Some New Aspects on Component Importance Measures

  • Min Xie
  • Kecheng Shen

Abstract

Component importance measures are useful in deciding where to allocate further efforts to increase system performance, particularly system reliability and availability. Which of the components should be judged as important, and hence to be improved at the first hand, depends on the component structural position in the system, the improvement potential of the component and also the improvement action to be taken. In this paper we review some recent advances in measuring the importance of system components. A general methodology that incorporates these features is presented. We will also introduce some concepts concerning availability importance useful for repairable systems.

Keywords

System Component Improvement Action System Availability Component Position Importance Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Xie, M. and Shen, K., On ranking of system components with respect to different improvement actions. Microelectron. Reliab., 1989, 29 (2), 159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birnbaum, Z. W., On the importance of different components in multicomponent system. In Multivariate analysis-II, ed. P. R. Krishnaiah, Academic Press, New York, 1969, pp. 581–92.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barlow, E. E. and Proschan, F., Importance of system components and fault tree events. Stochastic Processes Appl., 1975, 3, 153–73.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fussel, J. B., How to hand-calculate system reliability characteristics. IEEE Trans. Reliab.,1975, R-24, 169–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Natvig, B., A suggestion of a new measure of importance of system components. Stochastic Processes Appl., 1979, 9, 319–30.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xie, M., On some importance measures of system components. Stochastic Processes Appl., 1987, 25, 273–80.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shen, K. and Xie, M., The increase of Reliability of k-out-of-n systems Through Improving a Component. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1989, 26, 189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xie, M. and Shen, K., The parallel redundancy importance of system components. Technical Report, No. LiTH-IKP-R-566, Linköping University, Sweden, May 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boland, P. J., El-Neweihi, E. and Proschan, F., Active redundancy allocation in coherent systems. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 1988, 2 (3), 343–53.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iyer, S., The increase in reliability and mean time to failure of a system due to component redundancy. OPSEARCH, 1989, 26 (3), 145–50.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Råde, L., Expected time to failure of reliability systems. Math. Scientist, 1989, 14, 24–37.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xie, M. and Shen, K., On the increase of the expected system yield due to component improvement, Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1989, to appear.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Natvig, B., New light on measures of importance of system components. Scand. J. Statist., 1985, 12, 43–54.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakagawa, T. and Kowada, M., Analysis of a system with minimal repair and its applications to replacement policy, European J. Oper. Res., 1983, 12, 176–82.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aven, T., Some Consideration on Reliability Theory and its Applications. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1988, 21, 215–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F., Statistical theory of reliability and life testing, probability models. To Begin With, Silver Spring, MD, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min Xie
    • 1
  • Kecheng Shen
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Quality TechnologyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Machine DesignLund Institute of TechnologyLundSweden

Personalised recommendations