. Kinetics of flotation with fine bubbles, Trans. Inst. Min. Met., 94: C61–C70.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jameson G.J., Nam S., Moo-Young M., 1977. Physical factors affecting the recovery rates in flotation, Minerals Sci. Eng., 9(3), 103–118.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dobby G. S. and Finch J. A., 1987. Particle size dependence in flotation derived from a fundamental model of the capture process, Int. J. Min. Proc., 21, 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luttrell G.H., Adel G.T., and Yoon R.H., 1988. Hydrodynamics and mathematical modelling of fine coal flotation. XVI International Mineral Processing Congress.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yianatos J.B., Finch J.A., and Laplante A.R., in press. Selectivity in column flotation froths, Int. J. Min. Proc.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Falutsu M. and Dobby G.S., 1989. Direct measurement of froth drop back and collection zone recovery in a laboratory flotation column, Minerals Engineering, Vol 2, No.3, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Espinosa-Gomez R., Johnson N.W., and Finch J.A., 1989. Evaluation of flotation column scale-up at Mount Isa Mines Limited, Minerals Engineering, Vol 2, No.3, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newell A., Gray D., and Alford R.A., 1989. The application of flotation columns to gold recovery at Paddington gold mine, W.A. IPMI conference, Montreal, July.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alford R.A., 1989. The application and scale-up of flotation columns at Paddington, Column Flotation Workshop, Adelaide, July.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu M., 1987. Sparger study in flotation columns, Masters thesis, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reeves T.J., 1985. On-line viscometer for mineral slurries, Trans. Inst. Min. Met., 94: C201–C208.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Napier-Munn T.J., Reeves T.J., and Hansen J.Y., 1989. The monitoring of medium theology in dense medium cyclone plants, Aus. IMM Bulletin, Vol 294 No.3, 85–93.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ratchclor G.K., 1967. An introduction to fluid dynamics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kojovic, T., 1988. Automated model building, Ph. D thesis, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., 1986. Numerical recipes, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ynchausti R.A., McKay J.D., and Foot Jr. D.G., 1988. Column flotation parameters — their effects, Proceedings — Column Flotation’88, AIME.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davies O. L. (ed.), 1961. Statistical methods in research and production, Oliver and Boyd (ICI).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kelsall D.F., 1961. Application of probability in the assessment of flotation systems, Transactions of the institute of Min. and Met., Vol 70.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lauder D.W., 1988. Rotation circuit performance theory, Ph.D thesis, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lanczos C., 1964. Applied analysis, Pitman and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tikhonov O. and Kavetsky A., in press.. Flotometric analysis and predictive calculations for industrial flotation flowsheets, Aus IMM Bulletin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Alford
    • 1
  1. 1.Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research CentreUniversity of QueenslandIndooroopillyAustralia

Personalised recommendations