The Influence of Fine Structure, Morphology and Composition of Alloy and Oxide on the Growth of Cr2O3 Scales

  • M. Hirbod


The kinetics of morphological and structural development of Cr2O3 scales on Fe-Cr alloys, with and without yttrium additions, under isothermal conditions at 1000°C have been studied in an attempt to elucidate the growth processes. The steady state scale on the yttrium-free alloy is continuous and highly convoluted, with a porous, equiaxed grain structure. It is suggested that such a configuration results from the transport processes in the scale and from development of high compressive stresses, leading to lateral growth of the oxide. In particular, both inward movement of oxygen and outward movement of chromium occur, enabling new oxide to form within the bulk scale with accompanying oxide dilation. The presence of active elements, such as yttrium, in the alloy has a marked effect on the oxidation process.

In particular, there are considerable changes in the microstructure and the adherence of the scale resulting in a considerable decrease in the amount of scale spalling upon cooling or thermal cycling. The influence of the active element is accounted for in terms of its effect on the transport processes in thescale, i.e. the supression of chromium diffusion.

This enables oxygen to penetrate to the scale/metal interface where new oxide is formed without significant stress development.


Oxide Scale Alloy Surface Growth Stress High Compressive Stress Fracture Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hirbod, M., Ph.D. Thesis University of Manchester, England, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stott, F.H., Wood, G.C., Hirbod, M., Golightly, F.A., “Environmental Degradation of High Temperature Materials”, Proc. of the Institution of Metallurgists Conference, Douglas, Isle of Man, 1980, No. 15.1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood, G.C., Stott, F.H., J.Mat.Sci.Tech., 1987, 3, 519.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caplan, D., Sproule, G.I., Oxid.Met. 1975, 9, 459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lillerud, K.P., Kofstad, P., J.Electrochem. Soc. 1980, 127, 2397Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skeldon, P., Calvert, J.M., Lees, D.G., Oxid.Met. 1987, 28 (1/2), 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golightly, F.A., Stott F.H., and Wood, G.C., J.Electrochem, 1979, 126, 1037Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stott, F.H., Mater.Sci.Techn., 1988, 4, 437Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fox, P., Tatlock, G.J., Mater.Sci.Tech., 1988, 4, 439Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stout, J.H., Gerberich, W.W., S. Lin and S. Lii, Proc.Symp. on Fundamental Aspects of High Temperature Corrosion, II, The Electrochem. Soc, Boston, 1986, 173Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Romanarayanan, T.A., and Petkovic-Luton, R., Proc.Symp. on Fundamental Aspects of High Temperature Corrosion, II, The Electrochem. Soc, Boston, 1986, 75Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smialek, J.L., and Gibala, R., NASA Technical Memorandum 79259, Cleveland, Ohio, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bennet, M.J., Proc. 10th Int. Cong.Met.Corr., Oxford and IBH Publishing Co, P.V.T. Ltd., New Delhi, 1987, 4, 3761Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, Y.K., Pryzbylski, K., and Yurek, G.J., 259, ibid Ref. 20.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    King, W.E., Park, J.H., Routhort, J.L., and Goretta, K.C., Oxid.Met. 1988, 29, 314, 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Hirbod
    • 1
  1. 1.ABB Stal ABFinspongSweden

Personalised recommendations