Advertisement

Relationship between Ductility and Wear Resistance of High Mn-Steels

  • N. A. A. Rahim Aly
  • M. R. El-Koussy

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to study the relationship between ductility, yield stress and abrasive wear resistance of high manganese steels containing from 0.53 to 0.95% C and from 12.5 to 18.3% Mn and about 1% Mo. The specimens were studied in the as cast state. Factorial analysis was applied in this work. The two investigated factors were carbon and manganese content. Abrasive wear resistance was studied in wet sand using a laboratory tumbling mill. The relative weight loss was calculated after 240 hours of testing. Some specimens were subjected to compression test. The obtained stress strain curves were used to calculate the yield stress, σ0·2, the strain hardening coefficient, n, and the strength coefficient, K. The strain hardening coefficient was used as a measure of ductility.

As a result of this experiment four regression equations were obtained. Using these equations the relative weight loss, the strain hardening exponent, the yield stress and strength coefficient were predicted for composition which were not experimentally investigated. The predicted and experimental values were used to construct four charts showing the changes of the investigated parameters with changing carbon content from 0.3 to 1.0% and manganese content from 6 to 24%.

Keywords

Wear Resistance Stack Fault Energy Manganese Content High Wear Resistance Strength Coefficient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gouin, C.E., Manganese Steels that Don’t Require Heat Treatment, Climax Molybdenum Company, Colorado, U.S.A., 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cleemann, J.O., Grinding Media in Tumbling Mills, Zement-Kalk-Gips-Nr. 7, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmidt, I. and Wilhelm, M., Friction-Induced Martensitic Transformation of Hot-Rolled Austenitic Mn-Steels, Zmetakle Bd. 78, 1987, H. 2, pp. 129–130.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albright, D.L. and Dunn, D.J., Wear Behavior of Iron and Steel Castings for the Mining Industry, Journal of Metals, November 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller, A.E., Wear in Steels, Journal of Metals, October 1983.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herman, A., Fabert, Jr., Materials for Wear Resistance, Metals Engineering Quarterly, November 1975.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lekhachein, and Shewman, P.G., Effect of Hardness on the Solid Particle Erosion Mechanisms In AISI 1060 Steel, Wear, 89, 1983, pp. 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kashcheev, V.N., Some Aspects of Improving Abrasive Resistance, Wear 89, 1983, pp. 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vermeulen, L.A., Howat, D.D. and Gough, C.L.M., Theories of Ball Wear and the Results of a Marked Ball Test in Ball Milling, Journal of the South Africa Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, August 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pearce, J.T.H., The Use of Transmission on Electron Microscopy to Study the Effect of Abrasive Wear on the Matrix Structures of a High Chromium Cast Iron, Wear 89, 1983, pp. 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Votenova, T.F., High Manganese Steels and Alloys, Moscow, Metallurgia, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aly, N.A. and El-Koussy, M.R., Effect of Microstructure on Abrasive Wear of Some Cast Irons and Steels, Second International Conference on Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Suez Canal University, March 20–22, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Handbook der Souderstalkünde Eduard Houdremont, Springes-Verlag, 1956, pp. 425 (Russian Ed.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. A. A. Rahim Aly
    • 1
  • M. R. El-Koussy
    • 1
  1. 1.Cairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations