Interactive System for Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics

  • P. Rosendorf
  • J. Orsag
  • I. Schreiber
  • M. Marek
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 313)

Abstract

Numerical methods for the analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems including methods based on continuation techniques for obtaining curves of stationary or periodic solutions, bifurcation points and limit points in dependence on parameters have been developed and discussed in several available textbooks [1–4,6,7] and in the proceedings of conferences, cf. e.g. [5]. Original software for the analysis of the dependence of stationary solutions on a parameter [1,4] and of periodic solutions on a parameter[4,7], were also published. Productive application of such a software requires relatively deep knowledge both of specialized numerical methods and of the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. Also the organization of computations and the evaluation of computed results can often be quite complicated. Here we discribe our attempt to test the idea whether a unification of available numerical algorithms with the means and approaches of logical programming and knowledge engineering could help to increase productivity of the analysis of a nonlinear dynamical system.

Keywords

Bifurcation Point Nonlinear Dynamical System Ordinary Differential Equation Continuation Parameter Continuation Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kubicek, M., Marek, M. (1983), Computational Methods in Bifurcation Theory and Dissipative Structures, Springer Verlag, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holodniok, M., Klic, A., Kubicek,M., Marek, M. (1986), Methods of Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Models, Academia, Prague, (in czech)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rheinboldt, W.C (1986), Numerical Analysis of Parametrized Nonlinear Equations, J. Willey and Sons, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doedel, E.J., Kernevez, J.P. (1986), ‘AUTO: Software for Continuation and Bifurcation Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations’, Applied Mathematic Technical Report, California Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Küpper, T., Seydel, R., Troger, H. (editors), (1987), Bifurcation: Analysis, Algorithms, Applications, Birkhauser Verlag, BaselMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seydel, R. (1988), From Equilibrium to Chaos, Elsevier Science Publ., New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marek, M., Schreiber, I. (1989), Chaotic Behaviour of Deterministic Dissipative Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, Academia Press, PragueGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Information Processing Systems — Computer Graphics — Graphical Kernel System (GKS) — Functional Description, (1985), norm ISO 7942Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marek, M., Schreiber, I. (1987), ‘Formation of Periodic and Aperiodic Waves in Reaction-Diffusion Systems’, in T. Kupper, R. Seydel and H. Troger (eds.), Bifurcation: Analysis, Algorithms, Applications, Birkhauser, Basel, pp. 201–213Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shaw, S., Holmes, P. (1983), ‘A Periodically Forced Piesewise Linear Oscillator’, J. Sound and Vibration 90, 129MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Isomaki, A.M., Boehm, von J., Raty, R. (1985), ‘Devil’s Attractors and Chaos of a Driven Impact Oscillator’, Phys. Lett, 107A, 343Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Rosendorf
    • 1
  • J. Orsag
    • 1
  • I. Schreiber
    • 1
  • M. Marek
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Chemical EngineeringPrague Institute of Chemical TechnologyPrague 6Czechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations