Advances in Flexible Pipe Design and Construction

  • J. M. Neffgen
Part of the Advances in Underwater Technology, Ocean Science and Offshore Engineering book series (AUTOO, volume 24)


The industry’s strong desire during a time of uncertain oil prices to more economically exploit marginal oilfields has provided a strong stimulus to the development of associated pipeline technologies. Largely as a result of pioneering work performed in the 1970s, an alternative pipeline technology centered around the use of flexible steel reinforced pipe has been gaining greater prominence. The need for the introduction of a dynamic pipe capability into many subsea or floating prodution scenaria stems largely from the requirement to accomodate the system’s high inertial loads generated as a consequence of connecting fixed subsea hardware to a floating surface facility. Because of flexible pipe’s properties and composite construction, it provides a structure that can be quickly installed, variably configured, and which can adapt to a great range of system motions and environmental loads. Over the past 15 years, advances in oil resistant polymers and increases in the chemical resistivity of certain classes of steel have resulted in the construction of new types of flexible pipes capable of transporting ever harsher well fluids at higher temperatures. These and other improvements have resulted in greater product reliability and extended service lifetimes.


American Petroleum Institute SUBSEA Pipeline Integrity Monitoring Riser System Flexible Riser 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Petroleum Institute (1987). API RP17b-Recommended Practice for Flexible Pioe. API, Houston.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boef, W., Lange, F., Van den Boom, H. (1989). Analysis of Flexible Riser Systems, Floating Production Systems. Conference procs. 11/12 Dec. ’89, IBC, London.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kokkinowrachos, K., Giese, K. Peuker, M. (1987) Development of flexible risers for floating Offshore production. OTC 5469. Houston.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mckeehan, D., Halkyard, J., Griffiths, R. (1986). Marine Applications for a Continuous Fibre Optical Strain Monitoring System, OTC Procs. 5119. Houston.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neffgen, J.M. (1988). Integrity Monitoring for Flexible Pipes, from Pipes and Pipelines International. May/June, London.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neffgen, J.M. (1989). Optimisation of Subsea and Floating Production Systems Utilising Flexible Pipe Technology, from Procs. Floati ng Production Systems. IBC, Dec. 11/12, London.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Often, O., Loetveit, S.A. (1989). Increased Reliability through a Unified Analysis Tool for Bonded and Unbonded Flexible Pipes. In Advances in Subsea and Pipeline Technology and Engineering. Graham & Trotman, London.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    PAG-O-FLEX (1987). Fatigue Testing of Flexible Risers. Joint Industry Project Report. Pag-O-Flex, Dusseldorf, W. Germany.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross, R.B. (1989). Investigation of Failures. Procs. Offshore Europe, SPE 19273, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sterzenbach, M. (1989). SOLS for Floating Production Systems. Procs. Floating Production Systems. 11/12 Dec. 89, London.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veritec (1987). Guidelines for the Design and Construction of Flexible Pipes. Joint Industry Report JIPGFP-02, Oslo.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wallen, B., Abrahamsen, T. A Stainless Steel for North Sea Applications. Procs. Norges Ingeniørs Organisation Conference. 30 Jan. 1984, Oslo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Underwater Technology 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Neffgen
    • 1
  1. 1.Neptun Pag-O-Flex A.S.OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations